[Stigmatization in mental health care. Research among clients and care providers]. / Stigmatisering binnen de ggz; onderzoek onder cliënten en hulpverleners.

BACKGROUND: In addition to impediments to social and social functioning, people with severe mental illness also experience the negative consequences of prejudice and stigmatization. Stigmatization also occurs in mental health care, including addiction care. AIM: To describe the occurrence and manifestations of stigmatization by care providers, from the perspective of clients and care providers. METHOD: Digital surveys among clients of the panel Psychisch Gezien (n = 628) and among care providers (n = 471). RESULTS: More than half (54%) of the panel members had experienced stigmatization by mental health care providers in the past two years. They experienced this mainly through a distant attitude (22%) and the language used by care providers (20%). Two-fifths (40%) of the care providers indicated that stigmatization occured regularly or often in their own team. Both clients and counselors emphasized the importance of normalizing mental health problems, reluctant use of psychiatric labels and recovery-oriented work to reduce stigma. CONCLUSION: Stigmatization by mental health care providers is manifested in many ways, making it a complex and ambiguous problem. Although there is no ‘one size fits all’ solution, normalization of mental problems is an important starting point.

[Changes in the quality of life of older people living at home: does type of care play a role?]. / Veranderingen in de kwaliteit van leven van thuiswonende ouderen: speelt de vorm van zorg een rol?

PURPOSE: To determine whether a change in physical, psychological and social dimensions of quality of life of older people living at home is associated with receiving formal care, compared to informal care and no care. METHOD: Data from the observation cycles in 1998 and 2001 of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) were used. Older people receiving formal homecare in 1998 were compared to older people receiving informal care and to older people receiving no care at all in 1998 on subjective scores on 3-year changes in self-perceived health, loneliness, positive affect and satisfaction with life. The data were analysed using linear regression analysis and ANOVA. RESULTS: In all groups there is a change for the worse between 1998 and 2001 in the four aspects of quality of life. Self-perceived health declines significantly more in the group receiving formal care compared to the group without care, but this is explained by a higher score on functional limitations in 1998. Loneliness increases significantly more in the group receiving formal care, even after correction for confounders. In the group receiving formal care the satisfaction with life decreases significantly more compared to the group receiving no care and the group with informal care. An interaction effect with gender was found, showing that after correction for confounders this difference is maintained for the women but not for the men. There is no significant difference between the three care groups regarding changes in positive affect. CONCLUSION: Older men and women who receive formal home care experience an increase in loneliness, and older women who receive formal care experience less satisfaction with life, compared to women who receive informal care or no care. Future research should confirm these results and investigate the mechanisms underlying these changes.