Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 26(2): 139-147, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31490854

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Federally funded Community, Migrant, and Homeless Health Centers provide health services to the most vulnerable communities in the United States. However, little is known about their capabilities and processes for providing vaccinations to adults. PROGRAM: We conducted the first national survey of health centers assessing their inventory, workflow, capacity for, and barriers to provision of routinely recommended adult vaccines. In addition, we asked health center leaders' perceptions regarding best practices and policy recommendations for adult vaccinations. IMPLEMENTATION: A survey was developed on the basis of domains elicited from advisory panels and focus groups and was sent electronically to leaders of 762 health centers throughout the United States and its territories; data were collected and analyzed in 2018. EVALUATION: A total of 319 survey responses (42%) were obtained. Health centers reported stocking most routinely recommended vaccines for adults; zoster vaccines were not stocked regularly due to supply and storage issues. Respondents most commonly reported adequate reimbursement for vaccination services from private insurance and Medicaid. Most vaccinations were provided during primary care encounters; less than half of health centers reported providing vaccines during specialist visits. Vaccines administered at the health center were most commonly documented in an open field of the electronic health record (96%) or in an immunization information system (72%). Recommendations for best practices related to better documentation of vaccinations and communication with immunization information systems were provided. DISCUSSION: Health centers provide most adult vaccines to their patients despite financial and technological barriers to optimal provisioning. Further studies at point of care could help identify mechanisms for system improvements.


Assuntos
Pessoas Mal Alojadas/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , Migrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura Vacinal/normas , Adulto , Feminino , Grupos Focais/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Saúde Pública/normas , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
BMC Fam Pract ; 17: 121, 2016 08 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27567892

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The social determinants of health (SDH) are conditions that shape the overall health of an individual on a continuous basis. As momentum for addressing social factors in primary care settings grows, provider ability to identify, treat and assess these factors remains unknown. Community health centers care for over 20-million of America's highest risk populations. This study at three centers evaluates provider ability to identify, treat and code for the SDH. METHODS: Investigators utilized a pre-study survey and a card study design to obtain evidence from the point of care. The survey assessed providers' perceptions of the SDH and their ability to address them. Then providers filled out one anonymous card per patient on four assigned days over a 4-week period, documenting social factors observed during encounters. The cards allowed providers to indicate if they were able to: provide counseling or other interventions, enter a diagnosis code and enter a billing code for identified factors. RESULTS: The results of the survey indicate providers were familiar with the SDH and were comfortable identifying social factors at the point of care. A total of 747 cards were completed. 1584 factors were identified and 31 % were reported as having a service provided. However, only 1.2 % of factors were associated with a billing code and 6.8 % received a diagnosis code. CONCLUSIONS: An obvious discrepancy exists between the number of identifiable social factors, provider ability to address them and documentation with billing and diagnosis codes. This disparity could be related to provider inability to code for social factors and bill for related time and services. Health care organizations should seek to implement procedures to document and monitor social factors and actions taken to address them. Results of this study suggest simple methods of identification may be sufficient. The addition of searchable codes and reimbursements may improve the way social factors are addressed for individuals and populations.


Assuntos
Centros Comunitários de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , California , Competência Clínica , Aconselhamento , Humanos , Illinois , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , New York , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Autoeficácia , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa