Developing a curriculum for advanced fellowship training in complex cancer for the UK.

AIM: Surgery for complex colorectal cancer is elaborate: preoperative assessment, patient selection, radiological interpretation, operative strategy, operative technical skills, operative standardization, postoperative care and management of complications are all critical components. Given this complexity, training that encompasses all these crucial aspects to generate suitably edified surgeons is essential. To date, no curriculum exists to guide training in advanced and recurrent pelvic malignancy, particularly for complex colorectal cancer. Such a curriculum would potentially offer numerous advantages, not only for individual surgeons but also for research, governance, international collaboration and benchmarking. The aim of this study was to design and develop a framework for a curriculum for fellowship training in complex colorectal cancer that encompasses pelvic exenteration surgery. METHOD: Kern described a six-step method for curriculum design that is now widely adopted in medical education. Our study utilizes steps 1-4 of Kern's method to develop a syllabus and assessment framework for curriculum development for fellowship training in complex colorectal cancer encompassing pelvic exenteration. A literature review was conducted to address step 1, followed by targeted needs assessment in step 2 by conducting focus groups with trainees, fellows and experts to identify learning needs and goals with objective setting for step 3. An expert consensus group then voted on these recommendations and developed educational strategy recommendations as step 4. For the purposes of brevity, 'pelvic exenteration' in the text is taken to also encompass extended and multivisceral resections that fall under the remit of complex [colorectal] cancer. RESULTS: Step 1 of Kern's method identified a gap in the literature on curricula in complex cancer surgery. Step 2 identified key areas regarded as learning needs by trainees, including anatomy, hands-on experience and case volume. Step 3 defined the goals and objectives of a fellowship curriculum, defined in six domains including theoretical knowledge, decision-making, technical skills, postoperative management and continuing professional development. Finally, as a prelude to stages 5 and 6, a strategy for implementation and for feedback and assessment was agreed by an expert consensus meeting that defined case volume (a minimum of 20 pelvic exenteration operations within a fellowship period) and coverage of this syllabus with derived metrics. CONCLUSIONS: Our working group has developed a curriculum framework for advanced fellowship training in complex cancer in the UK. Validation is needed through implementation, and affirmation of its utility, both nationally and internationally, must be sought.

Analysis of outcomes achieved with squamous cell carcinomas of the anus in a single university hospital over the last two decades: Clinical response rate, relapse and survival of 190 patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We reviewed our series of anal squamous cell carcinomas (ASCC) treated over the last two decades. METHODS: ASCC patients undergoing treatment at the Leicester Royal Infirmary between 1998 and 2016 were selected. Age, gender, pathological tumor characteristics, treatment adopted, the overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) at 5-year follow-up were recorded and calculated. RESULTS: A total of 190 ASCC were reviewed, of these 64.2% (n = 122) received primary radical chemoradiotherapy. Complete response rate was 92.6% (n = 113) and four patients with residual disease underwent a salvage APER. Twenty-eight patients experienced recurrent disease (23.0%) either systemic (n = 8), local (n = 14), or both (n = 6); six had a salvage APER. Complete follow-up data are available for 63.1% patients (77/122). Overall, the locoregional failure rate of primary chemoradiotherapy (residual + recurrent disease) was present in 29 patients (29/122; 23.8%). OS was 41.6% CSS was 69.2% and DFS 60.0% at 5 years follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In our series of ASCC primary chemoradiotherapy had achieved significant initial complete response rates, however, long term-follow ups still present systemic and local recurrences. APR is able to treat 30% of the pelvic recurrences (6/20), the others are either associated with systemic disease or locally inoperable masses.

Circumferential resection margins and perineal complications after neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy followed by extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: Five years of activity at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Prone extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (ELAPE) has been introduced to improve the circumferential resection margins (CRM) compared with traditional APER. OBJECTIVE: We present short-term results achieved with prone ELAPE preceded by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy during the last 5 years of activity. DESIGN: A retrospective review was conducted. SETTINGS AND PATIENTS: Prone ELAPE operations performed between September 2010 and August 2014 at Leicester Royal Infirmary preceded by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. INTERVENTIONS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data regarding demographics, staging, neoadjuvant therapies, intraoperative perforations, and perineal complications were collected. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included. Pretreatment radiological T4 were 25.0%, histological T4 2.8%. Intraoperative perforations occurred in 2.8%, CRM was involved in 11.1%. Perineal complications consisted of superficial wound infections (20.8%), full thickness dehiscences (16.7%), hematomas (9.7%), pelvic collections (6.9%), and perineal hernias (5.6%). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, prone ELAPE preceded by long-course chemoradiotherapy has been successfully used in the last 5 years to resect low rectal tumors. Perineal wound complications rates are similar to those presented in series using direct perineal closures. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:86-90. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Rectal cancers with microscopic circumferential resection margin involvement (R1 resections): Survivals, patterns of recurrence, and prognostic factors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We have reviewed our series of rectal cancer patients with circumferential resection margin involvement (R1) with particular regard to survival and prognostic factors. METHODS: R1 rectal cancer patients undergoing surgery at the Leicester Royal Infirmary between 1998 and 2008. Age, gender, radiological, and pathological tumor characteristics, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies were examined as prognostic factors on the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 5-year follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 885 rectal cancers were reviewed. Six hundred ninety-nine patients underwent a mesorectal excision and 71 of them were R1 resections (12.9%). OS was 43.7% (CI95% 33.5-53.8%; median survival 39 months). DFS was 57.4% (CI95% 43.0-71.8%; median survival 31 months). Pelvic recurrence rate occurred in 16 patients (26.2%, CI95% 16.5-36.0%), systemic recurrence rate in 23 patients (37.7%, CI95% 25.5-49.9%). At Cox-regression LNR and adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with both OS and DFS. No significant association was found between OS or DFS and adjuvant radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In our series of R1 patients, the rates of local recurrence and OS at 5 years were 26.2% and 43.7%, respectively. Factors influencing systemic recurrences (LNR, adjuvant chemotherapy) are more associated with OS and DFS than those potentially affecting locoregional recurrences (adjuvant radiotherapy). J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:642-648. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Is the routine use of a water-soluble contrast enema prior to closure of a loop ileostomy necessary? A review of a single institution experience.

BACKGROUND: The aims of the study were to determine the radiological leak rate in those patients who had undergone a resection for left-sided colorectal cancer and to see if the presence of a leak can be related with the postoperative clinical period. We also aimed to identify any common factors between patients with leak. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of all patients who underwent a left-sided colorectal cancer resection with formation of a defunctioning ileostomy was undertaken. Between 2005 and 2010, 418 such patients were identified. RESULTS: A water-soluble contrast enema was performed in 339 patients (81.1 %). Of these, 24 (7.1 %) were reported to show an anastomotic leak. Data for these 24 patients is presented in this study. Twenty-three (95.8 %) of the leaks occurred in patients who had undergone an anterior resection; 95.8 % of the patients with a leak were male. Fifteen (62.5 %) patients underwent neo-adjuvant radiation. The mean length of stay in those patients shown to have a subsequent radiological leak was 18.8 days (median), compared with the overall unit figures of 12 days. Only 29.2 % of the patients who had a leak identified had an uncomplicated postoperative period. Overall 87.5 % of the patients had a reversal of the ileostomy. CONCLUSIONS: Radiological leakage is not uncommon. The majority of patients, who were shown to have a radiological leak in this study, were male, had undergone an anterior resection, had received neo-adjuvant radiation, had a longer initial length of stay and had postoperative complications. Water-soluble contrast enemas could be selectively used in patients with these characteristics.

Cancers of the anal canal: diagnosis, treatment and future strategies.

Anal cancer is an uncommon cancer; however, it is rising in incidence. There is confusion regarding nomenclature and the distinction between anal canal cancer and anal margin cancer. This article discusses the modern definition, etiology and staging of anal canal and anal margin cancers. Modern chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimens are discussed, in addition to modern imaging and radiotherapy techniques. Future preventative strategies and potential novel treatments are discussed.

Intestinal Failure: Epidemiology, Catheter-Related Sepsis and Challenges.

Background The Leicestershire intestinal failure team (LIFT) service provides specialist intestinal failure care to patients in Leicestershire and surrounding counties. Aims To study the epidemiology of intestinal failure (IF) cases referred to the service and review outcomes particularly the indications and delivery of parenteral nutrition (PN). To review catheter-related sepsis (CRS) rates and identify areas for improvement. Methods Service data from January 2016 to November 2017 was analysed retrospectively. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was carried out. Chi-square/Fisher Exact tests were used to identify significance on categorical data and non-parametric settling was used for qualitative data analysis. Results A total of 365 patients were referred to the service from January 2016 to November 2017. 58% patients had grade I intestinal failure. 34% and 24% referrals were made by the colorectal and hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) units, respectively. Gut rest (27%) and small bowel obstruction (25%) were the most common indications for nutritional support. Duration of PN requirements varied greatly, but most patients (39%) required it for up to seven days. Single lumen PICC line (64%) and cephalic vein (54%) were the most commonly used catheter and site of vascular access, respectively. Chronicity of IF and number of vascular catheters required to provide PN were significantly associated with rates of CRS. Conclusion CRS was found to be statistically significantly associated with chronic IF and number of vascular access catheters required to provide PN. Cost implication and morbidity of CRS could be analysed further to identify other ways to provide safer and cost-efficient parental nutrition for patients with intestinal failure.

Morphology of the mesorectum in patients with primary rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The size and contents of the pelvis differ between the genders, and this may affect mesorectal size and shape. The aim of this prospective pilot study was to examine radiologically the applied anatomy of the mesorectum. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients (35 male, 23 female) with primary rectal cancer who had suitable high-resolution staging pelvic magnetic resonance images between November 2002 and July 2004 were studied. Ten variables of mesorectal morphology were measured on axial images at the ischial spines. The associations between morphologic variables and gender and body mass index were examined. RESULTS: Compared with female patients, male patients had a larger area of overall mesorectal package (3,776 mm2 vs. 2,772 mm2, P = 0.001), larger area of mesorectal fat (2,562 mm2 vs. 1,842 mm2, P = 0.001), and higher ratio of anteroposterior to transverse diameter of the mesorectal package (0.82 vs. 0.56, P < 0.001). The anterior mesorectal fat buffer was significantly thinner in females than in males (2.9 mm vs. 7.8 mm, P < 0.001). Mesorectal fat area was greater in males with a body mass index >25 than with a body mass index <25. CONCLUSIONS: Males have a larger overall mesorectal package compared with females, mainly caused by mesorectal fat. The anterior mesorectal fat is significantly thinner in females than in males. Such morphologic differences may affect resection margin status.

Severe inflammatory ileitis resulting in ileal perforation in association with combination immune checkpoint blockade for metastatic malignant melanoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become standard of care in metastatic malignant melanoma management. Despite superior effectiveness to chemotherapy, significant immune-related adverse events (irAE) may occur, particularly if used in combination. Gastrointestinal irAEs were reported with different patterns of involvement. Here, we report the case of a patient who had ileal perforation as a complication of terminal ileitis, without colitis, induced by combination immune checkpoint blockade.

Surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer after curative resection represents a difficult clinical problem and a surgical challenge. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of a series of patients who underwent resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer with curative intent. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 64 patients who underwent surgical exploration with a view to cure for locally recurrent rectal cancer under the care of one surgeon between April 1997 and April 2004. Details were obtained on the primary tumor and the operation, the indication for investigation of recurrence, preoperative imaging, operative findings, morbidity and mortality, and histopathology. RESULTS: The median time interval between resection of primary tumor and surgery for locally recurrent disease was 31 (interquartile range, 21 to 48) months. Twenty-three patients had central disease, 10 patients had sacral involvement, 21 patients had pelvic sidewall involvement, and 10 patients had both sacral and sidewall involvement. Fifty-seven patients underwent resection of the tumor. Thirty-nine of the 57 patients underwent wide resection (abdominoperineal excision of rectum, anterior resection, or Hartmann's procedure) whereas 18 patients (31.6 percent) required radical resection (pelvic exenteration or sacrectomy). Curative, negative resection margins were obtained in 21 of 57 patients who had tumor excision (36.8 percent). Perioperative mortality was 1.6 percent. Significant postoperative morbidity occurred in 40 percent of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that a significant proportion of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer can undergo resection with negative margins.