Benefit of Radiotherapy in Extraskeletal Myxoid Chondrosarcoma: A Propensity Score Weighted Population-based Analysis of the SEER Database.

OBJECTIVES: Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMC) is a rare malignancy for which the role of radiotherapy is not well-defined. We examine the effect of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) on cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with localized EMC, in a propensity score weighted, population-based analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1973 to 2012) was queried for cases of localized EMC arising from soft connective tissues of the trunk and extremities treated with surgery and/or EBRT. Inverse probability treatment weighting was utilized, with survival analysis by weighted Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank testing. The primary endpoint was CSS. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-two patients were identified, diagnosed from 2004 to 2012. Ninety-four percent and 32% of 156 assessable patients underwent surgery and EBRT, respectively. By inverse probability treatment weighting, balancing covariates of age group, sex, race, grade, T stage, N stage, receipt of surgery, and anatomic site, we observed CSS of 97% versus 85% and 94% versus 85% in patients receiving EBRT versus no EBRT, at 3 and 5 years, respectively, at median follow-up of 33 months, P=0.01. A trend toward an overall survival benefit associated with EBRT was noted, P=0.06. Further adjusting for type of resection performed, CSS benefit persisted, 97% versus 85% at 3 years and 94% versus 85% at 5 years, P=0.02, with trend toward an overall survival benefit, P=0.08. CONCLUSIONS: The receipt of EBRT is associated with a CSS benefit in localized EMC. Aggressive local therapy, including EBRT, should be considered in these patients.

Single Institutional Experience of Stereotactic Radiosurgery Alone for First Brain Metastatic Event and Salvage of Second Brain Metastatic Event in a Community Setting with Review of the Literature.

PURPOSE: To document survival for patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone for brain metastases either at initial presentation or for salvage in conjunction with other known prognostic factors in a single institutional community setting with comparison to current literature. METHODS: All patients treated for brain metastases with SRS between October 2006 and October 2013 were reviewed. We identified 91 patients treated with SRS alone for first brain metastatic event (FBME) and 87 patients treated with SRS for second brain metastatic event (SBME). We excluded the 14 patients treated with SRS for both FBME and SBME to satisfy the independence assumption for comparison of groups. Patient demographics, including age, gender, primary cancer type, presence of extracranial metastases, number of brain metastases, initial site of metastases (brain vs. other), recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), and Karnofsky Performance status (KPS) were documented. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in overall survival for patients treated with SRS for FBME compared with SBME (log-rank p = 0.9347). Univariate and multivariable Cox regression modeling revealed KPS (p = 0.0003) and RPA (p = 0.0143) were the only independent prognostic factors for survival. Specifically, patients with RPA 1 had a 61% decreased risk of death compared to those with RPA 3. Patients with RPA 2 had a 33% decreased risk of death compared to those with RPA 3. The 1-year survival rate was 36.5% for patients with RPA1, 33.3% for those with RPA 2, and 17.1% for those with RPA 3. Patients with KPS 90-100 had a 62% decreased risk of death compared to those with KPS < 70. The 1-year survival rate for patients KPS 90-100, 70-80, and <70 were 60.7, 24.6, and 16.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: No difference in survival was noted for FBME and SBME with performance status, the single most important prognostic factor following SRS. Aggressive treatment should be considered for patients with good performance status regardless if presenting with FBME or SBME. Our results are consistent with single, multi-institutional, and randomized trials after literature review.

Survival and Control Prognosticators of Recurrent Gynecological Malignancies of the Pelvis and Para-aortic Region Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: To define prognostic factors associated with improved survival and local control (LC) for gynecologic cancer recurrences limited to the pelvis and para-aortic (PA) region using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS: Between 2/2008 and 7/2014, 30 women (35 targets) with pelvic or PA recurrence of endometrioid (n = 12), cervical (n = 11), ovarian (n = 3), uterine-serous (n = 2), or carcinosarcoma (n = 2) cancer were treated with SBRT. Eleven recurrences were located in the central pelvis, 11 along the pelvic sidewall (PSW), and 13 in the PA region. RESULTS: Five-year survival for all patients was 42% with a median survival of 43.4 months. Multivariate analysis revealed better performance status (PS), and smaller clinical tumor volume was significant for improved survival (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SBRT is a local therapy for recurrent gynecological malignancies in the pelvis and PA region with curative potential. SBRT is especially effective for LC when targeting PSW or PA recurrence and for patients with a cervical/endometrioid uterine primary. Survival is improved for patients with better PS and smaller recurrence volume prior to SBRT.

Propensity score matched comparison of SBRT versus IMRT for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an attractive option for prostate cancer due to its short treatment duration and cost. In this report, we compare the efficacy and toxicity outcomes of prostate cancer patients treated with SBRT to those who received intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS: Two hundred sixty-three patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma were included, ranging from clinically very low- to high-risk groups. We retrospectively compare consecutive patients treated with SBRT with consecutive patients treated with conventionally fractionated IMRT. For most patients, SBRT was delivered to a total dose of 36.25 Gy in five fractions and IMRT to 75.6 Gy in 42 fractions. To minimize selection bias, we perform propensity score analyses. RESULTS: The treatment groups became similar after propensity matching with absolute standard bias reduced to ≤0.19. For the first analysis, 5-year actuarial survival was 90.8 and 88.1 % in SBRT and IMRT groups, respectively (p = 0.7260), while FFBF was 88.7 and 95.5 %, respectively (p = 0.1720). For the second analysis (accounting for risk group), actuarial 5-year survival was 96.7 and 87.1 % in the SBRT and IMRT groups, respectively (p = 0.3025), while FFBF was 89.7 and 90.3 %, respectively (p = 0.6446). Toxicity did not exceed grade 3 in any of the studied patients. The highest recorded genitourinary toxicity at the time of latest follow-up was grade 2. CONCLUSION: Our data support the hypothesis that SBRT has non-inferior efficacy and toxicity rates as IMRT. Given the lower cost and convenience for patients, SBRT may be considered as an alternative treatment for localized prostate cancer.

The Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer by NCCN Risk Groups.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study is to compare freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) between stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with organ confined prostate cancer treated between 2007 through 2012 utilizing the 2015 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk stratification guidelines. A secondary objective is to compare our updated toxicity at last follow-up compared with pretreatment with respect to bowel, bladder, sexual functioning, and need for invasive procedures between the two groups. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 270 consecutive men treated with either SBRT (n = 150) or IMRT (n = 120) at a community hospital with two distinct radiation departments and referral patterns. Charts were reviewed for pretreatment and treatment factors including race, age, clinical T stage, initial PSA, Gleason score, use of androgen deprivation therapy, treatment with SBRT vs. IMRT, as well as stratification by 2015 NCCN guidelines. Kaplan-Meier (KM) methodology was used to estimate FFBF, with statistical comparisons accomplished using log rank tests. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to establish independent factors prognostic of biochemical failure. Descriptive statistics were used to describe toxicity graded by a modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) late radiation morbidity scoring system. RESULTS: Significant prognostic factors in univariate analysis for FFBF included NCCN risk groups (p = 0.0032), grade (p = 0.019), and PSA (p = 0.008). There was no significant difference in FFBF between SBRT vs. IMRT (p = 0.46) with 6-year actuarial FFBF of 91.9% for SBRT and 88.9% for IMRT. Multivariable analysis revealed only the NCCN risk stratification to be significant predictor for FFBF (p = 0.04). Four-year actuarial FFBF by NCCN risk stratification was 100% very low risk, 100% low risk, 96.5% intermediate risk, 94.5% high risk, and 72.7% very high risk. There were no grade 3 gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicities for either SBRT or IMRT at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: No significant difference in FFBF was found between SBRT and IMRT for organ confined prostate cancer in multivariable analysis within this retrospective data set. Overall toxicity was low. The 2015 NCCN risk stratification was validated in this population and was the only significant factor for FFBF in multivariable analysis.

Salvage Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy with or without Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy for Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme: A Single Institution Experience.

BACKGROUND: The current standard of care for salvage treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is gross total resection and adjuvant chemoradiation for operable patients. Limited evidence exists to suggest that any particular treatment modality improves survival for recurrent GBM, especially if inoperable. We report our experience with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) with and without chemo/immunotherapy, identifying prognostic factors associated with prolonged survival. METHODS: From 2007 to 2014, 19 patients between 29 and 78 years old (median 55) with recurrent GBM following resection and chemoradiation for their initial tumor, received 18-35 Gy (median 25) in three to five fractions via CyberKnife fSRT. Clinical target volume (CTV) ranged from 0.9 to 152 cc. Sixteen patients received adjuvant systemic therapy with bevacizumab (BEV), temozolomide (TMZ), anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (125)I-mAb 425, or some combination thereof. RESULTS: The median overall survival (OS) from date of recurrence was 8 months (2.5-61) and 5.3 months (0.6-58) from the end of fSRT. The OS at 6 and 12 months was 47 and 32%, respectively. Three of 19 patients were alive at the time of this review at 20, 49, and 58 months from completion of fSRT. Hazard ratios for survival indicated that patients with a frontal lobe tumor, adjuvant treatment with either BEV or TMZ, time to first recurrence >16 months, CTV <36 cc, recursive partitioning analysis <5, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status <2 were all associated with improved survival (P < 0.05). There was no evidence of radionecrosis for any patient. CONCLUSION: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 1205 will establish the role of re-irradiation for recurrent GBM, however our study suggests that CyberKnife with chemotherapy can be safely delivered, and is most effective in patients with smaller frontal lobe tumors, good performance status, or long interval from diagnosis.

SBRT: An Opportunity to Improve Quality of Life for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Oligometastatic prostate cancer is a limited metastatic disease state in which potential long-term control is still possible with the use of targeted therapies such as surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). SBRT may as well potentially prolong the time before the initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and docetaxel chemotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer. The goal of this study is to outline prognostic factors associated with improved outcome with SBRT for metastatic prostate cancer and to quantify the effect of prior systemic treatments such as ADT and docetaxel on survival after SBRT. METHODS: Twenty-four prostate cancer patients were treated with SBRT at the Philadelphia CyberKnife Center between August 2007 and April 2014. Retrospective data collection and analysis were performed for these patients on this Institutional Review Board approved study. Kaplan-Meier methodology was utilized to estimate and visually assess overall survival (OS) at the patient level, with comparisons accomplished using the log-rank test. Unadjusted hazard ratios were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. RESULTS: An improved median survival was noted for patients with oligometastatic disease defined as ≤4 lesions with median survival of >3 years compared with 11 months for polymetastases (p = 0.02). The use of docetaxel at some time in follow-up either before or after SBRT was associated with decreased survival with median survival of 9 months vs. >3 years (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Prognosis was better for men with recurrent prostate cancer treated with SBRT if they had ≤4 metastases (oligometastases) or if docetaxel was not necessary for salvage treatment. The prolonged median OS for men with oligometastases in this population of heavily pretreated prostate cancer patients following SBRT may allow for improved quality of life because of a delay of more toxic salvage therapies.

Definitive Treatment of Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy in a Community Cancer Center Setting.

INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) provides a superior non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment option when compared to conventional radiotherapy for patients deemed inoperable or refusing surgery. This study retrospectively analyzed the rates of tumor control and toxicity following SABR treatment (Cyberknife system) of primary early-stage NSCLC in a community setting. METHODS: One hundred patients were treated between 2007 and 2011. Patients with T3-4 or N1-3 disease, metastasis, recurrent local disease, or a non-lung primary were excluded from analysis. All patients had biopsy proven disease. Staging included CT or fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography scan. Median dose was 54 Gy (45-60); 18 Gy (10-20) per fraction. Median planned target volume expansion was 8 mm (2-10). Median BED was 151.2. Tumors were tracked via Synchrony, X-Sight Lung, or X-Sight Spine. Patients were evaluated for local control, overall survival (OS), and toxicity. All local failures were determined by evaluating post treatment PET/CT. RESULTS: With a median follow up of 27.5 months, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year local control rates were 100, 93.55, and 84.33%, respectively. Median survival was 2.29 years; actuarial 3-year survival was 37.20%. Grade-3 toxicity was observed in 2% of patients (pneumonia within 2 months of treatment, n = 1; chronic pneumonitis requiring hospital admission, n = 1). No patients demonstrated toxicity above Grade-3. Multivariate analysis did not show T-stage as an independent predictor of OS, though it did trend toward significance. CONCLUSION: In a community-center setting, definitive treatment of NSCLC with SABR for non-surgical candidates and those who choose to forego surgery result in excellent and comparable rates of local control and toxicity compared to published series from large academic centers.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for re-irradiation of lung cancer recurrence with lower biological effective doses.

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have evaluated re-irradiation of lung cancer recurrences with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). This study evaluates outcomes with SBRT re-irradiation for recurrent lung cancer. METHODS: Two hundred and seventy-eight patients treated with SBRT for lung cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Of those, 26 patients with 29 tumors were re-irradiated with SBRT. Ninety percent of tumors received prior external beam irradiation and 10 % received prior SBRT. Previous median radiation dose was 61.2 Gy with a median 8-month interval from previous radiation. The median re-irradiation SBRT dose was 30 Gy (48 Gy10 biological effective dose (BED)). Endpoints evaluated included local control, overall survival, and progression-free survival. RESULTS: Twenty-five of 29 tumors were evaluable for local control, with 27 tumors (93 %) considered in-field recurrences. In-field crude local control rate was 80 % (20/25) with 1 and 2-year actuarial rates of 78.6 and 65.5 %, respectively. One and 2-year actuarial survival rates were 52.3 and 37.0 %, respectively. One and 2-year actuarial progression-free survival rates were 56.7 and 37.0 %, respectively. Fifty-five percent of patients reported acute/chronic grades 1 and 2 toxicities. No grade 3 or higher toxicities were reported. CONCLUSION: Patients with recurrent lung cancer have limited options. SBRT re-irradiation is tolerable even after a median 61.2 Gy to the re-irradiation site. The lower BED used provided acceptable progression-free survival with low toxicity. Given the poor prognosis with current treatment options, new paradigms for re-treatment should include SBRT-re-irradiation as an adjunct to systemic therapy for in-field lung cancer recurrence.

Radioimmunotherapy as a novel treatment regimen: 125I-labeled monoclonal antibody 425 in the treatment of high-grade brain gliomas.

A Phase I/II clinical trial was undertaken between January 29, 1987 and January 25, 1997 to assess the efficacy of (125)I-labeled monoclonal antibody 425 ((125)I-MAb 425) in controlling high-grade brain gliomas. A total of 180 patients diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and astrocytoma with anaplastic foci (AAF) were administered (125)I-MAb 425 as an adjuvant treatment. All underwent initial surgery followed by postoperative external beam radiation therapy and a cumulative dose of 140 mCi of (125)I-MAb 425. Biodistribution of radioactivity after antibody administration showed increased uptake in brain tumor cells due to enhanced expression of epidermal growth factor receptors. A longer half-life of (125)I-MAb 425 in brain tumor cells compared to blood was observed. All patients were followed up for at least 5 years. Overall actuarial survival range for GBM and AAF patients showed 4-150 and 4-270 months, respectively. GBM and AAF patients under age 40 years with a Karnofsky performance status >70 had an actuarial median survival of 22.5 and 65 months, respectively. This adjuvant therapy demonstrates a significant increase in median survival and should be considered in the management of high-grade brain gliomas.

Combined plaque radiotherapy and transpupillary thermotherapy for choroidal melanoma: tumor control and treatment complications in 270 consecutive patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate tumor control and treatment complications following plaque radiotherapy combined with transpupillary thermotherapy for choroidal melanoma. DESIGN: Prospective noncomparative interventional case series. INTERVENTION: All patients received treatment for choroidal melanoma using plaque radiotherapy followed by 3 sessions of transpupillary thermotherapy provided at plaque removal and at 4-month intervals. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred seventy patients with newly diagnosed choroidal melanoma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 2 main outcome measures included local tumor recurrence and treatment-related complications. The clinical data regarding patient features, tumor features, radiotherapy and thermotherapy parameters were analyzed for their effect on the 2 main outcomes using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: Prior to treatment, the median base of the tumor was 11 mm (range, 4-21 mm) and the median thickness was 4 mm (range, 2-9 mm). Most tumors were located in the posterior pole with a median proximity of 2 mm to the foveola and 2 mm to the optic disc. The median radiotherapy dose to the tumor apex was 9000 rad. Transpupillary thermotherapy was applied in 3 sessions at 4-month intervals for a median of 700 mW. The tumor decreased in thickness to a median of 2.3 mm by 1 year and 2.1 mm by 2 years' follow-up with stable findings thereafter. Using Kaplan-Meier estimates, tumor recurrence was 2% at 2 years and 3% at 5 years. Risk factors for tumor recurrence included macular location of the tumor epicenter (P =.03), diffuse tumor configuration (P =.005), and tumor margin extending underneath the foveola (P =.001). Using Kaplan-Meier estimates, treatment-related complications at 5 years included maculopathy in 18% of the participants, papillopathy in 38%, macular retinal vascular obstruction in 18%, vitreous hemorrhage in 18%, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in 2%, cataract in 6%, and neovascular glaucoma in 7%. Enucleation for radiation complications was necessary in 3 cases (1%). CONCLUSION: Plaque radiotherapy combined with transpupillary thermotherapy provides excellent local tumor control with only 3% recurrence at 5 years' follow-up.

Radiation enhancement by gemcitabine-mediated cell cycle modulations.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the exact dose dependency and time dependency of the radiation-enhancing effect of gemcitabine (2',2'difluoro desoxycytidine [dFdC]) in in vitro experiments (HeLa cells: cancer of the uterine cervix, #4197 cells: oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma), and to correlate this effect with the underlying changes in cell cycle distribution. Cell viability was determined fluorometrically after exposure to dFdC (0-20.0 micro mol/l), irradiation (0-37.5 Gy), and both modalities. Combining both therapies, cells were exposed to dFdC (0-10.0 micro mol/l) for 24 hours before further treatment and irradiated (0-30 Gy) immediately afterwards with or without removal of dFdC. For cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry, cells were irradiated (0-40 Gy) or treated with dFdC (0.012-1.0 micro mol/l, 24-48 hours). Additionally, cells were exposed to dFdC (2.0 micro mol/l, 0-4 hours). Cell cycle kinetics were evaluated using bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) (10 micro mol/l) S-phase labeling, given either 30 minutes before or in the last hour of dFdC treatment (2.0 micro mol/l, 0-6 hours). The fluorometric assay revealed that dFdC enhances radiation-induced cytotoxicity at marginally toxic or nontoxic concentrations (<37 nmol/l). Radiation resulted in the anticipated G2/M arrest already at 2 Gy. DFdC induced concentration and exposure time-dependent cell cycle changes that were better resolved using BrdU, demonstrating a pronounced S-phase arrest already at 12 nmol/l. BrdU-pulse labeling revealed that the cell cycle block occurred at the G1/S boundary. Our data reconfirm the already known radiation enhancement, the S-phase specific activities of dFdC, and the relevance of the synchronized progression of cells through the S-phase with regard to the radiosensitizing properties of low-dose dFdC. However, we could demonstrate that before progressing in the S-phase, cells were blocked and partially synchronized at the more radiosensitive G1/S boundary. Furthermore, cells progressing past the block might accumulate proapoptotic signals caused by both radiation and dFdC, which will also results in cell death.

Radioiodinated (I-125) monoclonal antibody 425 in the treatment of high grade glioma patients: ten-year synopsis of a novel treatment.

The present report is the follow-up of patients enrolled in a phase II clinical trial using I-MAb 425 as an adjuvant treatment for high grade gliomas. Patient median survivals support published data from an earlier preliminary report. From January 29, 1987 to January 25, 1997, 180 patients diagnosed with astrocytoma with anaplastic foci (AAF) and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) were treated as outpatients with an average of three weekly intravenous or intraarterial injections of radiolabeled MAb 425. The mean dose was 140 mCi (5.2 GBq). Only one patient who received a single dose of more than 60 mCi (2.2 GBq) experienced acute toxicity. Patients received prior surgery and radiation therapy, with and without chemotherapy. Overall median survival for patients with GBM and AAF was 13.4 and 50.9 months, respectively, with Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ranging from 40 to 100 and age ranging from 11 to 75 years. Prognostic factors (KPS and age) correlated positively with increased survival, with KPS the most important determinant of median survival. Data analysis was performed on patients followed 5 years or longer. We conclude that the administration of I-MAb 425 with intensive medical management demonstrates a significant increase in median survival and should be considered a therapeutic regimen for the management of patients with high grade gliomas.

Simultaneous radiotherapy and radioimmunotherapy of malignant gliomas with anti-EGFR antibody labelled with iodine 125. Preliminary results.

BACKGROUND: In this paper we present the preliminary results of a prospective trial of the efficacy of simultaneous radiotherapy and anti-EGFR (125)I radioimmunotherapy of malignant gliomas with 2 years' total survival as the end-point, raising the question whether anti-EGFR (125)I radioimmunotherapy influences the disease-free survival in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or primary glioblastoma were previously treated by a macroscopically radical neurosurgical approach and randomized either to radiotherapy + radioimmunotherapy arm or treated by radiotherapy alone. Seven patients were included in the group with radioimmunotherapy, among them five with GBM and two with AA, and five patients in the control arm. Patients were irradiated to 60 Gy using three-dimensional conformal noncoplanar techniques. Anti-EGFR (125)I monoclonal antibody 425 radioimmunotherapy (50 mCi/course) was started during 4th week of radiotherapy and was repeated three times in one week intervals. RESULTS: Time of follow-up ranges between 2 and 10 months in the anti-EGFR (125)I radioimmunotherapy arm and 4 and 9 months in the control arm. Recurrence was diagnosed in all patients in the EGFR (125)I group with a lethal outcome in two of them and in 4 patients in the control group. Median time to recurrence was 2 and 5 months respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Taking into account early recurrences observed, we propose to continue the studies on the efficacy of adjuvant anti-EGFR (125)I radioimmunotherapy in a selected group of patients in whom the greatest benefit may be expected on the basis of molecular studies, among them EGFR expression investigation.

SBRT for the Primary Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: The Effect of Gleason Score, Dose and Heterogeneity of Intermediate Risk on Outcome Utilizing 2.2014 NCCN Risk Stratification Guidelines.

PURPOSE: To report an update of our previous experience using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the primary treatment of prostate cancer, risk stratified by the updated National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) version 2.2014, reporting efficacy and toxicity in a community hospital setting. METHODS: From 2007 to 2012, 142 localized prostate cancer patients were treated with SBRT using CyberKnife. NCCN guidelines Version 2.2014 risk groups analyzed included very low (20%), low (23%), intermediate (35%), and high (22%) risk. To further explore group heterogeneity and to comply with new guidelines, we separated our prior intermediate risk group into favorable intermediate and unfavorable intermediate groups depending on how many intermediate risk factors were present (one vs. > one). The unfavorable intermediate group was further analyzed in combination with the high risk group as per NCCN guidelines Version 2.2014. Various dose levels were used over the years of treatment, and have been categorized into low dose (35 Gy, n = 5 or 36.25 Gy, n = 107) and high dose (37.5 Gy, n = 30). All treatments were delivered in five fractions. Toxicity was assessed using radiation therapy oncology group criteria. RESULTS: Five-year actuarial freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) was 100, 91.7, 95.2, 90.0, and 86.7% for very low, low, intermediate and high risk patients, respectively. A significant difference in 5 year FFBF was noted for patients with Gleason score (GS) ≥8 vs. 7 vs. 5/6 (p = 0.03) and low vs. high dose (p = 0.05). T-stage, pretreatment PSA, age, risk stratification group, and use of ADT did not affect 5-year FFBF. Multivariate analysis revealed GS and dose to be the most predictive factors for 5-year FFBF. CONCLUSION: Our experience with SBRT for the primary treatment of localized prostate cancer demonstrates favorable efficacy and toxicity comparable to the results reported for IMRT in literature. GS remains the single most important pretreatment predictor of outcome.

Effect of fractionation in stereotactic body radiation therapy using the linear quadratic model.

PURPOSE: To examine the fractionation effect of stereotactic body radiation therapy with a heterogeneous dose distribution. METHODS: Derived from the linear quadratic formula with measurements from a hypothetical 2-cm radiosurgical tumor, the threshold percentage was defined as (α/ß(tissue)/α/ß(tumor)), the balance α/ß ratio was defined as (prescription dose/tissue tolerance*α/ß(tumor)), and the balance dose was defined as (tissue tolerance/threshold percentage). RESULTS: With increasing fractions and equivalent peripheral dose to the target, the biological equivalent dose of "hot spots" in a target decreases. The relative biological equivalent doses of serial organs decrease only when the relative percentage of its dose to the prescription dose is above the threshold percentage. The volume of parallel organs at risk decreases only when the tumor's α/ß ratio is above the balance α/ß ratio and the prescription dose is lower than balance dose. CONCLUSIONS: The potential benefits of fractionation in stereotactic body radiation therapy depend on the complex interplay between the total dose, α/ß ratios, and dose differences between the target and the surrounding normal tissues.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for the primary treatment of localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The low alpha/beta ratio of prostate cancer suggests that hypofractionated schemes of dose-escalated radiotherapy should be advantageous. We report our experience using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the primary treatment of prostate cancer to assess efficacy and toxicity. METHODS: From 2007 to 2010, 70 patients (51 % low risk, 31 % intermediate risk, and 17 % high risk) with localized prostate cancer were treated with SBRT using the CyberKnife system. One-third of patients received androgen deprivation therapy. Doses of 37.5 Gy (n = 29), 36.25 Gy (n = 36), and 35 Gy (n = 5) were administered in five fractions and analyzed as high dose (37.5 Gy) vs. low dose (36.25 and 35 Gy). RESULTS: At a median 27 and 37 months follow-up, the low and high dose groups' median PSA nadir to date was 0.3 and 0.2 ng/ml, respectively. The 3-year freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) was 100 %, 95.0 % and 77.1 % for the low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients. A dose response was observed in intermediate- and high-risk patients with 72 % vs. 100 % 3-year FFBF for the low and high dose groups, respectively (p = 0.0363). Grade III genitourinary toxicities included 4 % acute and 3 % late (all high dose). Potency was preserved in 83 % of hormone naïve patients. CONCLUSION: CyberKnife dose escalated SBRT for low-, intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer exhibits favorable efficacy with acceptable toxicity.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for patients with heavily pretreated liver metastases and liver tumors.

We present our initial experience with CyberKnife stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in a heavily pretreated group of patients with liver metastases and primary liver tumors. From October 2007 to June 2009, 48 patients were treated at the Philadelphia CyberKnife Center for liver metastases or primary liver tumors. We report on 30 patients with 41 discrete lesions (1-4 tumors per patient) who received an ablative radiation dose (BED ≥ 79.2 Gy10 = 66 Gy EQD2). The treatment goal was to achieve a high SBRT dose to the liver tumor while sparing at least 700 cc of liver from radiation doses above 15 Gy. Twenty-three patients were treated with SBRT for metastatic cancer to the liver; the remainder (n = 7) were primary liver tumors. Eighty-seven percent of patients had prior systemic chemotherapy with a median 24 months from diagnosis to SBRT; 37% had prior liver directed therapy. Local control was assessed for 28 patients (39 tumors) with 4 months or more follow-up. At a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 10-40 months), 14/39 (36%) tumors had documented local failure. A decrease in local failure was found with higher doses of SBRT (p = 0.0237); 55% of tumors receiving a BED ≤ 100 Gy10 (10/18) had local failure compared with 19% receiving a BED > 100 Gy10 (4/21). The 2-year actuarial rate of local control for tumors treated with BED > 100 Gy10 was 75% compared to 38% for those patients treated with BED ≤ 100 Gy10 (p = 0.04). At last follow-up, 22/30 patients (73%) had distant progression of disease. Overall, seven patients remain alive with a median survival of 20 months from treatment and 57 months from diagnosis. To date, no patient experienced persistent or severe adverse effects. Despite the heavy pretreatment of these patients, SBRT was well tolerated with excellent local control rates when adequate doses (BED > 100 Gy10) were used. Median survival was limited secondary to development of further metastatic disease in the majority of patients.

Tumor bed-to-skin distance using accelerated partial-breast irradiation with the strut-adjusted volume implant device.

PURPOSE: Because of the risk of skin toxicity with single dwell position, single-lumen brachytherapy devices are sometimes contraindicated for tumor cavities 5-7mm from the skin surface. We discuss the use of multicatheter device to treat patients with tumor bed-to-skin distances <7mm. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We treated 117 patients with accelerated partial-breast irradiation brachytherapy: 77 single-lumen and 40 multicatheter devices. A subset of 12 patients treated with SAVI(®) had bed-to-skin spacing <7mm. All patients had Tis-2N0 ductal carcinoma with negative margins. A total dose of 34.0Gy in 10 fractions was delivered twice daily. Planning target volume was created using computed tomography-based three-dimensional planning with a 1.0-cm expansion of the lumpectomy cavity. Skin dose was measured dosimetrically, with skin constraints <125% of the prescription. Toxicities were graded, and patients were assessed at various intervals. RESULTS: Of the patients treated with the multicatheter device, 0% (0/12) had their device pulled. At 2 weeks after treatment, fewer than 50% of the patients had skin toxicities of Grades 1-2, all of which resolved by 6 months. The cosmetic outcome was good to excellent at followup. CONCLUSIONS: Multicatheter devices permit well-tolerated accelerated partial-breast irradiation in patients with tumor cavities near the skin surface for which the single-lumen device may not be appropriate.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for radiation-induced cystitis and proctitis.

PURPOSE: To provide a retrospective analysis of the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for treating hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) and proctitis secondary to pelvic- and prostate-only radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nineteen patients were treated with HBOT for radiation-induced HC and proctitis. The median age at treatment was 66 years (range, 15-84 years). The range of external-beam radiation delivered was 50.0-75.6 Gy. Bleeding must have been refractory to other therapies. Patients received 100% oxygen at 2.0 atmospheres absolute pressure for 90-120 min per treatment in a monoplace chamber. Symptoms were retrospectively scored according to the Late Effects of Normal Tissues-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (LENT-SOMA) scale to evaluate short-term efficacy. Recurrence of hematuria/hematochezia was used to assess long-term efficacy. RESULTS: Four of the 19 patients were lost to follow-up. Fifteen patients were evaluated and received a mean of 29.8 dives: 11 developed HC and 4 proctitis. All patients experienced a reduction in their LENT-SOMA score. After completion of HBOT, the mean LENT-SOMA score was reduced from 0.78 to 0.20 in patients with HC and from 0.66 to 0.26 in patients with proctitis. Median follow-up was 39 months (range, 7-70 months). No cases of hematuria were refractory to HBOT. Complete resolution of hematuria was seen in 81% (n = 9) and partial response in 18% (n = 2). Recurrence of hematuria occurred in 36% (n = 4) after a median of 10 months. Complete resolution of hematochezia was seen in 50% (n = 2), partial response in 25% (n = 1), and refractory bleeding in 25% (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is appropriate for radiation-induced HC once less time-consuming therapies have failed to resolve the bleeding. In these conditions, HBOT is efficacious in the short and long term, with minimal side effects.