Inborn errors of immunity manifesting as atopic disorders.

Inborn errors of immunity are traditionally best known for enhancing susceptibility to infections. However, allergic inflammation, among other types of immune dysregulation, occurs frequently in patients with inborn errors of immunity. As such, the term primary atopic disorders (PADs) was recently coined to describe the group of heritable monogenic allergic disorders. It is becoming increasingly important for clinicians to recognize that allergic diseases such as food allergy, atopic dermatitis, and allergic asthma are expressions of misdirected immunity, and in patients who present with severe, early-onset, or coexisting allergic conditions, these can be indications of an underlying PAD. Identifying monogenic allergic disease through next-generation sequencing can dramatically improve outcomes by allowing the use of precision-based therapy targeting the patient's underlying molecular defect. It is therefore imperative that clinicians recognize PADs to be able to provide informed therapeutic options and improve patient outcomes. Here, we summarize the clinical features commonly seen with each of the currently known PADs, identify clinical warning signs that warrant assessment for PADs, and lastly, discuss the benefits of timely diagnosis and management of these conditions.

Diverse clinical features and diagnostic delay in monogenic inborn errors of immunity: A call for access to genetic testing.

BACKGROUND: Inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) are a group of conditions affecting immune system development and function. Due to their clinical heterogeneity and lack of provider awareness, patients suffer from long diagnostic delays that increase morbidity and mortality. Next-generation sequencing facilitates earlier diagnosis and treatment of IEIs, but too often patients are unable to see the benefit of this technology due to gaps in providers' knowledge regarding which patients to test and barriers to accessing sequencing. METHODS: Here, we provide detailed clinical phenotyping and describe the impact of genetic sequencing on a cohort of 43 patients with monogenic IEIs seen in a tertiary care center from 2014 to 2019. Data were abstracted from a chart review, and a panel of clinical immunologists were consulted on the impact of genetic sequencing on their patients. RESULTS: We found that our patients had significant diagnostic delays, averaging 3.3 years; had diverse manifestations of immune system dysfunction; and had demonstrated highly complex medical needs, with on average 7.9 subspecialties involved in their care and 4.9 hospitalizations prior to definitive treatment. Our results also demonstrate the benefits of genetic testing, as it provided the majority of our patients with a diagnosis, and positively impacted their treatment, follow-up, and prognosis. CONCLUSION: This paper expands the paucity of literature on genetically confirmed IEIs in North America and supports the expansion of access to genetic testing for patients with clinical features suggesting IEI, such as those presented in our cohort.

Passive Coping Strategies During Repeated Social Defeat Are Associated With Long-Lasting Changes in Sleep in Rats.

Exposure to severe stress has immediate and prolonged neuropsychiatric consequences and increases the risk of developing Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Importantly, PTSD develops in only a subset of individuals after exposure to a traumatic event, with the understanding of this selective vulnerability being very limited. Individuals who go on to develop PTSD after a traumatic experience typically demonstrate sleep disturbances including persistent insomnia and recurrent trauma-related nightmares. We previously established a repeated social defeat paradigm in which rats segregate into either passively or actively coping subpopulations, and we found that this distinction correlates with measures of vulnerability or resilience to stress. In this study, we examined differences between these two behavioral phenotypes in sleep changes resulting from repeated social defeat stress. Our data indicate that, compared to control and actively coping rats, passively coping rats have less slow-wave sleep (SWS) for at least 2 weeks after the end of a series of exposures to social defeat. Furthermore, resilient rats show less exaggerated motor activation at awakenings from rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and less fragmentation of REM sleep compared to control and passively coping rats. Together, these data associate a passive coping strategy in response to repeated social defeat stress with persisting sleep disturbances. Conversely, an active coping strategy may be associated with resilience to sleep disturbances. These findings may have both prognostic and therapeutic applications to stress-associated neuropsychiatric disorders, including PTSD.