Persistence with Biologic Treatment in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A German Claims Data Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the real-world rates of treatment discontinuation and switching of biologic therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: A retrospective claims data analysis on all continuously insured adult IBD patients with initiation of a biologic therapy was conducted. Observation started with the date of the first prescription of index tumor necrosis factor α-inhibitors (anti-TNFα) or vedolizumab (VDZ) therapy and lasted 12 months. Non-persistence was assumed in case of a switch to another biologic or a treatment gap of >90 days. RESULTS: We included 1,248 IBD biologic treatment starters (502 adalimumab, 77 golimumab, 441 infliximab, 228 VDZ); 837/411 were biologic-naïve (bio-naïve)/ biologic-experienced (bio-experienced). Mean age of bio-naïve/bio-experienced anti-TNFα patients was 39.2/38.1 years (54.9%/56.7% female) and 42.6/37.8 years for VDZ patients (56.3%/54.9% female). Seven hundred and seventy-two patients (61.9%) were persistent with their index biologic therapy after 12 months (61.9%/61.8% bio-naïve/bio-experienced). Percentage of persistent patients was 69.7% for VDZ (65.6%/71.3%) and 60.1% for anti-TNFα (61.4%/55.5%). VDZ was associated with later non-persistence in a multivariable Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio 0.675; p = 0.003) compared to anti-TNFα. CONCLUSIONS: Only 60-70% of IBD -patients are still persistent with their biologic therapy after 12 months. VDZ therapy is associated with a higher persistence than anti-TNFα therapy in this analysis.

Real-world clinical effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab and anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha treatment in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease patients: a German retrospective chart review.

BACKGROUND: Real-world comparisons of biologic treatment outcomes for ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) patients are limited. We sought to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of vedolizumab (VDZ) and anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) in UC and CD patients in Germany. METHODS: A retrospective chart review (15 sites) investigated UC and CD patients who were biologic-treatment naïve (biologic-naïve) or had received no more than one prior anti-TNFα before initiating treatment with VDZ or anti-TNFα between 15 July 2014 and 20 October 2015. Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed time to first chart-documented clinical remission (CR) and symptom resolution (UC: rectal bleeding [RB], stool frequency [SF]; CD: abdominal pain [AP], liquid stools [LS]) and outcome duration. RESULTS: A total of 133 UC (76 VDZ; 57 anti-TNFα) and 174 CD (69 VDZ; 105 anti-TNFα) patients were included. By Week 26, estimated cumulative rates of patients achieving CR or symptom resolution with VDZ vs anti-TNFα treatment were for UC: CR, 53.7% vs 31.7%; RB, 66.8% vs 55.8%; and SF, 59.8% vs 50.7%, respectively; and for CD: CR, 14.4% vs 32.8%; AP, 62.5% vs 56.0%; and LS, 29.9% vs 50.3%, respectively. Outcomes were sustained similarly between treatments, except RB (VDZ vs anti-TNFα: median 38.1 vs 15.1 weeks, P = 0.03). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 5.3% vs 7.0% (UC) and 8.7% vs 19.0% (CD) of VDZ vs anti-TNFα patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were differences in CR, symptom resolution, and safety profiles, real-world data support both VDZ and anti-TNFα as effective treatment options in UC and CD.

Perianal fistulas in adult patients with Crohn's disease in Germany - a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of claims data from German sickness funds.

INTRODUCTION: Perianal fistulas (PF) are presumably a frequent extraintestinal manifestation of Crohn's disease (CD), causing significant functional impairment. This study aims to gain representative data on the prevalence, characteristics, and treatment of CD patients suffering from PF in Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of claims data from several German company health insurance funds included adult patients with CD and PF in 2015. The dataset comprised in- and outpatient services with diagnoses, drug prescriptions, and other patient data. It is representative for age, gender, and region and allows extrapolation to the total German statutory health insurance (SHI) population. A systematic literature review was conducted to discuss these results in the international context. RESULTS: A CD prevalence of 299 per 100 000 and a PF prevalence in CD patients of 3.4 % was observed in this cross-sectional study. PF are most prevalent in young age groups (< 24 to 39). One-third of patients with PF received biologics and surgery. Surgical procedures were performed in 31.3 % of PF patients in the inpatient setting and in 4.4 % of PF patients in the outpatient setting. All complicated perianal fistula patients received at least 1 inpatient surgery and 44.8 % received biologic therapy. DISCUSSION: This claims data analysis in German patients estimates a CD prevalence in the SHI population that corresponds well to previously reported data. The prevalence rate for PF in CD patients is comparable with a previous cross-sectional German claims data analysis but is markedly lower than cumulative risks reported in longitudinal cohort studies. PF patients are young and treatment intensive with one-third requiring biologic treatment or inpatient surgery.

Real-world biologic treatment and associated cost in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe biologic treatment of German inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, including biologics' dosage, health care resource use, and treatment-associated cost. METHODS: In this retrospective claims data analysis, all continuously insured adult IBD patients (Crohn's disease [CD] or ulcerative colitis [UC]) who started a new therapy with an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-α) or vedolizumab (VDZ) were included. Observation started with the date of the first prescription of index biologic therapy and lasted 12 months. RESULTS: In the database, 1248 out of 57 296 IBD patients started a biologic treatment of interest (1020 anti-TNF-α, 228 VDZ), and 837 patients were bio-naïve (773 anti-TNF-α, 64 VDZ). The mean age of bio-naïve/bio-experienced anti-TNF-α patients was 39.2/38.1 years (54.9 %/56.7 % female) and 42.6/37.8 years for VDZ patients (56.3 %/54.9 % female). The proportion of patients receiving a maintenance dosage > 150 % compared to SmPC was 15.1 % for Adalimumab, 5.2-39.0 % for Golimumab, 14.7-34.5 % for Infliximab, and 19.7 % for VDZ patients. During the maintenance phase, up to 58.8 % of patients received at least 1 prescription of any CS, and 41.7 %/47.1 % (anti-TNF-α/VDZ) were treated in a hospital due to IBD. The mean IBD-related direct health care cost per patient year was €â€Š30 246 (anti-TNF-α)/ €â€Š28 227 (VDZ) for bio-naïve patients (p = 0.288) and €â€Š34 136 (anti-TNF-α)/ €â€Š32 112 (VDZ) for bio-experienced patients (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial percentage of patients receive a high biologic dosage in the maintenance phase. Despite biologic therapy, 30-40 % receive a CS therapy and/or experience at least 1 IBD-associated hospitalization within a year, possibly indicating a remaining disease activity.

Manual Compression versus Vascular Closing Device for Closing Access Puncture Site in Femoral Left-Heart Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Comparison of Costs and Effects in Inpatient Care.

OBJECTIVES: To compare complication rates, length of hospital stay, and resulting costs between the use of manual compression and a vascular closing device (VCD) in both diagnostic and interventional catheterization in a German university hospital setting. METHODS: A stratified analysis according to risk profiles was used to compare the risk of complications in a retrospective cross-sectional single-center study. Differences in costs and length of hospital stay were calculated using the recycled predictions method, based on regression coefficients from generalized linear models with gamma distribution. All models were adjusted for propensity score and possible confounders, such as age, sex, and comorbidities. The analysis was performed separately for diagnostic and interventional catheterization. RESULTS: The unadjusted relative risk (RR) of complications was not significantly different in diagnostic catheterization when a VCD was used (RR = 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-2.16) but significantly lower in interventional catheterization (RR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.21-0.93). Costs were on average €275 lower in the diagnostic group (95% CI -€478.0 to -€64.9; P = 0.006) and around €373 lower in the interventional group (95% CI -€630.0 to -€104.2; P = 0.014) when a VCD was used. The adjusted estimated average length of stay did not differ significantly between the use of a VCD and manual compression in both types of catheterization. CONCLUSIONS: In interventional catheterization, VCDs significantly reduced unadjusted complication rates, as well as costs. A significant reduction in costs also supports their usage in diagnostic catheterization on a larger scale.

Costs of conservative management of early-stage prostate cancer compared to radical prostatectomy-a claims data analysis.

BACKGROUND: Due to widespread PSA testing incidence rates of localized prostate cancer increase but curative treatment is often not required. Overtreatment imposes a substantial economic burden on health care systems. We compared the direct medical costs of conservative management and radical therapy for the management of early-stage prostate cancer in routine care. METHODS: An observational study design is chosen based on claims data of a German statutory health insurance fund for the years 2008-2011. Three hundred fifty-three age-matched men diagnosed with prostate cancer and treated with conservative management and radical prostatectomy, are included. Individuals with diagnoses of metastases or treatment of advanced prostate cancer are excluded. In an excess cost approach direct medical costs are considered from an insured community perspective for in- and outpatient care, pharmaceuticals, physiotherapy, and assistive technologies. Generalized linear models adjust for comorbidity by Charlson comorbidity score and recycled predictions method calculates per capita costs per treatment strategy. RESULTS: After follow-up of 2.5 years per capita costs of conservative management are €6611 lower than costs of prostatectomy ([-9734;-3547], p < 0.0001). Complications increase costs of assistive technologies by 30% (p = 0.0182), but do not influence any other costs. Results are robust to cost outliers and incidence of prostate cancer diagnosis. The short time horizon does not allow assessing long-term consequences of conservative management. CONCLUSIONS: At a time horizon of 2.5 years, conservative management is preferable to radical prostatectomy in terms of costs. Claims data analysis is limited in the selection of comparable treatment groups, as clinical information is scarce and bias due to non-randomization can only be partly mitigated by matching and confounder adjustment.

USING CLAIMS DATA FOR EVIDENCE GENERATION IN MANAGED ENTRY AGREEMENTS.

OBJECTIVES: This study assesses the use of routinely collected claims data for managed entry agreements (MEA) in the illustrative context of German statutory health insurance (SHI) funds. METHODS: Based on a nonsystematic literature review, the data needs of different MEA were identified. A value-based typology to classify MEA on the basis of these data needs was developed. The typology is oriented toward health outcomes and utilization and costs, key components of a new technology's value. For each MEA type, the suitability of claims data in establishing evidence of the novel technology's value in routine care was systematically assessed. Assessment criteria were data availability, completeness, timeliness, confidentiality, reliability, and validity. RESULTS: Claims data are better suited to MEA addressing uncertainty regarding the utilization and costs of a novel technology in routine care. In schemes where safety aspects or clinical effectiveness are assessed, the role of claims data is limited because clinical information is not included in sufficient detail. CONCLUSIONS: The suitability of claims data depends on the source of uncertainty and, in consequence, the outcome measures chosen in the agreements. In all schemes, the validity of claims data should be judged with caution as data are collected for billing purposes. This framework may support manufacturers and payers in selecting the most suitable contract type and agreeing on contract conditions. More research is necessary to validate these results and to address remaining medical, economic, legal, and ethical questions of using claims data for MEA.

Early decision-analytic modeling - a case study on vascular closure devices.

BACKGROUND: As economic considerations become more important in healthcare reimbursement, decisions about the further development of medical innovations need to take into account not only medical need and potential clinical effectiveness, but also cost-effectiveness. Already early in the innovation process economic evaluations can support decisions on development in specific indications or patient groups by anticipating future reimbursement and implementation decisions. One potential concept for early assessment is value-based pricing. METHODS: The objective is to assess the feasibility of value-based pricing and product design for a hypothetical vascular closure device in the pre-clinical stage which aims at decreasing bleeding events. A deterministic decision-analytic model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of established vascular closure devices from the perspective of the Statutory Health Insurance system. To identify early benchmarks for pricing and product design, three strategies of determining the product's value are explored: 1) savings from complications avoided by the new device; 2) valuation of the avoided complications based on an assumed willingness-to-pay-threshold (the efficiency frontier approach); 3) value associated with modifying the care pathways within which the device would be applied. RESULTS: Use of established vascular closure devices is dominated by manual compression. The hypothetical vascular closure device reduces overall complication rates at higher costs than manual compression. Maximum cost savings of only about €4 per catheterization could be realized by applying the hypothetical device. Extrapolation of an efficiency frontier is only possible for one subgroup where vascular closure devices are not a dominated strategy. Modifying care in terms of same-day discharge of patients treated with vascular closure devices could result in cost savings of €400-600 per catheterization. CONCLUSIONS: It was partially feasible to calculate value-based prices for the novel closure device which can be used to inform product design. However, modifying the care pathway may generate much more value from the payers' perspective than modifying the device per se. Manufacturers should thus explore the feasibility of combining reimbursement of their product with arrangements that make same-day discharge attractive also for hospitals. Due to the early nature of the product, the results are afflicted with substantial uncertainty.