A Lexicon for First-Trimester US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations.

The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound convened a multisociety panel to develop a first-trimester US lexicon based on scientific evidence, societal guidelines, and expert consensus that would be appropriate for imagers, clinicians, and patients. Through a modified Delphi process with consensus of at least 80%, agreement was reached for preferred terms, synonyms, and terms to avoid. An intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) is defined as a pregnancy implanted in a normal location within the uterus. In contrast, an ectopic pregnancy (EP) is any pregnancy implanted in an abnormal location, whether extrauterine or intrauterine, thus categorizing cesarean scar implantations as EPs. The term pregnancy of unknown location is used in the setting of a pregnant patient without evidence of a definite or probable IUP or EP at transvaginal US. Since cardiac development is a gradual process and cardiac chambers are not fully formed in the first trimester, the term cardiac activity is recommended in lieu of 'heart motion' or 'heartbeat.' The terms 'living' and 'viable' should also be avoided in the first trimester. 'Pregnancy failure' is replaced by early pregnancy loss (EPL). When paired with various modifiers, EPL is used to describe a pregnancy in the first trimester that may or will not progress, is in the process of expulsion, or has either incompletely or completely passed. © RSNA and Elsevier, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. This article is a simultaneous joint publication in Radiology and American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. All rights reserved. The articles are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal's style. Either version may be used in citing this article. See also the editorial by Scoutt and Norton in this issue.

A Lexicon for First-Trimester US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations.

The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound convened a multisociety panel to develop a first-trimester US lexicon based on scientific evidence, societal guidelines, and expert consensus that would be appropriate for imagers, clinicians, and patients. Through a modified Delphi process with consensus of at least 80%, agreement was reached for preferred terms, synonyms, and terms to avoid. An intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) is defined as a pregnancy implanted in a normal location within the uterus. In contrast, an ectopic pregnancy (EP) is any pregnancy implanted in an abnormal location, whether extrauterine or intrauterine, thus categorizing cesarean scar implantations as EPs. The term pregnancy of unknown location is used in the setting of a pregnant patient without evidence of a definite or probable IUP or EP at transvaginal US. Since cardiac development is a gradual process and cardiac chambers are not fully formed in the first trimester, the term cardiac activity is recommended in lieu of 'heart motion' or 'heartbeat.' The terms 'living' and 'viable' should also be avoided in the first trimester. 'Pregnancy failure' is replaced by early pregnancy loss (EPL). When paired with various modifiers, EPL is used to describe a pregnancy in the first trimester that may or will not progress, is in the process of expulsion, or has either incompletely or completely passed.

Socioeconomic Analysis of the Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancies: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify racial and socioeconomic disparities in the surgical management of ectopic pregnancy. DESIGN: Retrospective study. The National Inpatient Sample was sampled from 2015 to 2017 for inpatient hospitalizations for ectopic pregnancy. Cohorts were identified by surgical treatment type-open procedure vs laparoscopic procedure. Race/ethnicity, primary payer status, and median household income were primary variables of interest. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted. SETTING: Nationwide inpatient analysis. PATIENTS: Women presenting for ectopic pregnancy treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Type of surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Outcome measures were laparotomy vs laparoscopy for treatment. A total of 18 725 cases were identified, 8325 open and 10 400 laparoscopic. Hispanic women were more likely to receive open procedures as treatment for ectopic pregnancy than White women (odds ratio 1.226, p <.001). Women with private insurance were more likely to receive open procedures than women who used self-pay for treatment (odds ratio 0.809, p <.001). Women of lower median income status, <$60 000, were more likely to receive open procedures than women of the fourth quartile income group. Black women predominantly made up the first quartile income group. When controlling for covariates, Black women were not more likely to receive 1 method of surgical procedure over another. CONCLUSION: Income appears to be related to surgical management of ectopic pregnancy with women of lower median incomes receiving laparotomies over laparoscopic procedures. Equal access to healthcare remains a prudent need in communities of color. Further studies are needed to elucidate surgical decision-making in the management of ectopic pregnancy.

The history of tiered-effectiveness contraceptive counseling and the importance of patient-centered family planning care.

Public health workers, clinicians, and researchers have tried to increase long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use by changing contraceptive counseling between patients and providers. Several major health organizations now recommend tiered-effectiveness counseling, in which the most effective methods are explained first so that patients can use information about the relative efficacy of contraceptive methods to make an informed choice. Some scholars and practitioners have raised concerns that, given histories of inequitable treatment and coercion in reproductive health care, tiered-effectiveness counseling may undermine patient autonomy and choice. This Clinical Opinion examines the development of tiered-effectiveness contraceptive counseling, how its rise mirrored the focus on promoting LARC to decrease the unintended pregnancy rate, and key considerations and the potential conflicts of a LARC-first model with patient-centered care. Finally, we discuss how reproductive justice and shared decision making can guide efforts to provide patient-centered contraceptive care.

Beyond circles and squares: A commentary on updating pedigree nomenclature to better represent patient diversity.

With changes in our understanding of gender identity and disorders of sex differentiation (DSDs), as well as a need to promote medical care that appropriately reflects the intersectional personal identities of patients with respect to sex and gender, we explored possible modifications of pedigree nomenclature to better represent such patient diversity. There are currently no widely accepted standard symbols to simultaneously represent both gender identity and assigned sex at birth within a pedigree. Previous studies assessing perspectives from members of the transgender and gender non-binary (TGNB) community have highlighted the need for a unique symbol to represent non-binary individuals and better ways to represent core gender identities for gender minorities such as transgender individuals. In our experience we have encountered similar dilemmas with documentation for individuals with DSDs in terms of a lack of unequivocal symbolic representation within the pedigree. Here we propose three distinct symbols for gender identity combined with superscript symbols to represent sex assigned at birth, which we think may unequivocally represent TGNB individuals and patients with DSDs. It is clear that further research is needed to ensure that any proposed changes are acceptable by and respectful of all patients regardless of their gender identity and assigned sex at birth. We hope that further research will include focus groups and surveys to get broader input from gender minority stakeholders so that new standards can be developed and modified as we strive to meet the needs of our increasingly diverse patient population.

Over-the-Counter Oral Contraception as an Opportunity to Reduce Contraceptive Access Inequity.

This Viewpoint argues that making a progestin-only contraceptive pill available for sale as an over-the-counter product will help reduce logistic barriers to safe and effective birth control.

Characteristics Associated With Physician Bias in Contraceptive Recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine associations between obstetrician-gynecologist (OBGYN) contraceptive recommendations and sociodemographic characteristics of patients and recommending physicians. METHODS: OBGYNs affiliated with residency programs across the United States were recruited via email to participate in an online exploratory survey depicting scenarios of reproductive-age women of differing race and socioeconomic status, all other factors identical, and were asked to provide contraceptive recommendations. The χ2 test, Fisher's exact tests, and logistic regression were used to analyze recommendation differences based on physician and patient characteristics. RESULTS: Of 172 physician respondents, large proportions self-identified as white (74%) and attending physicians (56%) from the Mid-Atlantic (42%). In multivariate logistic regression, self-administered methods (odds ratio [OR], 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-0.8) and condoms (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.9) were recommended significantly less to Black high SES patients compared with white high SES patients. Non-white physicians recommended tubal ligation (OR, 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-0.9) significantly less than white physicians, and recommended long-acting reversible contraception (OR, 3.3, CI 2.2-5.2) and condoms (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9) significantly more. Trainee physicians recommended self-administered methods (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.4), condoms (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.2-0.3), and tubal ligation (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3-0.6) significantly less than attending physicians. CONCLUSIONS: OBGYN contraceptive recommendations differed based on patients' perceived race and SES. Recommendations also differed based on race, training level, and geographic location of the recommending physician. Results suggest that physician bias contributes to contraceptive recommendations. OBGYNs should receive education about contraceptive coercion and patient-centered decision-making so that they provide high-quality counseling to all patients.

Abortion providers in the United States: expanding beyond obstetrics and gynecology.

In the years preceding the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022) decision, there had been a shift in the demographics of abortion providers. Although most abortion providers were obstetricians-gynecologists, there had been a rapid increase in the number of internal medicine and family medicine physicians and advanced practice clinicians providing abortion care. As discourse about limiting abortion access has gained volume over the past few years, so have the number of legislative restrictions aimed at preventing people from seeking abortions. Among these are laws and policies targeted at reducing the number of providers and clinics providing abortion care, resulting in an absence of training, high case volume, and institutional restrictions. With the overturning of Roe v Wade, the landscape of abortion provision will continue to shift further. Action needs to be taken to expand the types of providers getting trained and providing abortions to ensure access for those seeking abortions.

Exploring the physician's role in contraceptive counseling at the time of abortion in the US.

OBJECTIVE: We explored how physicians conceptualize their role in contraceptive counseling at the time of abortion, including identifying clinician attitudes that may lead to patients' perceptions of contraceptive coercion. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted individual semi-structured interviews using questions based on components of the Theory of Planned Behavior. We recruited physician abortion providers using purposeful sampling to attain diversity in practice setting and geographic practice region. We analyzed transcribed interviews using initial and values coding methods. RESULTS: We interviewed 39 participants across the United States, who primarily self-reported as White female obstetrician gynecologists (OB/GYNs) aged 25 to 44. Over half of participants practiced in an academic setting. Participants perceived providing patient education and taking a patient-centered approach as part of their role in contraceptive counseling. Participants also believed it was their responsibility to prevent unintended pregnancies and subsequent abortions among their patients. External motivations behind this belief included wanting patients to avoid the challenges of obtaining another abortion, particularly in states with multiple abortion restrictions. Internal motivations included valuing professional goal attainment, discomfort with abortion, and abortion stigma. When physicians counseled about contraception, many expressed preferences toward methods of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and an emphasis on contraception provision for adolescents and women with prior abortions. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians providing abortions strive to use a patient-centered approach to contraceptive counseling. However, many continue to be motivated by the goal of avoiding a subsequent abortion which patients may perceive as coercion towards contraceptive uptake. IMPLICATIONS: Considering contraceptive counseling as a means to prevent subsequent abortion may lead to coercive practices, especially with specific patient populations. Moral codes and abortion stigma influence physicians' counseling practices and physicians must examine their personal values and motivations behind recommending contraception after an abortion.

An exploration of perceived contraceptive coercion at the time of abortion.

OBJECTIVE: To explore patient experiences of contraceptive coercion by healthcare providers at time of abortion. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a qualitative study of English-speaking women seeking abortion services at a hospital-based clinic. We used the Integrated Behavioral Model and the Reproductive Autonomy Scale to inform our semi-structured interview guide; the Scale provides a framework of reproductive coercion as a lack of autonomy or power to decide about and control decisions relating to reproduction. We enrolled participants until thematic saturation was achieved. Two coders used modified grounded theory to analyze transcribed interviews with Nvivo 11.0 (Κ=0.81). RESULTS: The 31 women we interviewed from June 2016 to March 2017 were all in the first trimester, and predominantly young (mean age 27±5 years), non-Hispanic Black (52%) and Medicaid-insured (68%). Some participants (42%) reported feeling "pressured" into choosing some form of contraception. A subset of participants (26%) voiced that providers seemed to prefer LARC methods or were "pushing" a specific method. Several participants perceived pressure to choose any method due to providers' preference to prevent repeat abortions. Conversely, participants who were offered a range of methods through the use of decision aids and who were given time to deliberate demonstrated more reproductive autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of participants perceived a form of coercion around their contraceptive counseling. Coercion manifested in perceived provider preference for specific methods or immediate initiation of a method. Participant narratives involving decision aids to offer a range of methods and time for deliberation demonstrated greater reproductive autonomy and less coercion. Abortion stigma may mediate potentially coercive interactions between patients and providers. IMPLICATIONS: This qualitative study explored contraceptive coercion at the time of abortion. Findings highlighted provider pressure to initiate contraception, LARC preference, and abortion stigma. Offering many methods and opportunity for deliberation supported autonomy and satisfaction. Findings inform ongoing efforts to improve contraceptive counseling and promote reproductive autonomy, while addressing unintended pregnancies.

Obstetric Outcomes After Failed Hysteroscopic and Laparoscopic Sterilization Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To compare obstetric outcomes after failed hysteroscopic and laparoscopic sterilization. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined pregnancy outcomes including live birth, preterm birth, stillbirth, spontaneous abortion, therapeutic abortion, ectopic pregnancies, and gestational trophoblastic disease using a commercial claims administrative database for the years 2007-2013. We used a Z-test to compare pregnancy outcomes per 100 person-years based on type of sterilization. Cox proportional hazard models controlled for patient age, geographic region, urbanicity, comorbidities, and insurance type. RESULTS: We evaluated 997 pregnancy outcomes among 817 women from a total of 70,115 women with a history of either hysteroscopic sterilization (n=387 pregnancies/27,724 cases) or laparoscopic sterilization (n=610 pregnancies/42,391 cases). Women undergoing hysteroscopic sterilization were slightly older than, but otherwise similar to, women undergoing laparoscopic sterilization. The most common outcome was live birth, which was more likely after hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization (adjusted hazard ratio 1.32, 95% CI 1.09-1.60). The rate of spontaneous abortion was not statistically significantly different between the two groups. Therapeutic abortion occurred more often after hysteroscopic sterilization (adjusted hazard ratio 1.49, 95% CI 1.10-2.01), whereas ectopic pregnancies occurred less often (adjusted hazard ratio 0.12, 95% CI 0.05-0.29) compared with laparoscopic sterilization. CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic sterilization is associated with higher rates of live birth and lower rates of ectopic pregnancy compared with laparoscopic sterilization. Spontaneous abortion and preterm birth rates were similar in both groups. These data do not support an adverse effect of hysteroscopic sterilization on subsequent pregnancy outcomes.