Serum level of tumor marker carbohydrate antigen-CA125 in heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: To assess serum levels of tumor marker carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) in patients with heart failure (HF) and to investigate possible correlation with echocardiographic parameters and level of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 76 patients with different cardiac symptoms hospitalized at Clinic for heart disease and rheumatism. Control group (n = 26) was consisted of patients without signs and symptoms of HF, normal left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) and normal BNP level. Patients with diagnosis of HF (n = 50) were subdivided into 2 group depending on signs and symptoms of fluid overload: compensated (compHF, n = 10) and decompensated group (decompHF, n = 40). Serum CA125 and BNP were measured on admission and all patient underwent ECG recording and trans thoracic echocardiographic examination. RESULTS: The median CA125 level in HF group was significantly higher compared to control group (71.05 [30.70-141.47]U/ml vs 10.75 [8.05- 14.32] U/ml, p < 0.0005). Higher CA125 levels were found in decompHF group compared to compHF group (94.90 [49.75-196.75]U/ml vs 11.90 [10.25-15.80]U/ml, p < 0.0005). In decompHF group 13 of patients had pleural and/or pericardial effusion- their CA125 levels were significantly higher compared to patients without serosal effusion (n = 27) (205.10 [106.50-383.90]U/ml vs. 71.50 [47.30-109.55] U/ml, p < 0.002). We found significant difference in CA125 levels between patients with atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm (98.40 [48.20-242.70] U/ml vs. 47.30 [12.95-99.05] U/ml, p = 0.015). There was no significant difference in CA125 levels in group with enlarged left atrium compared to normal sized atrium (p = 0.282), as well as in group with moderate/severe mitral regurgitation compared to group with no/mild mitral regurgitation (p = 0.99). Finally, levels of serum CA125 positively correlated with serum level of BNP (r = 0.293, p = 0.039), but not with LVEF (p = 0.369) and left atrium diameter (p = 0.636). CONCLUSION: Serum CA125 is elevated in decompensated HF patients: more pronounced elevation was found in patients with pleural and/or pericard effusion compared to patients with no serosal effusion. CA125 level correlated with BNP, but not with left atrium diameter nor with LVEF. Tumor marker CA125 could be used as a marker of systemic congestion and volume overload in decompensated HF. We hypothesized that high CA125 level indicates that measured high BNP is actually wet BNP.

Biphasic and monophasic pattern of brain natriuretic peptide release in acute myocardial infarction.

This study evaluated brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) release in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), absolute values as well as pattern of its release. There are two different patterns of BNP release in AMI; monophasic pattern--concentration in the first measurement is higher than in the second one, and biphasic pattern--concentration in the first measurement is lower than in the second one. We observed significance of biphasic and monophasic pattern of BNP release related to diagnostic and prognostic value. We included in this prospective observational study total of 75 AMI patients, 52 males and 23 females, average age of 62.3 +/- 10.9 years with range of 42 to 79 years. BNP was measured and pattern of its release was evaluated. In AMI group BNP levels were significantly higher than in controls (462.88 pg/mL vs. 35.36 pg/mL, p < 0.001). We found statistically significant real negative correlation (p < 0.05) between BNP concentration and left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) with high correlation coefficient (r = -0.684). BNP concentrations were significantly higher among patients in Killip class II and III compared to Killip class I; Killip class I BNP = 226.18 pg/mL vs. Killip class II 622.51 pg/mL vs. Killip class III 1530.28 pg/mL, p < 0.001. BNP concentrations were significantly higher in patients with; (i) myocardial infarction vs. controls; (BNP 835.80 pg/mL vs. 243.03 pg/mL); (ii) in pts with positive major adverse cardiac events (MACE) vs. negative MACE (BNP 779.08 pg/mL vs. 242.28 pg/mL, p < 0.001); (iii) in pts with positive compared to negative left ventricle (LV) remodelling (BNP 840.77 pg/mL vs. 341.41 pg/mL, p < 0.001). Group with biphasic pattern of BNP release had significantly higher BNP concentration compared to monophasic pattern group. In biphasic pattern group we found significant presence of lower LVEF, Killip class II and III, LV remodelling and MACE. We found that BNP is strong marker of adverse cardiac events in patients presenting with a myocardial infarction. In our AMI group we found significant elevation of BNP and it is suspected that second peak secretion is not only due to systolic dysfunction and subsequent remodeling of LV but also due to impact of ischaemia. Patients with biphasic pattern probably have worse prognosis due to severe coronary heart disease. Besides its diagnostic role as a simple blood marker of systolic function, BNP is also important prognostic marker who helps making clinical decision about early invasive vs. conservative management.

Brain natriuretic peptide release in acute myocardial infarction.

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is released from ventricular myocites due to their stretching and volume overload. In heart failure there is BNP release. Aim of this study was to observe BNP release in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We measured BNP in 75 patients with AMI. Control group (n=61) was similar by age and gender to AMI group. We found statistically significant elevation of BNP compared to controls (462.875 pg/ml vs 35.356 pg/ml, p< 0.001). Patients with severe systolic dysfunction had the highest BNP levels, while patients with the preserved systolic function had the lowest BNP levels (Group with EF< 30% BNP= 1129.036 pg/ml vs Group with EF31-40 % BNP= 690.177 pg/ml vs Group with EF 41-50% BNP= 274.396 pg/ml vs Group with EF> 51% BNP= 189.566 pg/ml, p< 0.001). We found statistically significant light positive correlation between BNP and left ventricle end-diastolic diameter (LVDd) (r= 0.246, p<0.05). and real positive correlation between BNP and peak troponin levels (r= 0.441, p < 0.05). BNP levels were higher in anteroseptal allocation of AMI compared to inferior allocation (835.80 pg/ml vs 243.03 pg/ml, p< 0.001) and in patients who were treated with heparin compared to fibrinolitic therapy (507.885 pg/ml vs 354.73 pg/ml, p< 0.05). BNP is elevated in AMI and is a quantitative biochemical marker related to the extent of infarction and the left ventricle systolic dysfunction. Besides echocardiographic calculation, elevation of BNP could be used for quick and easy determination of the left ventricle systolic dysfunction.