Opioid-Induced Constipation and Bowel Dysfunction: A Clinical Guideline.

OBJECTIVE: To formulate timely evidence-based guidelines for the management of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction. SETTING: Constipation is a major untoward effect of opioids. Increasing prescription of opioids has correlated to increased incidence of opioid-induced constipation. However, the inhibitory effects of opioids are not confined to the colon, but also affect higher segments of the gastrointestinal tract, leading to the coining of the term "opioid-induced bowel dysfunction." METHODS: A literature search was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, and EMBASE Classic, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Predefined search terms and inclusion/exclusion criteria were used to identify and categorize relevant papers. A series of statements were formulated and justified by a comment, then labeled with the degree of agreement and their level of evidence as judged by the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) system. RESULTS: From a list of 10,832 potentially relevant studies, 33 citations were identified for review. Screening the reference lists of the pertinent papers identified additional publications. Current definitions, prevalence, and mechanism of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction were reviewed, and a treatment algorithm and statements regarding patient management were developed to provide guidance on clinical best practice in the management of patients with opioid-induced constipation and opioid-induced bowel dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: In recent years, more insight has been gained in the pathophysiology of this "entity"; new treatment approaches have been developed, but guidelines on clinical best practice are still lacking. Current knowledge is insufficient regarding management of the opioid side effects on the upper gastrointestinal tract, but recommendations can be derived from what we know at present.

Long-term intrathecal infusion of low-dose morphine effectively relieves symptoms of severe restless legs syndrome/Willis-Ekbom disease without inducing opioid tolerance.

ABSTRACT: Restless legs syndrome/Willis-Ekbom disease (RLS/WED) causes a strong urge to move legs while resting. Restless legs syndrome/WED is an often-inherited disease occurring in 3% to 10% of adult populations, increasing with age. Severity varies from mild disturbance of sleep to painful restless legs and arms, loss of sleep, fatigue, and risk of suicide. Dopaminergic drugs relieve symptoms, but cause augmentation, ie, initially helpful but later increase the burden of symptoms. Oral gabapentinoids and opioids are often added, but opioid tolerance and adverse effects are common. With the high prevalence and incomplete help from oral drugs, significant unmet needs exist for effective therapy for severe RLS/WED. Ongoing spinal intrathecal infusion of low-dose morphine is effective, but not generally recognized, as only 12 cases have been published since 2002. We report 7 patients suffering from severe RLS/WED, who had no relief from oral dopaminergic, gabapentinoid, or opioid drugs; they all had excellent relief during ongoing spinal intrathecal infusion of morphine at only 1 to 5 µg/h, ongoing for 1 to 21 years without need of higher doses of morphine.. We suggest that morphine may be transported with the cerebrospinal fluid reaching and readjusting malfunctioning dopamine neuronal systems in the brain and spinal cord. The effects last only as long as the infusion continues. A patient with RLS/WED and persistent genital arousal disorder (PGAD) was relieved of both RLS/WED and PGAD symptoms. These case reports suggest that intrathecal infusion of low-dose morphine is an effective treatment of severe RLS.

The individual and societal burden of chronic pain in Europe: the case for strategic prioritisation and action to improve knowledge and availability of appropriate care.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is common in Europe and elsewhere and its under treatment confers a substantial burden on individuals, employers, healthcare systems and society in general. Indeed, the personal and socioeconomic impact of chronic pain is as great as, or greater, than that of other established healthcare priorities. In light of review of recently published data confirming its clinical and socioeconomic impact, this paper argues that chronic pain should be ranked alongside other conditions of established priority in Europe. We outline strategies to help overcome barriers to effective pain care resulting in particular from deficiencies in education and access to interdisciplinary pain management services. We also address the confusion that exists between proper clinical and scientific uses of opioid medications and their potential for misuse and diversion, as reflected in international variations in the access to, and availability of, these agents. DISCUSSION: As the economic costs are driven in part by the costs of lost productivity, absenteeism and early retirement, pain management should aim to fully rehabilitate patients, rather than merely to relieve pain. Accredited education of physicians and allied health professionals regarding state-of-the-art pain management is crucial. Some progress has been made in this area, but further provision and incentivization is required. We support a tiered approach to pain management, whereby patients with pain uncontrolled by non-specialists are able to consult a physician with a pain competency or a specialist in pain medicine, who in turn can recruit the services of other professionals on a case-by-case basis. A fully integrated interdisciplinary pain service should ideally be available to patients with refractory pain. Governments and healthcare systems should ensure that their policies on controlled medications are balanced, safeguarding public health without undue restrictions that compromise patient care, and that physician education programmes support these aims. SUMMARY: Strategic prioritization and co-ordinated actions are required nationally and internationally to address the unacceptable and unnecessary burden of uncontrolled chronic pain that plagues European communities and economies. An appreciation of the 'return on investment' in pain management services will require policymakers to adopt a long-term, cross-budgetary approach.

[Regional analgesia--risks and benefits]. / Regionalanalgesi--fordeler og ulemper.

BACKGROUND: Local anaesthetics may alleviate pain more effectively than any other anaesthetic method. In regional anaesthesia/analgesia, rare but serious complications make it necessary to always consider the risk-benefit ratio. The article discusses these issues and gives advice on effective and safe conduct. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The article is based on non-systematic literature searches in the PubMed and Cochrane databases and our own experience from research and clinical work. RESULTS: Regional anaesthesia is obtained by administering local anaesthetics near the spinal cord and nerve roots (spinal, epidural), spinal nerves (paravertebral), or close to peripheral nerves. Parts of the body will then become numb and paralysed. The same techniques are used for regional analgesia, but this is obtained by using more dilute solutions of local anaesthetics, and other analgesic drugs are often added. Pain impulses are inhibited, but sensation of touch and muscle functions are intact. Regional analgesia gives superior relief of pain provoked by movement. This facilitates early postoperative mobilization of patients, even after major surgery in weak patients. For these patients optimally performed regional analgesia may reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality better than general anaesthesia and opioid and non-opioid analgesics administered postoperatively. Infiltration of the wound with local anaesthetics followed by optimally dosed non-opioid and opioid analgesics is a good alternative for some types of surgery. The risk of spinal bleeding has increased due to increased patient age, routine thromboprophylaxis and frequent use of antihaemostatic drugs, including platelet inhibitors. Infections in the spinal cord are caused by insufficient hygiene. Selection of patients who are likely to benefit from regional anaesthesia/analgesia, strict hygienic precautions, optimal technique, close monitoring, and assistance from an acute pain team, as well as hospital protocols for handling rare but serious complications, have reduced the occurrence and consequences of serious complications. INTERPRETATION: Optimal regional anaesthesia/analgesia may improve the postoperative result.

[The elderly need better pain treatment]. / Eldre trenger bedre smertebehandling.

Age distribution in developed countries is currently shifting towards older age. However, knowledge regarding diseases and treatment of the oldest patients remains incomplete, especially when it comes to acute and chronic pain. Pain assessment is complicated in these patients as they often have more than one diagnosis contributing to the clinical picture, in addition age-related changes in pain perception and cognitive impairment render evaluation of subjective symptoms difficult. Multidisciplinary pain management programmes that combine pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment have proven efficacious in elderly patients. The choice of analgesics demands an understanding of age-related changes in drug-metabolism, co-morbidity and concurrent medication. Adjustment of drug doses and evaluation of benefits and risks should be tailored to each individual. There is an urgent need for better professional education programmes and further dedicated research specifically targeted to the needs of the elderly in our community.

[Do women with Caesarean section have to choose between pain relief and breastfeeding?]. / Må keisersnittspasienter velge mellom smertebehandling og amming?

BACKGROUND: The Caesarean section is a unique surgical procedure in that physicians postoperatively not only have to cater to the mothers' need for analgesics, but must also take into account the impact of this medication on the infant. Too cautious prescription of strong analgesics postoperatively may have untoward consequences, such as immobilisation and delayed onset of breastfeeding. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A questionnaire on procedures for standard postoperative analgesics after Caesarean section was sent to the 46 Norwegian hospitals with anaesthesiology departments organized in conjunction with delivery units. 38 questionnaires were returned to us. RESULTS: Most of these hospitals routinely prescribe both Paracetamol (95%) and NSAID (90%) in postoperative care immediately after Caesarean section. However, only 61% routinely prescribed an opioid. INTERPRETATION: When the mother is most in need of opioid analgesics, lactation is barely established. Therefore, even if traces of opioids are absorbed into the mother's milk, the doses will be very small and the infant's oral bioavailability at this time is likely to be low. Consequently, there is little evidence to support a policy of overly restrictive use of opioids.

Reducing risk of spinal haematoma from spinal and epidural pain procedures.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Central neuraxial blocks (CNB: epidural, spinal and their combinations) and other spinal pain procedures can cause serious harm to the spinal cord in patients on antihaemostatic drugs or who have other risk-factors for bleeding in the spinal canal. The purpose of this narrative review is to provide a practise advisory on how to reduce risk of spinal cord injury from spinal haematoma (SH) during CNBs and other spinal pain procedures. Scandinavian guidelines from 2010 are part of the background for this practise advisory. METHODS: We searched recent guidelines, PubMed (MEDLINE), SCOPUS and EMBASE for new and relevant randomised controlled trials (RCT), case-reports and original articles concerning benefits of neuraxial blocks, risks of SH due to anti-haemostatic drugs, patient-related risk factors, especially renal impairment with delayed excretion of antihaemostatic drugs, and specific risk factors related to the neuraxial pain procedures. RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Epidural and spinal analgesic techniques, as well as their combination provide superior analgesia and reduce the risk of postoperative and obstetric morbidity and mortality. Spinal pain procedure can be highly effective for cancer patients, less so for chronic non-cancer patients. We did not identify any RCT with SH as outcome. We evaluated risks and recommend precautions for SH when patients are treated with antiplatelet, anticoagulant, or fibrinolytic drugs, when patients' comorbidities may increase risks, and when procedure-specific risk factors are present. Inserting and withdrawing epidural catheters appear to have similar risks for initiating a SH. Invasive neuraxial pain procedures, e.g. spinal cord stimulation, have higher risks of bleeding than traditional neuraxial blocks. We recommend robust monitoring routines and treatment protocol to ensure early diagnosis and effective treatment of SH should this rare but potentially serious complication occur. CONCLUSIONS: When neuraxial analgesia is considered for a patient on anti-haemostatic medication, with patient-related, or procedure-related risk factors, the balance of benefits against risks of bleeding is decisive; when CNB are offered exclusively to patients who will have a reduction of postoperative morbidity and mortality, then a higher risk of bleeding may be accepted. Robust routines should ensure appropriate discontinuation of anti-haemostatic drugs and early detection and treatment of SH. IMPLICATIONS: There is an on-going development of drugs for prevention of thromboembolic events following surgery and childbirth. The present practise advisory provides up-to-date knowledge and experts' experiences so that patients who will greatly benefit from neuraxial pain procedures and have increased risk of bleeding can safely benefit from these procedures. There are always individual factors for the clinician to evaluate and consider. Increasingly it is necessary for the anaesthesia and analgesia provider to collaborate with specialists in haemostasis. Surgeons and obstetricians must be equally well prepared to collaborate for the best outcome for their patients suffering from acute or chronic pain. Optimal pain management is a prerequisite for enhanced recovery after surgery, but there is a multitude of additional concerns, such as early mobilisation, early oral feeding and ileus prevention that surgeons and anaesthesia providers need to optimise for the best outcome and least risk of complications.

Adding propacetamol to ketorolac increases the tolerance to painful pressure.

UNLABELLED: Combining an NSAID and paracetamol (acetaminophen) has in some studies given superior analgesia compared with the single drugs. In other trials no additive effect has been found. We have investigated the effect of this drug combination on the pressure pain tolerance threshold (PPTT), a reproducible correlate to clinical pain. The aim of this double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover study was to evaluate the effect of i.v. propacetamol 2 g (= paracetamol 1 g) and ketorolac 30 mg, individually and in combination, on PPTT in 16 volunteers on four separate days. PPTT was measured 15 min before and at 45, 60, 90 and 150 min after the start of test drug administration. The pressure stimuli were applied on the base of a fingernail, increasing by 30 kPa/s until the pressure pain tolerance threshold was reached. For the total observation period (150 min), only the combination (propacetamol+ketorolac) increased significantly PPTT compared with baseline (P<0.04), while PPTT decreased significantly after placebo (P<0.01). The combination (propacetamol+ketorolac) and ketorolac alone increased PPTT compared with placebo (combination vs. placebo and ketorolac vs. placebo, P<0.001) and with propacetamol (combination vs. propacetamol and ketorolac vs. propacetamol, P<0.001). The combination was significantly better than ketorolac alone (P<0.04). After propacetamol 2 g, PPTT did not change significantly neither compared with placebo or baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Tolerance to repeated painful pressure (PPTT) decreased after placebo. Ketorolac 30 mg caused an increase in PPTT compared with placebo but not with baseline. Adding propacetamol 2 g to ketorolac 30 mg significantly increased PPTT. These findings support the practice of combining paracetamol with an NSAID for relief of acute pain.

Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment.

UNLABELLED: This large scale computer-assisted telephone survey was undertaken to explore the prevalence, severity, treatment and impact of chronic pain in 15 European countries and Israel. Screening interviews identified respondents aged 18 years with chronic pain for in-depth interviews. 19% of 46,394 respondents willing to participate (refusal rate 46%) had suffered pain for 6 months, had experienced pain in the last month and several times during the last week. Their pain intensity was 5 on a 10-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (1 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable) during last episode of pain. In-depth interviews with 4839 respondents with chronic pain (about 300 per country) showed: 66% had moderate pain (NRS = 5-7), 34% had severe pain (NRS = 8-10), 46% had constant pain, 54% had intermittent pain. 59% had suffered with pain for two to 15 years, 21% had been diagnosed with depression because of their pain, 61% were less able or unable to work outside the home, 19% had lost their job and 13% had changed jobs because of their pain. 60% visited their doctor about their pain 2-9 times in the last six months. Only 2% were currently treated by a pain management specialist. One-third of the chronic pain sufferers were currently not being treated. Two-thirds used non-medication treatments, e.g,. massage (30%), physical therapy (21%), acupuncture (13%). Almost half were taking non-prescription analgesics; 'over the counter' (OTC) NSAIDs (55%), paracetamol (43%), weak opioids (13%). Two-thirds were taking prescription medicines: NSAIDs (44%), weak opioids (23%), paracetamol (18%), COX-2 inhibitors (1-36%), and strong opioids (5%). Forty percent had inadequate management of their pain. Interesting differences between countries were observed, possibly reflecting differences in cultural background and local traditions in managing chronic pain. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pain of moderate to severe intensity occurs in 19% of adult Europeans, seriously affecting the quality of their social and working lives. Very few were managed by pain specialists and nearly half received inadequate pain management. Although differences were observed between the 16 countries, we have documented that chronic pain is a major health care problem in Europe that needs to be taken more seriously.

Methylprednisolone reduces pain, emesis, and fatigue after breast augmentation surgery: a single-dose, randomized, parallel-group study with methylprednisolone 125 mg, parecoxib 40 mg, and placebo.

We compared methylprednisolone 125 mg IV (n = 68) and parecoxib 40 mg IV (n = 68) with placebo (n = 68) given before breast augmentation surgery in a randomized, double-blind parallel group study. Surgery was performed under local anesthesia combined with propofol/fentanyl sedation. Methylprednisolone and parecoxib decreased pain at rest and dynamic pain intensity from 1 to 6 h after surgery compared with placebo (mean summed pain intensity(1-6 h): methylprednisolone [17.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14.85-19.65] versus placebo [21.7; 95% CI, 19.3-24.1]; P < 0.03; parecoxib [15.25; 95% CI, 13.25-17.25] versus placebo; P < 0.001; mean summed dynamic pain intensity(1-6 h): methylprednisolone [22.7; 95% CI, 20.1-23.3] versus placebo [28.4; 95% CI, 26.0-30.8]; P < 0.01; parecoxib [20.9; 95% CI, 18.6-23.2] versus placebo; P < 0.001). Both rescue drug consumption and actual pain (all observations before and after rescue) during the first 6 h were similar in the two active drug groups and significantly reduced compared with placebo. Using a composite score of actual pain intensity and rescue analgesic use, the active drugs were significantly superior to placebo (P < 0.001 for both active drugs). Postoperative nausea and vomiting was reduced after methylprednisolone administration (incidence, 30%), but not after parecoxib (incidence, 37%), during the first 24 h compared with placebo (incidence, 60%; P < 0.001). Fatigue was reduced by methylprednisolone (incidence, 44%), but not by parecoxib (incidence, 59%), compared with placebo (incidence, 66%; P < 0.05). In conclusion, methylprednisolone 125 mg IV given before breast augmentation surgery had analgesic and rescue analgesic-sparing effects comparable with those of parecoxib 40 mg IV. Methylprednisolone, but not parecoxib, reduced nausea, vomiting, and fatigue.