Benefits and harms of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for reversal of vitamin K antagonist associated bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is used for reversal of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with bleeding complications. This study aims to assess benefits and harms of 4-factor PCC compared to fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or no treatment in VKA associated bleeding. PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched from 1945 to August 2015. Studies reporting 4-factor PCC use for VKA associated bleeding and providing data on INR normalization, mortality or thromboembolic (TE) complications were eligible. Two authors screened titles and full articles for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Mortality data were pooled using Mantel-Haenszel random effects meta-analysis. Nineteen studies were included (N = 2878); 18 cohort studies and one RCT. Six studies had good methodological quality, 9 moderate and 4 poor. Baseline INR values ranged from 2.2 to >20. The INR within 1 h after PCC administration ranged from 1.4 to 1.9, and after FFP administration from 2.2 to 12. PCC reduced the time to reach INR correction in comparison with FFP or no treatment. The observed mortality rate ranged from 0 to 43% (mean 17%) in the PCC, 4.8-54% (mean 16%) in the FFP and 23-69% (mean 51%) in the no treatment group. Meta-analysis of mortality data resulted in an OR of 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-1.5) for PCC versus FFP and an OR 0.41 (95% CI 0.13-1.3) for PCC versus no treatment. TE complications were observed in 0-18% (mean 2.5%) of PCC and in 6.4% of FFP recipients. Four-factor PCC is an effective and safe option in reversal of VKA bleeding events.

Emergencies on direct oral anticoagulants: Management, outcomes, and laboratory effects of prothrombin complex concentrate.

BACKGROUND: In the initial absence of specific reversal agents for factor Xa inhibitors (FXa-Is), prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) as a hemostatic agent has been recommended by guidelines. Since 2017, idarucizumab has been registered for dabigatran reversal. Still, data on the clinical outcome of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-related emergencies (major bleeding or urgent interventions) is scarce. In addition, it is unknown to what extent PCC restores thrombin generation in FXa-I-related emergencies. Our aim was to describe management and clinical outcomes of DOAC-related emergencies and to assess the laboratory effect of PCC in patients with FXa-I emergencies. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study in 5 Dutch hospitals, patients presenting with DOAC-related emergencies were eligible. The primary outcome was effective hemostasis according to the ISTH definition. Safety outcomes were 30-day mortality and thromboembolic rate. In patients treated with PCC, additional blood samples were taken to assess the effect on thrombin generation. RESULTS: We included 101 patients with major bleeding (FXa-I, 76; dabigatran, 25) and 21 patients requiring an urgent intervention (FXa-I, 16; dabigatran, 5). Of patients with major bleeding, 67% were treated with PCC or idarucizumab. Effective hemostasis, 30-day mortality, and thromboembolism rate were 67%, 22%, and 1%, respectively. In a subset of bleeding patients on FXa-I managed with PCC, thrombin generation increased, with 96% immediately after PCC administration. In patients requiring an urgent intervention, effective hemostasis, 30-day mortality, and thromboembolic rate were 95%, 14%, and 5%. CONCLUSIONS: Effective hemostasis was achieved in the majority of patients presenting with DOAC-related emergencies;, thromboembolic complications were rare, and mortality was quite high.

Clinical Impact and Course of Anticoagulant-Related Major Bleeding in Cancer Patients.

Cancer patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) have a two- to six-fold increased risk of anticoagulant-related major bleeding events compared with VTE patients without cancer. It is unknown whether major bleeding events are more severe in cancer patients than in those without cancer. Individual patient data from four randomized phase III trials that compared factor Xa inhibitors and vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of VTE were used to compare the severity of major bleeding events in patients with and without cancer. Using predefined criteria, the severity of the clinical presentation and course of major bleeding events were classified into four categories of increasing severity. A one-stage meta-analysis was used to evaluate the effect of cancer on the severity of the clinical presentation and course by estimating crude odds ratios (ORs) and ORs adjusted for age, sex and anticoagulant type with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The study group comprised 290 patients with major bleeding, of whom 50 (17%) had cancer. The clinical presentation was judged to be severe (category 3 or 4) in 38% of patients with cancer and 44% of patients without cancer (adjusted OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.47-1.72). The clinical course was found to be severe in 20 and 25% of patients with and without cancer, respectively (adjusted OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.35-1.61). The present study suggests that the clinical presentation and course of anticoagulant-related major bleeding events are not more severe in cancer patients than in patients without cancer. This may be reassuring for physicians who treat cancer patients with anticoagulant-related bleeding.

Clinical outcome of patients with a vitamin K antagonist-associated bleeding treated with prothrombin complex concentrate.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are used for the treatment of thromboembolism. Patients with severe VKA-associated bleeding require immediate restoration of haemostasis. Clinical studies on the effect of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) are heterogeneous with respect to outcome of bleeding. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcome of patients treated with PCC for VKA-associated bleeding. METHODS: We performed a cohort study of consecutive patients who received PCC for VKA-related bleeding in five Dutch hospitals. Data were collected by chart review on the bleeding event, international normalized ratio (INR), haemostatic efficacy, thromboembolic (TE) complications, and mortality. The primary outcome was effective haemostasis, assessed by an adaptation of the Sarode criteria with a surrogate outcome for patients with ICH without repeat CT. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included. Mean age was 74 years, 54% were male and 79% received VKA for atrial fibrillation. Most patients presented with ICH (41%) or GI bleeding (36%). Effective haemostasis was achieved in 67/98 (68%) patients using the adapted classification. Surrogate outcomes were applied for 32 patients and data for two patients was missing. Median pre-treatment INR was 3.9 (IQR 2.9-5.8). One hour after PCC infusion, the INR was available for 50 patients and of these, 35 (70%) had an INR ≤1.4. TE complications occurred in five patients and 22 died (60% bleeding-related) within 30 days. CONCLUSION: PCC achieved effective haemostasis in 68% of evaluable patients with VKA-associated bleeding. TE complication rates were low, but mortality rates were high, due to the large number of patients with ICH.

Impact of age, comorbidity, and polypharmacy on the efficacy and safety of edoxaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism: An analysis of the randomized, double-blind Hokusai-VTE trial.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are elderly, have multiple comorbidities and take several concomitant medications. Physicians may prefer warfarin over direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in such patients because comparative data are lacking. This analysis was designed to determine the effects of advanced age, comorbidities, and polypharmacy on the efficacy and safety of edoxaban and warfarin in patients with VTE. METHODS: Using data from the Hokusai-VTE study, we report rates of recurrent VTE and of clinically relevant bleeding by age category (<65, 65-75, and ≥75; <80 versus ≥80years), and by number of comorbidities (0, 1-2, >2) and concomitant medications (<3, 3-5, >5). Hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for edoxaban versus warfarin were determined and Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to construct time-to-event curves. At 3months, pre- and postdose levels of edoxaban were measured using mass spectrometry. For warfarin-treated patients, the time in therapeutic range was calculated. The study was approved by institutional review boards; informed consent was obtained. RESULTS: Recurrent VTE increased with advanced age, multiple comorbidities, and polypharmacy in warfarin-treated patients but not with edoxaban. Edoxaban was more effective than warfarin in patients ≥75years of age and in those with multiple comorbidities. In the 517 patients over 80years of age, recurrent VTE occurred in 2.8% given edoxaban and in 5.7% given warfarin (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.21-1.24). Bleeding increased with age, comorbidity, and polypharmacy regardless of treatment, but the relative safety of edoxaban versus well-managed warfarin was maintained. Age, comorbidity, and polypharmacy did not impact edoxaban concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a once-daily fixed dose of edoxaban is more effective and at least as safe as warfarin in high-risk VTE patients identified by older age, more comorbidities, and polypharmacy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00986154.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Pulmonary Embolism: Importance of Anatomical Extent.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) studies used direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with or without initial heparin. We aimed to (1) evaluate if PE patients benefit from initial heparin; (2) describe patient characteristics in the DOAC studies; and (3) investigate whether the anatomical extent of PE correlates with N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, cause of PE, and recurrence rate. Our methods were (1) an indirect meta-analysis comparing the recurrence risk in DOAC-treated patients with or without initial heparin to those patients given heparin/vitamin K antagonist (VKA). (2) To compare the PE studies, information was extracted on baseline characteristics including anatomical extent. (3) The Hokusai-VTE study was used to correlate anatomical extent of PE with NT-proBNP levels, causes of PE, and recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). The meta-analysis included 11,539 PE patients. The relative risk of recurrent VTE with DOACs versus heparin/VKAs was 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6-1.1) with heparin lead-in and 1.1 (95% CI: 0.8-1.5) without heparin. In the DOAC studies, the proportion of patients with extensive PE varied from 24 to 47%. In Hokusai-VTE, NT-proBNP was elevated in 4% of patients with limited and in over 60% of patients with extensive disease. Cause of PE and anatomical extent were not related. Recurrence rates increased from 1.6% with limited to 3.2% with extensive disease in heparin/edoxaban-treated patients, and from 2.4 to 3.9% in heparin/warfarin recipients. In conclusion, indirect evidence suggests a heparin lead-in before DOACs may be advantageous in PE. Anatomical extent was related to elevated NT-proBNP and outcome, but not to PE cause.

Clinical impact of major bleeding in patients with venous thromboembolism treated with factor Xa inhibitors or vitamin K antagonists. An individual patient data meta-analysis.

Factor Xa (fXa)-inhibitors are as effective and safer than vitamin-K-antagonists (VKA) in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We previously classified the severity of clinical presentation and course of all major bleeding events from the EINSTEIN, AMPLIFY and HOKUSAI-VTE trials separately. The current aim was to combine these findings in order to increase precision, assess a class effect and analyse presentation and course for different types of bleeding, i. e. intracranial, gastro-intestinal, and other. We classified the clinical presentation and course of all major bleeding events using pre-defined criteria. Both classifications comprised four categories; one being the mildest, and four the most severe. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for all events classified as category three or four between fXa-inhibitors and VKA recipients. Also, ORs were computed for different types of bleeding. Major bleeding occurred in 111 fXa-inhibitor recipients and in 187 LMWH/VKA recipients. The clinical presentation was classified as category three or four in 35 % and 48 % of the major bleeds in fXa inhibitor and VKA recipients, respectively (OR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.36-0.97). For intracranial, gastro-intestinal and other bleeding a trend towards a less severe presentation was observed for patients treated with fXa inhibitors. Clinical course was classified as severe in 22 % of the fXa inhibitor and 25 % of the VKA associated bleeds (OR 0.83, 95 % CI 0.47-1.46). In conclusion, FXa inhibitor associated major bleeding events had a significantly less severe presentation and a similar course compared to VKA. This finding was consistent for different types of bleeding.

Clinical impact of major bleeding in patients with venous thromboembolism treated with factor Xa inhibitors or vitamin K antagonists.

Factor Xa (fXa)-inhibitors are as effective and safer than vitamin-K-antagonists (VKA) in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We previously classified the severity of clinical presentation and course of all major bleeding events from the EINSTEIN, AMPLIFY and HOKUSAI-VTE trials separately. The current aim was to combine these findings in order to increase precision, assess a class effect and analyse presentation and course for different types of bleeding, i. e. intracranial, gastro-intestinal, and other. We classified the clinical presentation and course of all major bleeding events using pre-defined criteria. Both classifications comprised four categories; one being the mildest, and four the most severe. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for all events classified as category three or four between fXa-inhibitors and VKA recipients. Also, ORs were computed for different types of bleeding. Major bleeding occurred in 111 fXa-inhibitor recipients and in 187 LMWH/VKA recipients. The clinical presentation was classified as category three or four in 35% and 48% of the major bleeds in fXa inhibitor and VKA recipients, respectively (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.36-0.97). For intracranial, gastro-intestinal and other bleeding a trend towards a less severe presentation was observed for patients treated with fXa inhibitors. Clinical course was classified as severe in 22% of the fXa inhibitor and 25% of the VKA associated bleeds (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.47-1.46). In conclusion, FXa inhibitor associated major bleeding events had a significantly less severe presentation and a similar course compared to VKA. This finding was consistent for different types of bleeding.

Abnormal vaginal bleeding in women with venous thromboembolism treated with apixaban or warfarin.

Abnormal vaginal bleeding can complicate direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment. We aimed to investigate the characteristics of abnormal vaginal bleeding in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) receiving apixaban or enoxaparin/warfarin. Data were derived from the AMPLIFY trial. We compared the incidence of abnormal vaginal bleeding between patients in both treatment arms and collected information on clinical presentation, diagnostic procedures, management and outcomes. In the AMPLIFY trial, 1122 women were treated with apixaban and 1106 received enoxaparin/warfarin. A clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) vaginal bleeding occurred in 28 (2.5 %) apixaban and 24 (2.1 %) enoxaparin/warfarin recipients (odds ratio [OR] 1.2, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.7-2.0). Of all CRNM bleeds, 28 of 62 (45 %) and 24 of 120 (20 %) were of vaginal origin in the apixaban and enoxaparin/warfarin group, respectively (OR 3.4; 95 % CI 1.8-6.7). Premenopausal vaginal bleeds on apixaban were characterised by more prolonged bleeding (OR 2.3; 95 %CI 0.5-11). In both pre- and postmenopausal vaginal bleeds, diagnostic tests were performed in six (21 %) and in seven (29 %) apixaban and enoxaparin/warfarin treated patients, respectively. Medical treatment was deemed not necessary in 16 (57 %) apixaban and 16 (67 %) enoxaparin/warfarin recipients. The severity of clinical presentation and course of the bleeds was mild in 75 % of the cases in both groups. In conclusion, although the absolute number of vaginal bleeding events is comparable between apixaban and enoxaparin/warfarin recipients, the relative occurrence of vaginal bleeds is higher in apixaban-treated women. The characteristics and severity of bleeding episodes were comparable in both treatment arms.

Outpatient Management in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism with Edoxaban: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Hokusai-VTE Study.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) facilitate the outpatient treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the pivotal trials of DOACs have not reported outcomes separately for patients managed either as outpatients or in the hospital. We performed a subgroup analysis of the Hokusai-VTE study comparing efficacy and safety of edoxaban with warfarin in 8,292 patients with acute VTE. Patients received initial therapy with open-label enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin for ≥5 days in the hospital or as an outpatient at the discretion of the treating physician. Edoxaban or warfarin was then given for 3 to 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was the cumulative incidence of symptomatic recurrent VTE at 12 months. The principal safety outcome was the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (composite of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding). Of the 5,223 consecutively enrolled patients with recorded hospital status and length of stay, 1,414 patients (27.1%) were managed as outpatients and 3,809 were managed in hospital. Among the outpatients, initial presentation was symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) in 1,183 patients (83.7%) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in 231 patients (16.3%). Among the outpatients with DVT, recurrent VTE occurred in 18 (3.0%) given edoxaban and in 21 (3.6%) given warfarin (risk difference: −0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.6 to 1.4). The principal safety outcome in outpatients occurred in 46 edoxaban patients (7.7%) and in 48 warfarin patients (8.3%; risk difference: −0.59, 95% CI: −3.7 to 2.5). Most outpatients had symptomatic DVT at presentation. In these patients, initial heparin followed by edoxaban had similar efficacy and safety to standard therapy with heparin and warfarin.

Clinical impact and course of major bleeding with edoxaban versus vitamin K antagonists.

Edoxaban is a once-daily direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). The Hokusai-VTE study revealed that, after initial treatment with heparin, edoxaban was non-inferior to and safer than vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in the prevention of recurrent deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. This is the first report on the clinical relevance and management of bleeding events with edoxaban. All major bleeding events were classified blindly by three study-independent adjudicators. Pre-defined criteria were used to classify severity of clinical presentation and, separately, the clinical course and outcome into four categories. Major bleeding occurred in 56 patients treated with edoxaban and 65 patients treated with VKA. The severest categories (3 or 4) of the clinical presentation were assigned to 46 % of the major bleeding episodes in edoxaban recipients versus 58 % of the major bleeds in VKA recipients (odds ratio [OR] 0.62, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.30-1.27, p = 0.19). Clinical course was classified as severe (category 3 or 4) in 23 % of the edoxaban and 29 % of the VKA associated bleeds (OR 0.73, 95 % CI 0.32-1.66, p = 0.46). In conclusion, edoxaban associated major bleeding events have a comparable clinical presentation and course to major bleeds with VKA in patients treated for venous thromboembolism in the Hokusai-VTE study. These results may assure physicians that it is safe to prescribe this medication. If a major bleeding during edoxaban treatment occurs, its clinical presentation and clinical course are not worse than in VKA-treated patients.

Dose reduction of edoxaban preserves efficacy and safety for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. An analysis of the randomised, double-blind HOKUSAI VTE trial.

Direct oral anticoagulants simplify venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment by obviating the need for coagulation monitoring. Nonetheless, renal function, body weight and P-glycoprotein inhibitors influence drug levels. The objective of this analysis was to determine whether reduction in edoxaban dose based on clinical criteria avoids excess drug exposure and preserves efficacy and safety in the Hokusai-VTE study. After initial heparin, patients received edoxaban or warfarin for 3-12 months. Edoxaban was given once daily at a dose of 60 mg, which was reduced to 30 mg in patients with a creatinine clearance of 30-50 ml/minute, body weight ≤60 kg or receiving certain P-glycoprotein inhibitors. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent VTE and the principal safety outcome was major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding. A total of 8292 patients with acute VTE were randomised, 733 and 719 patients in the edoxaban and warfarin groups met the criteria for dose reduction. These patients were older, more often female or Asian and had more extensive VTE. Edoxaban levels were lower in the 30 mg edoxaban group. Rates of recurrent VTE and bleeding with the 30 mg and 60 mg edoxaban dose were comparable: VTE rates were 3.0 % and 3.2 % and clinically relevant bleeding rates were 7.9 % and 8.6 %, respectively. Rates of recurrent VTE and bleeding in the warfarin-treated patients meeting the criteria for dose reduction were 4.2 % and 12.8 %, respectively. The reduced dose edoxaban regimen maintained efficacy and safety compared with the 60 mg dose but was safer than warfarin in patients meeting the criteria for dose reduction.

Extended duration of anticoagulation with edoxaban in patients with venous thromboembolism: a post-hoc analysis of the Hokusai-VTE study.

BACKGROUND: There are few data on the relative efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants, such as edoxaban, compared with vitamin K antagonists during extended therapy for venous thromboembolism. This analysis evaluates the risk-benefit of extended treatment for up to 12 months with edoxaban compared with warfarin among patients enrolled in the Hokusai-VTE study who continued therapy beyond 3 months. METHODS: The Hokusai-VTE trial (NCT00986154) was a randomised, double-blind, event driven non-inferiority trial in 8292 patients comparing edoxaban with warfarin in the treatment of patients with acute venous thromboembolism. All patients were treated for at least 3 months and treatment was continued for up to 12 months. The outcomes at 12 months were documented in all patients irrespective of treatment duration. 3633 patients treated with edoxaban and 3594 treated with warfarin who completed 3 months of treatment were eligible for this analysis. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of adjudicated symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism evaluated for each of the time intervals of 3 months, greater than 3 months to 6 months, greater than 6 months to less than 12 months, and at 12 months, as well as the cumulative incidence occurring between 3 and 12 months. The principal safety outcome was the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (composite of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding). Both on-treatment and intention-to-treat analyses were done. FINDINGS: In the on-treatment analysis, the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism at 3 months was 1·1% (0·8-1·4; 44 of 4118 patients) in the edoxaban-treated group versus 1·2% (0·9-1·6; 51 of 4122) in the warfarin-treated group; between greater than 3 months and 6 months, 0·7% (0·3-1·5; eight of 1076) versus 0·5% (0·2-1·1; five of 1084); between greater than 6 months and less than 12 months, 0·2% (0·0-0·8; two of 896) versus 0·8% (0·03-1·7; seven of 851); and at 12 months, <0·1% (0·0-0·3; one of 1661) versus 0·1% (0·0-0·4; two of 1659). In the on-treatment analysis, the cumulative incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism between 3 and 12 months was 0·3% (95% CI 0·2-1·5; 11 of 3633 patients) in the edoxaban-treated group and 0·4% (0·2-1·7; 14 of 3594) in the warfarin-treated group (HR 0·78, 95% CI 0·36-1·72). The cumulative incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (major or non-major) between 3 and 12 months was 3·9% (95% CI 3·3-4·6; 143 of 3633 patients) in the edoxaban-treated group and 4·1% (3·5-4·8; 147 of 3594 patients) in the warfarin-treated group (HR 0·97, 95% CI 0·77-1·22); cumulative incidence of major bleeding was 0·3% (95% CI 0·2-0·5; 11 of 3633 patients) in the edoxaban-treated group and 0·7% (0·4-1·0; 24 of 3594 patients) in the warfarin-treated group (HR 0·45, 95% CI 0·22-0·92). Similar results were obtained in the intention-to-treat analysis. INTERPRETATION: Extended treatment with edoxaban is effective and associated with less major bleeding than warfarin. Edoxaban once daily provides an attractive alternative to warfarin for patients with venous thromboembolism who require extended treatment for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. FUNDING: Daiichi Sankyo.

Recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with pulmonary embolism and right ventricular dysfunction: a post-hoc analysis of the Hokusai-VTE study.

BACKGROUND: In patients with pulmonary embolism, right ventricular dysfunction is associated with early mortality. The Hokusai-VTE study used N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and right to left ventricular diameter ratio on CT as indicators of right ventricular dysfunction and reported that recurrent venous thromboembolism rates were lower with edoxaban than warfarin. The aim of the current study was to further explore the significance of right ventricular dysfunction and investigate potential explanations for the superiority of edoxaban-ie, differences in baseline clinical characteristics, duration of initial heparin treatment, bleeding rates, or quality of warfarin treatment. METHODS: The Hokusai-VTE trial was a randomised, double-blind, event-driven non-inferiority trial in patients from centres in 37 countries that compared edoxaban with warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. Patients received treatment for at least 3 months and up to a maximum of 12 months. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Outcome data at 12 months was collected for all patients irrespective of treatment duration. This prespecified subgroup analysis focuses on the included patients with pulmonary embolism. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of adjudicated symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism defined as a composite of deep vein thrombosis or non-fatal or fatal pulmonary embolism at 12 months. Recurrence rates with edoxaban and warfarin were compared in patients with and without right ventricular dysfunction. In those with NT-proBNP concentrations of 500 pg/mL or higher, we compared baseline characteristics, duration of heparin treatment, and bleeding leading to study drug discontinuation in the edoxaban and warfarin groups. We also assessed quality of warfarin treatment. All analyses were done with the modified intention-to-treat population. The Hokusai-VTE trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00986154. FINDINGS: Between Jan 28, 2010, and Oct 5, 2012, 8292 patients were enrolled from 439 centres, of whom 8240 received at least one dose of study drug. 3319 patients had pulmonary embolism. NT-proBNP was 500 pg/mL or higher in 465 (30%) of 1565 patients given edoxaban and in 507 (32%) of 1599 given warfarin. Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 14 (3%) of 465 patients in the edoxaban group and 30 (6%) of 507 in the warfarin group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·50, 95% CI 0·26-0·94; p=0·033). The right to left ventricular diameter ratio was 0·9 or higher in 414 (44%) of 937 patients in the edoxaban group and 427 (45%) of 946 in the warfarin group. Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 11 (3%) of 414 and 20 (5%) of 427 patients in the edoxaban and warfarin groups (HR 0·57, 95% CI 0·27-1·17; p=0·13). Baseline characteristics, duration of heparin treatment, and rates of bleeding leading to study drug discontinuation were similar in the edoxaban and warfarin groups and the quality of warfarin management was adequate for patients with NT-proBNP concentrations of 500 pg/mL or higher. INTERPRETATION: Findings from our analysis suggest that edoxaban is more effective than warfarin in the treatment and prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with pulmonary embolism and evidence of right ventricular dysfunction. FUNDING: Daiichi Sankyo.