Same-Day Discharge Does Not Increase Resource Utilization Within One Year of Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: While the safety of rapid recovery total joint arthroplasty is well established, less is known about its impact on postoperative care utilization patterns. We wished to examine whether same-day discharge-and its associated presumed reduction in hospital-based postoperative care and education-translates to the need for more postoperative support during the 1-year recovery period. METHODS: A retrospective review of 1,237 total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 1,710 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who had 0- or 1-day length of stay (LOS) from January 2020 to October 2023 was conducted. The primary outcome was the number of follow-up visits with total joint arthroplasty providers at our institution during the 1-year postoperative period. Secondary outcomes included 30-day emergency department returns, readmissions, 1-year physical therapy utilization, and improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function scores at 6 to 12 months postoperatively. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed to compare outcomes between 0-day and 1-day LOS THA and TKA patients. RESULTS: In both the THA and TKA populations, 0-day LOS patients were younger, had a lower average body mass index, were more likely to be White, men, and had an American Society of Anesthesiologists score < 3 than 1-day LOS patients. After controlling for differences between groups, no significant differences in the number of one-year follow-up visits, physical therapy visits, emergency department returns, or readmissions were seen between 0 and 1-day THA or TKA patients. In TKA patients, 1-day LOS was associated with lower improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function scores. CONCLUSIONS: After risk adjustment, same-day discharge of THA and TKA patients did not result in increased resource utilization during the one-year postoperative period. In the setting of a coordinated joint arthroplasty program with nurse navigator support, same-day discharge can be safely performed without increasing the need for postoperative care in appropriately selected patients undergoing both THA and TKA.

Non-White Race and Concomitant Orthopedic Conditions Are Risk Factors for Failure to Achieve Clinically Relevant Improvement After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Data from the American Joint Replacement Registry demonstrate that 1-year minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rates after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are substantially lower when using general patient reported outcome measures, such as Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), than joint specific measures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient characteristics and outcomes associated with MCID achievement after TKA using the PROMIS-PF measure. METHODS: A retrospective review of 263 patients undergoing TKA with preoperative and 1-year postoperative PROMIS-PF scores from March 12, 2020 to February 8, 2022 was performed. Three multivariate models were built to evaluate predictors of MCID achievement. Preoperative predictors evaluated included demographics, comorbidities, history of spine and knee surgery, and baseline PROMIS-PF. Postoperative clinical outcomes evaluated included lengths of stay, discharge statuses, complications, and utilizations of other orthopaedic services. RESULTS: There were 109 patients (41%) who achieved an MCID at 1-year postoperatively. Non-white patients had 2.17 times lower odds of achieving MCID. No clinical outcomes assessed were independently predictive of MCID achievement. During the 1-year postoperative period, 63% of patients sought care for another orthopaedic condition. Patients requiring postoperative injections on another joint had a 2.27 times lower odds of achieving MCID. Those seen for spine conditions postoperatively had a 2.44 lower odds of achieving MCID. CONCLUSIONS: Race, postoperative injections, and treatment for spine conditions after TKA were independent predictors of failure to achieve MCID. These results may guide preoperative patient consultation and risk-adjustment in future studies using PROMIS-PF as an endpoint for evaluation of TKA outcomes.

Injections prior to hip arthroscopy are associated with increased risk of repeat hip arthroscopy at 1 and 5 years.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have shown that intra-articular hip injections prior to hip arthroscopy (HA) can be a helpful diagnostic tool. However, local anesthetic and corticosteroid injections can be chondrotoxic and corticosteroid injections have been shown to increase the risk of infection during subsequent surgical intervention. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative injections adversely affect outcomes of HA using a national database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The TriNetX database was retrospectively queried. Patients undergoing HA for femoroacetabular impingement with at least 1 year of claims runout were included in the analysis. Patients were grouped by whether they had a hip injection within 1 year prior to HA. The rates of repeat HA, total hip arthroplasty (THA), infection, osteonecrosis, and new onset hip OA at 1- and 5-years postoperatively were compared between groups. Statistical significance was assessed at α = 0.05. RESULTS: 6511 HA patients with previous injection and 1178 HA patients without previous injection were included. Patients with a previous injection were overall younger (32.3 vs. 34.7 years, p < 0.001), more likely to be female (69 vs. 48%, p < 0.001) and had a higher BMI (26.3 vs. 25.7 kg/m2, p = 0.043). At 1 and 5-years postoperatively, patients with any injection were 1.43 (p < 0.001) and 1.89 (p < 0.001) times more likely to undergo repeat HA, respectively. At 1 and 5-years postoperatively, patients who underwent a corticosteroid injection were 2.29 (p < 0.001) and 1.89 (p < 0.001) times more likely to undergo repeat HA than patients with local anesthetic injection only and 1.56 (p < 0.001) and 2.08 (p < 0.001) times more likely to undergo repeat HA than patients with no injection. CONCLUSIONS: Intraarticular hip injections prior to hip arthroscopy, particularly corticosteroid injections, are associated with increased risk of repeat hip arthroscopy at 1 and 5 years. Additional studies are needed to elucidate this risk.

Social vulnerability adversely affects emergency-department utilization but not patient-reported outcomes after total joint arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple studies demonstrate social deprivation is associated with inferior outcomes after total hip (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasty; its effect on patient-reported outcomes is debated. The primary objective of this study evaluated the relationship between social vulnerability and the PROMIS-PF measure in patients undergoing THA and TKA. A secondary aim compared social vulnerability between patients who required increased resource utilization or experienced complications and those who didn't. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 537 patients from March 2020 to February 2022 was performed. The Centers for Disease Control Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) were used to quantify socioeconomic disadvantage. The cohort was split into THA and TKA populations; univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate primary and secondary outcomes. Statistical significance was assessed at p < 0.05. RESULTS: 48.6% of patients achieved PROMIS-PF MCID at 1-year postoperatively. Higher levels of overall social vulnerability (0.40 vs. 0.28, p = 0.03) were observed in TKA patients returning to the ED within 90-days of discharge. Increased overall SVI (OR = 9.18, p = 0.027) and household characteristics SVI (OR = 9.57, p = 0.015) were independent risk factors for 90-day ED returns after TKA. In THA patients, increased vulnerability in the household type and transportation dimension was observed in patients requiring 90-day ED returns (0.51 vs. 0.37, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Despite an increased risk for 90-day ED returns, patients with increased social vulnerability still obtain good 1-year functional outcomes. Initiatives seeking to mitigate the effect of social deprivation on TJA outcomes should aim to provide safe alternatives to ED care during early recovery.

Managing an epidemic within a pandemic: orthopedic opioid prescribing trends during COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: In response to the opioid epidemic, a multitude of policy and clinical-guideline based interventions were launched to combat physician overprescribing. However, the sudden rise of the Covid-19 pandemic disrupted all aspects of healthcare delivery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how opioid prescribing patterns changed during the Covid-19 pandemic within a large multispecialty orthopedic practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 1,048,559 patient encounters from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2022 at a single orthopedic practice was performed. Primary outcomes were the percent of encounters with opioids prescribed and total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) per opioid prescription. Differences in outcomes were assessed by calendar year. Encounters were then divided into two groups: pre-Covid (1/1/2019-2/29/2020) and Covid (3/1/2020-12/31/2022). Univariate analyses were used to evaluate differences in diagnoses and outcomes between periods. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess changes in outcomes during Covid after controlling for differences in diagnoses. Statistical significance was assessed at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The percentage of encounters with opioids prescribed decreased from a high of 4.0% in 2015 to a low of 1.6% in 2021 and 2022 (p < 0.001). MMEs per prescription decreased from 283.6 ± 213.2 in 2015 to a low of 138.6 ± 100.4 in 2019 (p < 0.001). After adjusting for diagnoses, no significant differences in either opioid prescribing rates (post-COVID OR = 0.997, p = 0.893) or MMEs (post-COVID ß = 2.726, p = 0.206) were observed between the pre- and post-COVID periods. CONCLUSION: During the Covid-19 pandemic opioid prescribing levels remained below historical averages. While continued efforts are needed to minimize opioid overprescribing, it appears that the significant progress made toward this goal was not lost during the pandemic era.

The Efficacy of Telemedicine Versus In-Person Education for High-Risk Patients Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: While multiple studies have demonstrated the positive impact of preoperative education on total joint arthroplasty (TJA) outcomes, the traditional method of conducting in-person individualized counseling or group education may limit access to these resources for a subset of the population. This study aimed to evaluate the use of preoperative telemedicine and in-person educational programs for primary TJA patients to determine if the utilization of telemedicine is inferior to in-person education in high-risk populations. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all "high-risk" patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA or THA by 1 of 10 board-certified surgeons at a single institution over 1 year was performed. Patients were prospectively classified as high-risk based on race/ethnicity, comorbidities, and socioeconomic and psychosocial factors. Demographics, comorbidities, and hospital outcomes were compared between patients receiving preoperative nurse navigator education via telemedicine versus those receiving face-to-face education. RESULTS: When comparing the interventions, telemedicine education was noninferior to face-to-face visits. No significant differences between postoperative length of stay, discharge home, 30-day emergency department return, or 30-day readmission rates were noted. Within the telemedicine group, patients who received video consultations were found to be 6 times more likely to be discharged home after surgery (odds ratio (OR): 5.95, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.00 to 25.49; P = .004) and less likely to have a 30-day readmission than the phone consultations (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.94: P = .050). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that telemedicine is not inferior to in-person preoperative education for patients undergoing unilateral TJA, although video-based consultation may improve outcomes over phone-only education.

Acetabular Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision: A Summary of Operative Factors, Outcomes, and Comparison of Approaches.

BACKGROUND: Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) presents a greater risk to patients than primary THA, and surgical approach may impact outcomes. This study aimed to summarize acetabular revisions at our institution and to compare outcomes between direct anterior and posterior revision THA. METHODS: A series of 379 acetabular revision THAs performed from January 2010 through August 2022 was retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative factors were summarized for all revisions and compared between direct anterior and posterior revision THA. RESULTS: The average time to acetabular revision THA was 10 years (range, 0.04 to 44.1), with mechanical failure (36.7%) and metallosis (25.6%) being the most prevalent reasons for revision. No differences in age, body mass index, or sex were noted between groups. Anterior revision patients had a significantly shorter length of stay (2.2 versus 3.2 days, P = .003) and rate of discharge to a skilled nursing facility (7.5 versus 25.2%, P = .008). In the 90-day postoperative period, 9.2% of patients returned to the emergency department (n = 35) and twelve patients (3.2%) experienced a dislocation. There were 13.2% (n = 50) of patients having a rerevision during the follow-up period with a significant difference between anterior and posterior approaches (3.8 versus 14.7%, respectively, P = .049). CONCLUSION: This study provides some evidence that the anterior approach may be protective against skilled nursing facility discharge and rerevision and contributes to decreased lengths of stay. We recommend surgeons select the surgical approach for revision THA based on clinical preferences and patient factors.

The effects of hypoalbuminemia in obese patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a highly effective surgery. However, poor nutritional status has been associated with worse outcomes. In orthopedics, nutrition status is commonly evaluated using serum albumin. When albumin levels fall below 3.0 g/dL, wound healing ability becomes impaired. Typically, malnutrition is associated with low BMI, but malnourished patients can also be obese. The goals of this study were to investigate the relationship between malnourishment represented through albumin levels of obese patients and likelihood of postoperative complications. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing primary TJA from 2016 to 2020 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program national database was performed. Patients with an albumin of < 3.5 g/dL were considered to have hypoalbuminemia and those with ≥ 3.5 g/dL were considered normal albumin. Univariate analysis was used to determine demographic and comorbidity differences between those with and without hypoalbuminemia. Outcomes of interest included length of stay, resource utilization, discharge disposition, and unplanned readmissions. Multivariate logistic regression examined albumin as a predictor of increased resource utilization and complications after controlling for possible confounding variables. RESULTS: Of the 79,784 patients, 4.96% of patients had low albumin. Those with hypoalbuminemia were nearly 1.5 years older than those with normal albumin, were more likely to be black, female, and had an overall increased comorbidity burden as shown by percent of patients with ASA > 3 (all p < 0.001). After risk adjustment, those with hypoalbuminemia and a BMI of 35 + had greater risk of complications and increased resource utilization. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated the prevalence of malnutrition increases as a patient's BMI increases. Further, hypoalbuminemia was associated with increased resource utilization and increased complication rates in all obese patients. We suggest screening albumin levels in obese patients preoperatively to give surgeons the best opportunity to optimize patient nutrition before undergoing surgery.

Effect of Weight Change on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Increased body mass index (BMI) has been previously described as a risk factor for complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA); however, its effect on patient-reported outcomes has not been thoroughly investigated. This study examines the effect of postoperative weight change on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) scores for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of 988 patients undergoing THA or TKA was performed. PROMIS-PF scores and BMI were recorded throughout the study duration. Patients were classified by a 5% change in BMI. A univariate analysis evaluated differences across groups. Mixed-effect models evaluated predictors of change in functional score over the postoperative follow-up time. RESULTS: 43.1% patients had a THA and 56.9% patients had a TKA. At 0 to 3 months, 92% of patients had no change in BMI, 3 to 6 months 82% had no change, and 6 to 12 months 80% had no change. There were no significant demographic or comorbidity differences across groups for both THA and TKA. Similar improvements in PROMIS-PF scores were observed across weight change groups. In the mixed-effect models, postoperative time was found to be a significant predictor of postoperative PF score. Both THA and TKA patients saw greater improvements in PROMIS-PF scores in patients with lower preoperative BMIs. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate most patients do not experience substantial changes in weight following TJA. However, lower BMIs at the time of surgery were associated with an increased functional improvement. Therefore, efforts to optimize BMI should be focused preoperatively to improve surgical outcomes.

Patients From Medically Underserved Areas Are at Increased Risk for Nonhome Discharge and Emergency Department Return After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Maryland Health Enterprise Zones (MHEZs) were introduced in 2012 and encompass underserved areas and those with reduced access to healthcare providers. Across the United States many underserved and minority populations experience poorer total joint arthroplasty (TJA) outcomes seemingly because they reside in underserved areas. The purpose of this study is to identify and quantify the relationship between living in an MHEZ and TJA outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of 11,451 patients undergoing primary TJA at a single institution from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2020 was conducted. Patients were classified based on whether they resided in an MHEZ. Statistical analyses were used to compare outcomes for TJA patients who live in MHEZ and those who do not. RESULTS: Of the 11,451 patients, 1057 patients lived in MHEZ and 10,394 patients did not. After risk adjustment, patients who live in an MHEZ were more likely to return to the emergency department within 90 days postoperatively and were less likely to be discharged home than those patients who do not live in an MHEZ. CONCLUSION: Total joint arthroplasty patients residing in MHEZ appear to present with poorer overall health as measured by increased American Society of Anesthesiologists and Hierarchical Condition Categories scores, and they are less likely to be discharged home and more likely to return to the emergency department within 90 days. Several factors associated with these findings such as socioeconomic factors, household composition, housing type, disability, and transportation may be modifiable and should be targets of future population health initiatives.

Enhanced Preoperative Education Pathways: A Step Toward Reducing Disparities in Total Joint Arthroplasty Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Patients with increased comorbidities, lower socioeconomic status, and African American (AA) race have been shown to be at increased risk for suboptimal outcomes after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Despite the body of evidence highlighting these disparities, few interventions aimed at improving outcomes specifically in high-risk patients have been evaluated. This study evaluates the impact of an enhanced preoperative education pathway (EPrEP) on outcomes after TJA. METHODS: All patients included underwent unilateral primary total hip or knee arthroplasty at a single institution from September 1, 2020 to September 31, 2021. This is a retrospective observational cohort study comparing demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes of patients treated through EPrEP with those receiving routine care. Subgroup analysis of outcome differences by race was performed. RESULTS: In total, 1,716 patients were included in the study: 802 went through the EPrEP and 914 did not. EPrEP patients had a higher comorbidity burden as measured by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.54 ± 1.71 vs 3.25 ± 1.75, P < .001). After risk adjustment, there was no significant relationship among EPrEP utilization and length of stay, home discharge, or 30-day readmissions. However, EPrEP patients were less likely to return to the emergency department 30 days postoperatively (odds ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.86, P = .016). No significant differences in outcomes between AA and non-AA patients were observed. CONCLUSION: High-risk patients receiving individualized nurse navigator counseling experienced similar outcomes to the broader patient population undergoing TJA. Implementation of EPrEPs may be an effective means of enhancing the equity of care quality across all patients undergoing TJA.

Addressing the Challenge of Spine Patient Triage: Development of a Simple Algorithm for Identification of Potential Surgical Candidates.

INTRODUCTION: Given that most spine conditions do not require surgical intervention, using surgeons to manage the subset of patients potentially requiring surgery is the most efficient resource allocation strategy. The purpose of this study was to develop a simple algorithm for identifying patients most likely to require spine surgery that could be used to appropriately triage this population to surgeons. METHODS: A retrospective review of 5,886 consecutive new patients presenting to a multidisciplinary spine clinic from March 2021 to September 2022 was conducted. The primary outcome was whether a patient underwent spine surgery during the study period. A total of 64 independent variables were recorded from patient intake and the first visit. A gradient boosted model was generated to identify the independent variables most associated with undergoing surgery. The five most important variables were entered into a multiple logistic regression model, and a simplified decision support tool was generated and assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 440 of 5886 patients (7.5%) underwent surgery during the study period. The following variables were identified as the top five predictors of spine surgery: patient goal of interest in learning about spine surgery, history of spine injections, difficulty walking a mile, radicular symptoms greater than axial symptoms, and increased age. Each of these variables was confirmed to be independently associated with undergoing surgery (all P < 0.001). The decision support tool yielded a sensitivity of 60.0%, specificity of 76.6%, likelihood ratio of 2.56, positive predictive value of 17.2%, and negative predictive value of 96.0% for predicting surgery. An AUC of 0.683 was achieved. CONCLUSION: A simple 5-question algorithm incorporating patient demographics, symptoms, treatment history, physical function, and patient goals may improve the ability of practices to identify potential spine surgery candidates before their first visit. Prospective application and evaluation of the algorithm to evaluate whether it improves the triage of appropriate patients to spine surgeons is warranted.

Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty Following a Diagnosis of Dementia: A TriNetX Database Study.

Background: As life expectancy improves for patients with dementia, the demand for mobility-improving surgeries such as total joint arthroplasty (TJA) will increase. There is little research on patients with dementia undergoing TJA, although dementia has been shown to be a risk factor for complications. The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes of patients with dementia undergoing TJA at 90 days, 2 years, and 5 years. Methods: The TriNetX database was retrospectively queried for all patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients were divided into cohorts by preoperative diagnosis of dementia and propensity score matched. The following outcomes were evaluated between groups at 90 days, 2 years, and 5 years postoperatively: revision, resection arthroplasty, closed reduction (THA only), femur fracture plating, and prosthetic joint infection. Readmission and manipulation under anesthesia (TKA only) were evaluated at 90 days postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: After matching, there were no differences in demographics or comorbidities between groups. TKA (odds ratio [OR] = 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-2.15, P < .001) and THA (OR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.92-2.45, P < .001) patients with dementia were more likely to be readmitted than patients without dementia. At 2 years (OR = 2.07, 95% CI 1.14-3.77, P = .015) and 5 years (OR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.32-3.48, P = .002) postoperatively, THA patients with dementia were more likely to have proximal femur fracture plating than patients without dementia. Conclusions: Patients undergoing THA with dementia had worse outcomes than patients undergoing THA without dementia and TKA with dementia. The overall rate of complications was low, and a diagnosis of dementia should not be an absolute contraindication to proceeding with TJA.

Disparities in Patient Reported Outcome Measure Completion Rates and Baseline Function in Newly Presenting Spine Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Review. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate disparities in patient reported outcome measures (PROM) completion rates and baseline function scores among newly presenting spine patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prior studies have demonstrated that minority patients and those of low socioeconomic status may present with worse physical and mental health on PROMs. As PROMs are increasingly used in clinical care, research, and health policy, accurate assessment of health status among populations relies on the successful completion of PROM instruments. METHODS: A retrospective review of 10,803 consecutive new patients presenting to a single multidisciplinary spine clinic from June 2020 to September 2022 was performed. Univariate statistics were performed to compare demographics between patients who did and did not complete PROMs. Multivariable analysis was used to compare PROM instrument completion rates by race, ethnicity, and Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and baseline scores among responders. RESULTS: 68.4% of patients completed PROMs at the first clinic visit. After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and diagnosis type, patients of non-white race (OR=0.661, 95%-CI=0.599-0.729, P<0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (OR=0.569, 95%-CI=0.448-0.721, P<0.001), and increased social vulnerability (OR=0.608, 95%-CI=0.511-0.723, P<0.001) were less likely to complete PROMs. In the multivariable models, patients of non-white race reported lower levels of physical function (ß=-6.5, 95%-CI=-12.4 to -0.6, P=0.032) and higher levels of pain intensity (ß=0.6, 95%-CI=0.2-1.0, P=0.005). Hispanic ethnicity (ß=1.5, 95%-CI=0.5-2.5, P=0.004) and increased social vulnerability (ß=1.1, 95%-CI=0.4-1.8, P=0.002) were each associated with increased pain intensity. CONCLUSION: Among newly presenting spine patients, those of non-white race, Hispanic ethnicity, and with increased social vulnerability were less likely to complete PROMs. As these subpopulations also reported worse physical function or pain intensity, additional strategies are needed to better capture patient reported health status in order to avoid bias in clinical care, outcomes research and health policy.

Outcomes in Lumbar Fusion Patients Stratified by the Clinical and Radiographic Degenerative Spondylolisthesis (CARDS) Classification System.

Background and objective The Meyerding classification system remains the most common classification system for spondylolisthesis based on the percentages of vertebral translation. However, the majority of patients with degenerative disease fall into Grade 1, limiting its utility in this subset of patients. The Clinical and Radiographic Degenerative Spondylolisthesis (CARDS) classification system provides a simple radiographic framework for classifying degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) patients by incorporating disc height, kyphosis, and anterior translation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes vary across different CARDS groups in patients undergoing one- or two-level lumbar fusion for DLS. Methods The patients were classified into one of the following four CARDS groups - Type A: advanced disc space collapse with no evidence of kyphosis; Type B: partially preserved disc space with less than 5.0 mm of translation; Type C: partially preserved disc space with greater than 5.0 mm of translation; and Type D: kyphotic alignment. Univariate analyses were performed to compare demographics, symptoms, clinical outcomes, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical (PH) and mental health (MH) scores across groups. Results Ninety-one patients were included in the study. Based on the CARDS classification, there were three (3%) Type A patients, 25 (28%) Type B, 58 (64%) Type C, and five (5%) Type D. No significant differences in baseline demographics, symptom duration, or PROMIS scores were observed across groups. Interbody utilization varied, ranging from 19% in CARDS C (n=11) to 60% in CARDS B (n=15) and D (n=3) patients (p=0.005). Thirty-day clinical outcomes were similar across groups. At an average follow-up of 8.9 months, improvements in PROMIS PH and MH scores and rates of clinically significant improvement were similar across groups. Conclusions Based on our findings, patients undergoing lumbar fusion for DLS present with similar demographic and clinical characteristics and experience similar clinical and patient-reported outcomes when stratified using the CARDS classification system. Posterolateral fusion (PLF) can be effective for various radiographic presentations of DLS. Further research is warranted to assess the utility of CARDS in preoperative planning.

The Relationship Between Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference and Pain Intensity Scores and Early Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption After Lumbar Fusion.

Background The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference and pain intensity measures quantify separate dimensions of pain from the patient's perspective. This study aimed to assess differences in these outcomes and to evaluate whether baseline PROMIS pain scores could be used as a leading indicator of increased pain and opioid consumption during early recovery after lumbar fusion. Methods A retrospective review of 199 consecutive patients undergoing posterolateral fusion (PLF) at a single institution was performed. All patients underwent one to three level lumbar PLF and preoperatively completed the PROMIS pain intensity and PROMIS pain interference measures. Multivariate linear regression was used to assess the relationship between preoperative PROMIS scores and postoperative pain numeric rating scale (NRS) and oral morphine milligram equivalents (OMME) by day after controlling for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). Results In comparison to patients with the lowest preoperative pain intensity scores, those with the highest scores required significantly more OMME on postoperative day (POD) zero and one (both p<0.05) and had higher pain NRS on POD one (p=0.02). Patients with the highest pain interference scores reported higher pain NRS on POD zero (p=0.02) but required similar OMME at all time points. After controlling for age, sex, and BMI, each one-point increase in preoperative PROMIS pain interference scores was associated with increased OMME on POD zero (ß=0.29, p=0.04) and POD one (ß=0.64, p=0.03). Conclusions Patients with high pain intensity reported higher levels of pain and required more opioids during the first 24 hours postoperatively, while those with high pain interference reported higher levels of pain on the day of surgery but utilized similar amounts of opioids. After risk adjustment, increased baseline PROMIS pain interference scores - but not pain intensity - were associated with increased opioid use. These results suggest that both measures should be considered when identifying patients at risk for increased pain and opioid consumption after PLF.

Social Determinants of Health in Maryland Hip Arthroscopy Patients.

Background Prior studies have demonstrated racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) completion rates, and improvement exists across multiple orthopedic conditions. The purpose of this study was to assess whether these disparities are present in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy (HA) procedures. Methods A retrospective study of 306 patients undergoing HA from 2021 to 2023 was performed. Social determinants of health (SDOH) were compared between HA patients and the general Maryland population. Patients were then classified by whether they completed baseline and six-month PROMs (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) instrument). Patients who completed PROMIS-PF were classified by whether or not they achieved minimal clinically important difference (MCID) at six months. Demographics and SDOH were compared using univariate analyses between patients who did and did not complete PROMs and between those who did and did not achieve MCID. SDOH were evaluated at the zip-code level using regional health information exchange measures. Results Compared to the Maryland population, HA patients resided in areas of lower social vulnerability. Preoperative and six-month PROMs were completed by 102 (33%) patients. No significant differences in demographics or any SDOH were found between patients who did and did not complete PROMs. Six-month MCID was achieved in 75 of 102 (74%) patients with complete PROMs; no significant differences in demographics or SDOH were observed between patients who did and did not achieve MCID. Conclusions For patients undergoing HA, disparities in patient-reported outcome completion rates and postoperative functional improvement do not appear to be present across demographics and SDOH, indicating equitable care is being delivered.

Inpatient or Outpatient: Does Initial Disposition Affect Outcomes in Trimalleolar Ankle Fractures?

Background The repair of trimalleolar fractures can be challenging for surgeons and may be managed as an inpatient or an outpatient. However, it is often unclear whether these patients should be admitted immediately or sent home from the emergency department (ED). This study aims to evaluate trimalleolar fractures treated surgically in the inpatient or outpatient settings to evaluate differences in outcomes for these patients. Methods A retrospective chart review of 223 patients undergoing open reduction internal fixation of a trimalleolar ankle fracture was performed from January 2015 to August 2022. Patients were classified by whether the fixation was performed as an inpatient or outpatient. Outcomes of interest included time from injury to surgery, complications, ED returns, and readmissions within 90 days. Results Inpatients had significantly higher ASA scores, BMI, and rates of comorbidities. Inpatient treatment was associated with faster time to surgery (median 2.0 vs. 9.0 days) and fewer delayed surgeries more than seven days from injury (18.4 vs. 67.9%). There were no differences in complications, 90-day ED returns, readmissions, or reoperation between groups. Conclusions Inpatient admission of patients presenting with trimalleolar ankle fractures resulted in faster time to surgery and fewer surgical delays than outpatient surgery. Despite having more preoperative risk factors, inpatients experienced similar postoperative outcomes as patients discharged home to return for outpatient surgery. Less restrictive admission criteria may improve the patient experience by providing more patients with support and pain control in the hospital setting while decreasing the time to surgery.

Predictors of same day cancellation of elective surgery.

Same day cancellations of surgery have adverse effects on both patients and health care systems. To date, the majority of research has evaluated reasons for same day cancellation, and relatively little is known about risk factors for cancellation. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate the accuracy of a model for preoperatively predicting which patients are at risk for experiencing same day cancellation. While accurately predicting which patients are likely to experience same day cancellation remains challenging, predictive models may aid in the early identification of patients at risk for cancellation. Future studies are required to assess whether the use of predictive analytics leads to reduced cancellation rates in practice.

Disparities in Hand Surgery Exist in Unexpected Populations.

Background The purpose of our study is to investigate disparities in the patient populations and outcomes of carpal tunnel release (CTR) and trigger finger release (TFR).  Methods A retrospective review of 777 CTR and 395 TFR patients from May 2021 to August 2022 was completed. The shortened form of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (QuickDASH) was recorded to evaluate physical function preoperatively and at one and three months postoperatively. This study was deemed institutional review board-exempt by the institutional clinical research committee. Results Compared to CTR, TFR patients resided in zip codes with higher levels of social vulnerability across dimensions of 'household composition and disability' (p=0.018) and 'minority status and language' (p=0.043). When analyzing QuickDASH scores by demographics and procedure, preoperative scores were statistically significantly higher for non-married (p=0.002), White (p=0.003), and female sex (p=0.001) CTR patients. Further, one-month postoperative scores were statistically higher for White and non-married CTR patients (0.016 and 0.015, respectively). At three months postoperatively, female and non-married patients had statistically significant higher scores (0.010 and 0.037, respectively). In TFR patients, one-month postoperative QuickDASH scores for White and female patients were statistically significantly higher (0.018 and 0.007, respectively). There were no significant differences in QuickDASH scores between rural and non-rural patients, household income (HHI) above or below the median, or the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) dimensions.  Conclusion Our study found marital status, sex, and race were associated with disparities in pre-and postoperative physical function in patients undergoing carpal tunnel or trigger finger release. However, future studies are warranted to confirm and develop solutions to disparities within this population.