Reconstructive limb-salvage surgery after lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma resection: A 20-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Reconstructive surgery is often required following lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma resection. The relationship between the method of plastic surgery reconstruction and postoperative wound healing or functional oncologic outcomes in this patient population is poorly understood. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review on all adult patients that underwent soft tissue reconstruction following resection of lower extremity soft tissue sarcomas between 1996 and 2016 at our institution. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-six patients were identified. Wound complications occurred within 6-months postoperatively in 72 patients (52.9%). Average time to heal was 13.0 weeks. Limb survival was 94.9%. 16.9% and 36.8% of patients had evidence of local recurrence or metastatic disease, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of overall wound complications, time to heal, limb survival, local recurrence, or metastatic disease between the different reconstructive methods. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, the utilization of different reconstructive techniques did not correlate with a difference in postoperative wound complications or oncologic outcomes. Local flaps can effectively reconstruct the majority of lower extremity sarcoma defects that cannot be closed primarily. However, alternative reconstructive techniques may be utilized when indicated without a significant increase in postoperative morbidity in this patient population.

Obesity and Survival After Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Importance: For patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), recent data suggest that obesity has a beneficial effect on survival outcomes in various cancer types. Reports on this association in head and neck cancer are limited. Objectives: To compare overall survival (OS) to 5 years and functional outcomes in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with ICIs based on pretreatment body mass index (BMI). Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective population-based cohort study used data obtained from the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network database to identify patients with HNSCC who received ICI treatment between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2023, resulting in a total of 166 patients (83 with BMI of 20.0-24.9 [normal BMI] and 83 with BMI of ≥30.0 [obesity BMI]) after propensity score matching (PSM) for pretreatment medical comorbidities and oncologic staging. Exposure: Normal BMI vs obesity BMI. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival and functional outcomes (dysphagia, tracheostomy dependence, and gastrostomy tube dependence) were measured to 5 years after ICI treatment and compared between patients with obesity BMI and normal BMI. Additional analyses compared OS and functional outcomes in the cohort with normal BMI and cohorts with overweight BMI (25.0-29.9) and underweight BMI (<20.0). Results: Among the 166 patients included in the PSM analysis (112 men [67.1%]; mean [SD] age, 62.9 [15.4] years), obesity BMI was associated with significantly improved OS at 6 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54 [95% CI, 0.31-0.96]), 3 years (HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.38-0.83]), and 5 years (HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.44-0.86]) after ICI treatment, compared with patients with normal BMI. Obesity BMI was also associated with decreased risk of gastrostomy tube dependence at 6 months (odds ratio [OR], 0.41 [95% CI, 0.21-0.80]), 1 year (OR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.21-0.78]), 3 years (OR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.18-0.65]), and 5 years (OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.18-0.65]). Obesity was also associated with decreased risk for tracheostomy dependence at 1 year (OR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.28-0.90]), 3 years (OR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.45-0.90]), and 5 years (OR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.45-0.90]). There were no differences in rates of dysphagia or immune-related adverse events between cohorts at any points. Conclusions and Relevance: Using population-level data for patients with HNSCC treated with ICIs, these results suggest that having obesity was associated with improved 6-month, 3-year, and 5-year OS compared with having normal BMI. Additionally, obesity was associated with decreased gastrostomy and tracheostomy tube dependence compared with normal BMI. Further investigation is required to understand the mechanism of these findings.

Regionalization of Head and Neck Oncology Tumor Boards: Perspectives of Collaborating Physicians.

Objectives: To survey academic and community physician preferences regarding the virtual multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) for further improvement and expansion. Study Design: This anonymous 14-question survey was sent to individuals that participated in the head and neck virtual MTBs. The survey was sent via email beginning August 3, 2021, through October 5, 2021. Setting: The University of Maryland Medical Center and regional practices in the state of Maryland. Methods: Survey responses were recorded and presented as percentages. Subset analysis was performed to obtain frequency distributions by facility and provider type. Results: There were 50 survey responses obtained with a response rate of 56%. Survey participants included 11 surgeons (22%), 19 radiation oncologists (38%), and 8 medical oncologists (16%), amongst others. More than 96% of participants found the virtual MTB to be useful when discussing complex cases and impactful to future patient care. A majority of respondents perceived a reduction in time to adjuvant care (64%). Community and academic physician responses strongly agreed that the virtual MTB improved communication (82% vs 73%), provided patient-specific information for cancer care (82% vs 73%), and improved access to other specialties (66% vs 64%). Academic physicians, more so than community physicians, strongly agreed that the virtual MTB improves access to clinical trial enrollment (64% vs 29%) and can be useful in obtaining CME (64% vs 55%). Conclusion: Academic and community physicians view the virtual MTB favorably. This platform can be adapted regionally and further expanded to improve communication between physicians and improve multidisciplinary care for patients.