Teaching Important Basic EEG Patterns of Bedside Electroencephalography to Critical Care Staffs: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) is commonly recommended for neurocritical care patients. Routine implementation of such monitoring requires the specific training of professionals. The aim of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of a training program on initiation of the basic interpretation of cEEG for critical care staff in a prospective multicenter study. METHODS: After completion of a pretest, participants (senior physicians, fellows, residents, medical students, and nurses) recruited in six French ICUs participated in a face-to-face electroencephalogram (EEG) training program followed by additional e-learning sessions at day 1 (post-course), day 15, day 30, and day 90, based on training tests followed by illustrated and commented answers. Each test was designed to evaluate knowledge and skills through correct recognition of ten predefined EEG sequences covering the most common normal and abnormal patterns. The primary objective was to achieve a success rate > 80% correct answers at day 90 by at least 75% of the participants. RESULTS: Among 250 participants, 77/108 (71.3%) who completed the full training program achieved at least 80% correct answers at day 90. Paired comparisons between the scores obtained at each evaluation showed an increase over time. The rate of correct answers at day 90 was > 80% for all common predefined EEG sequences, except for the recognition of periodic and burst-suppression patterns and reactivity, which were identified in only 42.6% (95% CI 36.4-48.8), 60.2% (54.1-66.3), and 70.4% (64.7-76.1) of the tests, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A training strategy for the basic interpretation of EEG in ICUs, consisting of a face-to-face EEG course supplemented with reinforcement of knowledge by e-learning, was associated with significant resignation and an effectiveness of training allowing 71% of learners to accurately recognize important basic EEG patterns encountered in critically ill patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03545776.

Impact of Proactive Nurse Participation in ICU Family Conferences: A Mixed-Method Study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate family perceptions of having a nurse participating in family conferences and to assess the psychologic well being of the same families after ICU discharge. DESIGN: Mixed-method design with a qualitative study embedded in a single-center randomized study. SETTING: Twelve-bed medical-surgical ICU in a 460-bed tertiary hospital. SUBJECTS: One family member for each consecutive patient who received more than 48 hours of mechanical ventilation in the ICU. INTERVENTION: Planned proactive participation of a nurse in family conferences led by a physician. In the control group, conferences were led by a physician without a nurse. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 172 eligible family members, 100 (60.2%) were randomized; among them, 88 underwent semistructured interviews at ICU discharge and 86 completed the Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire at ICU discharge and then the Hospital Anxiety Depression Questionnaire and the Impact of Event Scale (for posttraumatic stress-related symptoms) 3 months later. The intervention and control groups were not significantly different regarding the prevalence of posttraumatic stress-related symptoms (52.3 vs 50%, respectively; p = 0.83). Anxiety and depression subscale scores were significantly lower in the intervention group. The qualitative data indicated that the families valued the principle of the conference itself. Perceptions of nurse participation clustered into four main themes: trust that ICU teamwork was effective (50/88; 56.8%), trust that care was centered on the patient (33/88; 37.5%), trust in effective dissemination of information (15/88; 17%), and trust that every effort was made to relieve anxiety in family members (12/88; 13.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Families valued the conferences themselves and valued the proactive participation of a nurse. These positive perceptions were associated with significant anxiety or depression subscale scores but not with changes in posttraumatic stress-related symptoms.

Phenomenologic analysis of healthcare worker perceptions of intensive care unit diaries.

INTRODUCTION: Studies have reported associations between diaries kept for intensive care unit (ICU) patients and long-term quality-of-life and psychological outcomes in patients and their relatives. Little was known about perceptions of healthcare workers reading and writing in the diaries. We investigated healthcare worker perceptions the better to understand their opinions and responses to reading and writing in the diaries. METHODS: We used a phenomenologic approach to conduct a qualitative study of 36 semistructured interviews in a medical-surgical ICU in a 460-bed tertiary hospital. RESULTS: Two domains of perception were assessed: reading and writing in the diaries. These two domains led to four main themes in the ICU workers' perceptions: suffering of the families; using the diary as a source of information for families but also as generating difficulties in writing bad news; determining the optimal interpersonal distance with the patient and relatives; and using the diary as a tool for constructing a narrative of the patient's ICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: The ICU workers thought that the diary was beneficial in communicating the suffering of families while providing comfort and helping to build the patient's ICU narrative. They reported strong emotions related to the diaries and a perception of intruding into the patients' and families' privacy when reading the diaries. Fear of strong emotional investment may adversely affect the ability of ICU workers to perform their duties optimally. ICU workers are in favor of ICU diaries, but activation by the diaries of emotions among younger ICU workers may require specific support.

Writing in and reading ICU diaries: qualitative study of families' experience in the ICU.

PURPOSE: Keeping an ICU patient diary has been reported to benefit the patient's recovery. Here, we investigated the families' experience with reading and writing in patient ICU diaries kept by both the family and the staff. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study involving 32 semi-structured in-depth interviews of relatives of 26 patients (34% of all family members who visited patients) who met our ICU-diary criterion, i.e., ventilation for longer than 48 hours. Grounded theory was used to conceptualise the interview data via a three-step coding process (open coding, axial coding, and selective coding). RESULTS: Communicative, emotional, and humanising experiences emerged from our data. First, family members used the diaries to access, understand, and assimilate the medical information written in the diaries by staff members, and then to share this information with other family members. Second, the diaries enabled family members to maintain a connection with the patient by documenting their presence and expressing their love and affection. Additionally, families confided in the diaries to maintain hope. Finally, family members felt the diaries humanized the medical staff and patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate positive effects of diaries on family members. The diaries served as a powerful tool to deliver holistic patient- and family-centered care despite the potentially dehumanising ICU environment. The diaries made the family members aware of their valuable role in caring for the patient and enhanced their access to and comprehension of medical information. Diaries may play a major role in improving the well-being of ICU-patient families.

[Quality of life after a stay in the intensive care unit]. / La qualité de vie après un séjour en réanimation.

The study of quality of life is a critical indicator in evaluating the care of patients in intensive care. This must be measured to detect signs of psychological and physical sequelae and adapt patient support accordingly.

Opinions of families, staff, and patients about family participation in care in intensive care units.

PURPOSE: The aims of the study were to assess opinions of caregivers, families, and patients about involvement of families in the care of intensive care unit (ICU) patients; to evaluate the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members; and to measure family satisfaction with care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between days 3 and 5, perceptions by families and ICU staff of family involvement in care were collected prospectively at a single center. Family members completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and a satisfaction scale (Critical Care Family Needs Inventory). Nurses recorded care provided spontaneously by families. Characteristics of patient-relative pairs (n = 101) and ICU staff (n = 45) were collected. Patients described their perceptions of family participation in care during a telephone interview, 206 ± 147 days after hospital discharge. RESULTS: The numbers of patient-relative pairs for whom ICU staff reported favorable perceptions were 101 (100%) of 101 for physicians, 91 (90%) for nurses, and 95 (94%) for nursing assistants. Only 4 (3.9%) of 101 families refused participation in care. Only 14 (13.8%) of 101 families provided care spontaneously. The HADS score showed symptoms of anxiety in 58 (58.5%) of 99 and of depression in 26 (26.2%) of 99 family members. The satisfaction score was high (11.0 ± 1.25). Among patients, 34 (77.2%) of 44 had a favorable perception of family participation in care. CONCLUSIONS: Families and ICU staff were very supportive of family participation in care. Most patients were also favorable to care by family members.