Pharmacokinetics of cidofovir in renal insufficiency and in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis or high-flux hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Cidofovir is an antiviral agent used for the treatment of cytomegalovirus infection in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Because cidofovir is primarily eliminated by the kidneys and because its main adverse effect is nephrotoxicity, an understanding of the pharmacokinetic disposition of cidofovir in patients with renal insufficiency is necessary. METHODS: Twenty-four subjects were enrolled into this study and were divided into 6 groups depending on their degree of renal dysfunction, including subjects receiving maintenance continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and high-flux hemodialysis. The creatinine clearance (CLCR) for subjects not receiving dialysis ranged from 12 to 164 mL/min. Each subject received a single 0.5 mg/kg intravenous dose of cidofovir over 1 hour. Subjects not receiving dialysis were given intravenous hydration with 1 L normal saline solution and concomitant oral probenecid. Serial serum and urine samples were collected to determine pharmacokinetic parameters with use of noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD cidofovir clearance (CL) in control subjects (normal renal function; n = 5) was 1.7 +/- 0.1 mL/min/kg, which decreased with declining renal function as indicated by the regression equation: CL (mL/min/kg) = 0.94 x CLCR (mL/min/kg) + 0.064 (r2 = 0.91). Mean volume of distribution at steady state did not change significantly in subjects with kidney disease and cidofovir serum elimination half-life was significantly increased in subjects with severe renal impairment. Cidofovir was not significantly cleared during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, but high-flux hemodialysis resulted in the removal of 52% +/- 11% of the dose administered. CONCLUSION: The significant (P < .001) correlation observed between CLCR and CL in subjects with varying degrees of renal insufficiency indicates that aggressive dosage reduction of cidofovir would be necessary in subjects with kidney disease to ensure comparable drug exposure based on serum levels.

Is there a pharmacokinetic interaction between foscarnet and zalcitabine during concomitant administration?

Foscarnet, an antiviral agent used in the treatment of cytomegalovirus infection, and zalcitabine, an antiretroviral nucleoside analogue used in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection, are commonly used concomitantly. Foscarnet and zalcitabine may interact pharmacokinetically, as both compounds are partially eliminated by renal tubular secretion. Owing to dose-related toxicities associated with these two drugs, it is essential that we have data regarding their pharmacokinetic disposition during concomitant therapy. Twelve patients randomly received either foscarnet (four doses) or zalcitabine (five doses) (Phase 1), followed by concomitant foscarnet (four doses) and zalcitabine (six doses) (Phase 2), followed by dosing with the drug not received in Phase 1 (Phase 3). Following the last dose in each phase of the study, serial plasma samples were collected over 8 hours for zalcitabine and over 12 hours for foscarnet to determine the pharmacokinetics of each drug using noncompartmental analysis. Foscarnet plasma and urine levels were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography, and zalcitabine levels were determined using radioimmunoassay. No clinically significant alterations in the pharmacokinetics of foscarnet or zalcitabine occurred in this study. Thus despite the potential for foscarnet and zalcitabine to compete for renal tubular secretion, no apparent pharmacokinetic interaction exists between these two drugs at the clinically relevant doses studied.

Pharmacokinetics of intracellular zidovudine and its phosphorylated anabolites in the absence and presence of stavudine using an in vitro human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) model.

Both zidovudine (ZDV) and stavudine (D4T) must be intracellularly converted to their respective active triphosphate anabolites (ZDV-TP and D4T-TP). It is hypothesized that the combination of ZDV and D4T may lead to altered formation of phosphorylated anabolites for either drug. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of D4T on intracellular ZDV phosphorylation. Human PBMCs were incubated with [(3)H]ZDV in the presence and absence of D4T. Cells were harvested at several time points over 12 h to determine area under the intracellular concentration versus time curve (AUC) of ZDV and its phosphorylated anabolites. Radiolabled ZDV and anabolites were quantified using HPLC and LS. The AUC for ZDV-TP was 0.53 and 0.52 pmol x h/10(6) PBMC in the absence and presence of D4T, respectively. The AUC for ZDV monophosphate was 157.45 and 172.44 pmol x h/10(6) PBMC pre and post D4T. D4T does not appear to affect the formation of intracellular ZDV phosphates in human PBMCs under the conditions studied.