Shared decision-making needs, barriers, and facilitators of patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer in the hospital: a multi-level, mixed-methods study.

PURPOSE: Little is known about the shared decision-making (SDM) needs, barriers, and facilitators of patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer in the hospital. Understanding this may improve SDM and cancer care quality in this vulnerable population. METHODS: A single-site, mixed-methods study of hospitalized patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer, caregivers, and oncologists was conducted. After discharge, patient ± caregiver semi-structured interviews exploring SDM needs, barriers, and facilitators regarding their most important upcoming cancer-related decision were conducted. Oncologists were surveyed about patient knowledge and SDM needs using closed- and open-ended questions, respectively. Thematic analysis was performed for qualitative data with a focus on themes unique to or amplified by hospitalization. Descriptive statistics and the Chi-squared test were performed for quantitative data. RESULTS: Patients and caregivers reported high SDM needs surrounding treatment and prognostic information, leading to decisional conflict. Eight themes emerged: anticipated cancer treatment decisions, variable control preferences in decision-making, high cancer-related information needs and uncertainty, barriers and facilitators to information gathering during and post hospitalization, and decision-making facilitators. Among 32 oncologists, most (56%) reported patients were poorly informed about treatment and prognosis. Oncologists reported variable expectations about patient knowledge after hospitalization, facilitators to patient decision-making, and patient uncertainty while awaiting an outpatient oncologist appointment. CONCLUSION: Patients newly diagnosed with advanced cancer in the hospital have high SDM needs and experience decisional conflict. This may be due to barriers unique to or exacerbated by hospitalization. Further research is needed to develop strategies to address these barriers and enhance the facilitators identified in this study.

Evaluating Survival After Hospitalization Due to Immune-Related Adverse Events From Checkpoint Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: As immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) are increasingly approved for cancer treatment, hospitalizations related to severe immune-related adverse events (irAE) will increase. Here, we identify patients hospitalized due to irAEs and describe survival outcomes across irAE, CPI, and cancer type. METHODS: We identified patients hospitalized at our institution from January 2012 to December 2020 due to irAEs. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank tests. RESULTS: Of 3137 patients treated with CPIs, 114 (3.6%) were hospitalized for irAEs, resulting in 124 hospitalizations. Gastrointestinal (GI)/hepatic, endocrine, and pulmonary irAEs were the most common causes of irAE-related hospitalization. After CPI initiation, the average time to hospitalization was 141 days. Median survival from hospital admission was 980 days. Patients hospitalized due to GI/hepatic and endocrine irAEs had longer median survival than patients with pulmonary irAEs (795 and 949 days vs. 83 days [P < .001]). Patients with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma had longer median survival than patients with lung cancer (2792 days and not reached vs. 159 days [P < .001]). There was longer median survival in the combination group compared to the PD-(L)1 group (1471 vs. 529 days [P = .04]). CONCLUSIONS: As CPI use increases, irAE-related hospitalizations will as well. These findings suggest that among patients hospitalized for irAEs, survival differs by irAE and cancer type, with worse survival for patients with irAE pneumonitis or lung cancer. This real-world data contributes to research pertaining to hospitalization due to severe irAEs, which may inform patient counseling and treatment decision-making.

Around the World in 60 Minutes: How a Virtual Morning Report has Created an International Community for Clinical Reasoning and Medical Education.

Problem: Traditionally, clinical reasoning is developed with purposeful exposure to clinical problems through case-based learning and clinical reasoning conferences that harvest a collaborative exchange of information in real-life settings. While virtual platforms have greatly expanded access to remote clinical learning, case-based clinical reasoning opportunities are scarce in low and middle income countries. Intervention: The Clinical Problem Solvers (CPSolvers), a nonprofit organization focused on clinical reasoning education, launched Virtual Morning Report (VMR) during the COVID-19 pandemic. VMR is an open-access, case-based clinical reasoning virtual conference on the Zoom platform modeled after an academic morning report format available to participants worldwide. The authors conducted 17 semi-structured interviews with CPSolvers' VMR participants from 10 different countries to explore the experiences of the international participants of VMR. Context: The CPSolvers was founded by US physicians and has now expanded to include international members throughout all levels of the organization. VMR is open-access to all learners. Preliminary survey data collected from VMR sessions revealed 35% of the attendees were from non-English speaking countries and 53% from non US countries. Impact: Analysis generated four themes that captured the experiences of international participants of VMR: 1) Improving clinical reasoning skills where participants had little to no access to this education or content; 2) Creating a global community from a diverse, safe, and welcoming environment made possible by the virtual platform; 3) Allowing learners to become agents of change by providing tools and skills that are directly applicable in the setting in which they practice medicine; 4) Establishing a global platform, with low barriers to entry and open-access to expertise and quality teaching and content. Study participants agreed with the themes, supporting trustworthiness. Lessons Learned: Findings suggest VMR functions as and has grown into a global community of practice for clinical reasoning. The authors propose strategies and guiding principles based on the identified themes for educators to consider when building effective global learning communities. In an interdependent world where the virtual space eliminates the physical boundaries that silo educational opportunities, emphasis on thoughtful implementation of learning communities in a global context has the potential to reduce medical education disparities in the clinical reasoning space and beyond.

Integrating Concept Maps into a Medical Student Oncology Curriculum.

Expanding frontiers of knowledge have prompted medical schools to reconsider how best to promote learning in the face of information overload. Concept mapping (CM) promotes knowledge retention and integration. Students have perceived CM positively in prior studies, but the feasibility and utility of integrating CM into a medical student oncology curriculum as a learning and assessment tool have not been described. At the University of California, San Francisco, 152 medical students in a second-year hematology/oncology course produced concept maps about a single cancer type over 4 weeks. We collected student evaluations about CM. Two of three graders independently scored each map using a standard rubric. We compared CM scores with USMLE Step 1 scores and clerkship grades using regression. All students produced a concept map. Student perception was mixed, and students provided feedback to improve CM utility as a learning tool. Grading was feasible, and inter-rater reliability was high. CM scores did not predict USMLE Step 1 scores or clerkship grades. CM was feasible as a learning tool, and we present strategies based on student feedback and literature review to improve utility. CM was feasible and reliable as an assessment tool; additional validity evidence may improve utility. Future studies should explore whether CM integrated into medical student oncology curricula early, serially, and collaboratively, with iterative practice and feedback, may predict meaningful learning and performance outcomes.

Evaluating an Oncology Video Curriculum Designed to Promote Asynchronous Subspecialty Learning for Internal Medicine Residents.

Internal medicine (IM) residents frequently see patients in subspecialty clinics. However, there are few published core subspecialty curricula targeted to residents' learning and practical needs, and little guidance exists regarding delivery of core subspecialty content to residents rotating across multiple clinical sites. Our study objective was to evaluate a novel oncology video curriculum for IM residents as a model for asynchronous subspecialty resident learning. Using the cognitive theory of multimedia learning, we developed a five-part oncology video curriculum targeted specifically to the needs of IM residents. All second- and third-year residents rotating in oncology clinics from October 2018 to March 2019 at a single training program were invited to participate. We evaluated curricular demand, efficacy, and acceptability, using completion rates, knowledge tests, and a survey. Twenty-eight of 31 (90.3%) residents utilized the curriculum. Resident knowledge improved after utilizing the modules, by 36.9% from pre- to posttests (95% CI [31.3-42.5]; P<0.001) and 13.7% from pre- to delayed posttests (95% CI [7.5-20.0]; P<0.001). Twenty-four of 31 (77.4%) answered the survey. Most residents agreed or strongly agreed that the curriculum contributed to their knowledge (95.2%) and added educational value beyond the clinical rotation (93.1%). Our curriculum evaluation supports the asynchronous delivery of oncology education targeted to the learning needs of IM residents using a novel core video curriculum. These curricular methods provide a model for delivering subspecialty education to IM residents with complex and busy schedules.

Medical student motivation in specialised contexts.

PURPOSE: During their clinical years, medical students rotate in diverse environments, each with unique factors motivating or demotivating learning. Student motivation to learn in specialised clinical settings has not been robustly described. One framework to understand motivation to learn is self-determination theory (SDT), which posits that intrinsic motivation requires fulfilment of three innate psychological needs: competence, relatedness and autonomy. Referencing SDT, the authors aimed to understand factors influencing student motivation to learn in the specialised context of internal medicine (IM) subspecialty consult services, with the goal of optimising teaching and learning during these experiences. METHOD: Focus groups were conducted with 12 fourth-year medical students who had completed at least one inpatient IM subspecialty consult elective at the University of California, San Francisco, in 2020-2021. Students discussed factors that promoted and hindered their learning and motivation. The authors performed abductive thematic analysis using SDT as a sensitising framework. RESULTS: Three themes were identified and provided insight into how student motivation to learn can be supported: teaching at the appropriate level; integration into the team and workflow; and self-directed learning and career exploration. These themes were overlaid onto the needs of SDT, demonstrating that, in specialised clinical contexts, fulfilment of the needs is interconnected. CONCLUSION: This study provided insight into how students' innate needs can be satisfied in the learning environment of IM subspecialty consult electives, thereby promoting students' intrinsic motivation. Based on insights from the study, the authors offer recommendations for how educators can optimise student motivation to learn.

Launching an International Community of Practice in Hematology/Oncology Medical Education.

A community of practice (CoP) is a group of people who share a concern or a passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly. While the field of hematology/oncology has historically prioritized clinical care and biomedical research, medical education has received increasing attention within hematology/oncology in recent years. In 2018, ASCO launched the Education Scholars Program to train hematology/oncology clinicians in the science of teaching and learning. However, the number of hematology/oncology educators nationally and internationally far exceeds the capacity of the Education Scholars Program to train them. In addition, hematology/oncology educators often lack sufficient mentorship and guidance at their own institutions to pursue their chosen career path effectively. To ensure high-quality clinical care and research for generations to come, attention must be paid to improving support for hematology/oncology educators. Therefore, supported by ASCO, we developed an international medical education (Med Ed) CoP for hematology/oncology educators with the purpose of providing them with support, community, mentorship, resources, and scholarly opportunities in medical education. In this article, we describe the development of the Med Ed CoP using a three-stage framework (Establish-Grow-Sustain) including successes, challenges, and reflections. By supporting the needs of hematology/oncology educators, the Med Ed CoP will serve as a home for all who contribute to the field of hematology/oncology.

Web-Based Scaffolds: The Feasibility of a Constructivist Approach to Oncology Fellow Learning.

In this 2-institution feasibility pilot, oncology fellows used and updated freely available web-based learning tools (scaffolds) in a constructivist fashion.

Outcomes and Adverse Events in Patients with Cancer after Diagnosis of Immunotherapy-Associated Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-induced diabetes mellitus (CPI-DM) is a rare immune-related adverse event (irAE). Patients and providers fear that continuing CPIs puts patients at risk for additional irAEs and thus may discontinue therapy. Currently, there are little data to inform this decision. Therefore, this study aims to elucidate whether discontinuing CPIs after diagnosis of CPI-DM impacts the development of future irAEs and cancer outcomes such as progression and death. Patients who developed CPI-DM during cancer treatment at UCSF from 1 July 2015 to 5 July 2023 were analyzed for cancer outcomes and irAE development. Fisher's exact tests, Student t-tests, Kaplan-Meier methods, and Cox regression were used as appropriate. Of the 43 patients with CPI-DM, 20 (47%) resumed CPIs within 90 days of the irAE, 4 (9%) patients restarted after 90 days, and 19 (44%) patients never restarted. Subsequent irAEs were diagnosed in 9 of 24 (38%) who resumed CPIs and 3 of 19 (16%) who discontinued CPIs (p = 0.17). There was no significant difference in death (p = 0.74) or cancer progression (p = 0.55) between these two groups. While our single-institution study did not show worse cancer outcomes after discontinuing CPIs, many variables can impact outcomes, which our study was not adequately powered to evaluate. A nuanced approach is needed to decide whether to continue CPI treatment after a severe irAE like CPI-DM.

How Many Is Too Many? Using Cognitive Load Theory to Determine the Maximum Safe Number of Inpatient Consultations for Trainees.

PURPOSE: Cognitive load, specifically extraneous load (EL) reflective of distractions, may provide evidence of a lack of focus, potentially making additional work unsafe. The assessment of trainees performing inpatient consultations provides a helpful model for examining this question. The goal of this study was to provide useful information to clinical and educational leaders to optimize inpatient consultation services and rotations and mitigate potential patient safety risk. METHOD: In 2019, using the Consult Cognitive Load instrument, the authors obtained EL data from inpatient consultations performed by internal medicine fellows and psychiatry residents across 5 University of California hospitals. In 2023, the authors constructed a Wright map to compare the participants' EL data with the number of prior initial consultations performed during the shift. RESULTS: Of 326 trainees contacted, 139 (43%) completed the EL survey items. The Wright map shows that trainees were estimated to agree that interruptions were already distracting at the first consultation of the shift. After 4 consultations, trainees were estimated to strongly agree that interruptions were distracting and to agree that emotions, extraneous information, and technology were distracting. CONCLUSIONS: The authors propose a quantitative, empirically driven, mean safety limit of 4 new inpatient consultations per shift for trainees to avoid cognitive overload, thereby potentially supporting patient safety. Clinical and educational leaders can adjust this limit to fit the unique needs of their practice setting. A similar approach using cognitive load and item response theory could be used to conduct patient safety research in other domains.

Identifying Strategies for the Use of Gender and Sex Language in Clinical One-Liners.

Purpose: The "one-liner," commonly used in clinical communications, summarizes a patient's identity, presenting condition, medical history, and clinical findings. Imprecise, inconsistent use of gender and sex information in one-liners threatens the provision of affirming care to transgender, nonbinary, gender-expansive, and intersex patients and may exacerbate health care disparities. This study aimed to generate guidance for communicating gender and sex information in one-liners. Methods: This is an explanatory sequential, equal status mixed methods study of transgender, nonbinary, gender-expansive, and intersex people and clinicians caring for this population. Survey participants rated one-liners on a five-point Likert-type scale of appropriateness, considering affirmation and clinical utility, and provided open-ended comments. We conducted two focus groups with survey respondents to explore survey results and performed a thematic analysis of survey comments and focus group transcripts. Results: Survey respondents included 57 clinicians and 80 nonclinicians. One-liners containing patient pronouns were rated most appropriate, and appropriate patient descriptors included self-described gender identity or gender-neutral terms. In scenarios where patient sex information was not pertinent to the chief concern (CC), one-liners containing no sex information were rated most appropriate. Four themes were identified: inclusion of sex information based on relevance to the CC, accurate patient representation, influence of clinical setting, and risk of harm from inaccurate one-liners. Conclusion: This study generated data to support the appropriate use of gender and sex language in one-liners. Clinicians, educators, and trainees may use these findings to compose one-liners that are affirming and clinically useful for patients of diverse gender and sex identities.

Corresponding about Death: Analyzing Letters Exchanged between Patients with Cancer and Medical Students.

Medical students lack opportunities to have authentic conversations with patients with cancer in busy hospitals. An improved understanding of what such communication might look like may provide a framework for end-of-life curricula. The authors performed thematic analysis using written correspondence between patient and student participants in the University of California, San Francisco's Firefly Program whose letters discussed death or dying. Four themes emerged: (1) turmoil, (2) grief, (3) making peace, and (4) past, present, and future. Medical students expressed a fifth theme: unmet student expectations. The study provides educators with a unique perspective to help inform curriculum development and patient care.

From Boring to Bravo! Using Learning Science to Create Memorable Presentations.

The practice of oncology continues to evolve over time. Educators find themselves in a position where they are no longer able to teach a topic in its entirety. Moreover, the rapid expansion of information available through research and discovery in the field of oncology makes it difficult for learners to process the constant barrage of new content. Lecturers continue to impart knowledge using didactic techniques, often trying to include as much material as possible in the time permitted. The question becomes: In the face of an impossibly large field, how can one assist learners in learning, and retaining, what is most important? The science of learning continues to develop, and we now recognize that there are ways to teach that optimally facilitate the retention and application of knowledge. By using these strategies, educators can make it easier for learners to absorb and retain key information. This article will touch upon several such techniques: cognitive load optimization, analogy, contrasting cases, elaboration, and just-in-time telling. By applying these methods to didactic presentations, educators can ensure that their lessons are heard, understood, and ultimately transformed into something unforgettable.

Maintaining Medical Student Motivation During Remote Clinical Learning.

PURPOSE: Remote clinical learning (RCL) may result in learner disengagement. The factors that influence medical student motivation during RCL remain poorly understood. The authors aimed to explore factors that affect medical student motivation during RCL and determine potential strategies to optimize student motivation during RCL. METHOD: In December 2020, the authors conducted semistructured interviews with third- and fourth-year medical students at the University of California, San Francisco, who had experienced RCL. The authors coded transcripts and conducted an inductive thematic analysis using self-determination theory (SDT), which describes autonomy, competence, and relatedness as essential for motivation, as a sensitizing framework. RESULTS: Twelve students were interviewed. Four themes were identified and aligned with SDT: balancing flexibility and structure (autonomy), selecting appropriate resources (competence), setting reasonable expectations (competence), and building and maintaining community (relatedness). Students described a sense of tension between desiring flexibility and appreciating structure and accountability during RCL; a preference for high-yield, curated resources presented in an organized format during RCL; instances in which the remote curriculum fell short of their expectations or professional goals or in which they felt they had missed out on key clinical learning; and support sought from peers, mentors, and instructors during RCL, as well as the contribution of remote learning technology to a sense of community. CONCLUSIONS: The authors propose 4 guiding principles to address implementation of remote clinical curricula: provide students with choice within the bounds of a well-defined curriculum, curate and organize learning materials carefully and intentionally, orient students to the goals and objectives of the curriculum and discuss students' expectations for professional development, and incorporate structured opportunities for remote mentorship and peer-peer interaction and optimize these opportunities using technology. Educators can draw on the themes, guiding principles, and potential strategies identified to promote and maintain learner motivation during RCL.

Moving From Theory to Practice in Oncology Education When Virtual Is Your Reality.

Evidence-based education is crucial for meeting the evolving needs of learners in the oncology workforce, given the growing demand for well-trained providers and the rapidly changing complexities of cancer care. With the onset of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic, innovative means of delivering educational content in a virtual setting have become a necessary reality. Knowledge of learning science can be translated into concrete, pragmatic methods for using evidence-based education in a virtual world and affords important opportunities for innovation and inclusion across a broad network of educators and learners. We offer key insights and tools to promote attention to and agility with teaching in virtual settings to meet the needs of contemporary educators and learners.

Design-Based Bone Marrow Biopsy Training.

INTRODUCTION: Hematology/oncology fellows must achieve bone marrow biopsy proficiency. However, opportunities for fellows to perform bone marrow biopsies on patients are highly dependent on clinical volume. An easily accessible and feasible system to practice these procedures repetitively has not been described. Other specialties use 3-dimensional (3D)-printed models to practice procedures, but hematology/oncology has not yet incorporated this novel medical education tool, which has the potential to provide such an accessible and feasible system for procedural practice. METHODS: We used design thinking to develop and pilot a bone marrow biopsy simulation using 3D-printed pelvis models. We printed and optimized 2 models through iterative prototyping. In July 2019, we conducted a 1-hour session with 9 fellows. After an anatomy review, fellows practiced biopsies using the models with faculty feedback. To evaluate feasibility, we reviewed session evaluations, measured fellow comfort, surveyed supervising attendings, and gathered fellow and attending feedback. RESULTS: Fellows rated the 3D session highly. Fellow comfort improved after orientation. Supervisors noted no difference between the 2019 fellows and prior years. Fellows praised the opportunity to rehearse mechanics, receive feedback, and internalize anatomy. Fellows suggested incorporating a female pelvis and more soft tissue. Attending feedback on the model aligned with fellow feedback. We implemented the session again in 2020 with adjustments based on feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional printing represents an accessible and feasible educational tool. Three-dimensional-printed models provide opportunities for iterative practice, feedback, and anatomy visualization. Future iterations should continue to incorporate user feedback to optimize model utility.

Developing a Community for Patients With Cancer Through Longer-Term Art Therapy.

PURPOSE: Art therapy (AT) improves quality of life and symptoms in patients with cancer. However, previous studies that have demonstrated these effects focused on time-limited interventions. The benefits of longer-term AT interventions for patients with cancer remain unexplored. We aimed to delineate the benefits of one such intervention for patients with cancer. METHODS: The Art for Recovery open art studio (OAS) is a weekly experience that provides patients the opportunity to express themselves through art and discussion. In April 2019, we sent a cross-sectional survey with closed- and open-ended components to all patients attending the OAS. We analyzed the closed-ended results using descriptive statistics and the open-ended results using directed content analysis through the theoretical framework of community-based development (CBD). RESULTS: The response rate was 82% (18 of 22 patients). The median duration of OAS attendance was 2 years, and the median frequency of attendance was three times per month. All respondents found the OAS very helpful, and 17 (94%) of 18 believed that the friendships they had made were very valuable. Directed content analysis revealed three themes: togetherness, active engagement, and familiar surroundings. These themes and our closed-ended results aligned well with the CBD framework. CONCLUSION: Longer-term AT experiences may provide benefits, such as community development, that briefer interventions lack. Medical centers should consider providing longer-term AT experiences for patients with cancer to give them access to these benefits.