The Majority of Black Orthopaedic Surgeons Report Experiencing Racial Microaggressions During Their Residency Training.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgery is the least-diverse surgical specialty based on race and ethnicity. To our knowledge, the impact of this lack of diversity on discriminatory or noninclusive experiences perceived by Black orthopaedic surgeons during their residency training has never been evaluated. Racial microaggressions were first defined in the 1970s as "subtle verbal, behavioral, and environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative racial slights and insults to the target person or group." Although the term "microaggression" has long been established, more recently, as more workplaces aim to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion, it has entered the medical profession's lexicon as a means of describing the spectrum of racial discrimination, bias, and exclusion in the healthcare environment. QUESTION/PURPOSES: (1) What is the extent of discrimination that is perceived by Black orthopaedic surgeons during residency? (2) What subtypes of racial microaggressions (which encompasses racial discrimination, bias, and exclusion) do Black orthopaedic surgeons experience during residency training, and who are the most common initiators of these microaggressions? (3) What feedback statements could be perceived as racially biased to Black orthopaedic surgeons in residency training? (4) Are there gender differences in the reported types of racial microaggressions recalled by Black respondents during residency training? METHODS: An anonymous survey was administered between July 1, 2020, and September 1, 2020, to practicing orthopaedic surgeons, residents, and fellows in the J. Robert Gladden Orthopaedic Society database who self-identify as Black. There were 455 Black orthopaedic surgeons in practice and 140 Black orthopaedic residents or fellows in the database who met these criteria. Fifty-two percent (310 of 595) of participants responded. Fifty-three percent (243 of 455) were practicing surgeons and 48% (67 of 140) were current residents or fellows. Respondents reported their perception of discrimination in the residency workplace using a modified version of the single-item Perceived Occupational Discrimination Scale and were asked to recall any specific examples of experiences with racial discrimination, bias, or exclusion during their training. Examples were later categorized as different subtypes of racial microaggressions and were quantified through a descriptive analysis and compared by gender. RESULTS: Among survey respondents, 34% (106 of 310) perceived a lot of residency workplace discrimination, 44% (137 of 310) perceived some residency workplace discrimination, 18% (55 of 310) perceived a little residency workplace discrimination, and 4% (12 of 310) perceived no residency workplace discrimination. Categorized examples of racial microaggressions experienced in residency were commonly reported, including being confused for a nonphysician medical staff (nurse or physician's assistant) by 87% (271 of 310) of respondents or nonmedical staff (janitorial or dietary services) by 81% (250 of 310) of respondents. Racially explicit statements received during residency training were reported by 61% (190 of 310) of respondents. Thirty-eight percent (117 of 310) of such statements were reportedly made by patients and 18% (55 of 310) were reportedly made by attending faculty. Fifty percent (155 of 310) of respondents reported receiving at least one of nine potentially exclusionary or devaluing feedback statements during their residency training. Among those respondents, 87% (135 of 155) perceived at least one of the statements to be racially biased in its context. The three feedback statements that, when received, were most frequently perceived as racially biased in their context was that the respondent "matched at their program to fulfill a diversity quota" (94% [34 of 36]), the respondent was unfriendly compared with their peers (92% [24 of 26]), or that the respondent was "intimidating or makes those around him/her uncomfortable" (88% [51 of 58]). When compared by gender, Black women more frequently reported being mistaken for janitors and dietary services at 97% (63 of 65), compared with Black men at 77% (187 of 244; p < 0.01). In addition, Black women more frequently reported being mistaken as nurses or physician assistants (100% [65 of 65]) than Black men did (84% [205 of 244]) during orthopaedic residency training (p < 0.01). Black women also more frequently reported receiving potentially devaluing or exclusionary feedback statements during residency training. CONCLUSION: Perception of workplace discrimination during orthopaedic residency training is high (96%) among Black orthopaedic surgeons in the United States. Most respondents reported experiencing discrimination, bias, and exclusion that could be categorized as specific subtypes of racial microaggressions. Several different examples of racial microaggressions were more commonly reported by Black women. Certain feedback statements were frequently perceived as racially biased by recipients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To better understand barriers to the successful recruitment and retention of Black physicians in orthopaedics, the extent of racial discrimination, bias, and exclusion in residency training must be quantified. This study demonstrates that racial discrimination, bias, and exclusion during residency, wholly categorized as racial microaggressions, are frequently recalled by Black orthopaedic surgeons. A better understanding of the context of these experiences of Black trainees is a necessary starting point for the development of a more inclusive workplace training environment in orthopaedic surgery.

Comparison of Distal Spine Anchors and Distal Pelvic Anchors in Children With Hypotonic Neuromuscular Scoliosis Treated With Growth-friendly Instrumentation.

BACKGROUND: Lower preoperative pelvic obliquity (PO) and L5 tilt have been associated with good radiographic outcomes when the fusion ended short of the pelvis in children with neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS). Our purpose was to identify indications to exclude the pelvis in children with hypotonic NMS treated with growth-friendly instrumentation. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective review. Children with spinal muscular atrophy and muscular dystrophy treated with dual traditional growing rod, magnetically controlled growing rod, or vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib with minimum 2-year follow-up after the index surgery were identified. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-eight patients had distal spine anchors (DSAs) and 87 patients had distal pelvic anchors (DPAs) placed at the index surgery. Demographics and length of follow-up were similar between the groups but there was a greater percentage of DPA patients who were nonambulatory [79 patients (91%) vs. 18 patients (47%), P <0.0001]. Preindex radiographic measures were similar except the DSA patients had a lower PO (11 vs. 19 degrees, P =0.0001) and L5 tilt (8 vs. 12 degrees, P =0.001). Postindex and most recent radiographic data were comparable between the groups. There was no difference in the complication and unplanned returns to the operating room rates.Subanalysis of the DSA group based on ambulatory status showed similar radiographic measures except the ambulatory patients had a lower PO at all time points (preindex: 5 vs. 16 degrees, P =0.011; postindex: 6 vs. 10 degrees, P =0.045; most recent follow-up: 5 vs. 14 degrees, P =0.028). Only 1 ambulatory DSA patient had a PO ≥10 degrees at most recent follow-up compared with 6 nonambulatory DSA patients. Three (8%) DSA patients, all nonambulatory, underwent extension of their instrumentation to the pelvis. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic fixation should be strongly considered in nonambulatory children with hypotonic NMS treated with growth-friendly instrumentation. At intermediate-term follow-up, revision surgery to include the pelvis was rare but DSAs do not seem effective at maintaining control of PO in nonambulatory patients. DSA and DPA were equally effective at maintaining major curve control, and complication and unplanned returns to the operating room rates were similar. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic.

An Analysis of Scoliosis in Autism Spectrum Disorder.

BACKGROUND: Children with autism/Asperger are grouped into the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). It remains uncertain whether children with ASD and scoliosis have radiographic and clinical outcomes similar to idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review of a prospective scoliosis registry evaluated patients who had a posterior spinal fusion±Anterior Spinal Fusion and an underlying diagnosis of ASD between 1990 and 2021. A 2:1 match with AIS patients by age and sex was compared using demographic, radiographic, intraoperative, and SRS-22/30 variables. RESULTS: Thirty patients with ASD (63% male, mean age at surgery 14.6±2.5 y) met inclusion criteria, with a follow-up of 2.46±1.00 years. Despite no differences in curve magnitude preoperatively, patients with ASD had a higher percent correction at 2-year follow-up (66% vs. 57%, P =0.01) and improved mean curve magnitude (20±10 degrees) at 2-year follow-up compared with IS patients (27±11 degrees, P <0.01). ASD patients had less lumbar lordosis preoperatively (40±12 vs. 53±14, P <0.01), but there were no significant differences in sagittal parameters at 2-year follow-up. There were no significant differences in the rate of complications at 2-year follow-up between ASD and AIS cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with ASD exhibited decreased lordosis compared with IS patients preoperatively, their radiographic outcomes at 2-year follow-up were the same. In addition, ASD patients maintained greater curve correction than IS patients at 2 years follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic retrospective study.

The Sanders Classification and Obesity: Do Obese Kids With AIS Present With More Advanced Skeletal Maturity?

INTRODUCTION: Obese and overweight (OOW) patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have been shown to initially present with a more advanced Risser score compared to normal weight (NW) patients. The Sanders Maturity Scale (SMS) is now more commonly used by surgeons to assist with treatment decisions because it more reliably predicts skeletal maturity. However, the relationship between SMS and obesity has not been described. We hypothesize that in patients with AIS, OOW patients will have a higher SMS score on initial presentation when compared to NW patients. METHODS: Billing data from 2 different institutions were used to identify patients with AIS presenting to a pediatric orthopaedic spine surgeon for an initial visit between July 2012 and March 2020. We excluded those without height/weight data, spine radiographs, or left-hand radiographs for measuring SMS stage. Body mass index-for-age percentiles were calculated and used to group patients into NW (<85th percentile) or OOW (85th percentile and above) per Centers for Disease Control guidelines. After collecting preliminary data, a power analysis was performed using average SMS scores between NW and OOW patients with an alpha of 0.5, determining a needed sample size of approximately 300 male and 300 female subjects. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety patients (296 female, 294 male) were identified. The SMS stage at presentation was significantly greater in OOW compared to NW patients for both females (5.9±1.8 vs. 5.2±1.7; P =0.003) and males (4.9±1.9 vs. 4.1±1.8; P =0.002). The major curve magnitude for OOW females was significantly different from NW females (36±16 degrees vs. 30±16 degrees; P =0.004). The major curve magnitude was not different for OOW and NW males ( P =0.3). CONCLUSION: At initial presentation, OOW patients present at a greater skeletal maturity as measured by the SMS compared with NW patients. OOW female patients present with a greater major curve magnitudes than NW female patients. These results highlight negative implications of the pediatric obesity epidemic as it relates to the AIS population. These findings can be used to counsel families and provide anticipatory guidance for the AIS treatment plan. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-cross-sectional study.

Do Children With Medicaid Insurance Have Increased Revision Rates 5 Years After Posterior Spinal Fusions?

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic disparities in musculoskeletal care are increasingly recognized, however, no studies to date have investigated the role of the insurance carrier on outcomes after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with segmental spinal instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: A US insurance dataset was queried using the PearlDiver Mariner software for all patients aged 10 to 18 undergoing PSF for a primary diagnosis of AIS between 2010 and 2020. Age, sex, geographic region, number of levels fused, and baseline medical comorbidities were queried. Complications occurring within 90 days of the index surgery were queried using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes. Revision surgery was also queried up to 5 years after the index PSF. Categorical variables were compared using the Fisher χ 2 tests and continuous variables were compared using independent t tests. All-cause revision within 5 years was compared using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and a log-rank test. Significance was set at P -value <0.05. RESULTS: A total of 10,794 patients were identified with 9006 (83.4%) patients with private insurance and 1788 (16.6%) patients insured by Medicaid. The mean follow-up in the database was 5.36±3 years for patients with private insurance and 4.78±2.9 years for patients with Medicaid insurance ( P <0.001). Children with AIS and Medicaid insurance had a significantly higher prevalence of asthma, hypertension, and obesity. A larger percentage of children with Medicaid insurance (41.3%) underwent a ≥13-level PSF compared with privately insured children (34.5%) ( P <0.001). Medicaid patients did not experience higher odds of postoperative complications; in addition, revision surgeries occurred in 1.1% and 1.8% of patients with private insurance and Medicaid insurance, respectively at 5 years postoperatively ( P =0.223). CONCLUSION: Despite worse baseline comorbidities and longer fusion constructs, AIS patients insured with Medicaid did not have higher rates of complications or revisions at 5-year follow-up versus privately insured patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective cohort study.

Definition of Tweener: Consensus Among Experts in Treating Early-onset Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: The term "Tweener" is colloquially used to refer to early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients whose age and development make them candidates for multiple surgical options. The purpose of this study was to establish expert consensus on a definition to formally characterize the Tweener population. METHODS: A 3-round survey of surgeons in an international EOS study group was conducted. Surgeons were provided with various patient characteristics and asked if each was part of their definition for Tweener patients. Responses were analyzed for consensus (≥70%), near-consensus (60% to 69%), and no consensus (<60%). RESULTS: Consensus was reached (89% of respondents) for including chronological age in the Tweener definition; 8 to 10 years for females and 9 to 11 years for males. Surgeons agreed for inclusion of Sanders score, particularly Sanders 2 (86.0%). Patients who have reached Sanders 4, postmenarche, or have closed triradiate cartilage should not be considered Tweeners. Bone age range of 8 years and 10 months to 10 years and 10 months for females (12 y for males) could be part of the Tweener definition. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the Tweener definition could be the following: patients with open triradiate cartilage who are not postmenarche and have not reached Sanders 4, and if they have one of the following: Sanders 2 or chronological age 8 to 10 years for females (9 to 11 y for males) or bone age 8 years and 10 months to 10 years and 10 months for females (12 y for males). This definition will allow for more focused and comparative research on this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V-expert opinion.

Does Obesity Affect Preoperative Shoulder Balance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

BACKGROUND: Obese patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have been shown to present with larger curve magnitudes preoperatively. However, the effect of obesity on shoulder balance in AIS remains unknown. The purpose of our study was to determine if overweight and obese patients with AIS have worse radiographic shoulder balance on initial presentation when compared with normal weight patients. METHODS: AIS patients <18 years old, with Lenke 1 or 2 curves, who underwent a posterior spinal fusion between March 2013 and December 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. BMI-for-age percentiles as defined by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention were used: obese (≥95th percentile), overweight (85th to <95th percentile), and normal weight (5th to <85th percentile). Shoulder height was measured via the radiographic shoulder height (RSH) method, with an RSH ≤ 1 cm considered balanced. The primary outcome was preoperative shoulder balance. Secondary outcomes included postoperative shoulder balance, major curve correction, and UIV selection. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-four patients (116 [63%] normal weight and 68 [37%] overweight/obese) were included. The mean age at surgery was 13.1 ± 2 years, and mean follow-up was 17.4 ± 13 months. Preoperative shoulder imbalance was significantly greater in the overweight/obese group compared to the normal weight group (1.9 ± 1 cm vs. 1.5 ± 1 cm, p = 0.04). The odds ratio of presenting with unbalanced shoulders was 2.0 (95% CI: 1.02-3.83, p = 0.04) for the overweight/obese group. No significant differences were found for postoperative shoulder balance, UIV selection, or major curve correction. CONCLUSIONS: Overweight and obese patients with AIS are twice as likely to present with unbalanced shoulders preoperatively; however, this difference is not clinically relevant with a mean difference of 0.4 cm between cohorts. Finally, the preoperative BMI percentile did not show a significant effect on the chosen UIV or curve magnitude correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III: this is a retrospective case-control study.

Disparities in Pediatric Scoliosis: The Impact of Race and Insurance Type on Access to Nonoperative Treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has evidence-based, nonoperative treatments proven to be effective with early diagnosis and prompt treatment. The purpose of this study was to identify potential disparities in access to nonoperative treatment for AIS. Specifically, we sought to determine the interaction of socioeconomic factors on a major curve magnitude and recommend treatment at the initial presentation. METHODS: A retrospective review of AIS patients who underwent surgery at a single tertiary pediatric hospital between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2018 was conducted. Patients were divided into 2 groups for comparison: patients with public insurance (PUB) and those with private insurance (PRV). Primary variables analyzed were patient race, Area Deprivation Index (ADI), major curve magnitude, and treatment recommendation at the initial presentation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the predictors of the major curve magnitude at presentation. RESULTS: A total of 341 patients met the inclusion criteria; PUB and PRV groups consisted of 182 (53.4%) and 159 (46.6%) children, respectively. Overall, the major curve magnitude at presentation was significantly higher in PUB compared with PRV patients (50.0° vs. 45.1°; P =0.004) and higher in Black patients compared to White patients (51.8 vs. 47.0, P =0.042). Surgery was recommended for 49.7% of the PUB group and 43.7% of the PRV group. A lesser number of PUB patients had curve magnitudes within the range of brace indications (≤40°) compared to PRV patients (22.5% vs. 35.2%, respectively; P =0.010). The odds of having an initial major curve magnitude <40 degrees were 67% lower among Black patients with public insurance compared to Black patients with private insurance (OR=0.33; 95% CI: 0.13-0.83; P =0.019). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated disparity in access to nonoperative treatment for pediatric scoliosis. Black patients with public insurance were the most at-risk to present with curve magnitudes exceeding brace indications. Future work focused on understanding the reasons for this significant disparity may help to promote more equitable access to effective nonoperative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The Effect of Surgeon Experience on Outcomes Following Growth Friendly Instrumentation for Early Onset Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to utilize a multicenter, multisurgeon cohort to assess the effect of surgeon experience on outcomes of growth friendly instrumentation (GFI) in early onset scoliosis (EOS). We hypothesized that unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR), estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical time would be greater amongst early career surgeons (ECSs) when compared with advanced career surgeons (ACSs). METHODS: An international pediatric spine database was queried for patients ages 2 to 10 years treated by posterior distraction-based GFI with at least of 2-year follow up. Two groups were created for analysis based on surgeon experience: ECSs (with ≤10 y of experience) and ACSs (with >10 y of experience). The primary outcome was UPROR. Additional outcomes included: operating room time, EBL, neurological deficits, infection rate, hardware failure, and the Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24). Subgroup analysis was performed for further assessment based on procedure type, superior anchor type, etiology, and curve severity. RESULTS: A total of 960 patients met inclusion criteria including 243 (25.3%) treated by ECS. Etiology, sex, superior anchor, and EOSQ-24 scores were similar between groups (P>0.05). There were no clinically significant differences in patient age or preoperative major coronal curve. UPROR (35.8% vs. 32.7%, P=0.532), infection (17.0% vs. 15.6%, P=0.698), operating room time (235 vs. 231 min, P=0.755), and EBL (151 vs. 155 mL, P=0.833) were comparable between ECS and ACS groups. The frequency of having at least 1 complication was relatively high but comparable among groups (60.7% vs. 62.6%, P=0.709). EOSQ-24 subdomain scores were similar between groups at 2-year follow-up (P>0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed that ECS had increased surgical time compared with ACS in severe curves >90 degrees (270 vs. 229 min, P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first multicenter assessment of surgeon experience on outcomes in EOS. Overall, surgeon experience did not significantly influence UPROR, complication rates, EBL, or surgical time associated with GFI in this cohort of EOS patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Reliability of Low-dose Biplanar Radiography in Assessing Pediatric Torsional Pathology.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose biplanar radiographs (LDBRs) significantly reduce ionizing radiation exposure and may be of use in evaluating lower extremity torsion in children. In this study, we evaluated how well femoral and tibial torsional profiles obtained by LDBR correspond with 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance axial imaging (MRI) in pediatric patients with suspected rotational abnormalities. METHODS: Patients who had both LDBR and CT/MRI studies performed for suspected lower extremity rotational deformities were included. Unlike previous publications, this study focused on patients with lower extremity torsional pathology, and bilateral lower extremities of 17 patients were included. CT/MRI torsion was measured using the Reikerås method, after conversion to 3D reconstructions. The LDBRs were deidentified and sent to the software division of EOS imaging, who created 3D reconstructions and evaluated each reconstruction for the torsional quantification of the femurs and tibiae. These imaging modalities were compared using correlation statistics and Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 12.1±1.7 years old. Torsional values of the femur were significantly lower in LDBRs versus 3D CT/MRIs at 17.7±15.1 and 23.3±17.3, respectively (P=0.001). Torsional values of the tibia were similar in LDBRs versus 3D CT/MRIs at 23.6±10.6 and 25.3±11.2, respectively (P=0.503). There was a good intermodality agreement between LDBR and 3D CT/MRI torsional values in the femur (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.807) and tibia (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.768). Bland-Altman analyses showed a fixed bias with a mean difference of -5.6±8.8 degrees between femoral torsion measurements in LDBRs versus 3D CT/MRIs (P=0.001); 15% (5/34) of femurs had a clinically significant measurement discrepancy. Fixed bias for LDBR measurements compared with 3D CT/MRIs for the tibia was not observed (P=0.193), however, 12% (4/34) of tibias had a clinically significant measurement discrepancy. CONCLUSION: Although we found strong correlations between torsional values of the femur and tibia measured from LDBRs and 3D CT/MRIs, torsional values of the femur produced from LDBRs were significantly lower than values obtained from 3D CT/MRIs with some notable outliers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Outcomes and Complications in Management of Congenital Myopathy Early-Onset Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Congenital myopathies (CMs) are complex conditions often associated with early-onset scoliosis (EOS). The purpose of this study was to investigate radiographic outcomes in CM patients undergoing EOS instrumentation as well as complications. Secondarily, we sought to compare these patients to a population with higher prevalence, cerebral palsy (CP) EOS patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of a prospectively collected multicenter registry. The registry was queried for EOS patients with growth-sparing instrumentation (vertical expandable prosthetic titanium ribs, magnetically controlled growing rods, traditional growing rod, or Shilla) and a CM or CP diagnosis with minimum 2 years follow-up. Outcomes included major curve magnitude, T1-S1 height, kyphosis, and complications. RESULTS: Sixteen patients with CM were included. Six (37.5%) children with CM experienced 11 complications by 2 years. Mean major curve magnitude for CM patients was improved postoperatively and maintained at 2 years (P<0.01), with no significant increase in T1-S1 height or maximum kyphosis(P>0.05). Ninety-seven patients with CP EOS were included as a comparative cohort. Fewer CP patients required baseline respiratory support compared with CM patients (20.0% vs. 92.9%, P<0.01). Fifty-four (55.7%) CP patients experienced a total of 105 complications at 2 years. There was no evidence that the risk of complication or radiographic outcomes differs between cohorts at 2 years, though CP EOS patients experienced significant improvement in all measurements at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: EOS CM children face a high risk of complication after growing instrumentation, with similar curve correction and risk of complication to CP patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Surgical Outcomes of Obese Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis From Endemic Areas of Obesity in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Obesity rates continue to rise among children and adolescents across the globe. A multicenter research consortium composed of institutions in the Southern US, located in states endemic for childhood obesity, was formed to evaluate the effect of obesity on pediatric musculoskeletal disorders. This study evaluates the effect of body mass index (BMI) percentile and socioeconomic status (SES) on surgical site infections (SSIs) and perioperative complications in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated with posterior spinal fusion (PSF). METHODS: Eleven centers in the Southern US retrospectively reviewed postoperative AIS patients after PSF between 2011 and 2017. Each center contributed data to a centralized database from patients in the following BMI-for-age groups: normal weight (NW, 5th to <85th percentile), overweight (OW, 85th to <95th percentile), and obese (OB, ≥95th percentile). The primary outcome variable was the occurrence of an SSI. SES was measured by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), with higher scores indicating a lower SES. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty-one patients were included in this study (256 NW, 235 OW, and 260 OB). OB and OW patients presented with significantly higher ADIs indicating a lower SES (P<0.001). In addition, SSI rates were significantly different between BMI groups (0.8% NW, 4.3% OW, and 5.4% OB, P=0.012). Further analysis showed that superficial and not deep SSIs were significantly different between BMI groups. These differences in SSI rates persisted even while controlling for ADI. Wound dehiscence and readmission rates were significantly different between groups (P=0.004 and 0.03, respectively), with OB patients demonstrating the highest rates. EBL and cell saver return were significantly higher in overweight patients (P=0.007 and 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: OB and OW AIS patients have significantly greater superficial SSI rates than NW patients, even after controlling for SES. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Medical Malpractice in Pediatric Orthopaedics: A Systematic Review of US Case Law.

BACKGROUND: Compared with other orthopaedic subspecialties, pediatric orthopaedic surgeons are thought to be at greater risk for malpractice claims; however, there is scant research on this topic. The purpose of our study was to characterize publicly available malpractice cases pertaining to pediatric orthopaedics to determine the (1) most common specialties of the physicians implicated, (2) most common diagnoses involved, (3) rate of verdicts in favor of the plaintiff, (4) amount of indemnity payments resulting from all verdicts versus verdicts in which only an orthopaedic surgeon was involved, and (5) outcomes of cases that were appealed. METHODS: The Westlaw legal database was queried for jury verdicts, settlements, and appellate cases using the search terms "pediatric" AND "orthopaedic" from December 31, 1984, to January 1, 2016, yielding 176 appellate court cases and 189 jury reports/settlements. After excluding duplicate cases and those involving patients aged 21 years or older, 36 appellate and 84 jury reports/settlement cases remained for analysis. RESULTS: Lawsuits against orthopaedic surgeons and pediatricians were most common, in cases involving fracture diagnosis and misdiagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip, respectively. Of the 84 cases, 43 rulings favored the plaintiffs. The median (interquartile range) indemnity payment was $900,000 ($1.9 million), and for cases in which only the orthopaedic surgeon was named as the defendant, the median (interquartile range) indemnity payment was $675,000 ($827,000). Of the 34 appellate cases, 16 cases initially ruled in favor of the defendant were upheld and 13 were reversed/remanded. Five cases initially ruled in favor of the plaintiff were upheld, and none was reversed/remanded. CONCLUSIONS: Malpractice lawsuits named orthopaedic surgeons and pediatricians more often than physicians in other specialties. Orthopaedic surgeons were sued most often for management of fractures and pediatricians for mismanagement of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Nearly 51% of malpractice cases were ruled in favor of the plaintiff, with high indemnity payments. However, when cases that were ruled in favor of the physician were appealed, most verdicts were upheld. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Rotation effect and anatomic landmark accuracy for midline placement of lumbar artificial disc under fluoroscopy.

PURPOSE: Total disc arthroplasty can be a viable alternative to fusion for degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine. The correct placement of the prosthesis within 3 mm from midline is critical for optimal function. Intra-operative radiographic error could lead to malposition of the prosthesis. The objective of this study was first to measure the effect of fluoroscopy angle on the placement of prosthesis under fluoroscopy. Secondly, determine the visual accuracy of the placement of artificial discs using different anatomical landmarks (pedicle, waist, endplate, spinous process) under fluoroscopy. METHODS: Artificial discs were implanted into three cadaver specimens at L2-3, L3-4, and L4-L5. Fluoroscopic images were obtained at 0°, 2.5°, 5°, 7.5°, 10°, and 15° from the mid axis. Computerized tomography (CT) scans were obtained after the procedure. Distances were measured from each of the anatomic landmarks to the center of the implant on both fluoroscopy and CT. The difference between fluoroscopy and CT scans was compared to evaluate the position of prosthesis to each anatomic landmark at different angles. RESULTS: The differences between the fluoroscopy to CT measurements from the implant to pedicle was 1.31 mm, p < 0.01; implant to waist was 1.72 mm, p < 0.01; implant to endplate was 1.99 mm, p < 0.01; implant to spinous process was 3.14 mm, p < 0.01. When the fluoroscopy angle was greater than 7.5°, the difference between fluoroscopy and CT measurements was greater than 3 mm for all landmarks. CONCLUSIONS: A fluoroscopy angle of 7.5° or more can lead to implant malposition greater than 3 mm. The pedicle is the most accurate of the anatomic landmarks studied for placement of total artificial discs in the lumbar spine.

Low Prevalence of Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Patients With Achondroplasia.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries and their subsequent reconstructions are common in the general population, but there has been no research regarding ACL or PCL injuries in patients with achondroplasia, the most common skeletal dysplasia. Our goals were to (1) evaluate the prevalence of ACL and PCL injuries in adolescents and adults with achondroplasia, (2) compare this prevalence with that reported for the general population, (3) determine how many patients with ACL or PCL injuries underwent ligament reconstruction as treatment, and (4) determine patient activity levels as they relate to the rate of ACL/PCL injuries and reconstructions. METHODS: We reviewed medical records of 430 patients with achondroplasia seen in the senior author's clinic from 2002 through 2014. Demographic data were reviewed, as well as any documentation of ACL or PCL injury or reconstruction. We called all 430 patients by telephone, and 148 agreed to participate in our survey, whereas 1 declined. We asked these patients about their history of ACL or PCL injury or reconstruction, as well as current and past physical activity levels. RESULTS: No ACL or PCL injuries were found on chart review. One patient reached by telephone reported an ACL injury that did not require reconstruction. This yielded a theoretical prevalence of 3/430 (0.7%). Of the 148 patients surveyed, 43 (29%) reported low physical activity, 75 (51%) reported moderate physical activity, and 26 (17%) reported high physical activity. There was no significant difference in the rate of ACL injury when stratified by physical activity level (P=0.102). CONCLUSIONS: ACL and PCL injuries and reconstructions are extremely rare in patients with achondroplasia, which cannot be completely ascribed to a low level of physical activity. One possible explanation is that patients with achondroplasia, on an average, have a more anterior tibial slope compared with those without achondroplasia, which decreases the force generated within the ACL and may protect against ACL injury. Further research is needed to explore possible causes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-retrospective review.

What's New in the Management of Neuromuscular Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) can pose treatment challenges related to medical comorbidities and altered spinopelvic anatomy. We reviewed the recent literature regarding evaluation and management of NMS patients and explored areas where further research is needed. METHODS: We searched the PubMed database for all papers related to the treatment of NMS published from January 1, 2011 through July 31, 2014, yielding 70 papers. RESULTS: A total of 39 papers contributed compelling new findings. Steroid treatment has been most promising in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, leading to a significantly lower death rate, better pulmonary function, and longer independent ambulation. Growing rods in early-onset NMS were shown to result in significant improvements in major Cobb angles and pelvic obliquity, with low complication rates in patients with spinal muscular atrophy but high infection rates in those with cerebral palsy. Early reports of magnetic growing rods in NMS patients are favorable. Intraoperative neural monitoring is variable in this patient population; however, use of transcranial motor-evoked potentials in NMS patients seems to be safe. Blood loss is the highest in NMS patients when compared with all other diagnostic categories. However, tranexamic acid seems to significantly lower intraoperative blood loss. In a multicenter study, patients diagnosed with NMS had the highest surgical-site infection rate at 13.1%. Best-practice guidelines have been created regarding prevention of infection in NMS patients. Preoperative nutritional optimization and postoperative nutritional supplementation seem to help with lowering the infection rate in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: There have been major advances in the management of NMS patients, but many challenges remain. Further multicenter studies and randomized clinical trials are needed, particularly in the areas of infection prophylaxis, nutritional optimization, improvement in intraoperative neural monitoring, and prevention of proximal junctional kyphosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4-literature review.

The Tibial Slope in Patients With Achondroplasia: Its Characterization and Possible Role in Genu Recurvatum Development.

BACKGROUND: Genu recurvatum, a posterior resting position of the knee, is a common lower extremity deformity in patients with achondroplasia and has been thought to be secondary to ligamentous laxity. To the best of our knowledge, the role of the tibial slope has not been investigated, and no studies describe the tibial slope in patients with achondroplasia. Our goals were to characterize the tibial slope in children and adults with achondroplasia, explore its possible role in the development of genu recurvatum, and compare the tibial slope in patients with achondroplasia to that in the general population. METHODS: We reviewed 252 lateral knee radiographs of 130 patients with achondroplasia seen at our clinic from November 2007 through September 2013. Patients were excluded if they had previous lower extremity surgery or radiographs with extreme rotation. We analyzed patient demographics and, on all radiographs, the tibial slope. We then compared the mean tibial slope to norms in the literature. Tibial slopes >90 degrees had an anterior tibial slope and received a positive prefix. Statistical analysis included intraclass and interclass reliability, Pearson correlation coefficient, and the Student t tests (significance, P<0.05). RESULTS: The overall mean tibial slope for the 252 knees was +1.32±7 degrees, which was significantly more anterior than the normal slopes reported in the literature for adults (7.2 to 10.7 degrees, P=0.0001) and children (10 to 11 degrees, P=0.0001). The Pearson correlation coefficient for mean tibial slope and age showed negative correlations of -0.4011 and -0.4335 for left and right knees, respectively. This anterior tibial slope produces proximal and posterior vector force components, which may shift the knee posteriorly in weightbearing. CONCLUSIONS: The mean tibial slope is significantly more anterior in patients with achondroplasia than in the general population; however, this difference diminishes as patients' age. An anterior tibial slope may predispose to a more posterior resting knee position, also known as genu recurvatum. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-retrospective case series.

Implant-related Fractures in Children With Proximal Femoral Osteotomy: Blade Plate Versus Screw-side Plate Constructs.

BACKGROUND: Implant design may affect risk of fracture, especially in the proximal femur, which has been shown to have the highest risk of implant-related fracture (IRF). Blade plate (BPL) and screw-side plate (SSP) implants are used to stabilize proximal femoral osteotomies (PFOs). Our goal was to compare BPL and SSP constructs with regard to the rate, location, and timing of IRF in children undergoing PFOs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiographic records from 1 pediatric orthopaedic practice from 1995 through 2010. We identified 734 children 18 years or younger who underwent PFO with a BPL (480 patients) or an SSP (254 patients). Manufacture and style of implants were consistent throughout this period. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of mean age, sex, race, or diagnosis. The 2 groups were compared with respect to the rate, location, and timing of IRF. The t, Z, χ, and Fisher exact tests were used to analyze the data (statistical significance, P<0.05 for all analyses). RESULTS: The IRF rates were 2.9% and 1.6% in the BPL and SSP groups, respectively (P=0.27). The overall rate of IRF in all patients was 2.5%. Fractures distal to the implant occurred in 7 of 14 patients in the BPL group and 3 of 4 patients in the SSP group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in location of fracture with respect to the implant (P=0.78). The mean times to fracture were 3.8±2.9 and 2.4±2.3 years (P=0.39) in the BPL and SSP groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of IRF in children after PFO is substantial. Despite differences in design, there was no significant difference between BPL and SSP implants with respect to IRF risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

A multicenter evaluation of the time and travel burden on families with children treated for early-onset scoliosis.

PURPOSE: Patients who undergo growth-friendly (GF) treatment for early-onset scoliosis (EOS) undergo multiple clinical and surgical encounters. We sought to quantify the associated temporal and travel burden and estimate subsequent cost. METHODS: Four centers in an international study group combined data on EOS patients who underwent surgical GF treatment from 2006 to 2021. Data collected included demographics, scoliosis etiology, GF implant, encounter type, and driving distance. We applied 2022 IRS and BLS data or $0.625/mile and $208.2/day off work to calculate a relative financial burden. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were analyzed (55% female). Etiologies were: congenital (33.3%), idiopathic (18.7%), neuromuscular (30.7%), and syndromic (17.3%). The average age at the index procedure was 5.5 years. For the 300 patients, 5899 encounters were recorded (average 18 encounters/patient). Aggregate encounter types were 2521 clinical office encounters (43%), 2045 surgical lengthening encounters (35%), 1157 magnetic lengthening encounters (20%), 149 spinal fusions (3%), and 27 spinal fusion revisions (0.5%). When comparing patients by scoliosis etiology or by GF implant type, no significant differences were noted in the total number of encounters or average travel distance. Patients traveled a median round trip distance of 158 miles/encounter between their homes and treating institutions (range 2.4-5654 miles), with a cumulative median distance of 2651 miles for the entirety of their treatment (range 29-90,552 miles), at an estimated median cost of $1656.63. The mean number of days off work was 18 (range 3-75), with an associated loss of $3643.50 in income. CONCLUSION: Patients with EOS averaged 18 encounters for GF surgical treatment. These patients and their families traveled a median distance of 158 miles/encounter, with an estimated combined mileage and loss of income of $5300.

What is the role of plastic surgery for incisional closures in pediatric spine surgery? Results from a pediatric spine study group survey.

Current best practice guidelines recommend a plastics-style multilayer wound closure for high-risk pediatric spine surgery. However, plastic surgery closure of spinal incisions remains controversial. This study investigates surgeon perceptions and practice patterns regarding plastic surgery multilayered closure (PMC) in pediatric spine surgery. All surgeons in an international pediatric spine study group received a 30-question survey assessing incisional closure practices, frequency of plastic surgery collaboration, and drain management. Relationship to practice size, setting, geographic region, and individual diagnoses were analyzed. 87/178 (49%) surgeons responded from 79% of participating sites. Plastics utilization rates differed by diagnosis: neuromuscular scoliosis 16.9%, early onset scoliosis 7.8%, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 2.8% (P < 0.0001). Plastics were used more for early onset scoliosis [odds ratio (OR) 18.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.5, 40.2; P < 0.001] and neuromuscular scoliosis [OR 29.2 (12.2, 69.9); P < 0.001] than adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Plastics use was unrelated to practice size, setting, or geographic region (P ≥ 0.09). Respondents used plastics more often for spina bifida and underweight patients compared to all other indications (P < 0.001). Compared to orthopaedic management, drains were utilized more often by plastic surgery (85 vs. 21%, P = 0.06) and for longer durations (P = 0.001). Eighty-nine percent of surgeons felt plastics increased operative time (58 ±â€…37 min), and 34% felt it increased length of hospitalization. Surgeons who routinely utilize plastics were more likely to believe PMC decreases wound complications (P = 0.007). The perceived benefit of plastic surgery varies, highlighting equipoise among pediatric spine surgeons. An evidence-based guideline is needed to optimize utilization of plastics in pediatric spine surgery.