Higher Doses of Calcium Associated With Survival in Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Calcium is required for coagulation, cardiac output, and peripheral vascular resistance. Between 85% and 94% of trauma patients treated with massive blood transfusion develop hypocalcemia.1 The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between increased intravenous calcium administration during massive transfusion and improved survival of trauma patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of trauma patients who received massive transfusion over a 2-y period. Doses of elemental calcium administered per unit of blood product transfused were calculated by calcium to blood product ratio (CBR). Chi-square test evaluated association between coagulopathy and 30-d mortality. Two-sample t-test evaluated association between CBR and coagulopathy. Bivariate regression analysis evaluated association between CBR and blood products transfused per patient. Multivariable logistic regression analysis, controlling for age, sex, coagulopathy, and Injury Severity Score evaluated the association between CBR and mortality. RESULTS: The study included 77 patients. Coagulopathy was associated with increased 30-d mortality (P < 0.05). Patients who survived had higher CBR than those who died (P < 0.05). CBR was associated with a significant reduction in total blood products transfused per patient (P < 0.05). CBR was not associated with coagulopathy (P = 0.24). Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that Injury Severity Score ≥16, coagulopathy and decreased CBR were significant predictors of mortality (P < 0.05). CBR above 50 mg was a predictor of survival (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Higher doses of calcium given per blood product transfused were associated with improved 30-d survival and decreased blood product transfusions.

Using implementation science to decrease variation and high opioid administration in a surgical ICU.

BACKGROUND: High doses and prolonged duration of opioids are associated with tolerance, dependence, and increased mortality. Unfortunately, despite recent efforts to curb outpatient opioid prescribing because of the ongoing epidemic, utilization remains high in the intensive care setting, with intubated patients commonly receiving infusions with a potency much higher than doses required to achieve pain control. We attempted to use implementation science techniques to monitor and reduce excessive opioid prescribing in ventilated patients in our surgical intensive care unit (SICU). METHODS: We conducted a prospective study investigating opioid administration in a closed SICU at an academic medical center over 18 months. Commonly accepted conversions were used to aggregate daily patient opioid use. Patients with a history of chronic opioid use and those being treated with an intracranial pressure monitor/drain, neuromuscular blocker, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were excluded. If the patient spent a portion of a day on a ventilator, that day's total was included in the "vent group." morphine milligram equivalents per patient were collected for each patient and assigned to the on-call intensivist. Intensivists were blinded to the data for the first 7 months. They were then provided with academic detailing followed by audit and feedback over the subsequent 11 months, demonstrating how opioid utilization during their time in the SICU compared with the unit average and a blinded list of the other attendings. Student's t tests were performed to compare opioid utilization before and after initiation of academic detailing and audit and feedback. RESULTS: Opioid utilization in patients on a ventilator decreased by 20.1% during the feedback period, including less variation among all intensivists and a 30.9% reduction by the highest prescribers. CONCLUSION: Implementation science approaches can effectively reduce variation in opioid prescribing, especially for high outliers in a SICU. These interventions may reduce the risks associated with prolonged use of high-dose opioids. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level II.

Moving the needle on time to resuscitation: An EAST prospective multicenter study of vascular access in hypotensive injured patients using trauma video review.

BACKGROUND: Vascular access in hypotensive trauma patients is challenging. Little evidence exists on the time required and success rates of vascular access types. We hypothesized that intraosseous (IO) access would be faster and more successful than peripheral intravenous (PIV) and central venous catheter (CVC) access in hypotensive patients. METHODS: An EAST prospective multicenter trial was performed; 19 centers provided data. Trauma video review was used to evaluate the resuscitations of hypotensive (systolic blood pressure ≤90 mm Hg) trauma patients. Highly granular data from video recordings were abstracted. Data collected included vascular access attempt type, location, success rate, and procedural time. Demographic and injury-specific variables were obtained from the medical record. Success rates, procedural durations, and time to resuscitation were compared among access strategies (IO vs. PIV vs. CVC). RESULTS: There were 1,410 access attempts that occurred in 581 patients with a median age of 40 years (27-59 years) and an Injury Severity Score of 22 [10-34]. Nine hundred thirty-two PIV, 204 IO, and 249 CVC were attempted. Seventy percent of access attempts were successful but were significantly less likely to be successful in females (64% vs. 71%, p = 0.01). Median time to any access was 5.0 minutes (3.2-8.0 minutes). Intraosseous had higher success rates than PIV or CVC (93% vs. 67% vs. 59%, p < 0.001) and remained higher after subsequent failures (second attempt, 85% vs. 59% vs. 69%, p = 0.08; third attempt, 100% vs. 33% vs. 67%, p = 0.002). Duration varied by access type (IO, 36 [23-60] seconds; PIV, 44 [31-61] seconds; CVC 171 [105-298]seconds) and was significantly different between IO versus CVC ( p < 0.001) and PIV versus CVC ( p < 0.001) but not PIV versus IO. Time to resuscitation initiation was shorter in patients whose initial access attempt was IO, 5.8 minutes versus 6.7 minutes ( p = 0.015). This was more pronounced in patients arriving to the hospital with no established access (5.7 minutes vs. 7.5 minutes, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intraosseous is as fast as PIV and more likely to be successful compared with other access strategies in hypotensive trauma patients. Patients whose initial access attempt was IO were resuscitated more expeditiously. Intraosseous access should be considered a first line therapy in hypotensive trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level II.

Management of T-cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia and concurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma.

T-cell large granular leukemia (T-LGL) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by the clonal expansion of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. We present a unique case of T-LGL and concurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma occurring in a patient with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis. Pathology revealed a high-grade dedifferentiated liposarcoma. The diagnosis of T-LGL with a synchronous retroperitoneal sarcoma is a case that highlights the surgical management of these two rare conditions.

Phyllodes tumor masquerading as a fungating breast mass.

Phyllodes tumor of the breast is an uncommonly encountered disease. The tumor presenting as fungating breast mass or 'ruptured' breast is an even more rare presentation of an unusual disease. This report documents the case of a 60-year-old female with delayed presentation of a large exophytic mass of the left breast. Biopsy of this lesion was non-diagnostic, so excision via left total mastectomy was performed. The final pathology was consistent with malignant phyllodes tumor. This report highlights the features of a rare breast cancer, the challenges in obtaining a definitive diagnosis, and the treatment of this disease, in an effort to provide clinicians with an example of the management of such a peculiar entity.