Measuring Ultrasonographic Thickness of the Achilles Tendon Insertion Is Less Reliable Than the Midportion in Healthy Tendons and Patients With Tendinopathy.

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound is the preferred imaging method in the diagnostic process of Achilles tendinopathy (AT). Ultrasound tissue characterization (UTC) is a frequently used, standardized and valid method to assess tendon geometry in AT patients. It is unknown whether UTC is reliable for measuring Achilles tendon thickness. The aim of the study was to assess intra- and inter-rater reliability of Achilles tendon thickness measurements using UTC in both asymptomatic individuals and patients with AT, and to evaluate if the reliability of thickness measurements differs between the midportion and insertional area. METHODS: Exactly 50 patients with AT and 50 asymptomatic individuals were included. Using the conventional US and standardized UTC procedure maximum thickness was measured in the midportion and insertion region. To determine inter- and intra-rater reliabilities, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used. RESULTS: The ICC values for inter- and intra-rater reliability were classified as "excellent," for the AT group (0.93 [95% CI: 0.88-0.96] and 0.95 [0.92-0.97]) and asymptomatic participants (0.91 [0.87-0.94] and 0.94 [0.92-0.96]). The reliability of measuring tendon thickness in the midportion region was "excellent," with both inter-rater (0.97 [0.95-0.98]) and intra-rater (0.98 [0.96-0.99]) ICC values indicating high levels of agreement. In the insertional region, ICC values for inter-rater (0.79 [0.69-0.87]) and intra-rater (0.89 [0.84-0.93]) reliability were "moderate to good." CONCLUSION: We showed excellent reliability for measuring the US thickness of the midportion and good reliability of measuring the insertional region in patients with AT. Significantly lower ICCs were observed for the reliability of thickness measurements in the insertional region when compared with the midportion.

Low socioeconomic status is associated with worse treatment outcomes in patients with Achilles tendinopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether there is a difference in symptom severity at baseline and 24 weeks follow-up between conservatively managed patients with Achilles tendinopathy (AT) with low socioeconomic status (SES) compared with those with high SES. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 200 patients with AT were included and treated according to current guidelines. We linked a neighbourhood SES indicator based on income, employment and education level and divided the patient population into quintiles, with Q1 being the highest SES and Q5 the lowest. Symptom severity at baseline and follow-up was assessed using the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) score. Treatment adherence was not measured. We used a general linear model and the mean VISA-A scores at baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 weeks follow-up were compared between Q1 (n=45) and Q5 (n=39), while adjusting for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), Ankle Activity Score, symptom duration and baseline VISA-A score. RESULTS: Patients had a median age of 51 years and median BMI of 25.4, 40% were female. 74%, 70% and 58% of the participants completed the VISA-A at 6, 12 and 24 weeks, respectively. VISA-A scores at baseline were similar for Q1 and Q5 (43.9 and 41.8, p=0.591). At 24 weeks, there was a mean (95% CI) difference of 11.2 (1.0 to 21.3, p=0.032) points in favour of Q1 on the VISA-A score. CONCLUSION: AT patients with low SES may have worse outcomes when treated using the current guidelines. The difference in VISA-A score at 24 weeks is larger than the minimal clinically important difference and might be clinically relevant, but comes with uncertainty due to the large dispersion in the data. Clinicians need to consider the impact of social inequality when developing and implementing treatment plans.