Prophylactic Antibiotic Duration and Infectious Complications in Pancreatoduodenectomy Patients With Biliary Stents: Opportunity for De-escalation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare infectious complications in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) patients with biliary stents treated with short, medium, or long durations of prophylactic antibiotics. BACKGROUND: Pre-existing biliary stents have historically been associated with higher infection risk after PD. Patients are administered prophylactic antibiotics, but the optimal duration remains unknown. METHODS: This single-institution retrospective cohort study included consecutive PD patients from October 2016 to April 2022. Antibiotics were continued past the operative dose per surgeon discretion. Infection rates were compared by short (≤24 h), medium (>24 but ≤96 h), and long (>96 h) duration antibiotics. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to evaluate associations with a primary composite outcome of wound infection, organ-space infection, sepsis, or cholangitis. RESULTS: Among 542 PD patients, 310 patients (57%) had biliary stents. The composite outcome occurred in 28% (34/122) short, 25% (27/108) medium, and 29% (23/80) long-duration ( P =0.824) antibiotic patients. There were no differences in other infection rates or mortality. On multivariable analysis, antibiotic duration was not associated with infection rate. Only postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio 33.1, P <0.001) and male sex (odds ratio 1.9, P =0.028) were associated with the composite outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Among 310 PD patients with biliary stents, long-duration prophylactic antibiotics were associated with similar composite infection rates to short and medium durations but were used almost twice as often in high-risk patients. These findings may represent an opportunity to de-escalate antibiotic coverage and promote risk-stratified antibiotic stewardship in stented patients by aligning antibiotic duration with risk-stratified pancreatectomy clinical pathways.

Detection and Management of Perioperative Hyperglycemia at a Tertiary Cancer Center.

INTRODUCTION: To improve the detection and management of perioperative hyperglycemia at our tertiary cancer center, we implemented a glycemic control quality improvement initiative. The primary goal was to decrease the percentage of diabetic patients with median postoperative glucose levels > 180 mg/dL during hospitalization by 15% within 2 years. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team standardized preoperative screening, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative hyperglycemia management. We included all patients undergoing nonemergent inpatient and outpatient operations. We used a t test, rank sum, chi-square, or Fisher's exact test to assess differences in outcomes between patients at baseline (BL) (10/2018-4/2019), during the first phase (P1) (10/2019-4/2020), second phase (P2) (5/2020-12/2020), and maintenance phase (M) (1/2021-10/2022). RESULTS: The analysis included 9891 BL surgical patients (1470 with diabetes), 8815 P1 patients (1233 with diabetes), 10,401 P2 patients (1531 with diabetes) and 30,410 M patients (4265 with diabetes). The percentage of diabetic patients with median glucose levels >180 mg/dL during hospitalization decreased 32% during the initiative (BL, 20.1%; P1, 16.9%; P2, 12.1%; M, 13.7% [P < .001]). We also saw reductions in the percentages of diabetic patients with median glucose levels >180 mg/dL intraoperatively (BL, 34.0%; P1, 26.6%; P2, 23.9%; M, 20.3% [P < .001]) and in the postanesthesia care unit (BL, 36.0%; P1, 30.4%; P2, 28.5%; M, 25.8% [P < .001]). The percentage of patients screened for diabetes by hemoglobin A1C increased during the initiative (BL, 17.5%; P1, 52.5%; P2, 66.8%; M 74.5% [P < .001]). CONCLUSIONS: Our successful initiative can be replicated in other hospitals to standardize and improve glycemic control among diabetic surgical patients.

Classification of Post-Pancreatectomy Readmissions and Opportunities for Targeted Mitigation Strategies.

OBJECTIVE: Within a learning health system paradigm, this study sought to evaluate reasons for readmission to identify opportunities for improvement. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Post-pancreatectomy readmission rates have remained constant despite improved index hospitalization metrics. METHODS: We performed a single-institution case-control study of consecutive pancreatectomy patients (October 2016 - April 2022). Complications were prospectively graded in biweekly faculty and advanced practice provider meetings. We analyzed risk factors during index hospitalization and categorized indications for 90-day readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 835 patients, median age 65 years and 51% (427/835) males, underwent 64% (534/835) pancreatoduodenectomies, 34% (280/835) distal pancreatectomies, and 3% (21/835) other resections. 24% (204/835) of patients were readmitted. Primary indication for readmission was technical in 51% (105/204), infectious in 17% (35/204), and medical/metabolic in 31% (64/204) of patients. Procedures were required in 77% (81/105) and 60% (21/35) of technical and infectious readmissions, respectively, while 66% (42/64) of medical/metabolic readmissions were managed non-invasively. During the index hospitalization, benign pathology (OR 1.8, P=0.049), biochemical pancreatic leak (OR 2.3, P=0.001), bile/gastric/chyle leak (OR 6.4, P=0.001), organ-space infection (OR 3.4, P=0.007), undrained fluid on imaging (OR 2.4, P=0.045), and increasing white blood cell count (OR 1.7, P=0.045) were independently associated with odds of readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Most readmissions following pancreatectomy were technical in origin. Patients with complications during index hospitalization, increasing white blood cell count, or undrained fluid before discharge were at highest risk for readmission. Pre-discharge risk-stratification of readmission risk factors and augmentation of in-clinic resources may be strategies to reduce readmission rates.

Opioid Discharge Prescriptions After Inpatient Surgery: Risks of Rebound Refills by Length of Stay.

INTRODUCTION: As inpatient stays become shorter, one concern with standardizing discharge opioid prescriptions is the potential risk of "rebound refills." We sought to compare opioid prescription refill rates and volumes for surgical patients discharged on postoperative day (POD) 2-3, 4-7, and 8+. METHODS: In a prospective quality improvement protocol, faculty volunteered to use either a 5x-multiplier (5x) or usual care (UC) for discharge prescriptions after inpatient (≥48 h stay) surgery from Sep-Dec 2019. The 5x-multiplier is 5-times the patient's last 24-h opioid use (by oral morphine equivalents, OME). Cohorts were compared by POD of discharge: POD 2-3 ("SHORT"), POD 4-7 ("INTERMEDIATE"), and POD 8+ ("LONG"). The primary endpoint was 30-d refill rates. Secondary endpoints included 30-d refill OME and inpatient opioid weaning/discharge metrics. RESULTS: From 22 faculty, 409 patients were included. When stratified by POD, 154 (37.7%) were discharged SHORT, 176 (43.0%) INTERMEDIATE, and 79 (19.3%) LONG. SHORT stay patients had a median last 24-h OME of 10 mg (versus 5 mg INTERMEDIATE, 5 mg LONG; P = 0.268), and a median discharge OME of 55 mg (versus 75 mg INTERMEDIATE, 100 mg LONG; P = 0.221). Patients with SHORT stays did not have higher refill rates (11.7% versus 18.2% INTERMEDIATE, 19.0% LONG; P = 0.193) or higher median refill OME (150 mg versus 300 mg INTERMEDAITE, 339 mg LONG; P = 0.154). CONCLUSIONS: Despite concerns of increased refills, patients discharged by POD 2-3 were not associated with "rebound refills." A patient-centered 5x-multiplier standardization of discharge opioid prescriptions is feasible in all inpatient surgery patients, even those discharged following a short inpatient stay.

Association of Patient Controlled Analgesia and Total Inpatient Opioid Use After Pancreatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The initial settings on an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) pump can represent a significant source of postoperative opioid exposure. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of first day IV-PCA use on total inpatient opioid use after open pancreatectomy, before and after standardization of initial dosing. METHODS: Inpatient oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) were reviewed for pancreatectomy patients treated with IV-PCA at a single institution before and after (3/2016-8/2017 versus 3/2019-11/2020) implementation of a standardized initial IV-PCA dosing regimen (initial limit 0.1 mg hydromorphone, or 1 mg OME, every 10 min as needed). IV-PCA OME in the first 24 h and the total inpatient OME were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: Of 220 total patients, 132 were in the prestandardization (PRE) historical cohort. A first-24-h IV-PCA use was different (PRE median 95 mg versus poststandardization [POST] 15 mg, P < 0.001). The median total inpatient OME was different (P < 0.001) between PRE (525 mg, interquartile range [IQR] 239-951 mg) and POST patients (129 mg, IQR 65-204 mg) with 77% (median 373 mg) of total inpatient OMEs contributed by IV-PCA in the PRE and 56% (median 64 mg) in the POST cohorts. There were similar patient-reported pain scores between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Standardizing initial IV-PCA settings was associated with a reduced first-24-h opioid exposure, proportional and absolute total IV-PCA use, and total inpatient OMEs. Because of the contribution of an IV-PCA to the total inpatient opioid exposure, purposeful reduction or omission of an IV-PCA is critical to perioperative opioid reduction strategies.

Perioperative blood transfusions and survival in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients given multimodality therapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The impact of perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) on outcomes for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients given multimodality therapy (MMT) remains undefined. We sought to evaluate the association of PBT with survival after PDAC resection. METHODS: Pancreatectomy patients (July 2011-December 2017) who received MMT were abstracted from a prospective database. Overall survival (OS) was compared by PBT within 30 days, 24 h (24HR-BT), or 24 h until 30 days (Postop-BT). RESULTS: Most (76.6%) of 312 MMT patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy (NT). Eighty-nine patients (28.5%) received PBT; 58 (18.6%) 24HR-BT, and 31 (9.9%) Postop-BT. Compared with surgery-first, NT patients received more 24HR-BTs (22.2% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.003) and PBTs overall (32.6% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.004). Overall median OS was 45 months. The association of PBT with shorter median OS appeared limited to first 24-h transfusions (34 months 24HR-BT vs. 48 months Postop-BT vs. 53 months no-PBT, p = 0.009) and was dose-dependent, with a median OS of 52 months for 0 units 24HR-BT, 35 months for 1 unit, and 25 months for ≥2 units (p = 0.004). Independent predictors of OS included node-positivity (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.93, p < 0.001), perineural invasion (HR: 1.64, p = 0.050), postoperative pancreatic fistula (HR: 1.94, p = 0.018), and 24HR-BT (HR: 1.75, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Transfusions given within 24 h are associated with dose-dependent decreases in survival after pancreatectomy for PDAC.

Clinical Factors Associated With Practice Variation in Discharge Opioid Prescriptions After Pancreatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize opioid discharge prescriptions for pancreatectomy patients. BACKGROUND: Wide variation in and over-prescription of opioids after surgery contribute to the United States opioid epidemic through persistent use past the postoperative period. Objective strategies guiding discharge opioid prescriptions for oncologic surgery are lacking, and factors driving prescription amount are not fully delineated. METHODS: Characteristics of pancreatectomy patients (March 2016-August 2017) were retrospectively abstracted from a prospective database. Discharge opioids prescriptions were converted to oral morphine equivalents (OME). Regression models identified variables associated with discharge OME. RESULTS: In 158 consecutive patients, median discharge OME was 250 mg (range 0-3950). Discharge OME was labeled "low" (<200 mg) for 33 patients (21%) and "high" (>400 mg) for 38 (24%). Only shorter operative time (odds ratio [OR]-0.14, P = 0.004) and inpatient team (OR-15.39, P < 0.001) were independently associated with low discharge OME. Older age was the only variable associated with high discharge OME. Fifty-seven patients (36%) used zero opioids in the last 24-hours predischarge, yet 52 of 57 (91%) still received discharge opioids. Older age (OR-1.07), grade B/C pancreatic fistula (OR-3.84), and epidural use (OR-3.12) were independently associated with zero last-24-hours OME (all P ≤ 0.040). CONCLUSIONS: The wide variation in discharge opioid prescriptions is heavily influenced by provider routine/bias and not by objective criteria such as last-24-hours OME. Quality improvement strategies could include aggressive weaning protocols to increase the proportion of patients with zero/near-zero last-24-hour OME and limiting prescriptions to a conservative multiplier of the last-24-hour OME.

Inpatient Opioid Use After Pancreatectomy: Opportunities for Reducing Initial Opioid Exposure in Cancer Surgery Patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in enhanced surgical recovery programs, strategies limiting postoperative inpatient opioid exposure have not been optimized for pancreatic surgery. The primary aims of this study were to analyze the magnitude and variations in post-pancreatectomy opioid administration and to characterize predictors of low and high inpatient use. METHODS: Clinical characteristics and inpatient oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) were downloaded from electronic records for consecutive pancreatectomy patients at a high-volume institution between March 2016 and August 2017. Regression analyses identified predictors of total OMEs as well as highest and lowest quartiles. RESULTS: Pancreatectomy was performed for 158 patients (73% pancreaticoduodenectomy). Transversus abdominus plane (TAP) block was performed for 80% (n = 127) of these patients, almost always paired with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA), whereas 15% received epidural alone. All the patients received scheduled non-opioid analgesics (median, 2). The median total OME administered was 423 mg (range 0-4362 mg). Higher total OME was associated with preoperative opioid prescriptions (p < 0.001), longer hospital length of stay (LOS; p < 0.001), and no epidural (p = 0.006). The lowest and best quartile cutoff was 180 mg of OME or less, whereas the highest and worst quartile cutoff began at 892.5 mg. After adjustment for inpatient team, only epidural use [odds ratio (OR) 0.3; p = 0.04] predicted lowest-quartile OME. Preoperative opioid prescriptions (OR 8.1; p < 0.001), longer operative time (OR 3.4; p = 0.05), and longer LOS (OR 1.1; p = 0.007) predicted highest-quartile OME. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative opioid prescriptions and longer LOS were associated with increased inpatient OME, whereas epidural use reduced inpatient OME. Understanding the predictors of inpatient opioid use and the variables predicting the lowest and highest quartiles can inform decision-making regarding preoperative counseling, regional anesthetic block choice, and novel inpatient opioid weaning strategies to reduce initial postoperative opioid exposure.

Outpatient virtual clinical encounters after complex surgery for cancer: a prospective pilot study of "TeleDischarge".

BACKGROUND: Outpatient clinical encounters are used to promote recovery after complex surgical procedures for cancer. These care episodes are resource intensive. Virtual clinical encounters (VCEs) can now be conducted using widely available videoconferencing technologies. However, whether these technologies may be used to monitor postoperative recovery is unknown. METHODS: In this pilot study, we provided care using a comprehensive "TeleDischarge" protocol to 15 patients after pancreatectomy. In addition to routine follow-up, all patients participated in two scheduled and an unlimited number of unscheduled VCEs using mobile hardware and secure videoconferencing software. We evaluated feasibility, patient satisfaction, postoperative adverse events, and health care human resource utilization. RESULTS: The median age of enrolled patients was 63 y (range, 52-83 y) and 93% underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. Twenty-eight scheduled VCEs (93%) were completed successfully, and only one unscheduled VCE was requested. Twelve patients (80%) felt their postoperative care was enhanced by VCEs and 14 (93%) felt that VCEs should be a regular part of postoperative care. Minor interventions in four patients (27%) were performed on the basis of clinical data gathered during a VCE. On a per patient basis, the TeleDischarge pathway was estimated to take 36 min longer and to have a direct labor cost $39 greater than the standard pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Secure VCEs can be conducted using widely available hardware and software solutions. Although cancer patients support the introduction of mobile technology into postoperative care, further studies are needed to identify ways in which such technology can be used most effectively and efficiently to reduce barriers to recovery.

Active Surveillance for Adverse Events Within 90 Days: The Standard for Reporting Surgical Outcomes After Pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: The rate of adverse events after pancreatectomy is widely reported as a measure of surgical quality. However, morbidity data are routinely acquired retrospectively and often are reported at 30 days. The authors hypothesized that morbidity after pancreatectomy is therefore underreported. They sought to compare rates of adverse events calculated at multiple time points after pancreatectomy. METHODS: The authors instituted an active surveillance system to detect, categorize, and grade the severity of all adverse events after pancreatectomy, using the modified Accordion system and International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definitions. All patients and clinical events were monitored directly for at least 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: Of 315 consecutively monitored patients, 239 (76 %) experienced 500 unique adverse events. The absolute number of unique adverse events increased by 32 % between index discharge and 90 days and by 10 % between 30 and 90 days. The number of severe adverse events increased by 96 % between discharge and 90 days and by 29 % between 30 and 90 days. In this study, 16 % of the patients experienced at least one severe adverse event within the index hospitalization, 24 % within 30 postoperative days, and 29 % within 90 days. Among the 80 readmissions that occurred within 90 days, 28 (35 %) occurred later than 30 days after pancreatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of severe adverse events and readmissions are reported more than 30 days after surgery. All adverse events that occur within 90 days of surgery must be identified and reported for accurate characterization of the morbidity associated with pancreatectomy.

Postoperative Global Period Cost Reduction Using 3 Successive Risk-Stratified Pancreatectomy Clinical Pathways.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that iterative revisions of our original 2016 risk-stratified pancreatectomy clinical pathways would be associated with decreased 90-day perioperative costs. STUDY DESIGN: From a single-institution retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with 3 iterations: "version 1" (V1) (October 2016 to January 2019), V2 (February 2019 to October 2020), and V3 (November 2020 to February 2022), institutional data were aggregated using revenue codes and adjusted to constant 2022-dollar value. Grand total perioperative costs (primary endpoint) were the sum of pancreatectomy, inpatient care, readmission, and 90-day global outpatient care. Proprietary hospital-based costs were converted to ratios using the mean cost of all hospital operations as the denominator. RESULTS: Of 814 patients, pathway V1 included 363, V2 229, and V3 222 patients. Accordion Grade 3+ complications decreased with each iteration (V1: 28.4%, V2: 22.7%, and V3: 15.3%). Median length of stay decreased (V1: 6 days, interquartile range [IQR] 5 to 8; V2: 5 [IQR 4 to 6]; and V3: 5 [IQR 4 to 6]) without an increase in readmissions. Ninety-day global perioperative costs decreased by 32% (V1 cost ratio 12.6, V2 10.9, and V3 8.6). Reduction of the index hospitalization cost was associated with the greatest savings (-31%: 9.4, 8.3, and 6.5). Outpatient care costs decreased consistently (1.58, 1.41, and 1.04). When combining readmission and all outpatient costs, total "postdischarge" costs decreased (3.17, 2.59, and 2.13). Component costs of the index hospitalization that were associated with the greatest savings were room or board costs (-55%: 1.74, 1.14, and 0.79) and pharmacy costs (-61%: 2.20, 1.61, and 0.87; all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Three iterative risk-stratified pancreatectomy clinical pathway refinements were associated with a 32% global period cost savings, driven by reduced index hospitalization costs. This successful learning health system model could be externally validated at other institutions performing abdominal cancer surgery.

Postoperative pain scores and opioid use after standard bupivacaine vs. liposomal bupivacaine regional blocks for abdominal cancer surgery: A propensity score matched study.

BACKGROUND: Fascial plane blocks (FPBs) are widely used for abdominal surgery with the assumption that liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is more effective than standard bupivacaine (SB). METHODS: This was a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients administered FPBs with LB or SB â€‹+ â€‹admixtures (dexamethasone/dexmedetomidine) for open abdominal cancer surgery. Propensity score matching generated a 2:1 (LB:SB) matched cohort. Opioid use (mg oral morphine equivalents, OME) and severe pain (≥3 pain scores ≥7 in a 24-h period) were compared. RESULTS: Opioid use was >150 â€‹mg OME in 19.9 â€‹% (29/146) LB and 16.4 â€‹% (12/73) SB patients (p â€‹= â€‹0.586). Severe pain was experienced by 44 â€‹% (64/146) LB and 53 â€‹% (39/73) SB patients (p â€‹= â€‹0.198). On multivariable analysis, SB vs LB choice was not associated with high opioid volume >150 â€‹mg or severe pain. CONCLUSIONS: FPBs with standard bupivacaine were not associated with higher 72-h opioid use or more severe pain compared to liposomal bupivacaine.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound detects perfusion defects in an ex vivo porcine liver model: a useful tool for the study of hepatic reperfusion.

Following transplantation, areas of hypoperfusion can be associated with metabolic changes and poor organ recovery. Our study evaluated contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) agents for the detection of such areas. Livers were collected from ten pigs, connected to extracorporeal circuits and perfused using autologous blood. After 1 and 4 h livers were scanned with an ultrasound machine following the administration of CEUS agents. Biopsies from perfused and non-perfused areas were collected. The entire parenchyma enhanced strongly on non-contrast ultrasound at 1 h with no perfusion defects. Four hours later multiple perfusion defects manifested not evident with non-contrast ultrasound. Histology confirmed non-perfused areas corresponded to ischemic zones. In our model the addition of CEUS revealed perfusion defects after 4 h. This might facilitate detection and characterization of perfusion defects in transplanted livers.

A new leadership frontier: Nurse practitioners and physician associates as inpatient medical directors.

ABSTRACT: Nurse practitioners and physician associates (NPs and PAs) have become an integral part of health care delivery in every clinical setting. Both NPs and PAs possess the knowledge and skills to deliver quality care to patients that may otherwise go without. There is a push to have NPs and PAs work to the top of their licenses and take on leadership roles as they help reshape health care delivery in the United States. However, high-level leadership positions for this group of clinicians are not abundant, and no specific pathway has been established to develop these skills. The aim of this report is to share the early experience of a small group of NPs and PAs, given the opportunity to function as inpatient medical directors (IMD) and the qualities that make them ideal for this novel leadership role.

Incidence of Postoperative Complications Following Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cystic Lesions or Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the risks of pancreatectomy for mucinous pancreatic cysts (MCs) are balanced against the putative goal of removing potentially malignant tumors. Despite undergoing similar operations, different rates of perioperative complications and morbidity between MC and PDAC patient populations may affect recommendations for resection. We therefore sought to compare the rates of postoperative complications between patients undergoing pancreatectomies for MCs or PDAC. METHODS: A prospectively maintained institutional database was used to identify patients who underwent surgical resection for MCs or PDAC from July 2011 to August 2019. Patient demographics, complications, and perioperative data were compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients underwent surgical resection for MCs and 428 patients underwent resection for PDAC. Combined major 90-day postoperative complications were similar between MC and PDAC patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD, 32.5% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.068) or distal pancreatectomy (DP, 30.2% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.172). The most frequent complications were postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), abscess, and postoperative bleeding. The incidence of 90-day ISGPS Grade B/C POPF was higher in cyst patients undergoing PD (17.5% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.003) but not DP (25.4% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.473). No significant differences in operative time or length of stay between MCs and PDAC cohorts were observed. CONCLUSIONS: POPFs occur more frequently and at higher grades in patients undergoing PD for MCs than for PDAC and should inform patient selection. Accordingly, the perioperative management of MC patients undergoing PD should emphasize POPF risk mitigation.

Differential Gains in Surgical Outcomes for High-Risk vs Low-Risk Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Successive Refinements of Risk-Stratified Care Pathways.

BACKGROUND: The use of risk-stratified pancreatectomy care pathways (RSPCPs) is associated with reduced length of stay (LOS). This study sought to evaluate the impact of successive pathway revisions with the hypothesis that high-risk patients require iterative pathway revisions to optimize outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: A prospectively maintained database (October 2016 to December 2021) was evaluated for pancreaticoduodenectomy patients managed with RSPCPs preoperatively assigned based on postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) risk. Launched in October 2016 (version [V] 1), RSPCPs were optimized in February 2019 (V2) and November 2020 (V3). Targeted pathway components included earlier nasogastric tube removal, diet advancement, reduced intravenous fluids and opioids, institution-specific drain fluid amylase cutoffs for early day 3 removal, and patient education. Primary outcome was LOS. Secondary outcomes included major complication (Accordion grade 3+), POPF (International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery Grade B/C), and delayed gastric emptying (DGE). RESULTS: Of 481 patients, 234 were managed by V1 (83 high-risk), 141 by V2 (43 high-risk), and 106 by V3 (43 high-risk). Median LOS reduction was greatest in high-risk patients with a 7-day reduction (pre-RSPCP, 12 days; V1, 9 days; V2, 7 days; V3, 5 days), compared with low-risk patients (pre-pathway, 10 days; V1, 6 days; V2, 5 days; V3, 4 days). Complications decreased significantly among high-risk patients (V1, 45%; V2, 33%; V3, 19%; p < 0.001), approaching rates in low-risk patients (V1, 21%; V2, 20%; V3, 14%). POPF (V1, 33%; V2, 23%; V3, 16%; p < 0.001) and DGE (V1, 23%; V2, 22%; V3, 14%; p < 0.001) improved among high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Risk-stratified pancreatectomy care pathways are associated with reduced LOS, major complication, Grade B/C fistula, and DGE. The easiest gains in surgical outcomes are generated from the immediate improvement in the patients most likely to be fast-tracked, but high-risk patients benefit from successive application of the learning health system model.

Postoperative Opioid Use Is Associated with Increased Rates of Grade B/C Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) is a major source of morbidity after distal pancreatectomy. This study examined the association between postoperative opioid use and CR-POPF in the context of opioid-sparing postoperative care. METHODS: A case-control study was performed on consecutive patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy between October 2016 and April 2022 at a single institution. Patients who developed CR-POPF were compared to controls. Multivariable regression modeling was used to identify factors associated with CR-POPF. RESULTS: A total of 281 patients underwent 187 open, 20 laparoscopic, and 74 robotic-assisted operations. The rate of CR-POPF was 21% (n = 58). CR-POPF rate declined from 32 to 8% over the study period (p < 0.001). Median oral morphine equivalents (OME) administered on POD 0-1 and 0-3 were 94 and 129 mg, respectively, in patients who did not develop a fistula versus 130 and 180 mg in those who did (both p ≤ 0.001). POD 0-3 OME (OR 1.11, p = 0.044) was independently associated with increased odds of CR-POPF, with each additional 50 mg (equivalent to 10 tramadol pills) increasing the relative risk by 11% and absolute risk by 2%. CONCLUSION: Early postoperative opioid use after distal pancreatectomy was associated with increased odds of CR-POPF. Decreasing perioperative opioid use through enhanced postoperative management is a low-cost and generalizable approach that may reduce rates of CR-POPF after distal pancreatectomy.

Elevated CA 19-9 is associated with worse survival in patients with resected ampullary adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic utility of Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) in ampullary adenocarcinoma is unclear. We sought to evaluate the association between initial tumor marker levels and survival in patients with resected ampullary adenocarcinoma. METHODS: This was a single-institution, retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinoma from 1999 to 2021. CA 19-9 was assessed after biliary decompression. Contal and O'Quigley method determined optimal biomarker cutoff levels which were correlated with overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox Proportional Hazards Regression. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. Patients with CA 19-9 >100 U/mL had a shorter median OS (28 vs. 132 months, p < 0.001) compared to patients with CA 19-9 ≤ 100 U/mL at diagnosis. Survival was similar between pancreaticobiliary and intestinal tumor subtypes when CA 19-9 was >100 U/mL (OS:25 vs. 33 months, p = 0.415). By Cox regression analysis, CA 19-9 >100 U/mL was independently associated with worse OS (HR 2.8, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative CA 19-9 >100 U/mL was associated with shorter OS in patients with resected ampullary adenocarcinoma. CA 19-9 may be useful when counseling patients about prognosis or when considering the role of perioperative systemic therapy.

Evaluation and Recalibration of Risk-Stratified Pancreatoduodenectomy Drain Fluid Amylase Removal Criteria.

BACKGROUND: Risk-stratified drain fluid amylase cutoff values for postoperative day 1 (POD1) (DFA1) and POD3 (DFA3) can guide early drain removal after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of this study was to evaluate and recalibrate cutoff values instituted in Feb 2019 using a prospective sequential cohort. METHODS: We performed a single-institution prospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy following implementation of institution-specific DFA cutoffs in February 2019 through April 2022. DFA values, drain removal, and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (CR-POPF) were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined optimal cutoff values. RESULTS: In total, 267 patients, 173 (65%) low-risk and 94 (35%) high-risk, underwent 228 (85%) open and 39 (15%) robotic pancreatoduodenectomies. Seven (4%) low-risk patients and 21 (22%) high-risk patients developed CR-POPF. Drains were removed in 147 (55%) patients before/on POD3, with 1 (0.7%) CR-POPF. In low-risk patients, CR-POPF was excluded with 100% sensitivity if DFA1 < 286 (area under curve, AUC = 0.893, p = 0.001) or DFA3 < 97 (AUC = 0.856, p = 0.002). DFA1 < 137 (AUC = 0.786, p < 0.001) or DFA3 < 56 (AUC = 0.819, p < 0.001) were 100% sensitive in high-risk patients. Previously established DFA1 cutoffs of 100 (low-risk) and < 26 (high-risk) were 100% sensitive, while DFA3 cutoffs of 300 (low-risk) and 200 (high-risk) had 57% and 91% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Within a learning health system, we recalibrated post-PD drain removal thresholds to DFA1 ≤ 300 and DFA3 ≤ 100 for low-risk and DFA1 ≤ 100 and DFA3 ≤ 50 for high-risk patients. This methodology is generalizable to other centers for developing institution-specific criteria to optimize safe early drain removal.