RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Data are lacking on the effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) on atrial function. The aim of this study was to determine a cut-off of pre-ablation left atrial (LA) function in order to predict atrial functional recovery after RFCA. METHODSâANDâRESULTS: A total of 64 atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent RFCA were enrolled (age, 59.05±12.09 years; 36% persistent AF; LA volume 37.8±13.6 ml/m(2)). LA emptying fraction (LAEF), LA active fraction (LAAEF), LA passive emptying fraction (LAPEF) and LA expansion index (LAEI) were evaluated in sinus rhythm before and 48 h, 15 days, 1, 2, 3 and 9 months after ablation. LA function improvement was defined as any positive increase in LAEF compared with baseline. On univariate and multivariate analysis only baseline atrial function proved to be an independent predictor of LA function improvement after ablation (P=0.002; OR=0.001; 95% CI: 0.000-0.099). On receiver operating characteristic analysis (AUC=0.70), cut-off for baseline LAEF was 40%. At 9 months, patients with LAEF <40% had significant improvement in atrial performance (LAEF, P=0.01; LAAEF, P=0.036; LAEI, P=0.004); a signiï¬cant negative correlation between baseline LAEF and LA function improvement was observed (r=-0.62; 95% CI: -0.83 to -0.26; P(r=0)<0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline LAEF is an independent predictor of LA function recovery after RFCA. The beneficial effect of AF ablation is most evident in patients with LAEF<40%.
Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Função do Átrio Esquerdo , Ablação por Cateter , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos TestesRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim was to evaluate prognostic value of beta-blocker (BB) administration in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients in the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) era. METHODS AND RESULTS: The BleeMACS project is a multicenter, observational, retrospective registry enrolling patients with ACS worldwide in 15 hospitals. Patients discharged with BB therapy were compared to those discharged without a BB before and after propensity score with matching. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital reinfarction, in-hospital heart failure, 1-year myocardial infarction, 1-year bleeding and 1-year composite of death and recurrent myocardial infarction. After matching, 2935 patients for each group were enrolled. The primary endpoint of 1-year death was significantly lower in the group on BB therapy (4.5 vs 7%, p < 0.05), while only a trend was noted for recurrent acute myocardial infarction (4.5 vs 4.9%, p = 0.54). These results were consistent for patients older than 80 years of age, for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, and for those discharged with complete versus incomplete revascularization, but not for non-STEMI/unstable angina patients. CONCLUSIONS: BB therapy was related to 1-year lower risk of all-cause mortality, independently from completeness of revascularization, admission diagnosis, age and ejection fraction. Randomized controlled trials for patients treated with PCI for ACS should be performed.