Content validity of SarQoL, a quality of life questionnaire specific to sarcopenia.

BACKGROUND: The Sarcopenia & Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire is a patient-reported outcome measure designed for assessing health-related quality of life in individuals with sarcopenia. Despite its wide acceptance in the scientific literature, its content validity has only been partially demonstrated so far. AIMS: To enhance the evidence supporting the content validity of the SarQoL questionnaire. METHODS: Following COSMIN methodology, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 Belgian older adults who met the EWGSOP2 criteria for the diagnosis of sarcopenia and 11 experts in sarcopenia, with clinical or research background. Comprehensiveness, relevance and comprehensibility of SarQoL content were assessed through individual transcripts and were qualitatively analyzed thematically according to the seven dimensions of SarQoL. RESULTS: The majority of the concepts elicited during the semi-structured interviews fitted within existing SarQoL dimensions. Importantly, the different domains of SarQoL were consensually considered as relevant by patients and experts. Some new emergent concepts were identified by the participants. While many of them could be considered as enrichments of existing dimensions or sub-concepts, other new concepts (i.e. self-fulfilment, acceptance of the reduced condition, adaptation/use of strategies, depression) may highlight two potential dimensions not covered by SarQoL, i.e. patient empowerment and depression. Cognitive interviews also highlighted that SarQoL items and instructions were clear and comprehensible. CONCLUSIONS: SarQoL, in its current form, demonstrates good evidence of content validity for assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sarcopenia. We do not recommend adding new items or dimensions to SarQoL. Instead, for researchers or clinicians who aim to specifically address self-empowerment or depression of sarcopenic populations, we suggest completing the assessment of quality of life by concurrently using additional validated scales of patient empowerment or depression.

Previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk: a meta-analysis to update FRAX.

A large international meta-analysis using primary data from 64 cohorts has quantified the increased risk of fracture associated with a previous history of fracture for future use in FRAX. INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to quantify the fracture risk associated with a prior fracture on an international basis and to explore the relationship of this risk with age, sex, time since baseline and bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS: We studied 665,971 men and 1,438,535 women from 64 cohorts in 32 countries followed for a total of 19.5 million person-years. The effect of a prior history of fracture on the risk of any clinical fracture, any osteoporotic fracture, major osteoporotic fracture, and hip fracture alone was examined using an extended Poisson model in each cohort. Covariates examined were age, sex, BMD, and duration of follow-up. The results of the different studies were merged by using the weighted ß-coefficients. RESULTS: A previous fracture history, compared with individuals without a prior fracture, was associated with a significantly increased risk of any clinical fracture (hazard ratio, HR = 1.88; 95% CI = 1.72-2.07). The risk ratio was similar for the outcome of osteoporotic fracture (HR = 1.87; 95% CI = 1.69-2.07), major osteoporotic fracture (HR = 1.83; 95% CI = 1.63-2.06), or for hip fracture (HR = 1.82; 95% CI = 1.62-2.06). There was no significant difference in risk ratio between men and women. Subsequent fracture risk was marginally downward adjusted when account was taken of BMD. Low BMD explained a minority of the risk for any clinical fracture (14%), osteoporotic fracture (17%), and for hip fracture (33%). The risk ratio for all fracture outcomes related to prior fracture decreased significantly with adjustment for age and time since baseline examination. CONCLUSION: A previous history of fracture confers an increased risk of fracture of substantial importance beyond that explained by BMD. The effect is similar in men and women. Its quantitation on an international basis permits the more accurate use of this risk factor in case finding strategies.

[Physical activity in nursing homes: contributions of the SENIOR cohort]. / L'activité physique en maison de repos : contributions de la cohorte SENIOR.

The SENIOR ("Sample of Elderly Nursing homes Individuals: an Observational Research") study is a prospective follow-up of a cohort of more than 600 people living in nursing homes in Belgium. One of the objectives of this study is to investigate ways of managing frailty in order to prevent the occurrence of adverse health events. Thanks to the numerous demographic, clinical and anamnestic data collected annually, this study has shown the importance of promoting qualitative physical activity in nursing homes in order to improve the quality of life of residents. Specifically, our research showed the positive effect of physical activity programmes on weekly energy expenditure and improvement of functional abilities, motivation to engage in physical activity and quality of life. Furthermore, the possibilities to improve the motivational context of group physical activity sessions and the feasibility of innovative physical activity programmes, based on the development of a giant play mat or the organisation of competitions in nursing homes, were highlighted.

L'étude SENIOR («Sample of Elderly Nursing homes Individuals : an Observational Research¼) est un suivi prospectif d'une cohorte de plus de 600 personnes résidant en maison de repos, en Belgique. Un des objectifs de celle-ci est l'étude des pistes de prise en charge de la fragilité afin de prévenir la survenue d'événements indésirables de santé. Grâce aux nombreuses données démographiques, cliniques et anamnestiques récoltées annuellement, cette étude a permis de montrer l'importance de promouvoir l'activité physique qualitative en maison de repos afin d'améliorer la qualité de vie des résidents. Plus précisément, nos recherches ont montré l'effet positif des programmes d'activité physique sur les dépenses énergétiques hebdomadaires et l'amélioration des capacités fonctionnelles, de la motivation à pratiquer l'activité physique et de la qualité de vie. Par ailleurs, les possibilités d'améliorer le contexte motivationnel des séances d'activité physique de groupe et la faisabilité de programmes d'activité physique innovants basés sur l'élaboration d'un tapis de jeu géant ou l'organisation de compétitions en maisons de retraite, ont été mises en évidence.

The global approach to rehabilitation following an osteoporotic fragility fracture: A review of the rehabilitation working group of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) committee of scientific advisors.

PURPOSE: To conduct a review of the current state of the evidence for rehabilitation strategies post-fragility fracture. METHODS: Narrative review conducted by the Rehabilitation Working Group of the International Osteoporosis Foundation Committee of Scientific Advisors characterizing the range of rehabilitation modalities instrumental for the management of fragility fractures. RESULTS: Multi-modal exercise post-fragility fracture to the spine and hip is strongly recommended to reduce pain, improve physical function, and improve quality of life. Outpatient physiotherapy post-hip fracture has a stronger evidence base than outpatient physiotherapy post-vertebral fracture. Appropriate nutritional care after fragility fracture provides a large range of improvement in morbidity and mortality. Education increases understanding of osteoporosis which in turn increases utilization of other rehabilitation services. Education may improve other health outcomes such as pain and increase a patient's ability for self-advocacy. CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation interventions are inter-reliant, and research investigating the interaction of exercise, nutrition, and other multi-modal therapies may increase the relevance of rehabilitation research to clinical care.

Update of the fracture risk prediction tool FRAX: a systematic review of potential cohorts and analysis plan.

We describe the collection of cohorts together with the analysis plan for an update of the fracture risk prediction tool FRAX with respect to current and novel risk factors. The resource comprises 2,138,428 participants with a follow-up of approximately 20 million person-years and 116,117 documented incident major osteoporotic fractures. INTRODUCTION: The availability of the fracture risk assessment tool FRAX® has substantially enhanced the targeting of treatment to those at high risk of fracture with FRAX now incorporated into more than 100 clinical osteoporosis guidelines worldwide. The aim of this study is to determine whether the current algorithms can be further optimised with respect to current and novel risk factors. METHODS: A computerised literature search was performed in PubMed from inception until May 17, 2019, to identify eligible cohorts for updating the FRAX coefficients. Additionally, we searched the abstracts of conference proceedings of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, European Calcified Tissue Society and World Congress of Osteoporosis. Prospective cohort studies with data on baseline clinical risk factors and incident fractures were eligible. RESULTS: Of the 836 records retrieved, 53 were selected for full-text assessment after screening on title and abstract. Twelve cohorts were deemed eligible and of these, 4 novel cohorts were identified. These cohorts, together with 60 previously identified cohorts, will provide the resource for constructing an updated version of FRAX comprising 2,138,428 participants with a follow-up of approximately 20 million person-years and 116,117 documented incident major osteoporotic fractures. For each known and candidate risk factor, multivariate hazard functions for hip fracture, major osteoporotic fracture and death will be tested using extended Poisson regression. Sex- and/or ethnicity-specific differences in the weights of the risk factors will be investigated. After meta-analyses of the cohort-specific beta coefficients for each risk factor, models comprising 10-year probability of hip and major osteoporotic fracture, with or without femoral neck bone mineral density, will be computed. CONCLUSIONS: These assembled cohorts and described models will provide the framework for an updated FRAX tool enabling enhanced assessment of fracture risk (PROSPERO (CRD42021227266)).

Determining individual trajectories of joint space loss: improved statistical methods for monitoring knee osteoarthritis disease progression.

OBJECTIVES: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) progression is frequently monitored by calculating the change in knee joint space width (JSW) measurements. Such differences are small and sensitive to measurement error. We aimed to assess the utility of two alternative statistical modelling methods for monitoring KOA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used JSW on radiographs from both the control arm of the Strontium Ranelate Efficacy in Knee Osteoarthritis trial (SEKOIA), a 3-year multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase three trial, and the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI), an open-access longitudinal dataset from the USA comprising participants followed over 8 years. Individual estimates of annualised change obtained from frequentist linear mixed effect (LME) and Bayesian hierarchical modelling, were compared with annualised crude change, and the association of these parameters with change in WOMAC pain was examined. RESULTS: Mean annualised JSW changes were comparable for all estimates, a reduction of around 0.14 mm/y in SEKOIA and 0.08 mm/y in OAI. The standard deviation (SD) of change estimates was lower with LME and Bayesian modelling than crude change (SEKOIA SD = 0.12, 0.12 and 0.21 respectively; OAI SD = 0.08, 0.08 and 0.11 respectively). Estimates from LME and Bayesian modelling were statistically significant predictors of change in pain in SEKOIA (LME P-value = 0.04, Bayes P-value = 0.04), while crude change did not predict change in pain (P-value = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of LME or Bayesian modelling in clinical trials and epidemiological studies, would reduce sample sizes by enabling all study participants to be included in analysis regardless of incomplete follow up, and precision of change estimates would improve. They provide increased power to detect associations with other measures.

Development and validation of a short version of the Sarcopenia Quality of Life questionnaire: the SF-SarQoL.

PURPOSE: To facilitate the measurement of quality of life in sarcopenia, we set out to reduce the number of items in the previously validated Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL®) questionnaire, and to evaluate the clinimetric properties of this new short form. METHODS: The item reduction process was carried out in two phases. First, information was gathered through item-impact scores from older people (n = 1950), a Delphi method with sarcopenia experts, and previously published clinimetric data. In the second phase, this information was presented to an expert panel that decided which of the items to include in the short form. The newly created SFSarQoL was then administered to older, community-dwelling participants who previously participated in the SarcoPhAge study. We examined discriminative power, internal consistency, construct validity, test-retest reliability, structural validity and examined item parameters with a graded response model (IRT). RESULTS: The questionnaire was reduced from 55 to 14 items, a 75% reduction. A total of 214 older, community-dwelling people were recruited for the validation study. The clinimetric evaluation showed that the SF-SarQoL® can discriminate on sarcopenia status [EWGSOP2 criteria; 34.52 (18.59-43.45) vs. 42.86 (26.56-63.69); p = 0.043], is internally consistent (α = 0.915, ω = 0.917) and reliable [ICC = 0.912 (0.847-0.942)]. A unidimensional model was fitted (CFI = 0.978; TLI = 0.975; RMSEA = 0.108, 90% CI 0.094-0.123; SRMR = 0.055) with no misfitting items and good response category separation. CONCLUSIONS: A new, 14-item, short form version of the Sarcopenia Quality of Life questionnaire has been developed and shows good clinimetric properties.

Relationship between smoking and the incidence of sarcopenia: The SarcoPhAge cohort.

INTRODUCTION: The association of tobacco use and incidence of muscle impairments has not been extensively explored in research. In this study, the relationship between smoking and the incidence of sarcopenia is investigated. METHODS: The present longitudinal study used data from the Sarcopenia and Physical Impairment with advancing Age (SarcoPhAge) cohort, which includes older adults aged ≥65 years. All individuals with follow-up data on muscle health were included in this post hoc analysis. A diagnosis of sarcopenia was established, at each year of follow-up, according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in older People 2 (EWGSOP2) criteria. A sensitivity analysis was performed using other diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia. The smoking status and the number of cigarettes smoked per day were self-reported. The relationship between smoking status or the number of cigarettes smoked per day and the incidence of sarcopenia/severe sarcopenia throughout the 5 years of follow-up was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In total, the study population included 420 participants, with a median age of 71.7 years (P25-P75 = 67.7-76.9 years) and 59.8% were female. Over the 5 years of follow-up, 78 participants (18.6%) became sarcopenic as per the EWGSOP2 criteria and 41 individuals (9.8%) developed severe sarcopenia. There were significantly more smokers than non-smokers who developed sarcopenia (35.9% vs 16.8%, P-value = 0.003). A fully adjusted Cox model confirmed this observation, yielding a hazard ratio of 2.36 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31-4.26), meaning that smokers have a 2.36-fold higher risk of developing sarcopenia. Furthermore, individuals who smoked had a 2.68 times increased risk of developing severe sarcopenia (95% CI: 1.21-5.93) than those who did not smoke. Sensitivity analyses globally confirmed these findings when applying other diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia. DISCUSSION: Smoking seems to be an important predictor for the onset of sarcopenia, highlighting, once again, that tobacco use is a major public health problem.

Correction to: Algorithm for the management of patients at low, high and very high risk of osteoporotic fractures.

The article 'Algorithm for the management of patients at low, high and very high risk of osteoporotic fractures',written by J. A. Kanis, was originally published Online First without Open Access. After publication in volume [#], issue [#] and page [#-#], the author decided to opt for Open Choice and to make the article an Open Access publication.

Algorithm for the management of patients at low, high and very high risk of osteoporotic fractures.

Guidance is provided in an international setting on the assessment and specific treatment of postmenopausal women at low, high and very high risk of fragility fractures. INTRODUCTION: The International Osteoporosis Foundation and European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis published guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in 2019. This manuscript seeks to apply this in an international setting, taking additional account of further categorisation of increased risk of fracture, which may inform choice of therapeutic approach. METHODS: Clinical perspective and updated literature search. RESULTS: The following areas are reviewed: categorisation of fracture risk and general pharmacological management of osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS: A platform is provided on which specific guidelines can be developed for national use to characterise fracture risk and direct interventions.

Alternative and complementary therapies in osteoarthritis and cartilage repair.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint condition and, with a burgeoning ageing population, is due to increase in prevalence. Beyond conventional medical and surgical interventions, there are an increasing number of 'alternative' therapies. These alternative therapies may have a limited evidence base and, for this reason, are often only afforded brief reference (or completely excluded) from current OA guidelines. Thus, the aim of this review was to synthesize the current evidence regarding autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), vitamin D and other alternative therapies. The majority of studies were in knee OA or chondral defects. Matrix-assisted ACI has demonstrated exceedingly limited, symptomatic improvements in the treatment of cartilage defects of the knee and is not supported for the treatment of knee OA. There is some evidence to suggest symptomatic improvement with MSC injection in knee OA, with the suggestion of minimal structural improvement demonstrated on MRI and there are positive signals that PRP may also lead to symptomatic improvement, though variation in preparation makes inter-study comparison difficult. There is variability in findings with vitamin D supplementation in OA, and the only recommendation which can be made, at this time, is for replacement when vitamin D is deplete. Other alternative therapies reviewed have some evidence (though from small, poor-quality studies) to support improvement in symptoms and again there is often a wide variation in dosage and regimens. For all these therapeutic modalities, although controlled studies have been undertaken to evaluate effectiveness in OA, these have often been of small size, limited statistical power, uncertain blindness and using various methodologies. These deficiencies must leave the question as to whether they have been validated as effective therapies in OA (or chondral defects). The conclusions of this review are that all alternative interventions definitely require clinical trials with robust methodology, to assess their efficacy and safety in the treatment of OA beyond contextual and placebo effects.

French translation and validation of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool, an instrument for measuring functional ankle instability.

BACKGROUND: Ankle sprains are one of the most common musculoskeletal injuries, and can lead to chronic ankle instability (CAI). The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) measures a subset of CAI, functional ankle instability (FAI). Because no French version existed, we set out to translate and validate the CAIT in French. METHODS: The CAIT was translated using a forward-backward methodology. We examined its psychometric properties and calculated a cut-off score for FAI in a sample of 102 subjects (median age 22 years). RESULTS: The CAIT was translated without significant problems. The CAIT-F can discriminate between those with and without FAI (p < 0.001), with a cut-off score of ≤ 23 points. The test-retest reliability is excellent (ICC = 0.960), as is the internal consistency (α = 0.885). Construct validity was confirmed. No floor or ceiling effects were detected among subjects with FAI. CONCLUSIONS: The CAIT is now available in French, and is a valid and reliable instrument.

French translation and validation of the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score "ATRS".

BACKGROUND: To provide a cross-cultural French adaptation of the Achille's Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) and to assess its psychometric performances. METHOD: The ATRS questionnaire was first translated and inter-culturally adapted into French according to international guidelines. Then, 95 subjects were recruited to complete the French version of the ATRS twice (2 weeks of interval). The SF-36 and VISA-A were used as comparative questionnaires. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire were evaluated (test-retest reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, floor/ceiling effects). RESULTS: Thetest-retest reliability was excellent (ICC of 0,966 (95% CI:0.644-0.879)) and the internal consistency very high (Cronbach's alpha of 0,98). The convergent and divergent construct validity were also confirmed. Finally, none of the subjects obtained the lowest score (0) or the maximal score (100) to the questionnaire. CONCLUSION: A valid and reliable French version of the ATRS is now available.

Fracture risk following intermission of osteoporosis therapy.

Given the widespread practice of recommending drug holidays, we reviewed the impact of medication discontinuation of two common anti-osteoporosis therapies (bisphosphonates and denosumab). Trial evidence suggests the risk of new clinical fractures, and vertebral fracture increases when osteoporosis treatment with bisphosphonates or denosumab is stopped. INTRODUCTION: The aim of this paper was to review the available literature to assess what evidence exists to inform clinical decision-making with regard to drug holidays following treatment with bisphosphonates (BiP) or denosumab. METHODS: Systematic review. RESULTS: Differing pharmacokinetics lead to varying outcomes on stopping therapy. Prospective and retrospective analyses report that the risk of new clinical fractures was 20-40% higher in subjects who stopped BiP treatment, and vertebral fracture risk was approximately doubled. Rapid bone loss has been well described following denosumab discontinuation with an incidence of multiple vertebral fractures around 5%. Studies have not identified risk factors for fracture after stopping treatment other than those that provide an indication for treatment (e.g. prior fracture and low BMD). Studies that considered long-term continuation did not identify increased fracture risk, and reported only very low rates of adverse skeletal events such as atypical femoral fracture. CONCLUSIONS: The view that patients on long-term treatment with bisphosphonates or denosumab should always be offered a drug holiday is not supported by the existing evidence. Different pharmacokinetic properties for different therapies require different strategies to manage drug intermission. In contrast, long-term treatment with anti-resorptives is not associated with increased risk of fragility fractures and skeletal adverse events remain rare.

Determinants, consequences and potential solutions to poor adherence to anti-osteoporosis treatment: results of an expert group meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF).

Many patients at increased risk of fractures do not take their medication appropriately, resulting in a substantial decrease in the benefits of drug therapy. Improving medication adherence is urgently needed but remains laborious, given the numerous and multidimensional reasons for non-adherence, suggesting the need for measurement-guided, multifactorial and individualized solutions. INTRODUCTION: Poor adherence to medications is a major challenge in the treatment of osteoporosis. This paper aimed to provide an overview of the consequences, determinants and potential solutions to poor adherence and persistence to osteoporosis medication. METHODS: A working group was organized by the European Society on Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal diseases (ESCEO) to review consequences, determinants and potential solutions to adherence and to make recommendations for practice and further research. A systematic literature review and a face-to-face experts meeting were undertaken. RESULTS: Medication non-adherence is associated with increased risk of fractures, leading to a substantial decrease in the clinical and economic benefits of drug therapy. Reasons for non-adherence are numerous and multidimensional for each patient, depending on the interplay of multiple factors, suggesting the need for multifactorial and individualized solutions. Few interventions have been shown to improve adherence or persistence to osteoporosis treatment. Promising actions include patient education with counselling, adherence monitoring with feedback and dose simplification including flexible dosing regimen. Recommendations for practice and further research were also provided. To adequately manage adherence, it is important to (1) understand the problem (initiation, implementation and/or persistence), (2) to measure adherence and (3) to identify the reason of non-adherence and fix it. CONCLUSION: These recommendations are intended for clinicians to manage adherence of their patients and to researchers and policy makers to design, facilitate and appropriately use adherence interventions.

Recommendations for the conduct of economic evaluations in osteoporosis: outcomes of an experts' consensus meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) and the US branch of the International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Economic evaluations are increasingly used to assess the value of health interventions, but variable quality and heterogeneity limit the use of these evaluations by decision-makers. These recommendations provide guidance for the design, conduct, and reporting of economic evaluations in osteoporosis to improve their transparency, comparability, and methodologic standards. INTRODUCTION: This paper aims to provide recommendations for the conduct of economic evaluations in osteoporosis in order to improve their transparency, comparability, and methodologic standards. METHODS: A working group was convened by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis to make recommendations for the design, conduct, and reporting of economic evaluations in osteoporosis, to define an osteoporosis-specific reference case to serve a minimum standard for all economic analyses in osteoporosis, to discuss methodologic challenges and initiate a call for research. A literature review, a face-to-face meeting in New York City (including 11 experts), and a review/approval by a larger group of experts worldwide (including 23 experts in total) were conducted. RESULTS: Recommendations on the type of economic evaluation, methods for economic evaluation, modeling aspects, base-case analysis and population, excess mortality, fracture costs and disutility, treatment characteristics, and model validation were provided. Recommendations for reporting economic evaluations in osteoporosis were also made and an osteoporosis-specific checklist was designed that includes items to report when performing an economic evaluation in osteoporosis. Further, 12 minimum criteria for economic evaluations in osteoporosis were identified and 12 methodologic challenges and need for further research were discussed. CONCLUSION: While the working group acknowledges challenges and the need for further research, these recommendations are intended to supplement general and national guidelines for economic evaluations, improve transparency, quality, and comparability of economic evaluations in osteoporosis, and maintain methodologic standards to increase their use by decision-makers.

Impact of frailty status on the cost of drugs and dietary supplements prescribed to nursing home residents: the SENIOR cohort.

BACKGROUND: The financial impact associated with drug consumption has been poorly investigated among frail subjects and, specifically, in nursing home settings. AIMS: To determine the association of the average monthly cost of the drugs and dietary supplements consumed by nursing home residents with their frailty status. METHODS: This is an analysis of the first follow-up year of the SENIOR cohort. All participants were classified into "frail" or "non-frail" categories according to Fried's criteria at baseline. Monthly bills from the pharmacy were analysed to determine the association between the average monthly cost of the drugs and dietary supplements consumed and frailty status. RESULTS: A sample of 87 residents (83.8 ± 9.33 years and 75.9% women) from the SENIOR cohort was included. The prevalence of frailty was 28%. The median number of medications consumed each day was 9 (6-12) (no difference between frail and non-frail subjects; p = 0.15). The overall median monthly cost was € 109.6, of which 49% was covered by Belgian social security and the remaining balance was paid by the patient. When comparing the drug expenses of the frail subjects and the non-frail subjects, the overall average monthly cost did not differ between the 2 groups (p = 0.057). Nevertheless, the expenditure remaining to be paid by the residents, after the Belgian social security intervention, was significantly higher among the frail residents (€ 65.7) than among the non-frail residents (€ 47.6; p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty status has an impact on the expenditures related to the consumption of drugs.

[Frailty in nursing home : contribution of the SENIOR study]. / Apports de la cohorte liégeoise SENIOR dans l'étude de la fragilité en maison de repos.

Over the past 20 years, clinicians and researchers have shown increasing interest in frailty. However, there is still no consensus regarding its operational definition. An interesting definition in this context could be the one that best predicts functional decline and the occurrence of negative health outcomes. Moreover, frailty could be avoided, delayed and sometimes cured by the implementation of targeted interventions. The SENIOR cohort, a longitudinal study of nursing home residents, initiated in 2013, aims to contribute to the understanding of risk factors, consequences and dynamic of frailty. It also contributes to its management. This cohort is of great interest among scientists. Because of the large number of demographic, clinical and anamnestic data collected each year, the SENIOR study could fill the gap in the literature related to the frailty.

Au cours des deux dernières décennies, la documentation traitant de la fragilité s'est faite de plus en plus abondante. Toutefois, il n'existe toujours pas de définition opérationnelle et de critères universellement reconnus pour décrire la fragilité. Les critères cliniques de fragilité doivent être prédictifs du risque de déclin fonctionnel et d'événements péjoratifs de santé. Dans cette optique, identifier précocement les sujets fragiles permet d'agir sur les facteurs de risque et d'éviter les évolutions défavorables. La cohorte SENIOR, une étude longitudinale de personnes âgées résidant en maison de repos initiée en 2013, a pour objectif de contribuer à la compréhension des facteurs de risque, des conséquences et de la trajectoire de la fragilité. Elle a aussi pour but d'apporter des pistes de prise en charge. Cette cohorte suscite beaucoup d'intérêt dans le monde de la recherche scientifique. En effet, grâce aux nombreuses données démographiques, cliniques et anamnestiques récoltées annuellement, elle permet d'apporter des éléments de réponses aux problématiques liées à la fragilité des personnes âgées.

Bone health assessment in older people with or without muscle health impairment.

This study investigated the relationship between muscle and bone status in elderly individuals. Our results suggested links between sarcopenia and osteoporosis; impairment in muscle status (i.e., muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance) is associated with deterioration in bone mass and texture subsequently leading to an increased risk of fracture. INTRODUCTION: Accumulating evidence has shown associations between sarcopenia and osteoporosis, but existing studies face inconsistencies in the clinical definition of both conditions. Thus, we sought to investigate bone health among older individuals with or without muscle health impairment. METHODS: We conducted an analysis of cross-sectional data available from the Sarcopenia and Physical Impairment with Advancing Age (SarcoPhAge) study. Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) (i.e., a low muscle mass plus either low muscle strength or low physical performance). Muscle mass and areal bone mineral density (aBMD) were determined using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Muscle strength was assessed using a hand dynamometer, and physical performance was assessed with the Short Physical Performance Battery test. Using the cutoff limits proposed by the EWGSOP, we have classified women in the "low SMI group" when its value was < 5.50 kg/m2, in the "low muscle strength group" when strength was < 20 kg, and in the "low physical performance group" when SPPB < 8 points. The thresholds of < 7.26 kg/m2 (for SMI), < 30 kg (for muscle strength), and SPPB < 8 points were used for men. The 10-year fracture risk was obtained using the FRAX® tool. Moreover, bone texture was determined using the trabecular bone score (TBS) method. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 288 older subjects aged 74.7 ± 5.7 years, and 59.0% of the subjects were women. Sarcopenia was diagnosed in 43 individuals (14.9%), and osteoporosis was diagnosed in 36 subjects (12.5%). Moreover, aBMD values were, most of the time, lower in older men and women with muscle impairment (i.e., low muscle mass, low muscle strength, and low physical performance). For these subjects, we also noted a higher probability of fracture. When comparing bone quality, there were no significant differences in the TBS values between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic older men and women or between those with low and high muscle mass. However, when controlling for confounders (i.e., age, BMI, number of co-morbidities, smoking status, and nutritional status), TBS values were lower in older women with low muscle strength (p = 0.04) and in older men with low physical performance (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed interrelationships between components of sarcopenia and osteoporosis, with older subjects with muscle impairment having poorer bone health.

Own attitude toward aging among nursing home residents: results of the SENIOR cohort.

BACKGROUND: Stereotypes associated with aging are of great concern as extensive literature emphasizes its deleterious effects on physical and mental health of the elderly. AIM: To assess the relationship between the attitude toward aging and the frailty status of nursing homes residents. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of the data collected at baseline in the SENIOR cohort was conducted. All subjects received a diagnosis of frailty based on the Fried's criteria. They also responded to the Attitude to Aging Questionnaire (AAQ) and other questions assessing their subjective age, the age at which someone stops being considered young or is considered old and the open-ended Image-of-Aging question to evaluate the relationship between their perception of aging and their frailty status. RESULTS: 272 nursing home residents (83.9 ± 8.19 years; 75% women) participated in this study. Out of them, 54 (19.9%) were frail, 182 (66.9%) were pre-frail, and 36 (13.2%) were robust. According to the AAQ questionnaire, frail subjects have a more negative perception of aging (score of 80.3 ± 10.2 points) than pre-frail subjects (83.6 ± 10.8) and robust subjects (86.5 ± 10.5) (p = 0.02). However, the three groups did not differ in the age that would mark, to their opinion, the end of youth (p = 0.93) or the beginning of old age (p = 0.98). The subjective age, rapported by nursing home residents, was not significantly different according to their frailty status. At least, based on the Open-Ended Image of Aging question, the residents' vision of aging was not different according to the frailty status (p = 0.52). CONCLUSION: Based on the AAQ, frail subjects have more negative attitude to ageing compared to non-frail ones.