Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 20(12): 1083-1087, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30902652

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Calcific coronary lesions can be so resistant to prevent symmetric stent dilatation with high risk of ISR/thrombosis. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of super high-pressure dilatation (>30-to-45Atm) using a dedicated NC-balloon (OPN, SIS-Medical-AG, Winterthur-Switzerland). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 326 consecutive undilatable lesions in which conventional NC-balloons failed to achieve adequate post-dilatation luminal gain. After the failed attempt an OPN-balloon was inflated up to achieve a uniform balloon expansion (maximal dilatation pressure of 45-50 Atm). Lesions were divided into two groups according to the final inflation pressure: Group-I: lesion responsive to 30-40Atm and Group-2:>40 Atm. Angiographic success was defined as residual angiographic stenosis<30% assessed by visual estimation with TIMI3-flow. Procedural success was defined as the achievement of angiographic success without any MACE. RESULTS: Angiographic success was achieved in 97.5%, procedural success in 96.6%; 53% of the lesions were responsive to a slower inflation pressure (Group I) while in the remaining 47%, the optimal expansion required a pressure > 40ATM (Group II). In 3 patients coronary rupture occurred after balloon inflation and was successfully treated with stent implantation with a final TIMI3-flow. The OPN alone was able to achieve adequate expansion in >90%. 0.9% days MACE were reported. CONCLUSION: The OPN-dedicated high-pressure balloon provides an effective and safe strategy for treatment of severe resistant coronary lesions.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/instrumentação , Cateteres Cardíacos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Estenose Coronária/terapia , Calcificação Vascular/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/fisiopatologia , Circulação Coronária , Estenose Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose Coronária/fisiopatologia , Desenho de Equipamento , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pressão , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Calcificação Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
EuroIntervention ; 7(4): 472-9, 2011 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21764666

RESUMO

AIMS: In comparison with non-occlusive lesions, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusions (CTO) represents a greater challenge for the interventionalist, due to lower procedural success rates, relatively higher incidence of procedural complications and the increased rate of restenosis. The European Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion (ERCTO) was created with the goal of evaluating the real impact of CTO PCI in the European context, trying to analyse the rates of procedural success, technical information from the CTO procedures and patient outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data collection was carried out in 16 centres across Europe, starting from the beginning of January 2008. In two years of activity, a total of 1,914 patients with 1,983 CTO lesions were consecutively enrolled in the registry. Overall procedural success was achieved in 1,607 lesions (82.9%); anterograde procedures obtained higher procedural success of retrograde ones (83.2% versus 64.5%, p<0.001). Coronary perforation occurred more frequently in patients who underwent retrograde approach (4.7% versus 2.1%, p=0.04). Although no differences were observed in terms of 30-day major adverse cardiac events between anterograde and retrograde treated patients, a trend toward higher periprocedural non-Q-wave myocardial infarction was found in patients in which the retrograde approach was attempted (2.1% versus 1% p=0.08). Moreover, retrograde approach was related with longer procedural and fluoroscopy times (156.9±62.5 min vs. 98.2±52.8 min and 73.3±59.9 min vs. 38.2±43.9 min respectively, p<0.001) and higher contrast load administration (402±161 cc vs. 302±184 cc, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The first report of the ERCTO registry by the EuroCTO club shows a high procedural success rate obtained by expert European operators in a "real-world" consecutive series of patients, comparable with those reported by Japanese registries. The rate of observed procedural adverse events was low and similar to the non-CTO PCI series. In this registry, retrograde procedures were associated with extended fluoroscopy exposure and procedural time, increased contrast load administration as well as a higher incidence of coronary perforations. Such outcomes should become the standard of care that all centres undertaking CTO PCI should aspire to.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Oclusão Coronária/terapia , Pacientes Internados , Idoso , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/mortalidade , Doença Crônica , Meios de Contraste , Angiografia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/mortalidade , Vasos Coronários/lesões , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Fluoroscopia , Traumatismos Cardíacos/etiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia Intervencionista , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Padrão de Cuidado , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa