The Use of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology in Pediatric Thyroid Nodules: A Meta-Analysis.

Background: Little is known about the application of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) in pediatric thyroid nodules. This meta-analysis was aimed to investigate the use of TBSRTC in the pediatric population. Methods: Relevant articles were searched in PubMed and Web of Science. Meta-analysis of proportion and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed utilizing the random-effect model. We used subgroup analyses and meta-regression to explore the sources of heterogeneities. Egger's regression test and funnel plot visualization were used to examine publication bias. Results: We included 17 articles comprising of 3687 pediatric thyroid nodules for meta-analyses. TBSRTC outputs including frequency and risk of malignancy (ROM) for the majority of categories were not statistically different from recently published meta-analysis of 145,066 thyroid nodules in adult patients. The resection rate (RR) in the pediatric group was significantly higher in most of the categories compared with published adult data: benign, 23.2% [CI = 18.6-27.9] vs. 13.0% [CI = 9.5-16.5]; atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance, 62.6% [CI = 50.3-74.9] vs. 36.2% [CI = 29.9-42.5]; follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm, 84.3% [CI = 75.2-93.4] vs. 60.5% [CI = 54.5-66.5]; and suspicious for malignancy, 93.8% [CI = 90.1-97.6] vs. 69.7% [CI = 64.0-75.5]. Conclusion: TBSRTC is a valuable tool to make clinical decisions for pediatric patients with thyroid nodules. Pediatric patients with benign and indeterminate thyroid nodules had a higher RR than adult counterpart, but ROM of these categories in adults and children was not statistically different suggesting a potential risk of overtreatment in pediatric patients. Determining the best treatment guidelines and additional tools for risk stratification must be a top priority to precisely identify the target patient groups for surgical intervention.

Epidermal Growth Factor is Effective in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are one the common complications of diabetes mellitus. Many trials were performed to evaluate the effect of recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rhEGF) in healing DFUs. This meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the evidence of rhEGF treatment in DFUs in comparison to placebo. Databases included for the search were PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, ScienceDirect, and Scopus (up to January 2019). The outcome of interest was the complete healing rate of DFUs. We performed random effects meta-analysis stratified by the types of administration route (intralesional injection and topical apply) by calculating the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). A total of six studies involving 530 patients were eligible for analysis. The combined OR (intralesional injection and topical apply) was 4.005 (95% CI: (2.248; 7.135), p < 0.001). The ORs for intralesional injection and topical application were 3.599 (95% CI: (1.213; 10.677), p = 0.021) and 4.176 (95% CI: (2.112; 8.256), p < 0.001), respectively. Statistical heterogeneity might not be important in overall treatment (I2 = 15.17, p = 0.317) and both of the subgroups (I2: 24.56, p = 0.25 and I2: 33.26, p = 0.213, respectively). Our results support the use of rhEGF in the treatment of DFUs.