How Effective Is the Multidisciplinary Team Approach in Bariatric Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings are widely recommended in the management of bariatric surgery patients; however, there is limited evidence for their effectiveness. The aims of this study were to evaluate the decision-making process of a single-day bariatric MDT clinic and secondly to evaluate whether these MDT decisions were implemented. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study analysing MDT treatment decisions from February 2012 to June 2013 using an MDT proforma. The decision-making process of the MDT meeting was investigated by assessing the alterations in management plan between the surgeon and the rest of the MDT. Adherence to MDT decisions was also assessed. RESULTS: Decisions regarding 200 consecutive patients were analyzed. There was MDT agreement for 55%, and patients were listed for surgery on the day of the MDT. There was MDT disagreement regarding 45%, with conflicting opinions expressed by surgeons in 33/200 (17%), anaesthetists in 60/200 (30%) and dieticians in 65/200 (33%). The MDT plan was instigated in 78% and the most common reason for failure was patients failing to attend for further assessment. By the end of the study, 85% of patients underwent bariatric surgery, 11.5% declined further input, 2.5% chose further weight loss and 1% were removed from waiting list. CONCLUSION: Use of a single-day MDT clinic format resulted in a change in plan for a significant number of patients. This can be interpreted as improved quality of care for these patients, and we conclude the MDT approach is valuable.

Communicating the location of potential skin neoplasms for excision between the referring and the operating doctor--an audit of skin lesion referrals in Whanganui, New Zealand.

AIM: The importance of correctly defining the location of potential skin cancer when surgical treatment may be required is self-evident. Clear communication is essential if the professional diagnosing potential skin cancer is not the same professional providing treatment. We aimed to assess the nature of the localising information provided in referrals to the local anaesthetic skin lesion theatre in our institution. METHODS: Information localising target lesions for new patients seen in our local anaesthetic skin excision theatre was recorded during a 2-month period April to May 2012 inclusive RESULTS: 100 patients were seen in our skin excision theatre during the study period; 16 patients were not able to identify the target skin lesion at the time they entered the operating theatre. The target lesion could not be determined from the referral text in 30/100 cases. Diagrams were provided in 19/100 cases. Photographs were provided in 3/100 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Pictorial and photographic means of communicating the location of suspicious lesions are under-utilised in our service. Relying on the patient or the referral text to correctly identify the lesion leaves considerable room for error. We suggest that photographic information for skin lesion referrals is adopted as a minimum standard.