Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Eixos temáticos
Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Cancer ; 22(1): 1366, 2022 Dec 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36585700

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The gut microbiome plays an important role in immune modulation. Specifically, presence or absence of certain gut bacterial taxa has been associated with better antitumor immune responses. Furthermore, in trials using fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) to treat melanoma patients unresponsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), complete responses (CR), partial responses (PR), and durable stable disease (SD) have been observed. However, the underlying mechanism determining which patients will or will not respond and what the optimal FMT composition is, has not been fully elucidated, and a discrepancy in microbial taxa associated with clinical response has been observed between studies. Furthermore, it is unknown whether a change in the microbiome itself, irrespective of its origin, or FMT from ICI responding donors, is required for reversion of ICI-unresponsiveness. To address this, we will transfer microbiota of either ICI responder or nonresponder metastatic melanoma patients via FMT. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blinded phase Ib/IIa trial, 24 anti-PD1-refractory patients with advanced stage cutaneous melanoma will receive an FMT from either an ICI responding or nonresponding donor, while continuing anti-PD-1 treatment. Donors will be selected from patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 therapy. Two patients with a good response (≥ 30% decrease according to RECIST 1.1 within the past 24 months) and two patients with progression (≥ 20% increase according to RECIST 1.1 within the past 3 months) will be selected as ICI responding or nonresponding donors, respectively. The primary endpoint is clinical benefit (SD, PR or CR) at 12 weeks, confirmed on a CT scan at 16 weeks. The secondary endpoint is safety, defined as the occurrence of grade ≥ 3 toxicity. Exploratory endpoints are progression-free survival and changes in the gut microbiome, metabolome, and immune cells. DISCUSSION: Transplanting fecal microbiota to restore the patients' perturbed microbiome has proven successful in several indications. However, less is known about the potential role of FMT to improve antitumor immune response. In this trial, we aim to investigate whether administration of FMT can reverse resistance to anti-PD-1 treatment in patients with advanced stage melanoma, and whether the ICI-responsiveness of the feces donor is associated with its effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05251389 (registered 22-Feb-2022). Protocol V4.0 (08-02-2022).


Assuntos
Melanoma , Segunda Neoplasia Primária , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Fezes/microbiologia , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Melanoma/terapia , Melanoma/etiologia , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/etiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Melanoma Maligno Cutâneo
2.
Pigment Cell Melanoma Res ; 37(1): 15-20, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37554041

RESUMO

Despite the improved survival rates of patients with advanced stage melanoma since the introduction of ICIs, many patients do not have (long-term) benefit from these treatments. There is evidence that the exposome, an accumulation of host-extrinsic factors including environmental influences, could impact ICI response. Recently, a survival benefit was observed in patients with BRAF wild-type melanoma living in Denmark who initiated immunotherapy in summer as compared to winter. As the Netherlands lies in close geographical proximity to Denmark and has comparable seasonal differences, a Dutch validation cohort was established using data from our nationwide melanoma registry. In this study, we did not observe a similar seasonal difference in overall survival and are therefore unable to confirm the Danish findings. Validation of either the Dutch or Danish findings in (combined) patient cohorts from other countries would be necessary to determine whether this host-extrinsic factor influences the response to ICI-treatment.


Assuntos
Melanoma , Humanos , Melanoma/genética , Melanoma/terapia , Estações do Ano , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa