A slurry approach to identify nutrient critical source areas from subtropical catchment erosion.

Targeting catchment nutrient critical source areas (CSAs) (areas contributing most of the nutrients in a catchment) is an efficient way to prioritize remediation sites for reducing nutrient runoff to waterways. We tested if the soil slurry approach - with particle sizes and sediment concentrations representative of those in streams during high rainfall events - can be used to identify potential CSAs within individual land use types, examine fire impacts, and identify the contribution of leaf litter in topsoil to nutrient export in subtropical catchments. We first confirmed the slurry approach met the prerequisite to identify CSAs with relatively higher nutrient contribution (not absolute load estimation) by comparing the slurry sampling with stream nutrient monitoring data. We validated that: 1) differences in slurry total nitrogen to phosphorus mass ratios from different land uses were consistent with stream monitoring data; and 2) our estimated nutrient export contribution from agricultural land, via the slurry approach, was comparable to that derived from monitoring data. Additionally, we found nutrient concentrations in slurries differed across soil types and management practice within individual land uses, correlating with nutrient concentrations in fine particles. These results indicate the slurry approach can be used to identify potential small-scale CSAs. Slurry results from burnt soils were also comparable to other studies showing increased levels of dissolved nutrient loss and higher nitrogen than phosphorus loss, than non-burnt soils. The slurry method also showed the contribution of leaf litter to slurry nutrient concentrations from topsoil was greater for dissolved nutrients than particulate nutrients, indicating different forms of nutrients need to be considered for impacts of vegetation. Our study reveals that the slurry method can be used to identify potential small-scale CSAs within the same land use from erosion and can account for impacts of vegetation and bushfires, providing timely information to guide catchment restoration actions.

Scientific challenges and biophysical knowledge gaps for implementing nutrient offset projects.

Nutrient offsetting allows nutrient point source polluters to pay for diffuse source nutrient reductions, or improvements in nutrient load reductions from alternative point sources. These programs have the potential to provide a more cost-effective approach to achieve water quality goals in waterways compared to infrastructure upgrades. However, worldwide adoption of nutrient offset/trading has not been realized. Here, we identified the biophysical-chemical knowledge gaps that can act as barriers to adopting these programs and summarized areas where further research is needed. This includes a) evaluating if any appropriate spatial scale (local-, catchment-, or regional-scale) and time scale (especially for areas with dry/wet cycles) exists to achieve nutrient load management goals, and b) quantifying nutrient characteristic differences and load contributions between point and diffuse sources to determine possible offsets between the two. Where offsets are appropriate, there is also a need to 1) improve monitoring design and reduce modelling uncertainties to better quantify diffuse nutrient loads; 2) quantify and manage uncertainties in catchment interventions to reduce nutrient loads, and design effective long-term monitoring and maintenance to sustain intervention outcomes; 3) prioritize areas within catchments that are key nutrient sources for catchment interventions to achieve the optimal outcomes for nutrient load management and catchment and aquatic ecosystem health; and 4) develop methodologies to determine the environmental equivalency ratio between different nutrient sources in terms of ecosystem effects. This would include identifying the best metric to quantify equivalency ratios, determining discharge patterns for different nutrient sources, and linking this with ecosystem responses across seasons and in the downstream receiving environment. Addressing the identified knowledge gaps will improve the program feasibility assessment process as well as confidence and certainty in the environmental outcomes of nutrient offsetting.

Temporal and spatial water quality impacts of point-source versus catchment-derived nitrogen loads in an urbanised estuary.

The Brisbane River estuary is an anthropogenically-impacted waterway in southeast Queensland, Australia. The estuary is over 80 km long and flows through an urbanised region. It receives over 500 t per year of total nitrogen (N) from direct point-source discharges in addition to sporadic flood loads of N from an agriculturally impacted upper catchment. Comprehensive water quality monitoring data for the estuary have been collected from at least 2001. This monitoring data includes ambient nutrient concentrations in the estuary, nutrient concentration and volume of the catchment inflows, and nutrient concentration and volume of point source discharges. This long-term data from a range of sources was used to determine temporal and spatial variations in concentrations, forms, stores and loads of N along the estuary for the period 2001 to 2022. Results showed that, during low-flow periods, the store of N in the mid-upper estuary (33-81 km upstream) is significantly determined by point-source discharges to this reach, and therefore the store of N can be modelled. Model parameters are the daily point source loads, a point source load decay factor, and a background constant store. In the lower estuary (0-33 km upstream) N store can be accurately determined based on dilution with seawater, with point sources not having significant influence on total N in the reach. Total N from large flood events was found to largely pass through the estuary without detectable removal processes, delivering catchment derived N directly to coastal waters. This work informs potential application of nutrient offsets in the estuary, guiding where and when offset options will be effective to mitigate the water quality impacts of point-source nutrients.

Refining fine sediment source identification through integration of spatial modelling, concentration monitoring and source tracing: A case study in the Great Barrier Reef catchments.

Excess fine sediment delivery is a major contributor to the declining health of the Great Barrier Reef and identifying the dominant source areas of fine sediment has been critical to prioritising erosion remediation programs. The Bowen River catchment within the Burdekin Basin has been recognised as a major contributor and hence received considerable research investment over the last two decades. This study adopts a novel approach to integrate three independently derived sediment budgets produced from a catchment scale sediment budget model (Dynamic SedNet), targeted tributary water quality monitoring and geochemical sediment source tracing to refine and map the sediment source zones within the Bowen catchment. A four year study of water quality monitoring combined with modelled discharge estimates and geochemical source tracing both identified that the Little Bowen River and Rosella Creek were the largest sources of sediment in the Bowen River catchment. Both data sets contradicted initial synoptic sediment budget model predictions due to inadequate representation of hillslope and gully erosion. Recent improvements in model inputs have resulted in predictions that are consistent with the field data and are of finer resolution within the identified source areas. Priorities for further investigation of erosion processes are also revealed. Examining the benefits and limitations of each method indicates that these are complimentary methods which can effectively be used as multiple lines of evidence. An integrated dataset such as this provides a higher level of certainty in the prediction of fine sediment sources than a single line of evidence dataset or model. The use of high quality, integrated datasets to inform catchment management prioritisation will provide greater confidence for decision makers when investing in catchment management.

The bioavailability of nitrogen associated with sediment in riverine plumes of the Great Barrier Reef.

This study quantified the bioavailable nitrogen contribution from riverine plumes to Great Barrier Reef (GBR) coastal environments. The potential bioavailable nitrogen from two Dry Tropics riverine plumes was considerable [9 - 30% added to the end-of-catchment dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) load]. Particulate inorganic nitrogen conversion to DIN was an important process in short timeframes (25% to 100% of the generated load). The remaining load was contributed by microbial mineralisation of organic nitrogen. Flood plume sediment has potential to generate nitrogen once deposited and/or resuspended. Nitrogen generation was insignificant in a few plumes where immobilisation of nitrogen in bacteria biomass occurred. The source of organic matter in the plumes and availability of nitrogen relative to organic matter were important determinants of mineralisation/immobilisation. This research demonstrates that riverine plumes have potential to be considerable sources of bioavailable nitrogen to coastal environments of the GBR and that organic matter is a key bioavailability driver.

Short-term application of mulch, roundup and organic herbicides did not affect soil microbial biomass or bacterial and fungal diversity.

Application of synthetic herbicides is currently the most widely used and cost-effective methods to assist with revegetation programs. However, the effects of short-term application of herbicides such as Roundup®, acetic acid, BioWeed™ and Slasher® as compared with mulch, on soil microbial biomass and microbial diversity remain unknown. This study examined the effects of short-term herbicide application on soil microbial biomass, C:N ratio, and fungal and bacterial communities at months 2 and 8 following initiation of treatment application. No effects of treatments on soil pH, C:N and microbial biomass were found. No segregation among treatments in the community structure of bacteria and fungi was observed. However, the fungal phylum Basiodiomycota had one unidentified class, which was only found in the mulch treatment, suggesting the C quality in the mulch treatment may differ compared with the other treatments. The dry and hot conditions experienced throughout the study period may have resulted in fast degradation of the herbicides and may have minimised the impacts of the herbicides on microbial diversity and community structure. Given that the research was undertaken at a single site and over only a short time frame, the results should be extrapolated with caution. Herbicides may have greater impact with long-term use. Future research will need to assess the revegetation success of each treatment and determine if the observed change in Basidiomycota profile and C quality identified in this study becomes significant over the long-term. We hypothesise that mulching may be a preferred treatment to facilitate weed control in riparian zone revegetation.

Indicators of phytoplankton response to particulate nutrient bioavailability in fresh and marine waters of the Great Barrier Reef.

Sediments delivered to freshwater and marine environments can make important contributions to the aquatic bioavailable nutrient pool. In the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) catchments, particulate nutrients comprise an important fraction of the end of catchment loads; however, their contribution to the bioavailable nutrient pool is not well understood. This research determined which particulate nutrient parameters are the best indicators of the potential effect of fine sediment (<10 µm) on phytoplankton growth. Surface and subsurface sediments were lab-generated to cover a wide spectrum of particulate nutrient bioavailability from key soil types, land uses and erosion processes (hillslope and gully) in a wet and a dry tropics catchment of the GBR. Phytoplankton bioassays were used to assess freshwater and marine phytoplankton responses to sediments. The best indicators were selected by regressing measurements of phytoplankton growth against nutrient bioavailability parameters measured on the sediments. The selected indicator equations included organic carbon (C) pools for both fresh and marine water, highlighting the role of bacteria in mediating nutrient availability for phytoplankton. The equations also included various fractions of particulate nitrogen (N) (differentiating the adsorbed ammonium-N from the particulate organic N), and the ratios of C to N, which indicate the lability of the organic matter present in the sediment. Dissolved reactive phosphorus was also an important indicator in freshwater. The indicators performed better in assessing bioavailability potential than traditional methods to monitor particulate nutrients, e.g., particulate N and particulate phosphorus. Phytoplankton bioassays indicated that nutrients in sediment can promote phytoplankton growth, with nutrient bioavailability depending not only on sediment load, but also sediment characteristics associated with its parent soil. These characteristics vary with soil type, land use and erosion process. Findings will help prioritize erosion control to catchment areas which are most likely to contribute large amounts of bioavailable particulate nutrients to the GBR.

A novel bioassay to assess phytoplankton responses to soil-derived particulate nutrients.

Terrestrial particulate nutrients transported during flood events are known to indirectly fuel phytoplankton blooms in rivers, lakes and coastal waters, although the mechanisms are poorly understood. Quantifying the response of phytoplankton to nutrients in sediments eroded from catchments is fundamental to prioritizing areas for erosion control. This study developed a novel bioassay technique for rapidly assessing the effects of nutrients released from suspended sediments on the growth of marine and freshwater phytoplankton communities. A range of sediment slurries were placed in bioassay bottles within dialysis tubing in the presence of phytoplankton and their photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm) was measured over 72 h. This allowed an assessment of the effects of dissolved nutrients released from sediments without the confounding effects of suspended sediments. Chlorophyll a concentrations were also measured for comparison with Fv/Fm. Our study showed Fv/Fm was an effective method for measuring phytoplankton responses to sediment slurries. Photosynthetic efficiency was a more sensitive response metric than chlorophyll a. Applying the method to a range of suspended sediments from two tropical catchments in Australia that drain into Great Barrier Reef coastal waters, we identified a subset of sediment types (~40%) that increased Fv/Fm under the bioassay conditions. These sediments have the potential to stimulate marine and freshwater phytoplankton growth under the loads simulated in this study. The bioassay has the advantage of being a rapid and relatively simple method where a large number of sediments can be simultaneously tested for a phytoplankton response. To our knowledge this is the first time Fv/Fm has been used to assess phytoplankton responses to sediments in a bioassay. This approach advances the use of Fv/Fm as a sensitive indicator of phytoplankton responses to nutrients and could be used to develop indices of the relative risk various sediments pose, hence support decision making for erosion control measures.