Major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients: is it reasonable?

INTRODUCTION: We sought to evaluate the effect of age on postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing major liver surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC). METHODS: 77 patients were included. Patients were categorized into two groups: the "< 70-year-olds" group (n = 54) and the "≥ 70-year-olds" group (n = 23). RESULTS: Median LOS was 19 both for < 70-year-old group and ≥ 70-year-old group (P = 0.72). No differences in terms of severe complication were detected (44.4% Clavien-Dindo 3-4-5 in < 70-year-old group vs 47.8% in ≥ 70-year-old group, P = 0.60). Within 90 postoperative days, 11 patients died, 6 in < 70-year-old group (11.3%) and 5 in ≥ 70-year-old group (21.7%), P = 0.29. The median follow-up was 20 months. The death rate was 72.2% and 78.3% among patients < 70 years old and ≥ 70 years old. The OS at 2 and 5 years was significantly higher among the < 70 years old (57.0% and 27.7%) compared to the ≥ 70 years old (27.1% and 13.6%), P = 0.043. Adjusting for hypertension and Charlson comorbidity index in a multivariate analysis, the HR for age was 1.93 (95% CI 0.84-4.44), P = 0.12. Relapse occurred in 43 (81.1%) patients in the < 70-year-old group and in 19 (82.6%) patients in the ≥ 70-year-old group. DFS at 12, 24, and 36 months was, respectively, 59.6, 34.2, and 23.2 for the < 70 -year-old group and 32.5, 20.3, and 13.5 for the ≥ 70-year-old group (P = 0.26). Adjusting for hypertension and Charlson comorbidity index in a Cox model, the HR for age was 1.52 (95% CI 0.67-3.46), with P = 0.32. CONCLUSIONS: ≥ 70-year-old patients with PHCC can still be eligible for major liver resection with acceptable complication rates and should not be precluded a priori from a radical treatment.

Robot-Assisted Harvesting of Kidneys for Transplantation and Global Complications for the Donor.

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted kidney harvesting from living donors is feasible and safe. We report the results of a mono-centric experience relative to 98 consecutive robotic nephrectomies with emphasis on global donor complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. Donors underwent robot-assisted kidney harvesting. The preferred kidney was the left one even in the presence of vascular anomalies. In the first cases we used a robotic hand-assisted technique, then the totally robotic technique, and finally the modified totally robot-assisted technique. Postoperative complications were ranked according to the five-grade Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: Between November 2009 and November 2016, 98 living donors underwent nephrectomy. We experienced 14 complications. The 3 intraoperative ones (3.06%) were 1 pneumothorax and 2 acute bleedings, 1 of them requiring transfusion. The 11 postoperative complications (11.22%) were as follows: 5 wound seromas, 1 rhabdomyolisis (Clavien I), 1 paretic ileum, 1 anemia requiring transfusion, 1 hypertensive crisis (Clavien II), and 2 chylus collections drained by interventional radiologists (Clavien III). Transfusion rate was 2.1%; conversions, reoperations, and mortality were nil. No statistically significant difference was observed between the patients with complications and without in terms of gender, age, anatomical anomalies, body mass index (BMI), and learning curve. We observed a longer global operation length of time in patients with complications. CONCLUSION: Robotic assistance results in shorter and simpler learning curves for the harvesting of kidneys from living donors. It enables an easier and more efficient management of possible intraoperative complications. The rate of postoperative complications is comparable with the rate of complications encountered in traditional laparoscopic series with high numbers of harvestings.

Do Older Liver Grafts Have Worse Survival? The Niguarda Experience.

BACKGROUND: Elderly donor livers are thought to be marginal graft. In the present study, we aimed to identify an age threshold to consider a graft as elderly to identify the trend (if any) of the donor age in our series and to identify an efficient allocation criteria for elderly grafts. METHODS: We reviewed in a retrospective manner our series of 1520 liver transplants, comparing graft survival under and over a certain age. On the basis of the results of this analysis, we identified a threshold of 70 years to define a graft as old. The donor age trend analysis showed an increasing rate of transplants from elderly donors. RESULTS: To identify efficient allocation criteria for elderly graft, we stratified the series by the disease of the recipient: 556 patients underwent transplants for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC+ group) and 964 for other diseases (HCC- group). Two hundred twenty-one patients of 556 of the HCC+ group were hepatitis c virus (HCV) negative (HCC+/HCV- group), and 312 of 964 of the HCC- group were HCV positive (HCC-/HCV+). The survival analysis showed no significant differences in comparing the outcome for elderly and young grafts in the HCC+ (P = .135) and HCC- (P = .055) groups. CONCLUSIONS: When comparing the survival of old and young livers in the HCC+/HCV- group, the elderly livers appear to have a better outcome (P = .05); on the other hand, the same analysis in the HCC-/HCV+ group shows a worse outcome for old-aged grafts (P = .026). Therefore, the present study suggests that elderly livers should be allocated to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and should be avoided in HCV+ recipients.