Long-term safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion in dialysis patients with atrial fibrillation: a multi-center, prospective, open label, observational study.

Background: The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in end stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients undergoing dialysis is high, however, the high risk of bleeding often hampers with a correct anticoagulation in ESKD patients with AF, despite high thromboembolic risk. Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is a anticoagulation (OAT) for thromboembolism prevention in AF populations with high hemorrhagic risk. Methods and Results: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LAA occlusion in a cohort of dialysis patients undergoing the procedure (LAA occlusion cohort, n = 106), in comparison with two other ESKD cohorts, one taking warfarin (Warfarin cohort, n = 114) and the other without anticoagulation therapy (No-OAT cohort, n = 148). After a median follow-up of 4 years, a Cox regression model, adjusted for possible confounding factors, showed that the hazard ratios (HRs) of thromboembolic events in the LAA occlusion cohort were 0.19 (95%CI 0.04-0.96; p = 0.045) and 0.16 (95%CI 0.04-0.66; p = 0.011) as compared with Warfarin and No-OAT cohorts, respectively. The HR of bleeding in the LAA occlusion cohort was 0.37 (95%CI 0.16-0.83; p = 0.017) compared to Warfarin cohort, while there were no significant differences between the LAA occlusion and the No-OAT cohort (HR 0.51; 95%CI 0.23-1.12; p = 0.094). Adjusted Cox regression models showed lower mortality in patients undergoing LAA occlusion as compared with both the Warfarin cohort (HR 0.60; 95%CI 0.38-0.94; p = 0.027) and no-OAT cohort (HR 0.52; 95%CI 0.34-0.78; p = 0.002). Thromboembolic events in the LAA occlusion cohort were lower than expected according to the CHA2DS2VASc score (1.7 [95%CI 0.3-3.0] vs 6.7 events per 100 person/years, p < 0.001). Conclusion: In ESKD patients with AF, LAA occlusion is safe and effective and is associated with reduced mortality compared with OAT or no therapy.

Pancake polycystic kidney: case report.

Pancake kidney is a very rare fusion abnormality, characterised by the presence of a renal parenchymal mass located in pelvic site, generally with two pelvies and two ureters and without an intervening fibrous septum. The case here reported describes a condition of "pancake kidney", eventually associated with polycystic disease and abnormous vascular supply. Hypertension and microscopic hematuria were the only clinical signs.

Outcomes on safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion in end stage renal disease patients undergoing dialysis.

BACKGROUND: In patients with end stage renal disease and atrial fibrillation (AF), undergoing chronic dialysis, direct oral agents are contraindicated and warfarin does not fully prevent embolic events while increasing the bleeding risk. The high hemorrhagic risk represents the main problem in this population. Aim of the study was to estimate the safety and efficacy for thromboembolic prevention of left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion in a cohort of dialysis patients with AF and high hemorrhagic risk. METHODS: Ninety-two dialysis patients with AF who underwent LAA occlusion were recruited. For comparative purposes, two cohorts of dialysis patients with AF, one taking warfarin (oral anticoagulant therapy, OAT cohort, n = 114) and the other not taking any OAT (no-therapy cohort, n = 148) were included in the study. Primary endpoints were (1) incidence of peri-procedural complications, (2) incidence of 2-year thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events, (3) mortality at 2 years. In order to evaluate the effect of the LAA occlusion on the endpoints with respect to the OAT and No-therapy cohorts, a multivariable Cox regression model was applied adjusted for possible confounding factors. RESULTS: The device was successfully implanted in 100% of cases. Two major peri-procedural complications were reported. No thromboembolic events occurred at 2-year follow-up. The adjusted multivariable Cox regression model showed no difference in bleeding risk in the OAT compared to the LAA occlusion cohort in the first 3 months of follow-up [HR 1.65 (95% CI 0.43-6.33)], when most of patients were taking two antiplatelet drugs. In the following 21 months the bleeding incidence became higher in OAT patients [HR 6.48 (95% CI 1.32-31.72)]. Overall mortality was greater in both the OAT [HR 2.76 (95% CI 1.31-5.86)] and No-Therapy [HR 3.09 (95% CI 1.59-5.98)] cohorts compared to LAA occlusion patients. CONCLUSIONS: The study could open the way to a non-pharmacological option for thromboembolic protection in dialysis patients with AF and high bleeding risk.

Implant success and safety of left atrial appendage occlusion in end stage renal disease patients: Peri-procedural outcomes from an Italian dialysis population.

AIMS: To estimate the safety and the efficacy of the off label left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion in chronic dialysis patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In this preliminary paper, we report the design of the study and the data on peri-procedural complications. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study. Primary endpoints are i) incidence of peri-procedural complications, ii) cumulative incidence of two-year thromboembolic events iii) cumulative incidence of two-year bleedings iiii) mortality at two years. Adverse events and death within 30 days of the procedure were recorded. RESULTS: Fifty patients who underwent LAA occlusion between May 2014 and September 2017 were recruited. Both the mean age of the sample study and the dialysis duration were high [71.8 (9.6) years and 59.4 (78.2) months, respectively]. Most patients (84%) were hypertensive and 62% suffered a previous major bleeding. About half of them presented cardiovascular diseases. CHA2DS2VASCs and HASBLED scores were 4.0 (1.5) and 4.4 (0.9), respectively. Most patients (88%) showed atrial dilatation and 44% left ventricular hypertrophy; 32% had left ventricular ejection fraction <50%. Fifty five percent of patients had permanent AF and 32% paroxysmal AF. All devices were implanted successfully. No deaths or major adverse events were reported during a 30-day follow-up. Three episodes of peri-procedural access site bleeding were reported, requiring no transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data suggest the feasibility and safety of LAA occlusion in patients undergoing dialysis. Only the follow-up of these patients over time can provide evidence that LAA occlusion is effective in preventing of thromboembolic events in this very high-risk population.