PD-L1 Expression in Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Carcinoma, Correlation with the Immune Infiltrate - Preliminary Study.

Background: Although traditional management for esophageal and esogastric cancer has been improved, survival at 5 years is still low, and immunotherapy could be a way to improve it. In addition to the predictive value of the response to immunotherapy, PD-L1 also has a known prognostic value. We aimed to evaluate the immunohistochemical expression of PD-L1, CD8+ T-cell, and CD4/CD25+ T-cell (Tregs) infiltration and their relationship in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. Material and Methods: Endoscopic biopsies were analyzed in 14 patients with esophageal cancer or esogastric junction, before starting the neoadjuvant treatment, hospitalized from the period 2019- to 2021 in the St. Mary's Clinical Hospital, Bucharest. Immunohistochemical tests were performed to investigate the expression of lymphocyte intratumoral infiltrate markers. Results: Of the 14 cases, 13 (93%) were male, and 1 (7%) were female. Histological, 4 cases were adenocarcinomas, and 10 cases were squamous cell carcinomas. 10 cases showed epithelial PD-L1 positivity (78%). Using a quantitative evaluation of PD-L1 we obtained a statistical correlation between the median values of this marker with the expression of CD8. There was obtained a statistical correlation between PD-L1 positivity and low expression of CD4 or CD4+/CD25 T cells. Conclusions: PD-L1 is expressed in tumors with higher CD8+ T cell densities and lower CD4/CD25 positive cells (Tregs), indicating that the good prognosis of PD-L1-positive tumors could be due to the inhibition of CD4 / CD25-positive cells (Tregs) rather than the stimulation of CD8-positive T cells, by an adaptive immune resistance mechanism.

Peculiar encounter of sarcoidosis and solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas.

Objective: Current literature indicates a connection between sarcoidosis and malignancy, prompting advanced screening in uncertain cases. Solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPT) of the pancreas are rare entities that can be confirmed by adding imaging results to immunohistochemistry staining. The aim of this article is to describe a rare association of sarcoidosis and SPT.Materials and methods: Case report.Results: A young female patient with no prior medical history presents with shortness of breath and fatigue. The diagnosis of pulmonary and hepatic sarcoidosis is placed upon laboratory and radiographic changes. Intermittent abdominal pain prompts an MRI that shows the presence of a tumoral mass in the tail of the pancreas. Surgical resection of the mass is performed and histological examination indicates a SPT, subsequently confirmed by immunohistochemistry.Conclusion: This is the third reported case of concomitant sarcoidosis and solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas.

The importance of a multidisciplinary team in rectal cancer management.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the interval between surgery and adjuvant treatments regarding the overall survival and recurrence-free survival in patients from a developing country. For stages II and III rectal cancer, international guidelines recommend neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regardless of the tumor location. In the developing countries there is a shortage of radiotherapy centers, specialists, which lead to long waiting lists for radiotherapy. These problems might lead to protocol deviations. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on 161 patients with rectal cancer treated with surgery, postoperative CRT and with or without chemotherapy for a total of 6 months, at The Oncology Institute Cluj-Napoca between 2006-2010. All patients had 5 years of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients were enrolled in this study. The majority of patients were locally advanced stages (89.44%). The well known prognostic factors, such as TNM stage, performance status, CEA serum level, perineural, vascular and lymphatic invasion, and node capsular effraction had a statistically significant influence on overall survival. In 21.12% of patients the first adjuvant treatment was started in the first 4 weeks after surgery. Only 13.04% of patients started the concomitant CRT within the limit of 6 weeks after surgery. Concerning the time between surgery and CRT, we did not observe a statistically significantly difference in OS if the radiotherapy started after the first 6 weeks (p=0.701). The OS rate for locally advanced rectal cancer patients was 69.44%. CONCLUSIONS: In rectal cancer, the importance of the first therapeutic act is crucial. Following international guidelines provides a survival advantage and a better quality of life. In case of adjuvant treatment, it is recommended to start this treatment as soon as the local infrastructure allows it.