Association of nerve-sparing grading in robotic radical prostatectomy and trifecta outcome.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the neurovascular bundle preservation grades during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and compared to the trifecta combined outcome (oncologic control, continence, and sexual function) twelve months after the surgery. METHODS: Cohort of patients who underwent nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy had the neurovascular bundle preservation retrospectively graded from 0 to 8 according to the Hopkins subjective visual classification. Patients then were divided into two groups, according to the median of nerve-sparing grading: those with score six or high and those with score less than six. Main outcome was the trifecta combined outcome and secondary outcomes was the individual trifecta criteria (prospective analysis). A secondary analysis with groups divided according to pre-operatory SHIM score was made. RESULTS: One hundred robotic-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy were performed, of which 83 were included. There were 53 patients with grading greater than or equal to six (group 1) and 30 patients less than six (group 2). 66.6% patients (35/53) in group 1 had a trifecta combined outcome of compared to 33.3% (10/30) in group 2 (p = 0.017). Individually, the erectile function was higher in group 1 (73.6%) compared to group 2 (46.7%) (p = 0.014). Both the results of the combined endpoint trifecta and erection were also maintained in the group with preoperative SHIM ≥ 17. CONCLUSIONS: The grading of preservation of the neurovascular bundle in radical prostatectomy is related to a better combined trifecta outcome one year after surgery.

The impact of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors on mortality in a prostate cancer chemoprevention setting: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the impact of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (5ARI) for prostate cancer (PCa) primary prevention on specific and overall mortality (primary outcomes), the incidence of PCa diagnosis and disease aggressiveness (secondary outcomes). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials and BVS through April 2018 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement to identify randomized clinical trials (RCT) and cohort studies (CS). We included articles with data on mortality or PCa incidence for men using 5ARI previously to PCa diagnosis. RESULTS: Regarding the included studies, nine had data on mortality, 16 on PCa incidence and 12 on Gleason scores (GS). We found that the use of 5ARI had no impact on overall mortality (RR 0.93 95% CI 0.78-1.11) and PCa-related mortality (RR 1.35 95% CI 0.50-3.94), nor on high-grade PCa diagnosis (RR 1.06 95% CI 0.72-1.56). We identified a relative risk reduction of 24% in moderate-grade PCa diagnosis (RR 0.76 95% CI 0.59-0.98) and low-grade PCa diagnosis (RR 0.76 95% CI 0.59-0.97) Also, a reduction of 26% in overall PCa diagnosis was observed in the RCT subgroup analysis (RR 0.74 95% CI 0.65-0.84). CONCLUSION: 5ARI significantly reduced the risk of being diagnosed with PCa, not increasing high-grade disease, overall or cancer-specific mortality. Due to the relatively short mean follow-up of most studies, the mortality analysis is limited.

Macedo procedure: A continent catheterizable ileum-based reservoir. Step-by-step video.

This video provides a case report of a 16-year-old male patient who underwent bladder enlargement with a catheterized conduit under Macedo's technique. This technique involves the use of a segment of the distal ileum with a flap that is used for confection of the conduit. Key points include: 1) skin incision planning; 2) bladder release to allow a tension-free anastomosis; 3) reservoir and a conduit creation with a distal ileum; and 4) creation of a continence mechanism.