Role of lateral suspension for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a Delphi survey of expert panel.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Lateral suspension is an abdominal prosthetic surgical procedure used to correct apical prolapse. The procedure involves the placement of a T-shaped mesh on the anterior vaginal wall and on the isthmus or uterine cervix that is suspended laterally and posteriorly to the abdominal wall. Since its description in the late 90s, modifications of the technique have been described. So far, no consensus on the correct indications, safety, advantages, and disadvantages of this emerging procedure has been reached. METHODS: A modified Delphi process was used to build consensus within a group of 21 international surgeons who are experts in the performance of laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS). The process was held with a first online round, where the experts expressed their level of agreement on 64 statements on indications, technical features, and other aspects of LLS. A subsequent re-discussion of statements where a threshold of agreement was not reached was held in presence. RESULTS: The Delphi process allowed the identification of several aspects of LLS that represented areas of agreement by the experts. The experts agreed that LLS is a safe and effective technique to correct apical and anterior prolapse. The experts highlighted several key technical aspects of the procedure, including clinical indications and surgical steps. CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi consensus provides valuable guidance and criteria for the use of LLS in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, based on expert opinion by large volume surgeons' experts in the performance of this innovative procedure.

Italian multicenter mid-term analysis of laparoscopic lateral suspension in women with pelvic organ prolapse: clinical, sexual and Quality of Life assessment after surgical intervention.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic lateral suspension in women affected by high grade uterine prolapse associated to anterior defect. The secondary endpoint is to evaluate mid-term impact on Quality of Life and sexual function. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study on women undergoing laparoscopic lateral suspension for uterine prolapse ≥III stage was performed. We included 174 women, but due to exclusion criteria, 134 patients were enrolled for this study. Preoperative evaluation consisted of an urogynecological interview, clinical exam, 3-day voiding diary and urodynamic testing; the prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire was used to quantify the impact of prolapse symptoms on Quality of Life and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire short form, the Female Sexual Function Index and the Female Sexual Distress Scale were administered to evaluate sexual function before surgical intervention and at median follow-up of 3.8 years. RESULTS: We included 134 women with uterine prolapse ≥III stage. All patients underwent laparoscopic lateral suspension, 8 also posterior colporrhaphy and 5 also transobturator tape insertion. POP-Q classification score for anterior and apical compartment showed a significant average decrease. The surveys administered to patients showed an improvement in Quality of Life, an increase in the number of monthly intercourses and a significant improvement in sexual life after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic lateral suspension for pelvic organ prolapse correction is a safe and effective technique for uterine and anterior associated defect. Quality of Life and sexual function significantly improved after surgery.