Open issues in the assessment and management of pain in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Pain is the major symptom of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and its reduction is a key goal of treatment. It is widely agreed that assessment of pain is a fundamental component of the rheumatology evaluation and should be carried out at each clinic visit. However, so far there has been insufficient attention to the impact and causes of pain in children with chronic arthritis in both clinical practice and research. Quantitative measures of pain are seldom used regularly in daily care and pain assessment has not been incorporated in the most popular composite outcome measures for JIA, including the criteria employed to measure improvement in therapeutic trials. A recent advance in the development of pain tools involves mobile devices, particularly smartphones, and the internet to collect real-time self-reported data via electronic diaries. Concern has been raised by the recent observations of persistence of pain in some children with JIA despite adequate treatment with the modern biologic medications and good disease controls. These findings underscore the need of large-scale studies of the prevalence and determinants of pain in patients treated with contemporary care. In addition, the reasons that explain the persistence of pain after the resolution of the inflammatory process should be investigated through research on neurobiological mechanisms of pain and by addressing the role of factors external to the disease, such as mood, anxiety, and pain sensitisation and coping.

Evidence for Updating the Core Domain Set of Outcome Measures for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Report from a Special Interest Group at OMERACT 2016.

OBJECTIVE: The current Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) Core Set was developed in 1997 to identify the outcome measures to be used in JIA clinical trials using statistical and consensus-based techniques, but without patient involvement. The importance of patient/parent input into the research process has increasingly been recognized over the years. An Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) JIA Core Set Working Group was formed to determine whether the outcome domains of the current core set are relevant to those involved or whether the core set domains should be revised. METHODS: Twenty-four people from the United States, Canada, Australia, and Europe, including patient partners, formed the working group. Guided by the OMERACT Filter 2.0 process, we performed (1) a systematic literature review of outcome domains, (2) a Web-based survey (142 patients, 343 parents), (3) an idea-generation study (120 parents), (4) 4 online discussion boards (24 patients, 20 parents), and (5) a Special Interest Group (SIG) activity at the OMERACT 13 (2016) meeting. RESULTS: A MEDLINE search of outcome domains used in studies of JIA yielded 5956 citations, of which 729 citations underwent full-text review, and identified additional domains to those included in the current JIA Core Set. Qualitative studies on the effect of JIA identified multiple additional domains, including pain and participation. Twenty-one participants in the SIG achieved consensus on the need to revise the entire JIA Core Set. CONCLUSION: The results of qualitative studies and literature review support the need to expand the JIA Core Set, considering, among other things, additional patient/parent-centered outcomes, clinical data, and imaging data.

Clinical outcome measures in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), as a chronic condition, is associated with significant disease- and treatment-related morbidity, thus impacting children's quality of life. In order to optimize JIA management, the paediatric rheumatologist has begun to regularly use measurements of disease activity developed, validated and endorsed by international paediatric rheumatology professional societies in an effort to monitor the disease course over time and assess the efficacy of therapeutic interventions in JIA patients.A literature review was performed to describe the main outcome measures currently used in JIA patients to determine disease activity status.The Juvenile Disease Activity Score (JADAS), in its different versions (classic JADAS, JADAS-CRP and cJADAS) and the validated definitions of disease activity and response to treatment represent an important tool for the assessment of clinically relevant changes in disease activity, leading more and more to a treat-to-target strategy, based on a tight and thorough control of the patient condition. Moreover, in recent years, increasing attention on the incorporation of patient-reported or parent-reported outcomes (PRCOs), when measuring the health state of patients with paediatric rheumatic diseases has emerged.We think that the care of JIA patients cannot be possible without taking into account clinical outcome measures and, in this regard, further work is required.

Female sex and oligoarthritis category are not risk factors for uveitis in Italian children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk factors for chronic anterior uveitis in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: The clinical charts of patients followed between January 1987 and December 2011 were reviewed to establish whether they had uveitis. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of JIA and a disease category of persistent oligoarthritis, extended oligoarthritis, rheumatoid factor-negative polyarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or undifferentiated arthritis. Risk factors included sex, age at arthritis onset, disease category, and antinuclear antibody (ANA) status. The association of risk factors with occurrence of uveitis was evaluated by survival analysis, with first episode of uveitis as the event of interest, and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Of a total of 1189 patients, 278 (23.4%) had uveitis a median of 1.1 years after onset of arthritis. There was no difference in the cumulative probability of developing uveitis between males and females and between patients belonging to different JIA categories, whereas uveitis was strongly associated with age at arthritis onset ≤ 3.5 years and positive ANA. Patients possessing the latter 2 factors in combination had a greater probability of having uveitis than patients who had either of them alone. CONCLUSION: In our patients, the risk of uveitis was related to younger age at onset of arthritis and presence of ANA, but not to female sex and disease category. This finding suggests that the patients who require the most intensive ophthalmologic screening are those who have early-onset JIA and are ANA-positive, regardless of their sex or disease subtype.