Study on the obtaining of Tityus trivittatus venom in Argentina.

Envenomation by scorpions of the genus Tityus is an important public health problem in Argentina, involving near 8000 stings and 2 deaths each year. Treatment for envenomation is the use of specific antivenom and intensive hospital care. Antivenom is produced by the Ministry of Health and freely distributed throughout the country. For antivenom production it is necessary to collect scorpion venom, which is a difficult task because although scorpions can be found in Argentina, they are less abundant than in warmer latitudes. For this reason venom collection constitutes a bottleneck for antivenom production. Although in Argentina several species of Tityus can be found, most of the accidents are caused by Tityus trivittatus, and the venom of this scorpion has historically been the venom used for antivenom production. We analyzed retrospectively 26 pools of telson homogenates (6964 telsons) and 37 pools of milked venom obtained by electrical stimulation (equivalent to 6841 milkings). Lethal potencies of samples from different provinces were very similar, although venom from scorpions of Buenos Aires city showed the lowest potency. The venom obtained by milking (median LD50 12.3 µg), provided batches containing LD50s more potent when compared with the venom obtained from telson homogenates (p < 0.0001). Many batches of telson homogenates (30%) showed lower potencies than acceptable for antivenom production and control. In addition to the study of the venom yield, the records of immunization of horses, the potency of the batches and the protein content of each batch of anti-scorpion antivenom produced were analyzed, comparing those produced using milked venom with those using telson homogenates as immunogens. Batches produced using milked venom required a shorter period of immunization (p < 0.0001), rendered higher neutralizing titers (p 0.0350) and possessed lower protein content (p 0.0092). Results clearly showed that the milking of scorpions is a more efficient tool to obtain venom for antivenom production in comparison to the use of telson homogenates.

Optimización en la recuperación de inmunoglobulinas, como molécula entera y fragmento F(ab´)2, en la producción de antivenenos / Optimization in the immunoglobulins recovery, as whole molecule and F(ab´)2 fragment, in the antivenim production

En la actualidad se utilizan, principalmente, dos métodos de purificación de anticuerpos a partir de plasmas equinos hiperinmunes para la producción de antivenenos a nivel industrial, obteniéndose preparaciones enriquecidas en moléculas de inmunoglobulinas G ó fragmentos F(ab´)2. Con ambos métodos, luego de la precipitación, se observa una importante pérdida de capacidad neutralizante en comparación con la capacidad neutralizante de los plasmas de partida. En este trabajo, se realizó el fraccionamiento de plasmas equinos hiperinmunes utilizando ácido caprílico con y sin digestión enzimática con pepsina. El objetivo del trabajo fue dar a conocer la proporción de recuperación de la capacidad neutralizante luego del fraccionamiento; resultando ésta menor cuando el plasma se trató enzimáticamente. Adicionalmente, se propuso establecer cuál sería la etapa responsable de la diferencia en la recuperación de anticuerpos entre una metodología y otra. Cuando se purificaron las inmunoglobulinas enteras, se recuperó aproximadamente un 53% de la capacidad neutralizante mientras que cuando la muestra se purificó luego de ser tratada enzimáticamente, se obtuvo alrededor del 30% de esa actividad. Una relación de similar magnitud se verifica en la recuperación de la masa de proteínas solubles luego de remover los contaminantes, entre una metodología y otra. La insolubilización del fragmento Fc generado durante la digestión sería el responsable de esa pérdida adicional de proteína y capacidad neutralizante.(AU)

Today two methods are mainly used for the purification of antibodies from hyperimmune equine plasma at industrial level obtaining enriched preparations of immunoglobulin G (IgG) molecules or F(ab´)2 fragments. In both methods, after the precipitation, an important loss in the neutralizing capability was observed compared to the one of the original plasma. In this work, we performed the fractionation of hyperimmune equine plasma using caprylic acid, with and without enzymatic digestion with pepsin. The aim was to explain the percentage of recovery of the neutralizing capability after the fractionation; which resulted minor when the plasma was enzymatically treated. Additionally, we intended to establish which stage, in the purification process, was the responsible for the difference in the antibody recovery between one methodology and the other. When entire immunoglobulins were purified, approximately 53% of the neutralizing capacity was recovered, but when the sample was purified after the enzymatic treatment, around the 30% of the activity was obtained. A ratio of similar magnitude is verified on the recovery of the soluble protein mass after the removal of contaminants, between the two methods. The insolubilization of the fragment Fc generated during digestion would be responsible for the additional loss of protein and neutralizing capacity.(AU)

Optimización en la recuperación de inmunoglobulinas, como molécula entera y fragmento F(ab´)2, en la producción de antivenenos / Optimization in the immunoglobulins recovery, as whole molecule and F(ab´)2 fragment, in the antivenim production

En la actualidad se utilizan, principalmente, dos métodos de purificación de anticuerpos a partir de plasmas equinos hiperinmunes para la producción de antivenenos a nivel industrial, obteniéndose preparaciones enriquecidas en moléculas de inmunoglobulinas G ó fragmentos F(ab´)2. Con ambos métodos, luego de la precipitación, se observa una importante pérdida de capacidad neutralizante en comparación con la capacidad neutralizante de los plasmas de partida. En este trabajo, se realizó el fraccionamiento de plasmas equinos hiperinmunes utilizando ácido caprílico con y sin digestión enzimática con pepsina. El objetivo del trabajo fue dar a conocer la proporción de recuperación de la capacidad neutralizante luego del fraccionamiento; resultando ésta menor cuando el plasma se trató enzimáticamente. Adicionalmente, se propuso establecer cuál sería la etapa responsable de la diferencia en la recuperación de anticuerpos entre una metodología y otra. Cuando se purificaron las inmunoglobulinas enteras, se recuperó aproximadamente un 53% de la capacidad neutralizante mientras que cuando la muestra se purificó luego de ser tratada enzimáticamente, se obtuvo alrededor del 30% de esa actividad. Una relación de similar magnitud se verifica en la recuperación de la masa de proteínas solubles luego de remover los contaminantes, entre una metodología y otra. La insolubilización del fragmento Fc generado durante la digestión sería el responsable de esa pérdida adicional de proteína y capacidad neutralizante.

Today two methods are mainly used for the purification of antibodies from hyperimmune equine plasma at industrial level obtaining enriched preparations of immunoglobulin G (IgG) molecules or F(ab´)2 fragments. In both methods, after the precipitation, an important loss in the neutralizing capability was observed compared to the one of the original plasma. In this work, we performed the fractionation of hyperimmune equine plasma using caprylic acid, with and without enzymatic digestion with pepsin. The aim was to explain the percentage of recovery of the neutralizing capability after the fractionation; which resulted minor when the plasma was enzymatically treated. Additionally, we intended to establish which stage, in the purification process, was the responsible for the difference in the antibody recovery between one methodology and the other. When entire immunoglobulins were purified, approximately 53% of the neutralizing capacity was recovered, but when the sample was purified after the enzymatic treatment, around the 30% of the activity was obtained. A ratio of similar magnitude is verified on the recovery of the soluble protein mass after the removal of contaminants, between the two methods. The insolubilization of the fragment Fc generated during digestion would be responsible for the additional loss of protein and neutralizing capacity.