Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Res Vet Sci ; 133: 297-303, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33069429

RESUMO

Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) can be spread between and among cattle and wildlife hosts e.g. European badger (Meles meles). The majority of cattle in the UK and Ireland are grazed during the summer, potentially exposing them to Mycobacterium bovis. 18 farms were surveyed (39% dairy, 61% beef; fields n = 697) for one grazing season (May-November 2016, n = 148,461 field days) to quantify the co-occurrence of cattle with badger setts and latrines and adjacency to neighbouring cattle herds. 3% (n = 24) of the fields had a badger sett or latrine recorded, dairy cattle were significantly more likely to co-occur with badger setts and latrines than beef cattle. Most farms (89%) grazed cattle adjacent to a neighbouring herd, which accounted for 18% of the grazing season. Potential exposure to neighbouring herds did not differ between production systems but did vary between life stages. A significant positive association between the proportion of time cattle spent grazing fields with setts present and the historic 1-, 3- and 5- year bTB status (p = 0.007, p = 0.013 and p = 0.013 respectively) was found. However, when cattle were grazed in fields with latrines, a significant negative association was found between the proportion of time cattle spent grazing fields with latrines present and the historic 3- and 5- year bTB status (p = 0.033 and p = 0.012 respectively). Historic bTB status and percentage of days spent beside a neighbouring herd was unrelated. Idiosyncrasies at farm-level and between risk factors indicated that individual farm assessments would be beneficial to understand potential exposure risk.


Assuntos
Mustelidae , Tuberculose Bovina/transmissão , Animais , Animais Selvagens , Bovinos , Herbivoria , Irlanda , Mustelidae/microbiologia , Mycobacterium bovis , Fatores de Risco , Estações do Ano , Tuberculose Bovina/microbiologia
2.
Prev Vet Med ; 185: 105203, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33221040

RESUMO

There are a paucity of data quantifying on-farm management practices such as the frequency of intraherd cattle movements, use of consolidated or spatially fragmented grazing pastures, and duration of time cattle spend at grass with respect to biosecurity and disease transmission. Such movement dynamics are important when attempting to understand the maintenance of chronic infectious disease, such as bovine tuberculosis (bTB). We captured empirical data on daily cattle movements for a sample of eighteen farms throughout one complete grazing season (n = 18,988 grazing days) and assessed these attributes in relation to herd bTB risk. Dairy herds were stocked at significantly higher densities compared to beef production systems (6.6 animals/ha, 95 % confidence intervals (CI) 6.5-6.7 and 4.1 animals/ha, 95 %CI 4.1 - 4.1 respectively, p < 0.001). Most notably milking cows, were grazed at higher densities than other life stages (e.g. calves, heifers and bullocks) (p < 0.001) and experienced four times the number of movements between pastures. Beef cattle were more likely to be grazed across multiple (rather than single) fields (p < 0.001), with greater time spent on fragmented land away from the main/home farm (p < 0.001). None of the farm or herd attributes analysed (e.g. stocking density, frequency of movement, movement distances or land fragmentation) were associated with herd bovine tuberculosis (bTB) breakdowns during this study. However, there was a weak positive association between bTB breakdowns during the 3 years prior to the study and cattle movement distances (p = 0.05) and time spent on fragmented land (p = 0.08). After a bTB breakdown occurs, restrictions on animals moving out of these herds are implemented to control disease spread, yet we argue that more attention is needed on the role of intraherd grazing patterns in modelling disease transmission risk between herds.


Assuntos
Criação de Animais Domésticos , Benchmarking/estatística & dados numéricos , Meios de Transporte , Tuberculose Bovina/transmissão , Animais , Bovinos , Indústria de Laticínios , Suscetibilidade a Doenças/veterinária , Feminino , Masculino , Irlanda do Norte , Fatores de Risco
3.
Ecol Evol ; 9(15): 8479-8489, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31410255

RESUMO

In Great Britain and Ireland, badgers (Meles meles) are a wildlife reservoir of Mycobacterium bovis and implicated in bovine tuberculosis transmission to domestic cattle. The route of disease transmission is unknown with direct, so-called "nose-to-nose," contact between hosts being extremely rare. Camera traps were deployed for 64,464 hr on 34 farms to quantify cattle and badger visitation rates in space and time at six farm locations. Badger presence never coincided with cattle presence at the same time, with badger and cattle detection at the same location but at different times being negatively correlated. Badgers were never recorded within farmyards during the present study. Badgers utilized cattle water troughs in fields, but detections were infrequent (equivalent to one badger observed drinking every 87 days). Cattle presence at badger-associated locations, for example, setts and latrines, were three times more frequent than badger presence at cattle-associated locations, for example, water troughs. Preventing cattle access to badger setts and latrines and restricting badger access to cattle water troughs may potentially reduce interspecific bTB transmission through reduced indirect contact.

4.
J Cyst Fibros ; 13(4): 424-7, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24332244

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics are widely used to treat pulmonary infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF). Over the last decade evidence has accumulated showing that the choice of aminoglycoside and the dosing regimen may help reduce adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity. METHODS: We undertook an online survey to determine current practice in UK CF Centres. RESULTS: We received a response from 35/48 (73%) centres. A once daily regimen was used in 30/35 (86%) centres. Around one third had stopped using gentamicin in the last 10 years. In most cases respondents reported changing practice in response to new evidence or evidence based guidelines. Obstacles to introducing evidence based practice were identified both at the level of the CF Centre and the hospital trust. CONCLUSIONS: A once daily aminoglycoside regimen is now used in the majority of UK CF Centres. Tobramycin is first line and many centres have stopped using gentamicin. Obstacles to evidence based practice remain in a minority of centres.


Assuntos
Aminoglicosídeos/administração & dosagem , Fibrose Cística/tratamento farmacológico , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Vigilância da População/métodos , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Fibrose Cística/complicações , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Infecções Respiratórias/complicações , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa