Using sequential bone cutting to titrate soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty effectively minimizes soft tissue release.

BACKGROUND: Achieving soft tissue balance while maintaining limb alignment within acceptable boundaries is crucial for successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We proposed a sequential bone cutting (SBC) technique to titrate the soft tissue balance in robot-assisted TKA to achieve the desired balance with minimum soft tissue release. METHODS: In total, 106 robot-assisted TKAs using the SBC technique were included. The preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was < 10° in 76 and ≥ 10° in 30 knees. The gaps were initially balanced with the help of the pre-resection balancing provided by the robotic system. Soft tissue balance and alignment were quantitatively measured after the initial bone cutting and final bone cutting. Additional adjustments (bone recuts and soft tissue releases) required to address soft tissue imbalance after initial bone cutting were recorded. The frequencies of soft tissue releases, soft tissue balance, and resultant alignment ≤ 3° were compared between non-severe (HKA < 10°) and severe deformity (HKA ≥ 10°) groups. RESULTS: Soft tissue balance was achieved in 45 knees (42.5%) after initial bone cutting and in 93 knees (87.7%) after final balancing. The postoperative alignment was within 3° from neutral in 87 knees (82.1%) and 3-5° in 17 knees (16.0%). For unbalanced knees (n = 61) after initial bone cutting, soft tissue release was avoided by SBC in 37 knees (60.7%) and was deemed necessary in 24 knees (39.3%). Soft tissue release was more likely to be avoided in the non-severe deformity cohort (86.8% [33 of 38]) than in the severe deformity cohort (17.4% [4 of 23]; p < 0.001). The non-severe deformity cohort showed a significantly higher rate of resultant alignment ≤ 3° from neutral than the severe deformity cohort (90.8% vs. 60.0%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pre-resection balancing is inappropriate to ensure soft tissue balance. The SBC technique is effective in minimizing soft tissue release while maintaining overall alignment within acceptable boundaries.

Surgical Repair of Secondary Subaortic Stenosis in Congenital Heart Disease Without Initial Subaortic Obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Secondary subaortic stenosis (SSS) is a rare heart disease of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). It usually occurs after cardiovascular correction with or without initial left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO). Because most patients with SSS are asymptomatic, many do not realize the need for reoperation until the obstruction worsens. Few studies suggest the characteristics and reasons of SSS without initial SAS. We conducted a retrospective study to describe the characteristics and surgical outcomes of these patients. METHODS: In this study, we examined a single-center retrospective cohort of SSS patients without initial SAS undergoing resection from 2010 to 2019. Patients are defined as secondary subaortic obstruction requiring surgery after cardiovascular correction. Demographics, perioperative findings, and clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients had undergone secondary cardiac surgery for SSS without initial SAS during 10 years in our center. The median age at operation was 7.3 (4.0-13.5) years. In this study, the most commonly associated cardiac lesions were ventricular septal defect (VSD), atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD), patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), and coarctation arch hypoplasia (COA). The surgical techniques included membranous resection of five patients, fibromuscular resection of 17 patients, and reconstruction of the intraventricular baffle of one patient. The results of surgery in these patients are satisfied. The average LVOT gradient at the last follow up was 14.9 (7.8-26.2) mmHg. There was no operative mortality. Two patients had postoperative complications. The median follow-up period was 2.9 (1.1-4.3) years with one late death. Two patients (8.7%) had recurrence of stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary subaortic stenosis is an uncommon heart disease. The reason is related to several causes, including missed diagnosis, unnoticed abnormalities of LVOT, and further changes of geometric morphology by intracardiac surgery. The results of surgery in these patients are satisfied. However, the recurrence of stenosis is still frequent.

Experience of repair ventricular septal defect with left superior vena cava through right axillary thoracotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the experience in the treatment of repair ventricular septal defect with left superior vena cava (LSVC) through right axillary thoracotomy. To explore the surgical strategy of treating VSD with LSVC through right axillary thoracotomy. METHODS: right axillary thoracotomy and median sternotomy were performed in 73 cases of ventricular septal defect with LSVC in our center from 2018 to 2019. Perioperative data and surgical information were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: There were 54 cases of R-group and 19 cases of S-group with median age of 0.8 years (0.5-1.6years). In the 73 patients, 21(38.9%) were men and 52 (61.1%) women. The operation time of R-group was shorter than S-group, p<0.05. The postoperative drainage in R-group was less than S-group, p<0.05. The mechanical ventilation time was longer in the S-group than in the R-group, p<0.05. There were no deaths, serious complications and readmission in the follow-up 6 months(3-10months). CONCLUSION: Right axillary thoracotomy is a safe procedure with excellent cosmetic and clinical results for ventricular septal defect with left superior vena cava. It has the advantages of short operation time, less bleeding and short postoperative time.

Surgical repair of subaortic stenosis resection: 10 years of single-center experience in 65 patients.

BACKGROUND: Subaortic stenosis (SAS) was a rare congenital heart disease of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), ranging from "isolated" lesions to "tunnel" or "diffuse" lesions. We conducted a retrospective study to describe the characteristics of patients with different lesions and analyze the risk factors for reoperation. METHODS: In this study, we examined a single-center retrospective cohort of SAS patients undergoing resection from 2010 to 2019. Patients were classified as simple lesion group (n = 37) or complex lesion group (n = 28). Demographics, perioperative findings, and clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: The surgical effect of the two groups was significantly lower than that before the operation (p < .05). The median age at operation was 6 (3-11.8) years. There was no operative mortality. In complex lesion group, cardiopulmonary bypass time (CPB time), aortic cross-clamping time (ACC time), mechanical ventilation time, and intensive care unit (ICU) stay time were longer. The median follow-up period was 2.8 years (range: 1-3.8), with two late death. Six patients (9.2%) required reoperation due to restenosis or severe aortic insufficiency. The freedom from reoperation rates at 5 years was 66.7% for simple lesion but only 52.3% for complex lesion (p = .036). CONCLUSIONS: Although the lesions include many forms, SAS resection was still satisfactory. However, the reoperation after initial surgical treatment was not infrequent, especially in patients with complex lesion.