Changes in clearance, volume and bioavailability of immunosuppressants when given with HAART in HIV-1 infected liver and kidney transplant recipients.

Solid organ transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV)-infected individuals requiring the concomitant use of immunosuppressants (IS) [e.g. cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus (TAC)] and antiretrovirals (ARVs) [e.g. protease inhibitors (PIs) and/or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs)] is complicated by significant drug interactions. This paper describes the pharmacokinetics of CsA and TAC in 52 patients on both IS and NNRTIs, PIs or combined NNRTIs + PIs, in studies conducted at 2 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after transplantation. Cyclosporine and TAC blood concentrations were measured by LC/MS/MS. This multisubject, varied ARV-IS drug combination, longitudinal observational patient study provided a unique opportunity to examine the effect of different ARV drugs on IS pharmacokinetics (PK) by comparing the ratios of parameters over time and between PK parameters. Subjects taking concomitant PIs exhibited increases in CsA and TAC exposure (AUC/dose) due to the increased apparent oral bioavailability and decreased apparent oral clearance. Those subjects taking CsA and concomitant efavirenz (EFV) showed time dependent increases in exposure due to ~30% increases in the apparent oral bioavailability over time as well as a decreased apparent oral clearance, while subjects on TAC and EFV showed time-dependent changes in all PK parameters. The increased bioavailability was not observed in patients on CsA and nevirapine (NVP). These differences between IS drugs and the changes in PK parameters are not easily predicted, illustrating the importance of continued therapeutic drug monitoring in patients on these complex medication regimens. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Outcomes of liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a controversial indication for liver transplantation (LT) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients because of reportedly poor outcomes. This prospective, multicenter US cohort study compared patient and graft survival for 89 HCV/HIV-coinfected patients and 2 control groups: 235 HCV-monoinfected LT controls and all US transplant recipients who were 65 years old or older. The 3-year patient and graft survival rates were 60% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 47%-71%] and 53% (95% CI = 40%-64%) for the HCV/HIV patients and 79% (95% CI = 72%-84%) and 74% (95% CI = 66%-79%) for the HCV-infected recipients (P < 0.001 for both), and HIV infection was the only factor significantly associated with reduced patient and graft survival. Among the HCV/HIV patients, older donor age [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.3 per decade], combined kidney-liver transplantation (HR = 3.8), an anti-HCV-positive donor (HR = 2.5), and a body mass index < 21 kg/m(2) (HR = 3.2) were independent predictors of graft loss. For the patients without the last 3 factors, the patient and graft survival rates were similar to those for US LT recipients. The 3-year incidence of treated acute rejection was 1.6-fold higher for the HCV/HIV patients versus the HCV patients (39% versus 24%, log rank P = 0.02), but the cumulative rates of severe HCV disease at 3 years were not significantly different (29% versus 23%, P = 0.21). In conclusion, patient and graft survival rates are lower for HCV/HIV-coinfected LT patients versus HCV-monoinfected LT patients. Importantly, the rates of treated acute rejection (but not the rates of HCV disease severity) are significantly higher for HCV/HIV-coinfected recipients versus HCV-infected recipients. Our results indicate that HCV per se is not a contraindication to LT in HIV patients, but recipient and donor selection and the management of acute rejection strongly influence outcomes.

Clinical management of the HIV-positive kidney transplant recipient.

Tremendous progress has been achieved in the management of HIV, allowing individuals infected with this virus to live longer, healthier lives; however, the result of this progress is that HIV-infected individuals are developing end stage liver and kidney disease, and many are either dying from organ failure or living on dialysis. HIV infection was once a contraindication to transplantation, but transplantation is now a possibility for carefully selected patients at several transplant centers in the United States. This article provides an overview of transplantation in patients with HIV infection and describes the evolving clinical management of HIV-infected transplant recipients.

Solid organ transplantation: referral, management, and outcomes in HIV-infected patients.

Advances in HIV management make it difficult to deny solid organ transplantation to HIV-infected patients based on futility arguments. Preliminary studies suggest that both patient and graft survival are similar in HIV-negative and HIV-positive transplant recipients. While there has been no significant HIV disease progression, substantial interactions between immunosuppressants and antiretroviral drugs necessitate careful monitoring. The evaluation and management of HIV-infected transplant candidates and recipients require excellent communication among a multidisciplinary team, the primary HIV care provider, and the patient. Timely referral for transplant evaluation will prevent unnecessary mortality during the pre-transplant evaluation process.

Cyclosporine pharmacokinetics and dosing modifications in human immunodeficiency virus-infected liver and kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: With advances in antiretroviral therapy, many human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals are living longer and developing end-stage renal or hepatic disease requiring transplantation. Maintaining the viability of the transplant and suppressing HIV replication requires concomitant use of immunosuppressants (e.g., cyclosporine) and antiretrovirals (e.g., protease inhibitors or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors), which leads to drug interactions. To assist in appropriate clinical management of HIV-infected transplant recipients, the authors describe the pharmacokinetic interactions between cyclosporine and the antiretroviral medications, and required modifications of cyclosporine dosing. METHODS: Eighteen HIV-infected subjects with end-stage kidney or liver disease underwent transplantation. Subjects had pharmacokinetic studies before transplantation and for up to 2 years posttransplantation (at weeks 2-4, 12, 28, 52, and 104). Protease inhibitors, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and cyclosporine concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in plasma and whole blood, respectively. RESULTS: Subjects using protease inhibitors and cyclosporine had a threefold increase in cyclosporine area under the curve (4,190+/-2,180-11,900+/-1,600 ng*hr/mL, P<0.01), necessitating an 85% reduction in cyclosporine dose over a 2-year period (1.3+/-1.5-0.2+/-0.0 mg/kg/dose), leading to a progressive increase in oral cyclosporine bioavailability (R=0.92, P<0.02). Subjects on nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors showed minimal interactions with cyclosporine, and subjects on both HIV treatments had intermediate responses. CONCLUSIONS: HIV-infected transplant recipients on protease inhibitors require markedly lower doses of cyclosporine, with continued lowering of the cyclosporine dose over time and ongoing cyclosporine trough monitoring because of progressively increasing cyclosporine bioavailability. Medication changes must be carefully managed to avoid insufficient immunosuppression or toxicity resulting from drug interactions.

Kidney and liver transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: a pilot safety and efficacy study.

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients have historically been excluded from consideration for transplantation out of concern for the effects of immunosuppression on the progression of HIV disease. Improvements in HIV-related morbidity and mortality with the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) have prompted a reevaluation of transplantation as a treatment option for HIV-infected patients with end-stage kidney and liver disease. METHODS: Eligible patients met standard transplant criteria. They had undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA levels (viral load) for 3 months (kidney) or were predicted to achieve viral load suppression posttransplantation if unable to tolerate HAART (liver); a CD4+ T-cell count of more than 200 cells/microL (kidney) or more than 100 cells/microL (liver) for 6 months; and no history of opportunistic infections and neoplasm. Standard immunosuppression included prednisone, mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland), and cyclosporine (Neoral, Novartis, East Hanover, NJ). RESULTS: Fourteen patients received transplants (10 kidney transplants, mean follow-up 480 days; four liver transplants, mean follow-up 380 days). All of the kidney transplant recipients (100%) are alive and with functioning grafts, and three of four liver transplant patients (75%) are alive and well with functioning grafts (all liver transplant patients with normal liver function tests). The one death occurred 445 days posttransplantation in a liver recipient coinfected with hepatitis C virus, who died as the result of its rapid reoccurrence. Rejection occurred in 5 of 10 kidney transplant recipients but did not occur in any of the four liver transplant recipients. HIV viral loads have remained undetectable in all patients maintained with HAART. CD4 counts have remained stable in patients not treated for rejection. Patients receiving protease inhibitors require 25% of the dose of cyclosporine compared with patients receiving nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: There has been no evidence of significant HIV progression and no adverse effect of HIV on allograft function. Rejection is a concern in kidney transplant recipients, as is the possible poor outcome in hepatitis C virus-coinfected liver transplant recipients. Preliminary data are encouraging and indicate that transplantation should be a treatment option for individuals with well-controlled HIV disease.

Effects of exercise training plus normalization of hematocrit on exercise capacity and health-related quality of life.

The limitation to exercise capacity in hemodialysis patients has been attributed to anemia. We report the effects of normalization of hematocrit levels by using r-hu-recombinant erythropoietin and exercise training on exercise capacity and self-reported physical functioning in hemodialysis patients. Sixty-five patients were randomized into 1 of 4 groups: usual hematocrit (30%-33%) with no exercise training (UH); usual hematocrit (30%-33%) plus exercise training (UHX); normalized hematocrit (40%-42%) with no exercise training (NH); and normalized hematocrit (40%-42%) plus exercise training (NHX). Treadmill exercise testing was conducted at baseline and at 5 months after the initiation of the interventions. Analysis was performed on the data collapsed for 48 patients who met the criteria for hematocrit and exercise adherence and completed both baseline and post intervention (5.6 +/- 1.6 months) testing. Significant effects of exercise were found in peak oxygen uptake measurements (P = 0.03) and in self-reported physical functioning as measured by the Short Form-36 questionnaire (P = 0.01). There was a significant effect of hematocrit on the General Health scale on the SF-36 (P = 0.03). The changes in peak oxygen uptake with exercise training were small and levels remained lower than age-predicted values at the end of the study. These results indicate that there are other physiologic limitations to exercise capacity that are not overcome by exercise training or normalization of hematocrit. The effects of exercise training on self-reported physical functioning may be of clinical importance because these scores have been shown to be highly predictive of outcomes such as hospitalizations and mortality in hemodialysis patients.

Kidney and liver transplantation in HIV-infected patients: case presentations and review.

Until recently, HIV-infected patients have been excluded from consideration for solid organ transplantation. The relatively high mortality rates among HIV-infected transplant recipients observed in the era prior to the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), coupled with long waiting times for cadaveric organs, made it difficult to support organ transplantation in this patient group. However, in response to the marked reductions in morbidity and mortality associated with HIV infection, several transplant centers have developed pilot studies or revised their clinical criteria to allow transplantation in this group of patients. We describe two cases, one kidney and one liver transplant recipient, and review the major clinical and research issues related to this topic. Reports of transplantations in the pre-HAART era highlight two important findings. First, some HIV-infected transplant recipients did very well with long survival periods. However, overall progression to AIDS and death appeared accelerated. We recently reported on our preliminary experience with 45 selected transplant recipients in the HAART era. One-year patient survival rates were similar to unmatched survival data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Median CD4+ T-cell counts remained stable in the follow-up period compared to pretransplant. HIV-1 RNA nearly uniformly continued to be suppressed below the limits of detection. Preliminary data are promising and support the current efforts to evaluate patient and graft survival among HIV-infected transplant recipients and to explore the mechanisms underlying the many potential complications of transplantation in this population.

Determinants of exercise encouragement practices in hemodialysis staff.

The objective of this study was to survey patient care staff to (a) determine their perceived skills for and attitudes toward assessing physical functioning and encouraging exercise, (b) assess practice related to assessment of physical functioning and exercise encouragement, and (c) identify factors that predict encouragement of exercise in patient care staff. This was a cross-sectional, descriptive study in which questionnaires were completed by 100 patient care staff (RN, LVN, RD, SW, and patient care technicians) in five freestanding hemodialysis clinics. Frequency responses were calculated for the items of interest, and multiple regression analysis was performed to identify predictor variables of exercise encouragement practice (i.e., frequency of encouragement of exercise to patients). Four variables significantly predicted exercise encouragement activity: job position requiring professional training, the perception that patients lacked motivation to exercise, the perception that the staff member did not have skills to motivate patients to exercise, and the perception that it was not a part of the job responsibility.

Outcome of patients with hepatitis B virus and human immunodeficiency virus infections referred for liver transplantation.

The outcome of patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) referred for liver transplantation (LT) is unknown. A high frequency of lamivudine-resistant (LAM-R) HBV infection may increase the risk of liver-related death pre-transplantation and prophylaxis failure post-transplantation. We evaluated the association of LAM-R HBV on pre-transplant survival and post-transplant outcomes in 35 consecutive HIV-HBV coinfected patients referred for LT between July 2000 and September 2002. At the time of referral, the median CD4 count was 273/mm, MELD was 14, and LAM-R HBV infection was present in 67%. Among these referred patients, 26% were listed, 29% not listed due to relative/absolute contraindications; 26% not listed as too early for LT; 9% not listed as too sick for LT; and 11% died during transplant evaluation. Of the 9 listed patients, 4 remained listed, 1 died 18 months post-referral, and 4 were transplanted (11% of total) 3 to 40 months after listing. Of 17 evaluated but not listed patients, 5 died (p=0.38 compared to listed group) and all deaths were liver-related. All the HBV-HIV coinfected patients, who were transplanted, are HBsAg negative and have undetectable HBV DNA levels on prophylactic therapy using hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) plus lamivudine, with and without tenofovir or adefovir, with median 33.1 months follow-up. Late referral and the presence of LAM-R HBV pre-transplantation are common in referred HIV-HBV patients. In HIV-HBV coinfected patients undergoing LT, HBV recurrence is successfully prevented with combination prophylaxis using HBIG and antivirals.