RESUMO
Background: we evaluated the concordance between immunohistochemical p53 staining and TP53 mutations in a series of HGSOC. Moreover, we searched for prognostic differences between p53 overexpression and null expression groups. Methods: patients affected by HGSOC were included. For each case p53 immunohistochemical staining and molecular assay (Sanger sequencing) were performed. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were undertaken to determine whether the type of TP53 mutation, or p53 staining pattern influenced overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results: 34 HGSOC were considered. All cases with a null immunohistochemical p53 expression (n=16) showed TP53 mutations (n=9 nonsense, n=4 in-frame deletion, n=2 splice, n=1 in-frame insertion). 16 out of 18 cases with p53 overexpression showed TP53 missense mutation. Follow up data were available for 33 out of 34 cases (median follow up time 15 month). We observed a significant reduction of OS in p53 null group [HR = 3.64, 95% CI 1.01-13.16]. Conclusion: immunohistochemical assay is a reliable surrogate for TP53 mutations in most cases. Despite the small cohort and the limited median follow up, we can infer that HGSOC harboring p53 null mutations are a more aggressive subgroup.
Assuntos
Mutação com Perda de Função , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Humanos , Feminino , Relevância Clínica , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53/genética , Mutação , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genéticaRESUMO
AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Italy is divided into 20 regions. As a consequence of local autonomy, following marketing authorization by the Italian Medicines Agency, each drug for hospital use is not immediately available, because its approval needs to undergo further steps that can be different among regions. The Italian Society of Medical Oncology conducted the present study to describe the impact of the existence of sub-national pharmaceutical formularies on the disparity of access to new anti-cancer drugs among patients treated in different Italian regions. METHODS: The availability of 8 new anti-cancer drugs at a regional level and the coherence of regional authorizations compared with national authorizations approved by the Italian Medicines Agency were analyzed as of April 2009. RESULTS: Fourteen regions and autonomous province of Trento have a regional pharmaceutical formulary. In most cases, the regional pharmaceutical formularies include the eight analyzed drugs, with therapeutic indications coherent with national marketing authorization indications. Five drugs (bevacizumab, trastuzumab, rituximab, erlotinib, sunitinib) were included in all the existing regional pharmaceutical formularies, without restrictions, whereas three drugs (cetuximab, sorafenib, pemetrexed) were found to have restrictions in some regions. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of multiple hierarchical levels of drug evaluation creates a potential element of disparity in the access to pharmacological therapies for Italian citizens.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/provisão & distribuição , Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Farmacopeias como Assunto , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes/legislação & jurisprudência , Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes/estatística & dados numéricos , Formulários Farmacêuticos como Assunto , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Itália , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Farmacopeias como Assunto/normas , Sociedades MédicasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chemo-radiotherapy is standard of care in the treatment of unresectable stage III NSCLC. We aimed at assessing whether the addition of concurrent taxane-chemotherapy to thoracic irradiation following chemotherapy was able to improve treatment outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In PITCAP trial, patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC were randomized to receive 2 cycles of platinum-paclitaxel followed by 60-61.2Gy thoracic irradiation (control arm) or by same radiotherapy with concomitant weekly paclitaxel (experimental arm). A literature-based meta-analysis including all studies with same design was also performed. RESULTS: At the time of the second interim analysis, when 151 patients were randomized, accrual was terminated. With a median follow-up of 6.1 years, median survival was 13.2 vs 15.1 months, with a 3-year survival rate of 19.5 vs 21.2% in the control and experimental arm, respectively (HR: 0.97; 95% CI 0.69-1.36; p=0.845). Treatment toxicity was manageable in both arms. The meta-analysis of 5 trials (n=866) confirmed the lack of a meaningful effect on 1-year overall survival of a taxane added concurrently to radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support a meaningful survival benefit with the addition of single agent taxane given concurrently to radiotherapy after platinum-based induction in locally advanced NSCLC.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Hidrocarbonetos Aromáticos com Pontes/administração & dosagem , Carboplatina/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/radioterapia , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Metanálise como Assunto , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Hidrocarbonetos Aromáticos com Pontes/uso terapêutico , Carboplatina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Taxa de Sobrevida , Taxoides/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Receptor activator of NFkB (RANK), its ligand (RANKL) and the decoy receptor of RANKL (osteoprotegerin, OPG) play a pivotal role in bone remodeling by regulating osteoclasts formation and activity. RANKL stimulates migration of RANK-expressing tumor cells in vitro, conversely inhibited by OPG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined mRNA expression levels of RANKL/RANK/OPG in a publicly available microarray dataset of 295 primary breast cancer patients. We next analyzed RANK expression by immunohistochemistry in an independent series of 93 primary breast cancer specimens and investigated a possible association with clinicopathological parameters, bone recurrence and survival. RESULTS: Microarray analysis showed that lower RANK and high OPG mRNA levels correlate with longer overall survival (Pâ=â0.0078 and 0.0335, respectively) and disease-free survival (Pâ=â0.059 and 0.0402, respectively). Immunohistochemical analysis of RANK showed a positive correlation with the development of bone metastases (Pâ=â0.023) and a shorter skeletal disease-free survival (SDFS, Pâ=â0.037). Specifically, univariate analysis of survival showed that "RANK-negative" and "RANK-positive" patients had a SDFS of 105.7 months (95% CI: 73.9-124.4) and 58.9 months (95% CI: 34.7-68.5), respectively. RANK protein expression was also associated with accelerated bone metastasis formation in a multivariate analysis (Pâ=â0.029). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first demonstration of the role of RANK expression in primary tumors as a predictive marker of bone metastasis occurrence and SDFS in a large population of breast cancer patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Receptor Ativador de Fator Nuclear kappa-B/biossíntese , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica/métodos , Ligantes , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos , Osteoprotegerina/biossíntese , Ligante RANK/biossíntese , RNA Mensageiro/metabolismoAssuntos
Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/tratamento farmacológico , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Capecitabina/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patologia , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/cirurgia , Adulto , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Capecitabina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To determine whether a dose-dense regimen improves outcome in early breast cancer patients, we compared outcomes with the same fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) chemotherapeutic regimen administered every 3 weeks (FEC21) or administered every 2 weeks (FEC14 including support with filgrastim, a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) in a multicenter phase III randomized trial. METHODS: A total of 1214 patients with early-stage breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of FEC14 (604 patients) or of FEC21 (610 patients). Study endpoints were overall survival and event-free survival. Associations were assessed by multivariable analysis with adjustment for age; tumor size; grade; proliferative rate; and menopausal, lymph node, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor status. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Patients in the FEC14 arm had fewer dose reductions or treatment delays or discontinuation (26%) than those in the FEC21 arm (33%) (difference = 7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2% to 12%; P = .008). FEC14 therapy, compared with FEC21 therapy, was associated with more asthenia (36% versus 29%, difference = 7%, 95% CI = 2% to 12%; P = .01), bone pain (33% versus 4%, difference = 29%, 95% CI = 25% to 33%; P < .001), anemia (38% versus 19%, difference = 19%, 95% CI = 14% to 24%; P < .001), and thrombocytopenia (8% versus 2%, difference = 6%, 95% CI = 4% to 9%; P < .001), but with less leukopenia (12% versus 45%, difference = 33%, 95% CI = 28% to 37%; P < .001). No acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome was observed. At a median follow-up of 10.4 years, no statistically significant difference in the hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.67 to 1.13) or recurrence (HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.71 to 1.08) was found between FEC14 and FEC21 groups after adjustment by multivariable analysis. Although the study was underpowered for subset analysis, we found no evidence that the effect of the treatment type was associated with any of the potential prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Our results support the long-term safety of FEC14 chemotherapy as an adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. However, this therapy was not associated with improved outcome, but because of the limited statistical power of our study, we cannot rule out a modest improvement in outcome associated with FEC14 therapy.