Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cureus ; 16(1): e52625, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38374857

RESUMO

Rhabdomyolysis is a syndrome caused by skeletal muscle disruption that results in the release of muscle proteins into circulation, which can lead to life-threatening systemic complications. These complications include acute kidney injury (AKI), renal failure, compartment syndrome, and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy. Patients commonly present with muscle pain, fatigue, weakness, and dark-colored urine. We present the case of a 37-year-old male who presented to the hospital with pain in the lower limbs and difficulty in mobility for the past two days after returning from Jamaica. He had a mild cold and body aches but denied any sore throat, cough, or shortness of breath (SOB). He tested negative for COVID-19. He had attended his local hospital the previous night, but due to the long waiting time, he presented to the accident and emergency department at our hospital. His physical examination was normal, and his urine was dark in color. All laboratory test results were normal, except for creatinine kinase (CK) levels >100,000 IU/L (reference: 40-320 IU/L) and an alanine transaminase (ALT) level of 376 U/L (reference: 30-130 U/L). Magnetic resonance imaging of both femurs revealed a high signal in multiple muscle compartments bilaterally on a short TI inversion recovery (STIR) sequence. Autoimmune screening results were negative. He had a similar episode last year due to COVID-19 with elevated CK levels. He received conservative treatment with IV fluids and was discharged eight days after hospital admission.

2.
Cureus ; 16(4): e57825, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721173

RESUMO

Hypertension is the most prevalent condition in clinical practice. Hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolaemia are major contributing factors to cardiovascular diseases. They commonly coexist in a single patient. Statins have been used as prominent medicines for the reduction of cardiovascular events. Statins have been shown to reduce blood pressure in patients with hypertension and have lipid-lowering properties in recent articles. Statins reduce blood pressure because of their impact on endothelial function, their interactions with the renin-angiotensin system, and their influence on major artery compliance. This meta-analysis aimed to ascertain the effectiveness and efficacy of statins for managing hypertension in patients with hypertension. Systematic searches were conducted on PubMed, Science Direct, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Randomized controlled trials, systematic trials, and cohort studies were retrieved using keywords on statins and their use in patients with hypertension. Exclusion criteria included studies that were not in the English language, studies that did not include patients on statins with hypertension, studies that did not provide enough information, technical reports, opinions, or editorials, and studies involving patients < 18 years old. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, adult patients aged > 18 years old, and studies that were freely available or through institutional login. This meta-analysis scrutinized 9361 randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews, of which 32 articles including 25 randomized controlled trials and seven meta-analyses were included in the final analysis. This meta-analysis of the role of statins in hypertensive patients aimed to determine the outcome of hypertension control along with antihypertensive medication. Our study showed that statins are useful in reducing both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. We used a heterogeneous model for analysis due to variations in the study characteristics. The I2 value was 0.33 (0.76, 0.10) for systolic blood pressure and 0/88 (0.86, 0.90) for diastolic blood pressure. The I2 value for the seven meta-analyses included in the study was 1.79 (2.88, 0.69).

3.
Cureus ; 15(3): e36775, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37123701

RESUMO

With the clinical increase in Type 2 Diabetes worldwide, several interventions to decrease its incidence have been investigated. One such intervention is Vitamin D supplementation, as it affects Insulin secretion from the pancreas and Insulin receptors in the cells of the body. This systematic review addresses whether or not Vitamin D supplementation has a role in reducing the risk of developing Type 2 Diabetes. Systematic searches were conducted on PubMed, and Cochrane Library mainly but also checked Google Scholar. Randomized controlled trials, systematic trials and cohort studies were retrieved that included keywords pertaining to Vitamin D supplementation and the incidence of Type 2 Diabetes. Exclusion criteria included studies that looked at different forms of Diabetes, studies including patients aged less than 18 or more than 85 years of age and studies that were not English language. For all the trials identified, the incidence of Type 2 Diabetes among the cohort receiving vitamin D supplementation was compared to the cohort receiving placebo medication. Additionally, the Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) was analyzed to observe if there was a difference between Insulin resistance among these two cohorts between the start of the trials and the end. Thirteen randomized controlled trials were identified. Seven of these identified incidences of Type 2 Diabetes as a research outcome, out of which six showed no statistically significant impact of vitamin D on the incidence of Type 2 Diabetes. Out of the 13 trials, 10 analyzed the impact of vitamin D supplementation on patients' HOMA-IR. In six of these trials, patients receiving vitamin D supplementation had a decrease in their HOMA-IR, while it increased in 4 trials. In seven of the ten trials that analyzed for HOMA-IR, the HOMA-IR was less in the vitamin D cohort than the placebo cohort. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that vitamin D supplementation significantly reduces the incidence of Type 2 Diabetes despite its effects on insulin resistance. Further research in this area would be helpful in order to influence clinical guidelines on vitamin D supplementation among patients at risk of Type 2 Diabetes.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa