Does Size Matter? Opioid Use after Laparoscopy for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using an 8 mm versus 10-12 mm Accessory Port.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a change in lateral accessory port (LAP) size from 10-"?>12 mm to 8 mm among women undergoing laparoscopic native tissue pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery was effective at reducing opioid use after surgery. DESIGN: Prospective cohort of women taking part in a POP surgical registry. SETTING: Tertiary academic hospital in Calgary, Canada. PATIENTS: Women undergoing laparoscopic uterosacral ligament apical suspensions for stage ≥2 POP with either uterine preservation or concomitant hysterectomy. A total of 92 women were included during a 15-month study period from June 2020 and September 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic apical suspension using either a 10-"?>12 mm or 8 mm LAP, with the change occurring at the midpoint of the study period. Fascial defects from 10-"?>12 mm ports were closed with a fascial closure device. Perioperative care and technique were otherwise unchanged. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Postoperative opioid use was measured by mean morphine equivalent daily dose, accounting for all oral and intravenous opioids used in the first 24 hours after surgery. A total of 50 cases (54.3%) used a 10-12 mm LAP, and 42 cases (45.7%) used an 8 mm LAP. Mean morphine equivalent daily dose after surgery with a 10-12 mm LAP was significantly higher than with an 8 mm LAP (35.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 24.9-45.6] vs 13.6 [95% CI 8.0-19.2], p <.001). The proportion of women who did not require opioids postoperatively was higher in the 8 mm group (45.2%, n = 19) than the 10-12 mm group (18.0%, n = 9) (crude odds ratio 3.76, 95% CI 1.47-9.66). Similarly, the proportion of women who did not fill an opioid prescription after discharge was higher in the 8 mm group (35.7%, n = 15) than the 10-12 mm group (16.0%, n = 8) (crude odds ratio 2.92, 95% CI 1.09-7.81). These results remained statistically significant after adjustment for age, body mass index, race and ethnicity, length of procedure, and concomitant procedures performed. CONCLUSION: Compared with a 10-12 mm port, the use of an 8 mm LAP during laparoscopic native tissue apical POP surgery is associated with decreased opioid use in the first 24 hours after surgery.

Infant and Maternal Outcomes for Women Who Experience Imprisonment in Ontario, Canada: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the population-level risk of infant and maternal outcomes for women who experience imprisonment and compare outcomes with the general population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. We used linked correctional and health data for women released from provincial prisons in 2010. We defined three exposure groups for Ontario singleton deliveries from 2005-2015: deliveries to women who were in prison during pregnancy but not necessarily for delivery, prison pregnancies; deliveries to women who had been in prison but not while pregnant, prison controls; and general population deliveries. We compared groups using generalized estimating equations. Primary outcomes were preterm birth, low birth weight, and small for gestational age birth weight. Secondary outcomes included NICU admission, neonatal abstinence syndrome, placental abruption, and preterm prelabour rupture of membranes. RESULTS: In prison pregnancies (n = 544) and prison controls (n = 2156), respectively, preterm birth risk was 15.5% and 12.5%, low birth weight risk was 13.0% and 11.6%, and small for gestational age birth weight risk was 18.1% and 19.2%. Adjusted for maternal age and parity and compared with general population deliveries (N = 1 284 949), odds ratios were increased for prison pregnancies and prison controls, respectively, at 2.7 (95% CI 2.2-3.4) and 2.1 (95% CI 1.9-2.4) for preterm birth, 3.1 (95% CI 2.4-3.9) and 2.7 (95% CI 2.3-3.1) for low birth weight, and 1.6 (95% CI 1.3-2.1) and 1.8 (95% CI 1.6-2.0) for small for gestational age birth weight. CONCLUSION: There is an increased risk of adverse infant outcomes in women who experience imprisonment compared with the general population, whether they are in prison during pregnancy or not.

Development of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse over 10 years of mid-life follow-up is affected by occupational lifting and/or pushing for parous women.

OBJECTIVE: To document the risk of new-onset symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) among perimenopausal women and examine whether occupational lifting and/or pushing is a risk factor in the development of POP over a 10-year follow-up window. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of prospective, longitudinal data from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) cohort study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We analyzed women with current employment at the start of SWAN who were followed annually during mid-life. At baseline, women self-reported the frequency of occupational lifting and pushing, which was classified as Never, Infrequent (less than half the time), or Frequent (half the time or more) occupational lifting and/or pushing. Women were asked about new-onset symptomatic POP from the second to tenth annual follow-up. Modified Poisson regression was used to quantify crude and adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for POP according to load-bearing categories. Parous women were modelled separately, as initial analyses suggested effect modification by parity status. RESULTS: In our sample of 1590 parous women, 8.2 % reported new-onset symptomatic POP over 10 years of follow-up. Multivariable analysis revealed that Infrequent (aRR 1.51, 95 % CI 1.04-2.20) and Frequent (aRR 2.03, 95 % CI 1.29-3.17) occupational lifting and/or pushing were associated with the development of POP. CONCLUSION: Frequent occupational lifting and/or pushing significantly increased parous women's risk of developing POP symptoms. This strengthens existing evidence that occupational exposures can be risk factors for POP. Gender-based education and prevention strategies in the workplace and in primary health care are necessary to reduce the burden of this condition for mid-life women.

Quality of Antenatal Care for Women Who Experience Imprisonment in Ontario, Canada.

Importance: Women who experience imprisonment have high morbidity and an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Antenatal care could modify pregnancy-related risks, but there is a lack of evidence regarding antenatal care in this population. Objectives: To examine antenatal care quality indicators for women who experience imprisonment and to compare these data with data for the general population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based, retrospective cohort study used linked correctional and health administrative data from women released from provincial prison in Ontario, Canada, in 2010 and women in the general population with deliveries at 20 weeks' gestation or greater from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2015. Data analysis was performed from January 1, 2017, to May 4, 2020. Exposures: Pregnancies in women with time in prison during pregnancy (prison pregnancies), pregnancies in women with time in prison but not while pregnant (prison control pregnancies), and pregnancies in women in the general population (general population pregnancies). Main Outcomes and Measures: Antenatal care quality indicators: first-trimester visit, first-trimester ultrasonography, and 8 or more antenatal care visits. Results: A total of 626 prison pregnancies in 529 women (mean [SD] age, 26.6 [5.4] years), 2327 prison control pregnancies in 1570 women (mean [SD] age, 26.2 [5.4] years), and 1 308 879 general population pregnancies in 884 063 women (mean [SD] age, 30.3 [5.3] years) were studied. Of 626 prison pregnancies, 193 women (30.8%; 95% CI, 27.1%-34.6%) had a first-trimester visit, 272 (48.4%; 95% CI, 44.4%-52.4%) had at least 8 antenatal care visits, and 209 (34.6%; 95% CI, 31.0%-38.4%) received first-trimester ultrasonography. In 2327 prison control pregnancies, 1106 women (47.5%; 95% CI, 45.3%-49.8%) had a first-trimester visit, 1356 (59.2%; 95% CI, 56.9%-61.4%) had 8 or more antenatal care visits, and 893 (38.5%; 95% CI, 36.4%-40.6%) received first-trimester ultrasonography. Compared with 1 308 879 general population pregnancies, the odds of antenatal care were lower for the first-trimester visit (odds ratios [ORs], 0.11 [95% CI, 0.09-0.13] in prison pregnancies and 0.23 [95% CI, 0.21-0.25] in prison control pregnancies), 8 or more antenatal care visits (ORs, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.14-0.19] in prison pregnancies and 0.25 [95% CI, 0.23-0.28] in prison control pregnancies), and first-trimester ultrasonography (ORs, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.36-0.50] in prison pregnancies and 0.51 [95% CI, 0.46-0.55] in prison control pregnancies). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that women who experienced imprisonment were substantially less likely to receive adequate antenatal care than were women in the general population whether or not they were in prison during pregnancy. Efforts are needed to improve antenatal care for this population both in prison and in the community.