Atrial fibrillation detected after acute ischemic stroke: evidence supporting the neurogenic hypothesis.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether atrial fibrillation (AF) detected after acute ischemic stroke is caused by neurogenic or cardiogenic mechanisms. Based on the potential damage to the autonomic nervous system, neurogenic mechanisms could be implicated in the pathophysiology of newly diagnosed AF. To test this hypothesis, we developed a mechanistic approach by comparing a prespecified set of indicators in acute ischemic stroke patients with newly diagnosed AF, known AF, and sinus rhythm. METHODS: We prospectively assessed every acute ischemic stroke patient undergoing continuous electrocardiographic monitoring from 2008 through 2011. We compared newly diagnosed AF, known AF, and sinus rhythm patients by using 20 indicators grouped in 4 domains: vascular risk factors, underlying cardiac disease, burden of neurological injury, and in-hospital outcome. RESULTS: We studied 275 acute ischemic stroke patients, 23 with newly diagnosed AF, 64 with known AF, and 188 with sinus rhythm. Patients with newly diagnosed AF had a lower proportion of left atrial enlargement (60.9% versus 91.2%, P=.001), a smaller left atrial area (22.0 versus 26.0 cm2, P=.021), and a higher frequency of insular involvement (30.4% versus 9.5%, P=.017) than participants with known AF. Compared with patients in sinus rhythm, those with newly diagnosed AF had a higher proportion of brain infarcts of 15 mm or more (60.9% versus 37.2%, P=.029) and a higher frequency of insular involvement (30.4% versus 7.3%, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The low frequency of underlying cardiac disease and the strikingly high proportion of concurrent strategic insular infarctions in patients with newly diagnosed AF provide additional evidence supporting the role of neurogenic mechanisms in a subset of AF detected after acute ischemic stroke.

Shared decision making in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: A consensus based on Delphi methodology.

Shared decision making is a way of incorporating patients' preferences and values into the decisions regarding the treatment and follow-up plan for the condition that affects them. It is currently applied mainly in the context of chronic disorders for which there is no cure available but nevertheless many therapeutic alternatives, such as multiple sclerosis (MS). Current views and opinions on shared decision making for the treatment of MS are discussed in this consensus based on a modified Delphi method that included a group of neurologists from Argentina. A set of statements was defined by the experts and seeks to serve as a guide to apply this concept in clinical practice.

Decision making process in multiple sclerosis: An Argentine pilot study.

BACKGROUND: There is scarce information regarding the decision-making process (DMP) in people with MS (PwMS) from Latin America. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the DMP in Argentinean PwMS and to assess its relationship with patient preferences, and clinical-demographic characteristics. METHODS: PwMS from the patient organization Esclerosis Múltiple Argentina (n = 1275) were invited to participate in a self-administered web-based survey. Participants were asked to provide clinical-demographic information and to complete a questionnaire on their perceptions about the information provided by their physician, the Control Preference Scale, and the Satisfaction with the Decisions and Care Questionnaire, and were inquired on their preferred sources of information about MS. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 379 PwMS. Most were females (67%); mean age: 40.3 (SD = 11.1) years; mean disease duration: 7.9 (SD = 7.2) years. Patients' decisional control preferred role was active in 47%, shared in 27%, and passive in 26%. A moderate concordance (weighted kappa 0.55) was observed between patients' preferences and self-reported DMP. Seventy-two percent participated in the DMP according to their preferences (concordance rates: active 66%, shared 87%, passive 51%). Most (83%) declared receiving information from their neurologists, matching their preferences (94%). CONCLUSIONS: Argentinian PwMS have distinctive preferences regarding information management and decision making.

COVID-19 in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder patients in Latin America: COVID-19 in MS and NMOSD patients in LATAM.

BACKGROUND: There is no data regarding COVID-19 in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients in Latin America. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients included in RELACOEM, a LATAM registry of MS and NMOSD patients infected with COVID-19. METHODS: RELACOEM is a longitudinal, strictly observational registry of MS and NMOSD patients who suffer COVID-19 and Dengue in LATAM. Inclusion criteria to the registry were either: (1) a biologically confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis based on a positive result of a COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test on a nasopharyngeal swab; or (2) COVID-19-typical symptoms (triad of cough, fever, and asthenia) in an epidemic zone of COVID-19. Descriptive statistics were performed on demographic and clinical variables. The cohort was later stratified for MS and NMOSD and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with hospitalizations/intensive critical units (ICU) admission. RESULTS: 145 patients were included in the registry from 15 countries and 51 treating physicians. A total of 129 (89%) were MS patients and 16 (11%) NMOSD. 81.4% patients had confirmed COVID-19 and 18.6% were suspected cases. 23 (15.8%) patients were hospitalized, 9 (6.2%) required ICU and 5 (3.4 %) died due to COVID-19. In MS patients, greater age (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.25) and disease duration (OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.14-1.69) were associated with hospitalization/ICU. In NMOSD patients, a greater age (54.3 vs. 36 years, p=<0.001), increased EDSS (5.5 vs 2.9, p=0.0012) and disease duration (18.5 vs. 10.3 years, p=0.001) were significantly associated with hospitalization/ICU. CONCLUSION: we found that in MS patients, age and disease duration was associated with hospitalization and ICU admission requirement, while age, disease duration and EDSS was associated in NMOSD.