Same day embolisation followed by microsurgical resection of brain arteriovenous malformations: a single centre early experience.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this paper is to report our experience of treating cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVM) in adults with pre-operative embolisation and microsurgical resection on the same day during a single anaesthetic at a single centre between April 2016 and December 2018. We included both elective AVM and AVM that had bled acutely. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data from patients with cerebral AVMs who underwent embolisation followed by microsurgical resection on the same day at a single neurosurgical centre. PRIMARY ENDPOINTS INCLUDED: Total procedure time (embolisation and microsurgical resection), procedure finish time, intra-operative blood loss, degree of nidus obliteration on postoperative angiography, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, total stay at the neurosurgical centre and modified Rankin Score (pre- and post-procedure). RESULTS: •Nineteen patients underwent same-day pre-operative embolisation and microsurgical resection over the 32-month period. The average patient age was 40 years (range 19-66 years). One patient had undergone a prior attempt at embolisation and one patient previously had sterotactic radiosurgery (STRS). •Thirteen of the AVM were in the dominant hemisphere and six in the non-dominant hemisphere. Sixteen AVM were located supratentorially and three were in the posterior fossa. Spetzler-Martin grades included 4 grade 1, 10 grade 2, 4 grade 3 and 1 grade 4. •The average blood loss intra-operatively was 289 mls. •The average list finish time was 19:56 (range 15:10-00:00). •Seventeen patients had 100% nidus obliteration on post-operative digital subtraction angiography, one patient had a small remnant and was referred to STRS and one patient died in the ICU post operatively. CONCLUSION: Overall, the authors believe same-day embolisation and microsurgical resection represents a safe treatment strategy. The technique minimises hemorrhagic complications from delayed venous occlusion and avoids multiple anaesthetics and hospital admissions.

Anatomical variations of the circle of Willis and their prevalence, with a focus on the posterior communicating artery: A literature review and meta-analysis.

The circle of Willis is an anastomotic network of arteries surrounding the base of the brain, providing collateral circulation to prevent ischemia. It has, however, long been established that it exhibits considerable anatomical variation when compared to Thomas Willis' originally described circle. This study aimed primarily to determine an accurate prevalence of the variation of the circle of Willis in the general population and the prevalence of common posterior communicating artery variations. Additional aims were to explain why such a wide range of reported variations exist, and whether different types of studies report significantly different prevalence of variation. A comprehensive literature search identified 764 papers. A three-phase screening process was undertaken, involving a critical analysis of papers, and a total of 33 papers were selected for analysis and literature review. A descriptive statistics test with bootstrap was performed to estimate the average prevalence of variations. The estimated prevalence of general variation, unilateral, and bilateral posterior communicating artery hypoplasia or aplasia was 68.22 ± 14.32%, 19.45 ± 8.63%, and 22.83 ± 14.58%, respectively. Over half of the population exhibit a circle of Willis with some form of variation. To provide a more accurate estimation for the prevalence of variations, a universal classification system needs to be established, collating all the work from high-quality studies, to provide a comprehensive database of the circle's variations. Knowing the prevalence of variations and how they can impact neurosurgical approaches or patterns of ischemic pathology can be crucial in providing effective patient care.

Chiropractic manipulation: reasons for concern?

Chiropractic's popularity is rising among the general population. Moreover, few studies have been conducted to properly evaluate its safety. We report three cases of serious neurological adverse events in patients treated with chiropractic manipulation. The first case is a 41 years old woman who developed a vertebro-basilar stroke 48 h after cervical manipulation. The second case represents a 68 years old woman who presented a neuropraxic injury of both radial nerves after three sessions of spinal manipulation. The last case is a 34 years old man who developed a cervical epidural haematoma after a chiropractic treatment for neck pain. In all three cases there were criteria to consider a causality relation between the neurological adverse events and the chiropractic manipulation. The described serious adverse events promptly recommend the implementation of a risk alert system.

Traumatic clivus epidural hematoma: case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic clival epidural hematoma is an extremely rare reported entity. CASE DESCRIPTION: We describe the case of a 26-year-old woman involved in a car accident who presented with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13, bilateral abducens palsy, bilateral numbness on the mandibular territory of the trigeminal nerve, and left hypoglossal palsy. Radiological examinations revealed a clival epidural hematoma. The patient was managed conservatively, with clinical improvement of her neurological condition. This is the first traumatic clival epidural hematoma reported in an adult. From a review of the literature, we found only 8 cases. CONCLUSION: The pathophysiology of these hematomas is still a subject of debate; occipitoatlantoaxial ligamentous instability may play a role in it. In one third of the cases, bilateral cranial nerve palsies were associated. Apparently, they have a benign outcome.

Safety of chiropractic interventions: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of reported adverse events. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the tolerability and safety of chiropractic procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite the increasing popularity of chiropractic, there are few properly designed prospective controlled trials, and there is a disproportionate lack of evaluation of its safety profile. The literature reports multiple neurologic complications of spinal manipulation, some of which are clinically relevant and even life threatening. METHODS: We performed an electronic search in 2 databases: Pubmed and the Cochrane Library for the years 1966 to 2007. All articles that reported adverse reactions associated with chiropractic were included irrespective of type of design. The outcome measures were the type of adverse events associated or attributed to chiropractic interventions and their frequency. RESULTS: A total of 376 potential relevant articles were identified, 330 of which were discarded after abstract or complete article analysis. The search identified 46 articles that included data concerning adverse events: 1 randomized controlled trial, 2 case-control studies, 7 prospective studies, 12 surveys, 3 retrospective studies, and 115 case reports. Most of the adverse events reported were benign and transitory, however, there are reports of complications that were life threatening, such as arterial dissection, myelopathy, vertebral disc extrusion, and epidural hematoma. The frequency of adverse events varied between 33% and 60.9%, and the frequency of serious adverse events varied between 5 strokes/100,000 manipulations to 1.46 serious adverse events/10,000,000 manipulations and 2.68 deaths/10,000,000 manipulations. CONCLUSION: There is no robust data concerning the incidence or prevalence of adverse reactions after chiropractic. Further investigations are urgently needed to assess definite conclusions regarding this issue.