RESUMO
The production of biogas from microalgae has gained attention due to their rapid growth, CO2 sequestration, and minimal land use. This study uses life cycle assessment to assess the environmental impacts of biogas production from wastewater-grown microalgae through anaerobic digestion within an optimized microalgae-based system. Using SimaPro® 9 software, 3 scenarios were modeled considering the ReCiPe v1.13 midpoint and endpoint methods for environmental impact assessment in different categories. In the baseline scenario (S1), a hypothetical system for biogas production was considered, consisting of a high rate algal pond (HRAP), a settling, an anaerobic digester, and a biogas upgrading unit. The second scenario (S2) included strategies to enhance biogas yield, namely co-digestion and thermal pre-treatment. The third scenario (S3), besides considering the strategies of S2, proposed the biogas upgrading in the HRAP and the digestate recovery as a biofertilizer. After normalization, human carcinogenic toxicity was the most positively affected category due to water use in the cultivation step, accounted as avoided product. However, this category was also the most negatively affected by the impacts of the digester heating energy. Anaerobic digestion was the most impactful step, constituting on average 60.37% of total impacts. Scenario S3 performed better environmentally, primarily due to the integration of biogas upgrading within the cultivation reactor and digestate use as a biofertilizer. Sensitivity analysis highlighted methane yield's importance, showing potential for an 11.28% reduction in ionizing radiation impacts with a 10% increase. Comparing S3 biogas with natural gas, the resource scarcity impact was reduced sixfold, but the human health impact was 23 times higher in S3.
Assuntos
Biocombustíveis , Microalgas , Águas Residuárias , Microalgas/metabolismo , Microalgas/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Águas Residuárias/química , Anaerobiose , Meio AmbienteRESUMO
The current technical issues related to the conversion of algal biomass into aviation biofuel through hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) and the upgrading of bio-oil through hydrotreatment have been reviewed and consolidated. HTL is a promising route for converting microalgae into sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). However, HTL must be followed by the hydrotreatment of bio-oil to ensure that its composition and properties are compatible with SAF standards. The fact that microalgae offer the possibility of recovering wastewater treatment resources not only makes them more attractive but also serves as an incentive for wastewater treatment, especially in countries where this service has not been universalized. The combination of SAF and wastewater treatment aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations, representing an advantageous opportunity for both aviation and sanitation. In this context, the utilization of HTL by-products in the concept of a biorefinery is essential for the sustainability of aviation biofuel production through this route. Another important aspect is the recovery and reuse of catalysts, which are generally heterogeneous, allowing for recycling. Additionally, discussions have focused on biomass pretreatment methods, the use of solvents and catalysts in HTL and hydrotreatment reactions, and the operational parameters of both processes. All these issues present opportunities to enhance the quantity and quality of bio-oil and aviation biofuel.
Assuntos
Microalgas , Óleos de Plantas , Polifenóis , Águas Residuárias , Biocombustíveis , Temperatura , BiomassaRESUMO
The present paper compared, through life cycle assessment (LCA), the production of aviation biofuel from two hydrothermal routes of microalgae cultivated in wastewater. Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) and gasification followed by Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (G + FT) were compared. Both routes included biomass production, hydrotreatment for biofuel upgrading, and product fractionation. Secondary data obtained from the literature were used for the cradle-to-gate LCA. G + FT had a higher impact than HTL in the 18 impact categories assessed, with human carcinogenic toxicity exerting the most harmful pressure on the environment. The catalysts were the inputs that caused the most adverse emissions. The solvent used for bio-oil separation also stood out in terms of impacts. In HTL, emissions for global warming were -51.6 g CO2 eq/MJ, while in G + FT, they were 250 g CO2 eq/MJ. At the Endpoint level, HTL resulted in benefits to human health and ecosystems, while G + FT caused environmental damage in these two categories, as well as in the resources category. In the improvement scenarios, besides considering solid, aqueous, and gaseous products as co-products rather than just as waste/emissions, a 20% reduction in catalyst consumption and 90% recovery were applied. Thus, in HTL, 39.47 kg CO2 eq was avoided, compared to 35.44 kg CO2 eq in the base scenario. In G + FT, emissions decreased from 147.55 kg CO2 eq to the capture of 8.60 kg CO2 eq.
Assuntos
Biocombustíveis , Biomassa , Microalgas , Águas Residuárias , Microalgas/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Águas Residuárias/química , AviaçãoRESUMO
Microalgae biomass (MB) is a promising source of renewable energy, especially when the cultivation is associated with wastewater treatment. However, microalgae wastewater technologies still have much to improve. Additionally, microalgae biomass valorization routes need to be optimized to be a sustainable and feasible source of green bioenergy. Thus, this paper aimed to evaluate the environmental impacts of the production of briquettes from MB, cultivated during domestic wastewater treatment. Also, it was evaluated how much the drying of the MB affected the life cycle and the environment. Improvements in the life cycle to mitigate the environmental impacts of this energy route were proposed. Cradle-to-gate modeling was applied to obtain a life cycle assessment (LCA) from cultivation to the valorization of MB, through its transformation into a solid biofuel. With LCA, it was possible to identify which technical aspect of the process needs to be optimized so that environmental sustainability can be achieved. Two scenarios were compared, one with the microalgae growth in a high-rate algal pond (HRAP) (scenario 1) and the other in a hybrid reactor, formed by a HRAP and a biofilm reactor (BR) (scenario 2). LCA highlighted the electric power mix, representing, on average, 60% of the total environmental impacts in both scenarios. The valorization of MB in briquettes needs to consume less energy to offset its yield. The environment suffered pressure in freshwater eutrophication, due to the release of 3.1E-05 and 3.9E-05 kg of phosphorus equivalent; in fossil resources scarcity, with the extraction of 1.4E-02 and 4.5E-02 kg of oil equivalent; and in climate change, by the emission of 1.0E-01 and 1.9E-01 kg of carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent, in scenarios 1 and 2, respectively. Scenario 1 was highly damaging to terrestrial ecotoxicity, with the release of 3.5E-01 kg of 1,4 Dichlorobenzene, coming from the CO2 used in MB growth. This category was the one that most negatively pressured the environment, differing from scenario 2, in which this input was not required. This was the only impact category in which scenario 2 had a better environmental performance when compared to scenario 1. Cotton, required in scenario 2, represented up to 87% of emissions in some of the evaluated categories. Despite the impacts that occurred in the two modeled scenarios, the environmental gains due to the use of wastewater for microalgae growth, replacing the synthetic cultivation medium, stood out. In the sensitivity analysis, two alternative scenarios were proposed: (i) electricity consumption for drying has been reduced, due to the natural decrease of MB humidity, and (ii) MB briquettes were considered a substitute for coal briquettes. Results indicated that pressures on climate change and fossil resource scarcity were eliminated in both scenarios and this also occurred for freshwater eutrophication in scenario 2. This paper contributes to the improvement and development of converting MB routes into more sustainable products, causing less pressure on the environment. Also, the study contributes to filling a gap in the literature, discussing methods and technologies to be improved, and consequently making microalgae biotechnology environmentally feasible and a potential renewable energy alternative.
Assuntos
Microalgas , Animais , Biocombustíveis , Biomassa , Estágios do Ciclo de Vida , Águas ResiduáriasRESUMO
Microalgae biomass contributes to effluent bioremediation. It is a concentrated source of nutrients and organic carbon, making it a potential alternative as a soil biostimulant. In this context, this study aimed to evaluate the soil application of microalgae biomass produced from the meat processing industry effluent treatment. The biomass was applied dry and as a mixture to demonstrate its potential to increase plant production and soil metabolic functions, analyzed short-term. Doses of 0.25%, 0.5%, 1%, and 2% biomass were applied in soils from (i) Horizon A: taken at a depth between 0 and 10â cm and; (ii) Horizon B: taken at a depth between 20 and 40â cm. Corn growth (Zea Mays L.), basal soil respiration, microbial biomass carbon, total organic carbon, ß-glucosidase, acid phosphatase, arylsulfatase, and urease enzymatic activity were evaluated in each sample. It is concluded that applying 2% microalgae biomass led to higher basal soil respiration, microbial biomass carbon, and ß-glucosidase, acid phosphatase, arylsulfatase enzymatic activity in both soils. On the other hand, boron may have contributed to urease activity reduction in Soil A. Although 2% biomass led to higher soils characteristics, that dose did not promote higher plant growth. Hence, considering that plant growth must be in line with changes in soil characteristics, the result that provided the higher plant shoot dry matter mass was by applying 0.55% biomass in both soils. Therefore, the application of microalgae biomass produced from a meat processing industry effluent treatment promoted a biologically active soil and boosted plant growth.
Assuntos
Microalgas , Solo , Biomassa , Urease , Glucosilceramidase , Carbono , Arilsulfatases , Monoéster Fosfórico Hidrolases , Microbiologia do SoloRESUMO
Microalgae-based treatment can be applied to the bioremediation of agro-industrial wastewater, aiming at a circular economy approach. The present work compared the technical-environmental feasibility of operating a bubble column photobioreactor (PBR) and a high rate pond (HRP) for microalgae biomass production and wastewater treatment of a meat processing facility. The comparison was made regarding biomass productivity, phytoplankton composition, treatment efficiency, life cycle assessment, and energy balance. The daily yields of total biomass and the maximum specific growth rates were 483.33 mg L-1 d-1 and 0.23 d-1 for PBR and 95.00 mg L-1·d-1 and 0.193 d-1 for HRP, respectively, with a predominance of the species Scenedesmus acutus. The treatment efficiency of COD (~50%) and phosphorus (100%) were similar in the two reactors. However, the PBR showed greater assimilation of ammoniacal nitrogen (100% removal) due to the higher microalgal biomass productivity. Environmental impacts were assessed through the ReCiPe methodology for midpoint and endpoint levels. Results revealed that CO2 supply was the most impactful process for both systems (>60%), but HRP reached lower environmental burdens (-105.90 mPt) than PBR (60.74 mPt). Energy balance through the Net Energy Ratio also resulted in the HPR advantage over the PBR (NER = 14.23 and 1.09, respectively). Still, both reactors present advantages when applied to different valorization routes. At the same time, both present room for improvement in the light of bioeconomy and biorefineries, aiming at sustainable wastewater treatment plants.
Assuntos
Microalgas , Scenedesmus , Biomassa , Fotobiorreatores , Águas ResiduáriasRESUMO
With the increasing demand for food, it is increasingly important to maintain soil fertility with the application of fertilizers to supply the nutritional needs of plants. However, the nutrients applied to the soil can suffer significant losses, impacting the environment, and increasing production costs. Using alternative sources, such as microalgae biomass (MB) generated in the treatment of wastewater, in the production of organomineral fertilizers is a way to recover nutrients from the sewage, in addition to contributing to the improvement in soil fertility and favoring crop growth, which can guarantee agricultural sustainability. In the present study, MB was grown in the effluent 00from the food industry and, subsequently, a pelleted organomineral fertilizer (POF) was produced consisting of the combination of MB and synthetic fertilizer (urea), in different proportions. The performance of the proposed fertilizer was analyzed for losses due to ammonia volatilization (N-NH3) over time, for nitrogen assimilation capacity (N) by corn plants (Zea mays L.), and its structure was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. The study concluded that the highest accumulated volatilization of N-NH3 was in the proportion of 40% of MB and the maximum content of N is reached in the proportion of 24.55% of MB. From the proportion of 25% of MB, there is no increase in N absorbed by plants, at the same time that the volatilization of N-NH3 grows with the increase in MB. The most important factors for obtaining these results were the interaction between MB and urea in the produced organomineral fertilizer tablet, where an increasingly thicker physical barrier was formed with the increase in the proportion of MB; in addition to the POF pH, in which the increase in MB proportions directly favored the pH increase.
Assuntos
Fertilizantes , Microalgas , Agricultura , Amônia/análise , Fertilizantes/análise , Nitrogênio/análise , Solo , Volatilização , Águas ResiduáriasRESUMO
Hydrothermal carbonization is a thermochemical treatment whose objective is to convert carbohydrate components of a given biomass into carbon-rich material in an aqueous medium. Biomass of wastewater grown microalgae is among the various potential biomasses for this route. However, operational parameters of hydrothermal carbonization for different types of biomass are still being investigated. In general, larger temperature ranges (180-260 °C) are applied to woody biomasses, which have fibrous and/or ligneous structures and, therefore, are more thermally stable than algae biomass. This study presents the hydrothermal carbonization of microalgae biomass cultivated in an agro-industrial effluent. For this purpose, a Parr reactor was operated at different temperatures (130, 150 and 170 °C) and retention times (10, 30 and 50 min). Results showed improvements in the properties of the hydrochar, mainly energy yield and carbon concentration, after the thermochemical treatment. Energy recovery was improved, as well as hydrophobicity of the carbonized material. It was observed that in the retention time of 10 min, the increase in temperature provided an increase of 7.53% in the yield of solids. On the other hand, in the retention times of 30 and 50 min, when the temperature was increased, the solid yield decreased 6.70% and 0.92%, respectively. Thus, the highest yield of solids (77.72%) and energy (78.21%) was obtained at the temperature of 170 °C and retention time of 10 min. There was a high ash content in the raw biomass (32.99%) and an increase of approximately 3% in the carbonized material, regardless of the applied treatment. With the exception of potassium and sodium, the other macro and micronutrients were concentrated in the hydrochar after thermochemical treatment, indicating the potential of the material for agriculture application, in addition to energy use. Results showed that the retention time was the most significant operational parameter of the process.
Assuntos
Microalgas , Biomassa , Carbono , Temperatura , Águas ResiduáriasRESUMO
The cultivation of microalgae in wastewater allows to obtain a biomass concentrated in nutrients and organic material. This biomass added to phosphate fertilizers can promote a slow release of the nutrient and consequently a higher absorption of phosphorus (P). The objective of this study was to investigate P uptake by plants subjected to triple superphosphate (TSP) fertilization, added with microalgae biomass (MB) grown in wastewater. TSP was added with different MB proportions in order to verify if there would be a different behaviour in P release for millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) plants. With the proportion that maximized P accumulation in plants, a second experiment was carried out to investigate whether MB exerts influence of P diffusion in the soil. Finally, a third trial was conducted in a greenhouse, where TSP and TSP + 12% MB were applied to the soil under different phosphorus doses in corn (Zea mays L.). The proportion of MB in TSP that maximized the increase of P content and concentration in plants was approximately 12% MB. From this proportion, a reduction in the values of the variables analysed in the plant with the increase of the proportion of MB in the biofertilizer was observed. Similar behaviour was observed when evaluating P diffusion in sandy and clay soils. Fertilizers TSP and TSP + 12% MB showed no difference in P diffusion in the soil, while the ratio of 30% MB clearly impaired P diffusion. In a greenhouse, the P content presented significant difference for the tests carried out with TSP and TSP + 12% MB fertilizer, in which the latter provided higher P recovery rate by plants. Therefore, MB added to TSP had a positive influence on plant development and its P recovery capacity when applied in a proportion of 12% MB to the fertilizer mass.
Assuntos
Solo , Disponibilidade Biológica , Biomassa , Fertilizantes , Fósforo , Águas ResiduáriasRESUMO
In order to ease one of the main challenges of biomass production in wastewater, the harvest stage, this study proposes as main innovations: the comparison of technical and environmental performance of different methods of harvesting biomass which have not been addressed in the literature and the projection of an optimal environmental scenario for biomass harvesting. For this, three harvesting methods were evaluated and compared, namely the gravitational sedimentation (GS) via settling tank, coagulation with tannin followed by gravitational sedimentation (TC/GS), and a biofilm reactor operated in parallel with a settling tank (BR/GS). TC/GS required less time to concentrate the biomass (121.13 g/day); however, the biomass had a higher moisture content (99.02%), which may compromise its direct application for production of most bioproducts and bioenergy, only a dewatering step is recommended. The harvesting methods interfered in biomass characterisation, mainly in carbohydrate content, which was higher in biomass concentrated over time (28-37%) than biomass concentrated in a single day by coagulation (13.8%). The results of the life cycle assessment revealed that in scenarios which included TC/GS methods and the BR/GS presented less environmental impact in relation to only GS. Additionally, the combination of these two methods comprises the best scenario and promises to optimise the harvest of biomass grown in wastewater.
Assuntos
Microalgas , Biofilmes , Biomassa , Estudos de Viabilidade , Águas ResiduáriasRESUMO
Waste, especially biomass in general, is a large reservoir of nutrients that can be recovered through different technologies and used to produce biofertilizers. In the present study, environmental impacts of the production of microalgae biomass-based phosphate biofertilizer compared to triple superphosphate through life-cycle assessment conducted in the Simapro® software were investigated. The functional unit of the analysis was 163 g of P for both fertilizers. Phosphorus was recovered from a meat processing industry effluent in a high-rate algal pond. Impacts related to the entire biofertilizer chain impacted mainly on climate changes (3.17 kg CO2eq). Microalgae biofertilizer had higher environmental impact than conventional fertilizer in all impact categories, highlighting climate change and terrestrial ecotoxicity. An ideal scenario was created considering that: all energy used comes from photovoltaic panels; in the separation step a physical method will be used, without energy expenditure (i.e. gravimetric sedimentation) and; biomass will be dried in a drying bed instead of the thermal drying. In this scenario, the impact of biofertilizer approached considerably those of triple superphosphate. When impacts of biomass cultivation and concentration stages were disregarded, drying step was of great relevance, contributing to increase biofertilizer impacts. More research is needed to optimize the algae production chain and determine the possibility of obtaining higher added value products more environmental attractive.
Assuntos
Microalgas , Biomassa , Fósforo , Lagoas , Águas ResiduáriasRESUMO
Microalgae are recognized as a potential source of biomass for obtaining bioenergy. However, the lack of studies towards economic viability and environmental sustainability of the entire production chain limits its large-scale application. The use of wastewaters economizes natural resources used for algal biomass cultivation. However, desirable biomass characteristics for a good fuel may be impaired when wastewaters are used, namely low lipid content and high ash and protein contents. Thus, the choice of wastewaters with more favorable characteristics may be one way of obtaining a more balanced macromolecular composition of the algal biomass and therefore, a more suitable feedstock for the desired energetic route. The exploration of biorefinery concept and the use of wastewaters as culture medium are considered as the main strategic tools in the search of this viability. Considering the economics of overall process, direct utilization of wet biomass using hydrothermal liquefaction or hydrothermal carbonization and anaerobic digestion is recommended. Among the explored routes, anaerobic digestion is the most studied process. However, some main challenges remain as little explored, such as a low energy pretreatment and suitable and large-scale reactors for algal biomass digestion. On the other hand, thermochemical conversion routes offer better valorization of the algal biomass but have higher costs. A biorefinery combining anaerobic digestion, hydrothermal carbonization and hydrothermal liquefaction processes would provide the maximum possible output from the biomass depending on its characteristics. Therefore, the choice must be made in an integrated way, aiming at optimizing the quality of the final product to be obtained. Life cycle assessment studies are critical for scaling up of any algal biomass valorization technique for sustainability. Although there are limitations, suitable integrations of these processes would enable to make an economically feasible process which require further study.
Assuntos
Microalgas , Águas Residuárias , Biocombustíveis , Biomassa , Lipídeos , PlantasRESUMO
Microalgal biofilm in soils represents an alternative fertilization method for agricultural sustainability. In the present study, greenhouse gas emission, soil ammonia volatilization, and the growth of Pennisetum glaucum were evaluated under the effect of a microalgal biofilm, commercial urea, and a control (without application of a nitrogen source). CH4 emissions were equal for the three treatments (p>0.05). CO2 emissions significantly increased in microalgal biofilm treatment (p<0.01), which was also responsible for the highest N2O emissions (p<0.01). The ammonia (NNH3) volatilization losses were 4.63%, 18.98%, and 0.82% for the microalgal biofilm, urea, and control treatments, respectively. The main differences in soil characteristics were an increase in nitrogen and an increase in cation exchange capacity (p<0.01) caused by the algal biomass application to the soil. The soil organic matter content significantly differed (p<0.05) among the three treatments, with the microalgal biofilm treatment having the greatest increase in soil organic matter. Significant differences were observed for shoot dry matter mass and nitrogen content in the plants from both treatments where nitrogen sources were applied. All treatments differed from each other in leaf dry matter mass, with the urea treatment increasing the most. Chlorella vulgaris was the dominant microalgal specie in the soil.