Occipital ischaemic stroke after visual snow phenomenon - a case report.

BACKGROUND: Persistent migraine with aura and neuroimaging examinations revealing ischaemia in the contralateral cortex may be associated with migrainous infarction. Despite being a neurological symptom that is distinct from migraine with aura, the visual snow phenomenon may also be associated with cerebral ischaemia. Here we describe a patient who reported short-lasting daily symptoms of visual snow that affected his entire visual field before becoming continuous and left-sided following acute occipital brain ischaemia. CASE REPORT: In February 2017, a 74-year-old retired male was referred to our headache outpatient clinic with a diagnosis of recent right occipital cerebral ischaemia and migraine with aura. The patient reported visual snow symptoms that had changed from being bilateral and temporary to left-sided and permanent one day upon awakening; after being admitted to hospital a few hours later, he discovered he had had a stroke. He said he had never had any symptoms of migraine with aura. The visual snow phenomenon disappeared completely after about 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: In our patient, a temporary daily visual snow phenomenon reversed to a persistent one. This phenomenon occurred in the part of his visual field that had been affected by the ischaemic occipital stroke, as typically happens in migrainous infarction. We hypothesise that the occipital lesion disrupted the inhibitory circuits, leading to a quadrantopic persistent visual snow. Since the mechanism may be the same as that observed in migrainous infarction, though with a different pathophysiology, it is possible to speculate that the aura in this case is the result, as opposed to the cause, of stroke in most patients.

Migraine Awareness in Italy and the Myth of "Cervical Arthrosis".

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to assess the degree of awareness migraine patients had of their condition. The secondary aims were to evaluate the frequency of an incorrect diagnosis of "cervical arthrosis" in patients unaware of having migraine and to compare the clinical features, diagnostic investigation, and treatment strategies between the 2 subgroups of migraineurs, that is, those with and without the incorrect diagnosis of "cervical arthrosis." METHODS: Patients, between 18 and 65 years, were consecutively referred to 5 Headache Centers in 2 Italian regions for a first visit. They fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for migraine (with/without aura, episodic/chronic) and were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Each patient underwent a specific cranial/cervical musculoskeletal clinical examination. RESULTS: A total of 117/250 subjects (46.8%) were unaware that they suffered from migraine. In these unaware subjects, the most frequently reported diagnosis was "cervical arthrosis" in 34/117 (29.1%), followed by tension-type headache in 23/117 (19%). The cervical region was the most common site of pain onset in the so-called "cervical arthrosis" group (52.9%, P < .0001), where also more pericranial (58.8%; P = .041) and neck (70.6%; P = .009) muscle tenderness, restricted range of cervical vertical (47.1%; P < .001), and lateral (29.4%; P = .040) movements were reported. More "cervical arthrosis patients" had been referred to an Emergency Department (88.2%; P = .011) and had undergone more cervical spine radiography (23.5%; P = .003) and magnetic resonance imaging (20.6%; P = .044). While they had used fewer triptans (11.8%; P = .007) and received less pharmacological prophylaxis (2.9%; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: In our sample, there were high misdiagnosis rates for migraine sufferers in Italy. The most common misdiagnosis, that is, "cervical arthrosis," led to misuse of healthcare facilities and had a negative impact on the migraine treatment.

Management of headache patients.

Headache is a very common complaint, in both primary care and in specialist settings. Headache patients account for around 20% of all outpatients seen in neurological practices and their management, particularly when they present with intractable headache, or are suspected of having secondary headaches, can be a challenge for the clinician. All the guidelines agree that the diagnosis of headache is merely clinical and that testing is not recommended if the individual is not significantly more likely than anyone else in the general population to have a significant abnormality. A full history of the temporal profile of the headache should be gathered first: when it first started, the circumstances of its onset, whether it has remained the same over time, and, if not, in what way it has changed. The patient should be questioned carefully about the specific characteristics of the attacks (frequency, duration, severity of the pain, efficacy of the treatments). It is also necessary to establish whether there is a history of other diseases and to investigate gynecological and psychological history, and family history. History alone allows a diagnosis of probable primary headache. Signs of a possible secondary headache must be carefully sought in all patients, even in apparently clear-cut cases. The guidelines recommend careful investigation of new headaches or those whose features have recently changed in order to exclude secondary headache. Once a secondary headache has been reasonably ruled out, it can help the patient to investigate possible comorbid pathologies and suggest appropriate lifestyle changes.

A CARE: pathway in medication-overuse headache: the experience of the Headache Centre in Pavia.

Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is one of the headache forms that most frequently prompts patients to consult a specialist headache centre. The prevalence of this form in the general population is approximately 1-2%. Around 40% of patients seen at headache centres present with a chronic form of headache and 80% of this chronic headache patients make excessive use of symptomatic drugs. MOH shows a clinical improvement, accompanied by a reduction in the consumption of analgesic drugs, if patients are submitted to detoxification therapy. But detoxification is only the first stage in a long and complex course of care and global approach demands adequate follow-up visit to prevent early relapses. At the Headache Centre of the C. Mondino Institute of Neurology in Pavia, a course of care (CARE: ) has been developed for the complete management of patients with MOH both during Hospitalization and during the subsequent follow-up period. CARE: IS designed to trace the clinical, psychopathological and pharmacological profile of MOH in the short-, medium- and long-term; to look for factors possibility predictive of relapse; to assess the direct costs linked to overuse-headache in the year leading up to and following detoxification; and to evaluate disability, in terms of working days lost, before and after detoxification.