Tetracycline fiber used alone or with scaling and root planing in periodontal maintenance patients: clinical results.

This study evaluated the 6-month clinical response to sustained-release tetracycline fibers used alone or with scaling and root planing in 25 adult periodontal maintenance patients. All subjects had at least one pocket > or = 4.0 mm that bled on probing and required therapy. Thirty-six teeth were treated with tetracycline fibers for 7 to 12 days; twelve of the 36 teeth also received scaling and root planing. The selection of teeth for scaling and root planing was based on the condition of the teeth. Therapeutic results were evaluated by changes in probing depth and frequency of bleeding on probing. Use of tetracycline fibers and fibers with scaling produced 1.8- and 1.7-mm reductions in probing depth, respectively, 1 month after treatment; reductions declined to 1.3 and 0.8 mm at 3 months, but rebounded to 1.5 and 1.3 mm at 6 months. The percentage of teeth exhibiting bleeding on probing decreased from 100% at baseline to 68% and 50% in the fiber and fiber plus scaling groups, respectively, at 6 months. None of the differences was statistically significant. Tetracycline fibers clearly decreased clinical signs of periodontal inflammation. Addition of scaling and root planing at the time of fiber placement further decreased, although not significantly, the degree of inflammation.

Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus free gingival graft in the coverage of exposed root surfaces. A 5-year clinical study.

The authors compared the clinical results obtained in gingival recession correction treatment using free gingival and bilaminar connective subpedicle grafts. 35 patients were treated with free gingival grafts (Group A) and 35 with subpedicle grafts (Group B). Class I and II Miller gingival recessions were chosen for treatment by the 2 procedures. The degree of gingival recession (GR), keratinized tissue (KT) and the exposed root surface area (ERSA) were measured preoperatively and again 5 years post-surgery. Bilaminar connective grafting showed better results in reducing the amount of GR while both techniques significantly increased the width of KT (p > 0.05). The mean % of root coverage obtained in patients in group A was 53.19% +/- 21.48, whereas for the group B, 85.23% +/- 17.86 of exposed root surface was covered post surgical intervention (p < 0.001). In group A, only 3 patients (8.75%) showed a complete resolution of gingival recession after treatment, whereas in group B, 17 subjects (48.57%) presented with complete coverage. On the basis of these results, the authors conclude that the subpedicle graft promises better results in the coverage of exposed root surfaces when compared with the free gingival graft.