Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(4)2024 Mar 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38674194

RESUMO

Traumatic pneumothorax (PTX) occurs in up to 50% of patients with severe polytrauma and chest injuries. Patients with a traumatic PTX with clinical signs of tension physiology and hemodynamic instability are typically treated with an urgent decompressive thoracostomy, tube thoracostomy, or needle decompression. There is recent evidence that non-breathless patients with a hemodynamically stable traumatic PTX can be managed conservatively through observation or a percutaneous pigtail catheter. We present here a 52-year-old woman who presented to the emergency department with a 55 mm traumatic PTX. Following aspiration of 1500 mL of air, a clinical improvement was immediately observed, allowing the patient to be discharged shortly thereafter. In hemodynamically stable patients with a post-traumatic PTX, without specific risk factors or oxygen desaturation, observation or simple needle aspiration can be a reasonable approach. Although the recent medical literature supports conservative management of small traumatic PTXs, guidelines are lacking for hemodynamically stable patients with a significantly large PTX. This case report documents our successful experience with needle aspiration in such a setting of large traumatic PTX. We aimed in this article to review the available literature on needle aspiration and conservative treatment of traumatic pneumothorax. A total of 12 studies were selected out of 190 articles on traumatic PTX where conservative treatment and chest tube decompression were compared. Our case report offers a novel contribution by illustrating the successful resolution of a sizable pneumothorax through needle aspiration, suggesting that even a large PTX in a hemodynamically stable patient, without other risk conditions, can be successfully treated conservatively with simple needle aspiration in order to avoid tube thoracostomy complications.


Assuntos
Pneumotórax , Humanos , Pneumotórax/terapia , Pneumotórax/etiologia , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Traumatismos Torácicos/complicações , Toracostomia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 32(6): 563-8, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24666743

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) in septic shock defined by Rivers et al was proven to reduce mortality and validated by observational studies. However, criticism is centered in particular on the early requirement of a central venous catheter (CVC) and on central venous pressure (CVP) as an indicator of volume responsiveness. The present study is a pivotal study to investigate the reliability of a less invasive approach, which uses inferior vena cava (IVC) and lung ultrasounds (US) to guide the infusion of fluids and lactate clearance to monitor tissue perfusion. METHODS: We enrolled 51 patients with septic shock. As a marker of preload optimization, we measured IVC collapse in place of CVP and serum lactate clearance in place of central venous oxygen saturation as a marker of tissue perfusion. As outcomes, we considered the accomplishment of the noninvasive EGDT goals, the number of patients treated without the need of a CVC, the amount of fluids administered in the first 6 hours, the development of pulmonary edema, and the overall mortality rate. RESULTS: Inferior vena cava US evaluation resulted feasible in 92% of patients. Lung US was performed in 100% of cases. In the first 6 hours, only 61.7% of patients received a CVC, an average of 5.5 L of crystalloids were administered, and only 4 patients developed clinical overt pulmonary edema. Mortality was 34% at 28 days and 38.3% at 60 days. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach to resuscitation in septic shock appears feasible in the emergency department and needs further study with a randomized controlled trial.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Choque Séptico/terapia , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Protocolos Clínicos , Soluções Cristaloides , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Soluções Isotônicas/uso terapêutico , Lactatos/sangue , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Oxigênio/sangue , Ressuscitação/métodos , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico por imagem , Choque Séptico/fisiopatologia , Ultrassonografia , Veia Cava Inferior/fisiopatologia
3.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 24(7): 781-7, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24467608

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is very few information regarding pain after craniotomy in children. OBJECTIVES: This multicentre observational study assessed the incidence of pain after major craniotomy in children. METHODS: After IRB approval, 213 infants and children who were <10 years old and undergoing major craniotomy were consecutively enrolled in nine Italian hospitals. Pain intensity, analgesic therapy, and adverse effects were evaluated on the first 2 days after surgery. Moderate to severe pain was defined as a median FLACC or NRS score ≥ 4 points. Severe pain was defined as a median FLACC or NRS score ≥ 7 points. RESULTS: Data of 206 children were included in the analysis. The overall postoperative median FLACC/NRS scores were 1 (IQR 0 to 2). Twenty-one children (16%) presented moderate to severe pain in the recovery room and 14 (6%) during the first and second day after surgery. Twenty-six children (19%) had severe pain in the recovery room and 4 (2%) during the first and second day after surgery. Rectal codeine was the most common weak opiod used. Remifentanil and morphine were the strong opioids widely used in PICU and in general wards, respectively. Longer procedures were associated with moderate to severe pain (OR 1.30; CI 1.07-1.57) or severe pain (OR 1.41; 1.09-1.84; P < 0.05). There were no significant associations between complications, pain intensity, and analgesic therapy. CONCLUSION: Children receiving multimodal analgesia experience little or no pain after major craniotomy. Longer surgical procedures correlate with an increased risk of having postoperative pain.


Assuntos
Craniotomia/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Analgésicos/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Craniotomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco
4.
Eur J Radiol ; 138: 109650, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33743491

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The capability of lung ultrasound (LUS) to distinguish the different pulmonary patterns of COVID-19 and quantify the disease burden compared to chest CT is still unclear. METHODS: PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients who underwent both LUS and chest CT at the Emergency Department were retrospectively analysed. In both modalities, twelve peripheral lung zones were identified and given a Severity Score basing on main lesion pattern. On CT scans the well-aerated lung volume (%WALV) was visually estimated. Per-patient and per-zone assessments of LUS classification performance taking CT findings as reference were performed, further revisioning the images in case of discordant results. Correlations between number of disease-positive lung zones, Severity Score and %WALV on both LUS and CT were assessed. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to determine LUS performance in detecting %WALV ≤ 70 %. RESULTS: The study included 219 COVID-19 patients with abnormal chest CT. LUS correctly identified as positive 217 (99 %) patients, but per-zone analysis showed sensitivity = 75 % and specificity = 66 %. The revision of the 121 (55 %) cases with positive LUS and negative CT revealed COVID-compatible lesions in 42 (38 %) CT scans. Number of disease-positive zones, Severity Score and %WALV between LUS and CT showed moderate correlations. The AUCs for LUS Severity Score and number of LUS-positive zones did not differ in detecting %WALV ≤ 70 %. CONCLUSION: LUS in COVID-19 is valuable for case identification but shows only moderate correlation with CT findings as for lesion patterns and severity quantification. The number of disease-positive lung zones in LUS alone was sufficient to discriminate relevant disease burden.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Ultrassonografia
5.
Intern Emerg Med ; 16(4): 1051-1060, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33175297

RESUMO

An ongoing outbreak of pneumonia associated with severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) occurred at the end of February 2020 in Lombardy, Italy. We analyzed data from a retrospective, single-center case series of 310 consecutive patients, with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, admitted to the emergency room. We aimed to describe the clinical course, treatment and outcome of a cohort of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, with special attention to oxygen delivery and ventilator support. Throughout the study period, 310 consecutive patients, with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, attended the Emergency Room (ER), of these, 34 were discharged home directly from the ER. Of the remaining 276 patients, the overall mortality was 30.4%: 7 patients died in the ER and 77 during hospitalization. With respect to oxygen delivery: 22 patients did not need any oxygen support (8.0%), 151 patients were treated with oxygen only (54.7%), and 49 (17.8%) were intubated. 90 patients (32.6%) were treated with CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) or NIV (Non Invasive Ventilation); in this group, 27 patients had a Do Not Intubate (DNI) order and were treated with CPAP/NIV as an upper threshold therapy, showing high mortality rate (88.9%). Among the 63 patients treated with CPAP/NIV without DNI, NIV failure occurred in 36 patients (57.1%), with mortality rate of 47.2%. Twenty-seven (27) patients were treated with CPAP/NIV without needing mechanical ventilation and 26 were discharged alive (96.3%). The study documents the poor prognosis of patients with severe respiratory failure, although a considerable minority of patients treated with CPAP/NIV had a positive outcome.


Assuntos
COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19/mortalidade , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Oxigenoterapia , Respiração Artificial , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa