The digital child: A cross-sectional survey study on the access to electronic devices in paediatrics.

AIM: To explore the use of electronic devices in children and possible risk factors for smartphone ownership and cyberbullying. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted involving 62 Italian general paediatricians who administered a close-ended questionnaire about the use of electronic devices to 1732 parents/caregivers. RESULTS: Data of 2563 children aged 0-14 years were collected. Investigating the electronic device use by parents/caregivers of children aged 0-1 years, 72.5% of mothers were revealed to have the habit to use a smartphone during breastfeeding and bottle-feeding. The ownership of a smartphone was found in 29.5% of children aged 2-14 years, 68.1% considering only children aged 10-14. A higher parental degree level was identified as a protective factor for smartphone ownership by children (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.36-0.98; p = 0.04 for father; OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.33-0.78; p = 0.002 for mother). A higher risk of cyberbullying was found when caregivers did not use any restrictions on smartphone use (OR 11.92; 95% CI 3.41-41.68; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The absence of rules for smartphone use represents a risk factor for cyberbullying. In this context, the general paediatrician might play an important role in helping parents/caregivers and their children adopt safer use of electronic devices.

Sleep and new media usage in toddlers.

Several studies over the years have demonstrated the association between lack of sleep in children and certain physical, psychological, and behavioral disorders. The aim of this study was to disentangle the association between new screen-based electronic devices and sleep problems in toddlers, adjusting for other covariates already known to be associated with sleep quality. We conducted a cross-sectional study with the aid of a national sample of 1117 toddlers. Parents reported children's sleeping habits such as total sleep time and sleep onset latency, recreational activities, bedtime routines, and temperament. An ordered logistic regression was run to assess the associations between new media exposure and two sleep outcomes (total sleep time and sleep onset latency). Everyday use of a tablet or smartphone raised the odds of a shorter total sleep time (OR 1.95 [1.00-3.79], p < 0.05) and a longer sleep onset latency (OR 2.44 [1.26-4.73] p < 0.05) irrespective of other factors, such as temperament (restlessness, sociability), or traditional screen exposure (watching TV or playing videogames).Conclusion: New media usage is a factor associated in toddlers with sleeping fewer hours and taking longer to fall asleep, irrespective of other confounding factors. What is known • Studies have found an association between sleep behavior and the use of computers and video games in early childhood. • The blue light emitted from TV screens suppresses endogenous melatonin. What is new • The study found an association between daily new media (tablet and smartphone) usage and sleep quality in toddlers • New media usage exposes toddlers to the risk of fewer hours of sleep and taking longer to fall asleep, irrespective of other factors.

An online survey among general pediatricians on melatonin use in children with chronic insomnia.

OBJECTIVES: Although melatonin (MLT) is the molecule most used by pediatricians for sleep problems, scarce evidence exists on its use in healthy pediatric population. The objective of this study was to describe MLT use by Italian pediatricians in healthy children with chronic insomnia. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional open survey was administered to Italian pediatricians, between June and November 2022, collecting information about their use of MLT in healthy children: age range of patients, dosages used, time of administration, duration of treatment, association with other treatments, perceived efficacy, and side effects. Data were reported as frequencies with their respective 95% confidence intervals. Chi-square statistics assessed significant differences between pediatricians who had training in pediatric sleep and those who did not. RESULTS: Among 428 respondents, 97.4% of pediatricians used MLT; 87.3% of them prescribed MLT in children aged 1-2 years, 62.1% in 2-5 years and 42.5% in 10-18 years. 84.9% of them suggested to take MLT 30 min before bedtime. 37.9% indicated to continue treatment for one month, 30.2% for 2-3 months. 74.1% of pediatricians usually prescribed MLT 1 mg/day. The most frequent treatment associated with MLT was sleep hygiene (85.4%). Almost all pediatricians found MLT effective in reducing difficulties falling asleep. Only 3.2% of them reported mild side effects. CONCLUSIONS: MLT is widely prescribed by Italian pediatricians, but no consensus exists about its use in typically developing children. There is a need for clear guidelines to optimize the use of MLT in healthy children.

Paracetamol and Ibuprofen in the Treatment of Fever and Acute Mild-Moderate Pain in Children: Italian Experts' Consensus Statements.

Fever and pain are challenging symptoms in children and adolescents and are common reasons for consultations in primary care and hospital. Paracetamol and ibuprofen are currently the only recommended drugs for treating fever in Italy, but the therapeutic approaches are discrepant in the different settings. In Italy, paracetamol and ibuprofen are the most prescribed analgesics for acute mild-moderate pain in children; however, their use is often inappropriate in that fever is over-treated and pain is under-treated. An Italian board of experts analyzed the motivations for the misalignment between daily practice and guidelines of fever and acute mild-moderate pain management of the territory and hospitals. The expert opinion consensus process underscored the appropriate use of paracetamol and ibuprofen according to clinical scenarios, patients' profiles, and the safety features of the drugs. Although patients' profiles can indicate different benefits from paracetamol or ibuprofen, critical issues of fever and acute mild-moderate pain management persist in primary care and hospitals. These expert opinion consensus statements can be an across-the-board tool to harmonize the routine practice between the territory and hospitals, especially under special conditions (at-risk for dehydration, coagulation disorder patients, etc.). It can also promote educational activity about fever and acute mild-moderate pain management to enhance the milestones already achieved by Italian pediatricians.

Understanding Discomfort in Order to Appropriately Treat Fever.

Although national and international guidelines on the management of childhood and adolescent fever are available, some inadequate practices persist, both from parents and healthcare professionals. The main goal of bringing children's temperature back to normal can lead to the choice of inappropriate drugs or non-necessary combination/alternation of antipyretic treatments. This behavior has been described in the last 35 years with the concept of fever-phobia, caused also by the dissemination of unscientific information and social media. It is therefore increasingly important that pediatricians continue to provide adequate information to parents in order to assess the onset of signs of a possible condition of the child's discomfort rather than focusing only on temperature. In fact, there is no clear and unambiguous definition of discomfort in literature. Clarifying the extent of the feverish child's discomfort and the tools that could be used to evaluate it would therefore help recommend that antipyretic treatment is appropriate only if fever is associated with discomfort.