A comparison of breastfeeding rates by obesity class.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare breastfeeding initiation rates for women across body mass index (BMI) classes, including normal BMI (18.50-24.99 kg/m2), overweight (25.00-29.99 kg/m2), obese (30.00-39.99 kg/m2), morbidly obese (40.00-49.99 kg/m2) and extreme obesity (≥50.00 kg/m2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort of women with singleton pregnancies, delivering in St. John's, NL between 2002 and 2011. The primary outcome was any breastfeeding on hospital discharge. Breastfeeding rates across BMI categories were compared, using univariate analyses. Multivariate analysis included additional maternal and obstetric variables. RESULTS: Twelve thousand four hundred twenty-two women were included: 8430 breastfed and 3992 did not breastfeed on hospital discharge. Progressively decreasing rates of breastfeeding were noted with increasing obesity class: normal BMI (71.1%), overweight (69.1%), obese (61.6%), morbidly obese (54.2%), and extremely obese women (42.3%). Multivariate analysis confirmed that increasing obesity class resulted in lower odds of breastfeeding: overweight (adjusted odds ratios (aOR) 0.86, 95%CI 0.76-0.98), obese (aOR 0.65, 95%CI 0.57-0.74), morbidly obese (aOR 0.57, 95%CI 0.44-0.74), and extreme obesity (aOR 0.37, 95%CI 0.19-0.74). CONCLUSION: Women in higher obesity classes are progressively less likely to initiate breastfeeding. Women with the highest prepregnancy BMIs should be particularly counseled on the benefits of breastfeeding.

Emergency physicians as human billboards for injury prevention: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a novel injury prevention intervention designed to prompt patients to initiate an injury prevention discussion with the ED physician, thus enabling injury prevention counselling and increasing bicycle helmet use among patients. METHODS: A repeated measures 2 x 3 randomized controlled trial design was used. Fourteen emergency physicians were observed for two shifts each between June and August 2013. Each pair of shifts was randomized to either an injury prevention shift, during which the emergency physician would wear a customized scrub top, or a control shift. The outcomes of interest were physician time spent discussing injury prevention, current helmet use, and self-reported change in helmet use rates at one year. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine the impact of the intervention. RESULTS: The average time spent on injury prevention for all patients was 3.3 seconds. For those patients who actually received counselling, the average time spent was 17.0 seconds. The scrub top intervention did not significantly change helmet use rates at one year. The intervention also had no significant impact on patient decisions to change or reinforcement of helmet use. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the intervention did not increase physician injury prevention counselling or self-reported bicycle helmet use rates among patients. Given the study limitations, replication and extension of the intervention is warranted.