Clinical and genetic analysis of 18 pancreatic carcinoma/melanoma-prone families.

Families with both melanoma and pancreatic cancer are extremely rare and some are affected with the autosomal dominant inherited familial atypical multiple mole melanoma-pancreatic cancer (FAMMM-PC) syndrome. The phenotypic and genotypic expressions of such pancreatic cancer-melanoma prone families are not well defined. The National Case Collection of Familial Pancreatic Cancer of the Deutsche Krebshilfe includes 110 pancreatic cancer families, 18 of which (16%) show an association of pancreatic cancer and melanoma. These 18 families were analysed regarding their phenotype and the prevalence of germline mutations in the candidate genes CDKN2A, BRCA2, CHEK2, NOD2, ARL11 and Palladin (PALLD). There were two types of families: five families with the FAMMM-PC phenotype and 13 PC/melanoma families without the multiple mole phenotypes (PCMS). The prevalences of PC and melanoma in the two types of families were similar. The prevalence of other tumour types, especially breast carcinoma, was higher (11%) in PCMS- than in FAMMM-PC families (2.4%, p = 0.02). CDKN2A mutations were identified in 2 of 18 (11%) PCMS families. A cosegregating BRCA2 mutation was detected in one PCMS family without breast cancer. None of the reported germline mutations in the NOD2, Palladin, ARL11 or CHEK2 genes were detected in either type of family. In conclusion, families with an accumulation of PC and melanoma show a large variety of phenotypic expression, which is not always consistent with the FAMMM-PC phenotype. More PC/melanoma-prone families need to be analysed to clarify whether such families represent variations of the FAMMM-PC syndrome or two distinct hereditary cancer syndromes.

A novel insulinoma tumor suppressor gene locus on chromosome 22q with potential prognostic implications.

The molecular mechanisms contributing to the tumorigenesis of insulinomas are still poorly understood. As moderate to high rates of LOH have been found on chromosome 22q in gastrinomas, we performed a finer deletion mapping study of chromosome 22q with 8 microsatellite markers in 15 insulinomas (4 malignant and 11 benign). Fourteen of 15 (93%) insulinomas revealed LOH on chromosome 22q, whereas the shortest region of overlap implicated a deletion of approximately 700 kb at 22q12.1-q12.2 with an LOH rate of up to 57% (8 of 14). Although the expressed sequence tag marker A006E25 that is localized in the hSNF5/INI1 gene on 22q11.2 revealed LOH in 50% of informative cases (7 of 14), no alterations in this gene could be identified by single strand conformational polymorphism analysis, direct DNA sequencing, or RNA expression analysis. Remarkably, the four malignant tumors showed a common deleted region between markers D22S345 and D22S1144 compared with none of the 11 benign insulinomas. The observed high frequency of chromosome 22q12 deletions in insulinomas is suggestive for a region compatible with harboring a tumor suppressor gene. The hSNF5/INI1 gene is most likely not the candidate gene, because no alterations could be identified. The distinct pattern of allelic loss identified in this chromosomal region appears to be an attractive candidate marker for further evaluation with regard to the discrimination between benign and malignant insulinomas.

Higher frequency of DPC4/Smad4 alterations in pancreatic cancer cell lines than in primary pancreatic adenocarcinomas.

The tumor suppressor gene DPC4/Smad4 at 18q21.1 is inactive in about 50% of pancreatic carcinoma xenografts and cell lines. However, the role of DPC4 in the multistep carcinogenesis of primary pancreatic adenocarcinomas remains uncertain. Therefore, we examined 45 primary human pancreatic adenocarcinomas and 12 pancreatic cancer cell lines for DPC4 alterations by single-strand conformational variant (SSCV) analysis and a PCR-based deletion assay. DPC4 was inactivated by either homozygous deletion or point mutation in 6 of 12 cell lines (50%). None of the primary pancreatic carcinomas carried a DPC4 mutation, although 66% revealed LOH of 18q21 sequences. These findings suggest that inactivation of DPC4 occurs more frequently in tumor-derived cell lines than in primary pancreatic adenocarcinomas. In addition, another, yet unidentified, tumor suppressor gene(s) may be linked with the frequent LOH of 18q21 in primary pancreatic adenocarcinomas.

Expression and distribution of VLA receptors in the pancreas: an immunohistochemical study.

Very late activation (VLA) receptors mediate cell adhesion to extracellular matrix, mainly by acting as adhesion receptors to fibronectin, collagen, and laminin as well as to other cells. These interactions not only regulate normal cell-extracellular matrix contact, but also are thought to be involved in metastasis and invasive tumor growth. Using immunohistochemistry [the alkaline phosphatase-anti-alkaline phosphatase (APAAP) technique] we compared the expression and distribution of VLA receptors in normal pancreatic tissue, chronic pancreatitis, and ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemically, VLA alpha 2 and VLA alpha 6 were moderately to strongly expressed on the basal surface of ductal and acinar cells in normal pancreatic tissue, whereas centroacinar cells predominantly expressed VLA alpha 3 and VLA alpha 5. Similarly, pancreatic carcinoma showed an intensive staining for VLA alpha 2 and VLA alpha 6 with a diffuse distribution on the cell surface. Expression of VLA alpha 3 and VLA alpha 5 in pancreatic carcinoma was heterogeneous, ranging from moderate to weak and lost in about 50% of the cells. As our results suggest, cell-basement membrane interaction in ductal and acinar pancreatic cells is primarily mediated through VLA alpha 2 and VLA alpha 6, whereas VLA alpha 3 and VLA alpha 5 are the major VLA receptors on centroacinar cells. In pancreatic carcinoma a loss (VLA alpha 5) or redistribution (VLA alpha 2, VLA alpha 6) of VLAs was observed. This redistribution of VLA alpha 2 and VLA alpha 6 may reflect a loss of spatial arrangement of tumor cells and their ability to randomly interact with extracellular matrix structures during invasion and metastasis.

Expression and function of VLA-alpha 2, -alpha 3, -alpha 5 and -alpha 6-integrin receptors in pancreatic carcinoma.

The expression of the VLA-integrins alpha 2, alpha 3, alpha 5 and alpha 6 was studied immunohistochemically in tissue samples from ductal pancreatic cancer, chronic pancreatitis, normal pancreas and in 8 cell lines of ductal human pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, adhesion assays on purified extracellular matrix (ECM)-compounds were used to define the function of alpha 2, alpha 3, alpha 5 and alpha 6 in pancreatic cancer cells. Immunohistochemically, VLA alpha 2 and VLA alpha 6 were moderately to strongly expressed on the basal surface of ductal and acinar cells in normal pancreatic tissue, while centro-acinar cells predominantly expressed VLA alpha 3 and VLA alpha 5. Pancreatic carcinoma showed intense staining for VLA alpha 2 and VLA alpha 6 with a diffuse distribution on the cell surface. The redistribution of VLA alpha 2 and VLA alpha 6 may reflect a loss of spatial arrangement of tumor cells and their ability to interact randomly with extracellular matrix structures during invasion and metastasis. Expression of VLA alpha 3 and VLA alpha 5 in pancreatic carcinoma was heterogeneous, ranging from moderate to weak, and was lost in about 50% of the cells. Two pancreatic carcinoma cell lines (PC 3, PC 44) were further investigated in adhesion assays. Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against alpha 2 (GI 9, 10-G-11) were able to inhibit tumor-cell adhesion to collagen IV (59%-72%) in both cell lines. A MAb against alpha 6 (GoH3) inhibited tumor-cell adhesion to laminin (52%-86%) in both cell lines. These results suggest that alpha 2 is a collagen-binding site and alpha 6 a laminin-binding site in pancreatic cancer cells. The anti-alpha 5-MAb SAM I inhibited adhesion of PC3 to fibronectin (76%), being without effect in PC44. Adhesion of both cell lines to fibronectin was almost completely inhibited by RGDS (85%-88%). Thus, alpha 5 is a functionally important fibronectin binding site in some pancreatic carcinoma cells, suggesting further RGD-dependent fibronectin binding sites in other pancreatic carcinoma cells.