Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 101
Filtrar
1.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 36(1): 321-331, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33975792

RESUMO

Unilateral pulmonary edema (UPE) is an uncommon yet potentially life-threatening complication of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS). Most frequently described after robotically assisted mitral valve (MV) repair, it is characterized by right lung edema, hypoxemia, hypercapnia, pulmonary hypertension, and hemodynamic instability beginning minutes-to-hours after separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The authors describe a severe case with refractory hypoxemia requiring veno-venous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) after robotically assisted MV repair.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Edema Pulmonar , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Edema Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Edema Pulmonar/etiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos
2.
Anesthesiology ; 135(5): 864-876, 2021 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34520520

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal morphine decreases postoperative pain in standard cardiac surgery. Its safety and effectiveness have not been adequately evaluated in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. The authors hypothesized that intrathecal morphine would decrease postoperative morphine consumption after minimally invasive cardiac surgery. METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial, patients undergoing robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass received either intrathecal morphine (5 mcg/kg) or intrathecal saline before surgery. The primary outcome was postoperative morphine equivalent consumption in the first 24 h after surgery; secondary outcomes included pain scores, side effects, and patient satisfaction. Pain was assessed via visual analog scale at 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after intensive care unit arrival. Opioid-related side effects (nausea/vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, respiratory depression) were assessed daily. Patient satisfaction was evaluated with the Revised American Pain Society Outcome Questionnaire. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were randomized to receive intrathecal morphine (n = 37) or intrathecal placebo (n = 42), with 70 analyzed (morphine 33, placebo 37). Intrathecal morphine patients required significantly less median (25th to 75th percentile) morphine equivalents compared to placebo during first postoperative 24 h (28 [16 to 46] mg vs. 59 [41 to 79] mg; difference, -28 [95% CI, -40 to -18]; P < 0.001) and second postoperative 24 h (0 [0 to 2] mg vs. 5 [0 to 6] mg; difference, -3.3 [95% CI, -5 to 0]; P < 0.001), exhibited significantly lower visual analog scale pain scores at rest and cough at all postoperative timepoints (overall treatment effect, -4.1 [95% CI, -4.9 to -3.3] and -4.7 [95% CI, -5.5 to -3.9], respectively; P < 0.001), and percent time in severe pain (10 [0 to 40] vs. 40 [20 to 70]; P = 0.003) during the postoperative period. Mild nausea was more common in the intrathecal morphine group (36% vs. 8%; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: When given before induction of anesthesia for totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass, intrathecal morphine decreases use of postoperative opioids and produces significant postoperative analgesia for 48 h.


Assuntos
Analgesia/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Morfina/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Espinhais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morfina/administração & dosagem
3.
Anesth Analg ; 131(3): 792-807, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32665471

RESUMO

Intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation, introduced more than 50 years ago, remains the most commonly utilized mechanical circulatory support device for patients with cardiogenic shock and myocardial ischemia, despite lack of definitive proof regarding its outcome in these patients. Part I of this review focused on the history of counterpulsation, physiologic principles, technical considerations, and evidence for its use in cardiogenic shock; Part II will discuss periprocedural uses for IABP counterpulsation and review advances in technology, including the emergence of alternative mechanical circulatory support devices that have influenced IABP utilization.


Assuntos
Coração Auxiliar/tendências , Hemodinâmica , Balão Intra-Aórtico/tendências , Isquemia Miocárdica/terapia , Revascularização Miocárdica , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Difusão de Inovações , Humanos , Balão Intra-Aórtico/efeitos adversos , Balão Intra-Aórtico/instrumentação , Balão Intra-Aórtico/mortalidade , Isquemia Miocárdica/mortalidade , Isquemia Miocárdica/fisiopatologia , Revascularização Miocárdica/efeitos adversos , Revascularização Miocárdica/mortalidade , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Fatores de Risco , Choque Cardiogênico/mortalidade , Choque Cardiogênico/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Função Ventricular
4.
Anesth Analg ; 131(3): 776-791, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32590485

RESUMO

Intraaortic balloon pump counterpulsation is the most common form of mechanical circulatory support used in patients with myocardial ischemia and cardiogenic shock. The physiologic principles of counterpulsation include diastolic augmentation of aortic pressure and systolic reduction of left ventricular afterload, resulting in hemodynamic benefits through increased coronary perfusion pressure and improved myocardial oxygen balance in patients with myocardial ischemia. Major trials have failed to conclusively demonstrate improvements in morbidity and mortality with counterpulsation therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), cardiogenic shock, and/or severe coronary artery disease undergoing revascularization therapy, and the debate over its applications continues. Part I of this review focuses on the history of the development of counterpulsation, technical considerations, and complications associated with its use, its physiologic effects, and evidence for its use in myocardial ischemia and cardiogenic shock.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Balão Intra-Aórtico , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Revascularização Miocárdica , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Animais , Contraindicações de Procedimentos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/história , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/fisiopatologia , Hemodinâmica , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Balão Intra-Aórtico/efeitos adversos , Balão Intra-Aórtico/história , Balão Intra-Aórtico/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio/história , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Revascularização Miocárdica/efeitos adversos , Revascularização Miocárdica/mortalidade , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Choque Cardiogênico/história , Choque Cardiogênico/mortalidade , Choque Cardiogênico/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Função Ventricular
8.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 33(6): 1673-1681, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30655198

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are associated with perioperative complications in noncardiac surgery; however, little is known about their effect on cardiac surgery. This study assessed the effect of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after cardiac surgery and operating conditions. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial with blinded outcomes assessment. SETTING: University hospital, single institution. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients having cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. INTERVENTIONS: One hundred patients were randomized to receive succinylcholine (group SUX) for intubation with no further NMB administered or cisatracurium (group CIS) for intubation and maintenance NMB. The primary outcome was a composite incidence of PPCs in the 72 hours after elective cardiac surgery. PPCs included failure to extubate within 24 hours, need for reintubation, pneumonia, aspiration, unanticipated need for noninvasive respiratory support, acute respiratory distress, and mortality from respiratory arrest. The secondary outcome was the adequacy of operating conditions as assessed by blinded surgeon survey (including a rating of surgical conditions on a Likert scale from 1 = poor to 5 = excellent), anesthesiologist report, and patient questionnaire. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The composite incidence of PPCs did not differ between groups (8 of 50 patients in both groups; 16%). Mean surgeon rating of surgical conditions was lower in the SUX group (4.65 ± 0.85 v 4.96 ± 0.20, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Although avoiding nondepolarizing NMBA is feasible, doing so worsened operating conditions and did not reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/efeitos adversos , Bloqueio Neuromuscular/efeitos adversos , Bloqueadores Neuromusculares/efeitos adversos , Pneumonia Aspirativa/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/etiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Atracúrio/efeitos adversos , Atracúrio/análogos & derivados , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia , Pneumonia Aspirativa/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/epidemiologia , Succinilcolina/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa