Higher precision, first tier newborn screening for metachromatic leukodystrophy using 16:1-OH-sulfatide.

Newborn screening (NBS) for metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is based on first-tier measurement of sulfatides in dried blood spots (DBS) followed by second-tier measurement of arylsulfatase A in the same DBS. This approach is very precise with 0-1 false positives per ∼30,000 newborns tested. Recent data reported here shows that the sulfatide molecular species with an α-hydroxyl, 16­carbon, mono-unsaturated fatty acyl group (16:1-OH-sulfatide) is superior to the original biomarker 16:0-sulfatide in reducing the number of first-tier false positives. This result is consistent across 4 MLD NBS centers. By measuring 16:1-OH-sulfatide alone or together with 16:0-sulfatide, the estimated false positive rate is 0.048% and is reduced essentially to zero with second-tier arylsulfatase A activity assay. The false negative rate is predicted to be extremely low based on the demonstration that 40 out of 40 newborn DBS from clinically-confirmed MLD patients are detected with these methods. The work shows that NBS for MLD is extremely precise and ready for deployment. Furthermore, it can be multiplexed with several other inborn errors of metabolism already tested in NBS centers worldwide.

Exploring the Cost-Effectiveness of Newborn Screening for Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) in the UK.

Metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is a fatal inherited lysosomal storage disease that can be detected through newborn bloodspot screening. The feasibility of the screening assay and the clinical rationale for screening for MLD have been previously demonstrated, so the aim of this study is to determine whether the addition of screening for MLD to the routine newborn screening program in the UK is a cost-effective use of National Health Service (NHS) resources. A health economic analysis from the perspective of the NHS and Personal Social Services was developed based on a decision-tree framework for each MLD subtype using long-term outcomes derived from a previously presented partitioned survival and Markov economic model. Modelling inputs for parameters related to epidemiology, test characteristics, screening and treatment costs were based on data from three major UK specialist MLD hospitals, structured expert opinion and published literature. Lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at 1.5% to account for time preference. Uncertainty associated with the parameter inputs was explored using sensitivity analyses. This health economic analysis demonstrates that newborn screening for MLD is a cost-effective use of NHS resources using a willingness-to-pay threshold appropriate to the severity of the disease; and supports the inclusion of MLD into the routine newborn screening programme in the UK.